A computer-aided detection system in the everyday setting of diagnostic, screening, and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided detection (CADe) has been developed to improve detection during colonoscopy. After initial reports of high efficacy, there has been an increasing recognition of variability in the effectiveness of CADe systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate a CADe system in a varied colonoscopy population. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized trial was conducted at seven hospitals (both university and non-university) in Europe and Canada. Participants referred for diagnostic, non-immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening, or surveillance colonoscopy were randomized (1:1) to undergo CADe-assisted or conventional colonoscopy by experienced endoscopists. Participants with insufficient bowel preparation were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) per colonoscopy. RESULTS: 581 participants were enrolled, of whom 497 were included in the final analysis: 250 in the CADe arm and 247 in the conventional colonoscopy arm. The indication was surveillance in 202/497 colonoscopies (40.6 %), diagnostic in 199/497 (40.0 %), and non-iFOBT screening in 96/497 (19.3 %). Overall, ADR (38.4 % vs. 37.7 %; P = 0.43) and APC (0.66 vs. 0.66; P = 0.97) were similar between CADe and conventional colonoscopy. SSLs per colonoscopy was increased (0.30 vs. 0.19; P = 0.049) in the CADe arm vs. the conventional colonoscopy arm. CONCLUSIONS: In this study conducted by experienced endoscopists, CADe did not result in a statistically significant increase in ADR. However, the ADR of our control group substantially surpassed our sample size assumptions, increasing the risk of an underpowered trial.

Long-term outcomes of cyclosporin induction and ustekinumab maintenance combination therapy in patients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Background: Effective management of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a major challenge and there remains a paucity of available maintenance treatment options after efficacious cyclosporin induction therapy. Objectives: We investigated the long-term effectiveness and safety of cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy in patients with steroid refractory ASUC. Design: Monocentric, prospective study. Methods: We included patients with steroid refractory ASUC with multiple failed prior advanced therapies, who were treated with cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy. Results: Among the 11 included patients, 10 had prior failure to infliximab and 8 failed at least three previous biological therapies. The mean baseline Mayo and Lichtiger scores were 10.9 (9-12) and 13.3 (11-14), respectively. Ustekinumab was initiated 3.2 weeks (1-8) after initiation of cyclosporin treatment and combination therapy was continued for a mean of 11.5 (4-20) weeks. Clinical response was achieved in six patients at week 16 and clinical steroid-free clinical remission in five patients at week 48. Endoscopic remission was achieved in five patients at week 16 and together with histological remission in five patients at week 52. Intestinal ultrasound demonstrated mean bowel wall thickening in the sigmoid colon of 5.5 mm at baseline and 3.5 mm at week 52, respectively. Two patients had to undergo colectomy (mean 4.5 months, range 3-6) and three stopped ustekinumab therapy due to ineffectiveness. Overall, combination therapy was well tolerated. Conclusion: Combination of cyclosporin and ustekinumab therapy allowed nearly half of ASUC patients to reach clinical and endoscopic remission after 52 weeks, warranting further studies. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Effects of cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis In this study, we looked at how to treat patients with a severe form of ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease, when the usual treatments don't work. We tested a combination of two drugs, cyclosporine and ustekinumab, to see if it could help these patients in the long term. We included eleven patients who had already tried many other treatments and didn't get better. Most of them had also tried a drug called infliximab and had failed at least three other biological therapies. At the start, these patients were very sick, with high scores on disease activity measures. We gave them ustekinumab in addtion after a therapy with cyclosporin had been started before. The combination therapy continued for an average of almost 12 weeks. After 16 weeks, six patients showed improvement in their symptoms, and five were able to stop taking steroids. Five patients also had their colon lining looking healthy again when we looked inside with a scope after 16 weeks. And after 52 weeks, five patients had normal colon lining and healthy tissue under the microscope. Ultrasound showed that the thickness of their colon wall had decreased. Unfortunately, two patients had to have surgery to remove their colon, and three had to stop taking ustekinumab because it didn't help them. Overall, the combination therapy was safe and well-tolerated. In conclusion, combining cyclosporin and ustekinumab helped about half of the patients with severe ulcerative colitis get better and have healthy colon lining after 52 weeks. This suggests that more research is needed to understand the benefits of this treatment in these patients.