RESUMO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of severe hypocalcemia in patients attending the emergency department. Symptoms, causes, treatment, and outcome of severe hypocalcemia as well as course of calcium concentrations were assessed. This retrospective case series included all adult patients with measurements of serum calcium concentrations presenting to the emergency department of the Bürgerspital Solothurn between January 01 in 2017 and December 31 in 2020. Medical record reviews were performed of all patients with severe hypocalcemia, defined by a serum calcium concentration < 1.9 mmol/L, to assess clinical presentation and management. 1265 (3.95%) patients had a serum calcium concentration of < 2.1 mmol/L of which 139 (11%) had severe hypocalcemia of < 1.9 mmol/L. 113 patients had at least one measurement of albumin. Of these, 43 (3.4%) had an albumin-corrected serum calcium < 1.9 mmol/L defining true, severe hypocalcemia. Hypocalcemia was identified and documented in 35% of all cases. The mean serum calcium concentration was 1.74 ± 0.14 mmol/L. Calcium concentrations in malignancy-related hypocalcemia were similar to non-malignancy-related hypocalcemia. The main symptoms attributed to hypocalcemia were cardiac and neurologic. 12% of patients with severe hypocalcemia received intravenous and 23% oral calcium replacement. Active malignancy was the main cause of severe hypocalcemia in 28%, while in most cases, the main cause remained unclear. 41.9% of severely hypocalcemic patients reattended the emergency department for another episode of hypocalcemia within 1 year. Hypocalcemia is common in patients attending the emergency department, however, appears to be neglected frequently. The disorder is often a manifestation of severe disease, triggered by multiple causes. Calcium replacement was administered in less than half of the patients with severe hypocalcemia in this study. Due to frequent readmissions to the emergency department and a high mortality, increased awareness of the disorder and careful follow-up are desirable.
RESUMO
D-dimer levels significantly increase with declining renal function and hence, renal function-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs to rule out pulmonary embolism were suggested. Aim of this study was to "post hoc" validate previously defined renal function-adjusted D-dimer levels to safely rule out pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to the emergency department. In this retrospective, observational analysis, all patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability receiving D-dimer measurement and computed tomography angiography (CTA) to rule out pulmonary embolism between January 2017 and December 2020 were included. Previously defined renal function-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs (1306 µg/l for moderate and 1663 µg/l for severe renal function impairment) were applied to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values. One thousand, three hundred sixty-nine patients were included of which 229 (17%) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was ≥ 60 ml/min in 1079 (79%), 30-59 ml/min in 266 (19%) and < 30 ml/min in 24 (2%) patients. Only three patients (1.1%) with an eGFR < 60 ml/min had a D-dimer level < 500 µg/l. There was a significant correlation between D-dimer and eGFR (R = - 0.159, p < 0.001). Calculated on the standard D-dimer cutoff value of 500 µg/l, sensitivity of D-dimer testing was 97% for patients with an eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min and 100% for those with 30-60 ml/min, while specificity decreased in patients with renal function impairment. A negative predictive value of 0.99 as a premise to safely rule out pulmonary embolism was achieved by applying a D-dimer cutoff of 1480 µg/l for eGFR 30-59 ml/min and 1351 µg/l for eGFR < 30 ml/min. The findings of this study underline that application of renal function-adapted D-dimer levels in combination with a clinical prediction rule appears feasible to rule out pulmonary embolism. Out of the current dataset, renal function-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs to rule out pulmonary embolism were slightly different compared to previously defined cutoffs. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to validate possible renal function-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs.