Preemptive Approach to Plerixafor Use Is Optimal in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Germ Cell Tumors Undergoing Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection: Effect on Collection Days, Yields, and Cost.

Evidence describing the use of plerixafor in the off-label population of relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors (GCT) is limited. We aim to describe the effect of rescue versus preemptive plerixafor use on apheresis collection days, collection yields, and cost. We retrospectively collected data on 77 consecutive patients (at least 15 years of age) with GCT who underwent peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection for autologous stem cell transplant between January 1, 2020 and May 1, 2022. Depending on insurance approval, plerixafor was given either as "rescue" (after a first apheresis collection of < 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) or as "preemptive" on Day 4 of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prior to the first apheresis collection, if the Day 4 peripheral blood CD34+ count was < 40 cells/µL. A total of 66% of patients who received preemptive plerixafor completed collection in 1 day, similar to good mobilizers who only needed G-CSF (71%, p = 0.366). In contrast, all poor mobilizers in the rescue group required at least 2 days of collection and had lower CD34+ cell yields than the preemptive group (7.15 vs. 9.81 × 106/kg, p = 0.0055). A cost analysis revealed that preemptive plerixafor may save approximately $7000 per patient compared with a rescue approach. Preemptive plerixafor in GCT patients undergoing PBSC collection allows relatively poor mobilizers to collect in fewer days and with lower overall cost. Fewer apheresis procedures result in less risk to the patient, increased patient satisfaction, and the ability to schedule more patients within the constraints of staffing.

Revisiting the benefits of isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange for sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Isovolemic hemodilution red cell exchange (IHD-RCE) is a modified form of the standard red cell exchange (STD-RCE), intended to reduce red cell requirements in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). This retrospective crossover analysis of nine patients aims to add to the limited existing literature on IHD-RCE and address the equipoise regarding whether the benefits of (a) decreased RBC usage per exchange and (b) increased interprocedure interval (via lower fraction of cells remaining, FCR) can be observed at the same time, in the same patient. METHODS: At a single center, we identified 37 patients with SCD undergoing chronic RCE between 2014 and 2021. We excluded those patients who did not have at least six consecutive procedures of each type (STD- and IHD-RCE), arriving at nine patients for analysis. RESULTS: When using greater decreases in hematocrit than previously published, we did not find that IHD-RCE resulted in any clinically apparent adverse events. We did find greater decreases in diastolic blood pressure and increases in heart rate in some patients, as compared to STD-RCE. After correcting for total blood volume, seven of the nine patients had significantly reduced red cell requirements with each IHD-RCE. Because the pattern of achieving a lower FCR than programmed was seen to an equal extent with both IHD-RCE and STD-RCE, none of the nine patients showed any statistical difference in actual FCR between procedure types. DISCUSSION: Our data do not support the observation of both IHD-RCE benefits, decreased red cell usage per exchange and lower FCR/increased interprocedure interval, simultaneously.

Comparison of low fixed dose versus standard-dose rituximab to treat thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the acute phase and preemptively during remission.

The standard dose of rituximab used in B-cell hematological malignancies, 375 mg/m2 weekly, may be excessive for autoimmune conditions. Successful use of a low, fixed dose of 100-200 mg of rituximab, weekly for 4 weeks, has been reported in the literature in the treatment of autoimmune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP). We retrospectively analyzed our rituximab data in aTTP over a 13-year-period for 39 patients, with the aim of comparing response and outcomes with a standard lymphoma-dose course versus a low fixed 100 mg-dose course. Compared to the standard dose (17 patients, 17 courses of 4 infusions), our patients who received a low dose (8 patients, 9 courses of 4 infusions) had a possibly lower baseline risk but did achieve a similar time to remission and number of plasma exchange procedures to remission. Preemptive low-dose courses for ADAMTS13 activity <50 % during remission (6 patients, 10 courses of 4 infusions) achieved a median peak ADAMTS13 activity of 99 %, in a median of 1 month, with no clinical relapses. Our results provide additional evidence for the efficacy of low-dose rituximab, with the benefit of much lower cost, less infusion time, and theoretically lower risk of toxicity.