Patient-Reported Outcome and Clinical Scores Are Equally Accurate in Predicting Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate, objective assessment of disease activity. AIMS: We aimed to determine how strong patient-reported outcomes, clinical scores and symptoms correlate with endoscopy and biomarkers for assessment of disease activity in patients with UC. METHODS: Consecutive patients with UC followed at the McGill University IBD Center and referred for endoscopy (surveillance or flare) were included prospectively between September 2018 and August 2020. Patient-reported outcome (PRO2), partial Mayo, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and Baron and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) scores were calculated. C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCAL) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with UC [age: 49(IQR:38-61) years, female: 46.2%, 57.3% extensive disease, 42.7% on biologicals] were included prospectively. Rectal bleeding (RBS), stool frequency (SF) subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission (RBS0 and SF ≤ 1), partial Mayo (≤ 2) and SCCAI (≤ 2.5) remission were similarly associated with mucosal healing defined by MES (0 or ≤ 1), Baron (0 or ≤ 1) or UCEIS (≤ 3) scores in ROC analysis (AUC:0.93-0.72). There was a moderate-to-strong agreement between MES Baron and UCEIS (K = 0.91-0.41). A UCEIS of ≤ 3 was identified as the best cutoff to clinical or endoscopic remission. Agreement between CRP and clinical remission or endoscopic healing (MES/Baron) was poor (K ~ 0.2), while agreement between FCAL and RBS-PRO2 or MES/Baron/UCEIS was moderate to strong (K = 0.44-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between RBS, SF, PRO2, partial Mayo and SCCAI in predicting endoscopic healing was moderate to strong, while no clinically meaningful difference was found in accuracy across the scores and definitions. FCAL, but not CRP, was associated to clinical and endoscopic remission.

Low Rate of Drug Discontinuation, Frequent Need for Dose Adjustment, and No Association with Development of New Arthralgia in Patients Treated with Vedolizumab: Results from a Tertiary Referral IBD Center.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating clinical data on the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in 'real-world' setting is still desirable. Recent reports have raised concerns that arthralgia may be associated with VDZ. AIMS: The aim of this study is to present clinical experience with VDZ from a tertiary IBD center. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were performed of consecutive patients exposed to VDZ between 2015 and 2018. Clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic efficacy and safety data were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 130 IBD (75CD, 55UC) patients were included. Median duration of VDZ therapy was 65 weeks. Probability of drug discontinuation was 4.9% and 9.4% at 1 and 2 years. Dose intensification was more frequent in CD compared to UC (at 1 and 2 years: 64.8/87.9% vs. 26.5/35.7%, p < 0.001). Clinical remission rates at 3-, 6- and 12 months were 44.4%, 71.4% and 77.1% in UC, and 9.1%, 26.7% and 29.2% in CD patients, respectively. Prior use of multiple biologic agents was associated with diminished efficacy of VDZ in CD. Three new cases of arthralgia were encountered during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy displayed good drug sustainability and clinical efficacy in a population with severe disease phenotype and high rates of previous anti-TNF failure. Frequent dose intensification was required. The safety profile was good, and no association between newly onset arthralgia and VDZ therapy was observed.

No Change in Surgical and Hospitalization Trends Despite Higher Exposure to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Québec Provincial Database From 1996 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have high health care expenditures because of medications, hospitalizations, and surgeries. We evaluated disease outcomes and treatment algorithms of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Québec, comparing periods before and after 2010. METHODS: The province of Québec's public health administrative database was used to identify newly diagnosed patients with IBD between 1996 and 2015. The primary and secondary outcomes included time to and probability of first and second IBD-related hospitalizations, first and second major surgery, and medication exposures. Medication prescriptions were collected from the public prescription database. RESULTS: We identified 34,644 newly diagnosed patients with IBD (CD = 59.5%). The probability of the first major surgery increased after 2010 in patients with CD (5 years postdiagnosis before and after 2010: 8% [SD = 0.2%] vs 15% [SD = 0.6%]; P < 0.0001) and patients with UC (6% [SD = 0.2%] vs 10% [SD = 0.6%] ;P < 0.0001). The probability of the second major surgery was unchanged in patients with CD. Hospitalization rates remained unchanged. Patients on anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) medications had the lowest probability of hospitalizations (overall 5-year probability in patients with IBD stratified by maximal therapeutic step: 5-aminosalicylic acids 37% [SD = 0.6%]; anti-TNFs 31% [SD = 1.8%]; P < 0.0001). Anti-TNFs were more commonly prescribed for patients with CD after 2010 (4% [SD = 0.2%] vs 16% [SD = 0.6%]; P < 0.0001) in the public health insurance plan, especially younger patients. Corticosteroid exposure was unchanged before and after 2010. Immunosuppressant use was low but increased after 2010. The use of 5-ASAs was stable in patients with UC but decreased in patients with CD. CONCLUSIONS: The probability of first and second hospitalizations remained unchanged in Québec and the probability of major surgery was low overall but did increase despite the higher and earlier use of anti-TNFs.

Cardiorenal syndrome and heart failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Concomitant anemia, heart failure, and renal disease can be seen in a large proportion of patients with heart failure. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current definitions and mechanisms involved in this pathophysiological relationship, as well as the potential management and treatment options available for these patients. RECENT FINDING: Dysfunctional heart can promote the dysfunction of the kidneys through a variety of pathophysiological mechanism, the reciprocal holds true as well. Heart failure has been considered as the most common type of cardiovascular complication seen in patients with renal failure. Central to this relationship lies anemia, which can be the result or the cause of either heart or kidney disease. SUMMARY: Cardiorenal syndrome is a complex condition, which requires the collaboration and resources from cardiology, cardiac surgery, nephrology, and critical care. Of great importance is recognizing the presence of cardiorenal syndrome and appreciating the impact it can play on treatment options and survival.

Benefits of implementing a rapid access clinic in a high-volume inflammatory bowel disease center: Access, resource utilization and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Emergency situations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) put significant burden on both the patient and the healthcare system. AIM: To prospectively measure Quality-of-Care indicators and resource utilization after the implementation of the new rapid access clinic service (RAC) at a tertiary IBD center. METHODS: Patient access, resource utilization and outcome parameters were collected from consecutive patients contacting the RAC between July 2017 and March 2019 in this observational study. For comparing resource utilization and healthcare costs, emergency department (ED) visits of IBD patients with no access to RAC services were evaluated between January 2018 and January 2019. Time to appointment, diagnostic methods, change in medical therapy, unplanned ED visits, hospitalizations and surgical admissions were calculated and compared. RESULTS: 488 patients (Crohn's disease: 68.4%/ulcerative colitis: 31.6%) contacted the RAC with a valid medical reason. Median time to visit with an IBD specialist following the index contact was 2 d. Patients had objective clinical and laboratory assessment (C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin in 91% and 73%). Fast-track colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy was performed in 24.6% of the patients, while computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in only 8.1%. Medical therapy was changed in 54.4%. ED visits within 30 d following the RAC visit occurred in 8.8% (unplanned ED visit rate: 5.9%). Diagnostic procedures and resource utilization at the ED (n = 135 patients) were substantially different compared to RAC users: Abdominal computed tomography was more frequent (65.7%, P < 0.001), coupled with multiple specialist consults, more frequent hospital admission (P < 0.001), higher steroid initiation (P < 0.001). Average medical cost estimates of diagnostic procedures and services per patient was $403 CAD vs $1885 CAD comparing all RAC and ED visits. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a RAC improved patient care by facilitating easier access to IBD specific medical care, optimized resource utilization and helped avoiding ED visits and subsequent hospitalizations.

Strictures in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: Is There a Role for the Gastroenterologist or Do We Always Need a Surgeon?

Symptomatic strictures occur more often in Crohn disease than in ulcerative colitis. The mainstay of endoscopic therapy for strictures in inflammatory bowel disease is endoscopic balloon dilation. Serious complications are rare, and risk factors for perforation include active inflammation, use of steroids, and dilation of ileorectal or ileosigmoid anastomotic strictures. This article presents current literature on strictures in inflammatory bowel disease. Focus is placed on the short- and long-term outcomes, complications, and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation for Crohn disease strictures. Adjuvant techniques, such as intralesional injection of steroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor, stricturotomy, and stent insertion, are briefly discussed.

High Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Results in Low Colorectal Cancer and Dysplasia Rates, While Rates of Dysplasia are Low Before the Suggested Onset of Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] are at increased risk for colorectal dysplasia [CRD] and colorectal cancer [CRC]. Adherence to CRC surveillance guidelines is reportedly low internationally. AIM: To evaluate surveillance practices at the tertiary IBD Center of the McGill University Health Center [MUHC] and to determine CRD/CRC incidence. METHODS: A representative inflammatory bowel disease cohort with at least 8 years of disease duration [or with primary sclerosing cholangitis] who visited the MUHC between July 1 and December 31, 2016 were included. Adherence to surveillance guidelines was compared to modified 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines. Incidence rates of CRC, high-grade dysplasia [HGD], low-grade dysplasia [LGD] and colorectal adenomas [CRA] were calculated based on pathology. RESULTS: In total, 1356 CD and UC patients (disease duration: 12 [interquartile range: 6-22) and 10 [interquartile range: 5-19] years) were identified. The surveillance cohort consisted of 680 patients [296 UC and 384 CD]. Adherence to surveillance guidelines was 76/82% in UC/colonic CD. An adequate number of biopsies were taken in 54/54% of UC/colonic CD patients. The incidence of CRC/HGD in UC and CD with colonic involvement was 19.5/58.5 and 25.1/37.6 per 100,000 patient-years, respectively. The incidence of dysplasia before 8 years of disease duration was low in both UC/CD [19.5 and 12.5/100,000 patient-years] with no CRC detected. The CRA rate was 30/38% in UC/colonic CD. CONCLUSION: High adherence to surveillance guidelines and low CRC and dysplasia, but not CRA rates were found, suggesting that adhering to updated, stratified, surveillance recommendations may result in low advanced neoplasia rates. The incidence of dysplasia before the start of surveillance was low.

Perceived Quality of Care is Associated with Disease Activity, Quality of Life, Work Productivity, and Gender, but not Disease Phenotype: A Prospective Study in a High-volume IBD Centre.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Measuring quality of care [QoC] in inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] has become increasingly important, yet complex assessment of QoC from the patients' perspective is rare. We evaluated perceived QoC using the Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes-IBD [QUOTE-IBD] questionnaire, and investigated associations between QoC, disease phenotype, work productivity, and health-related quality of life [HRQoL] in a high-volume IBD centre. METHODS: Consecutive patients attending McGill University Health Centre [MUHC]-IBD Centre completed the QUOTE-IBD, Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ], IBD-Control, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] questionnaires. The QUOTE-IBD comprises 23 questions, each rated by a quality impact [QI] score. QI scores were calculated for the evaluation of IBD specialists, general practitioners [GPs], and hospital care. RESULTS: In all, 525 patients completed the questionnaire. Total QI scores for IBD specialists, GPs, and hospital care were 8.57, 8.70, and 8.33, respectively. The lowest QI scores were related to 'accessibility' for both IBD specialists and GPs. Female gender, current disease activity, poor HRQoL [SIBDQ score ≤50], and poor disease control [IBD-Control score <13] were associated with lower mean QI scores [p <0.001 for all]. Disease phenotype was not associated with QI scores in either Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC] [p = 0.69, p = 0.791, respectively]. An inverse correlation was found between total QI scores and work productivity loss [IBD specialist: p <0.001; GP: p = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: Overall patient satisfaction with QoC was good; however, improving patient accessibility to care is warranted. Disease phenotype was not associated with patient satisfaction, whereas female gender, current disease activity, HRQoL, and work productivity loss were associated with patients' quality assessment, underlining that perceived QoC could be partly subjective regarding disease control and quality of life.

Harmonization of quality of care in an IBD center impacts disease outcomes: Importance of structure, process indicators and rapid access clinic.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the quality of care at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center using quality of care indicators (QIs) including patient assessment strategy, monitoring, treatment decisions and outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the quality of care pre- and post-referral and during follow-up at the at the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) IBD center. Consecutive patients were included presenting with an outpatient visit ('index visit') between July and December 2016. Disease characteristics, biochemistry, imaging and endoscopy data, changes in medications, and vaccination profiles were captured. RESULTS: 1357 patients were included. At referral, a large proportion of patients were objectively re-evaluated (ileocolonoscopy: 79%, cross-sectional imaging: 39.3%, biomarkers: 89.9%, 81.9%). Therapeutic strategy was changed in 53.6% with 22.5% of patients starting biologics. Tight objective patient monitoring was applied during follow-up (colonoscopy: 79%, cross-sectional imaging: 61.8% were available at index visit; C-reactive protein: 78%, Faecal calprotectin: 37.6%, therapeutic drug monitoring: 16.3% were performed additionally). Maximum therapeutic step was biologicals in 48.8% of the patients, while only 6.6% of all patients were steroid dependent. Implementation of a rapid access clinic improved healthcare delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support that tight monitoring was applied at the MUHC IBD center with a high emphasis on objective patient (re)evaluation, timely access and accelerated treatment strategy at referral and during follow-up.

Appropriateness of Biologics in the Management of Crohn's Disease Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.

Background: 3 classes of biologics are now available for the treatment of Crohn's disease. The availability of multiple treatment options has led to questions regarding the appropriateness of each agent for a given patient. We aimed to evaluate physician preferences for the use of specific biologic agents in a variety of Crohn's disease management scenarios using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology. Methods: A panel consisting of members of the CINERGI group (Canadian IBD Network for Research and Growth in Quality Improvement) was assembled. A literature review was performed on factors identified as influential upon choice of biologic therapy. Clinical scenarios were developed, and panelists rated the appropriateness of biologic therapy classes in each scenario individually and again during a face-to-face meeting after moderated discussion. Results: Two hundred eighty-eight modifications of 3 clinical scenarios were rated. Factors that influenced biologic choice included perianal disease, antidrug antibody status, extraintestinal manifestations, consideration of potential pregnancy, and history of serious infection or malignancy. Anti-TNF therapy was considered appropriate in the postoperative patient. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were considered appropriate in patients without perianal disease over the age of 65 with a history of malignancy or serious infection. The use of anti-TNF therapy was considered inappropriate in some scenarios whereby drug level was adequate and no antidrug antibody (ADA) was detectable. Conclusions: We evaluated the appropriateness of the 3 available classes of biologics in a number of scenarios for the treatment of Crohn's disease. History of serious infection and malignancy, particularly in individuals over 65 years, and consideration of future pregnancy were patient-specific variables that impacted treatment decisions. These findings can serve as a guide for providers considering biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.10.1093/ibd/izy333_video1izy333.video15850922807001.

Positioning of old and new biologicals and small molecules in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

The past decade has brought substantial advances in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, evidence for the value of combination therapy, the recognition of targeting lymphocyte trafficking and activation as a viable treatment, and the need for early treatment of high-risk patients are all fundamental concepts for current modern IBD treatment algorithms. In this article, authors review the existing data on approved biologicals and small molecules as well as provide insight on the current positioning of approved therapies. Patient stratification for the selection of specific therapies, therapeutic targets and patient monitoring will be discussed as well. The therapeutic armamentarium for IBD is expanding as novel and more targeted therapies become available. In the absence of comparative trials, positioning these agents is becoming difficult. Emerging concepts for the future will include an emphasis on the development of algorithms which will facilitate a greater understanding of the positioning of novel biological drugs and small molecules in order to best tailor therapy to the patient. In the interim, anti-TNF therapy remains an important component of IBD therapy with the most real-life evidence and should be considered as first-line therapy in patients with complicated Crohn's disease and in acute-severe ulcerative colitis. The safety and efficacy of these 'older' anti-TNF therapies can be optimized by adhering to therapeutic algorithms which combine clinical and objective markers of disease severity and response to therapy.

Endoscopic management of Crohn's strictures.

Symptomatic intestinal strictures develop in more than one third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) within 10 years of disease onset. Strictures can be inflammatory, fibrotic or mixed and result in a significant decline in quality of life, frequently requiring surgery for palliation of symptoms. Patients under the age of 40 with perianal disease are more likely to suffer from disabling ileocolonic disease thus may have a greater risk for fibrostenotic strictures. Treatment options for fibrostenotic strictures are limited to endoscopic and surgical therapy. Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) appears to be a safe, less invasive and effective alternative modality to replace or defer surgery. Serious complications are rare and occur in less than 3% of procedures. For non-complex strictures without adjacent fistulizaation or perforation that are less than 5 cm in length, EBD should be considered as first-line therapy. The aim of this review is to present the current literature on the endoscopic management of small bowel and colonic strictures in CD, which includes balloon dilatation, adjuvant techniques of intralesional injection of steroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor, and metal stent insertion. Short and long-term outcomes, complications and safety of EBD will be discussed.

Quality of Care and Outcomes Among Hospitalized Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Half of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require hospitalization. We sought to characterize inpatient quality indicators of care and outcomes during IBD-related hospitalizations at 4 major IBD referral centers in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD admitted from 2011 to 2013 to tertiary centers in Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, and Vancouver. We assessed the following inpatient indicators of care: pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, Clostridium difficile testing, and medical rescue therapy for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We also evaluated rates of VTE, C. difficile infection, and IBD-related surgery. RESULTS: There were 837 patients hospitalized for IBD (Crohn's disease, 59%; UC, 41%). The proportion of patients with IBD who received VTE prophylaxis and C. difficile testing were 77% and 82%, respectively, although these indicators varied significantly by center and admitting specialty. Patients admitted under surgeons were more likely than those admitted under gastroenterologists to receive VTE prophylaxis (84% versus 74%, P = 0.016) but less likely to be tested for C. difficile (41% versus 88%, P < 0.0001). The rate of VTE was the same for those who did and did not receive VTE prophylaxis (2.2 per 1000 hospital-days). Among the 14 VTE events, 79% had received prophylaxis, but only 36% within 24 hours of admission. Among steroid-refractory UC patients, 70% received rescue therapy within 7 days of steroid initiation. The proportion of patients with UC and CD who required respective bowel surgery was 18% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities to optimize quality of care among hospitalized patients with IBD.

Splenosis involving the gastric fundus, a rare cause of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report and review of the literature.

Splenosis, the autotransplantation of splenic tissue following splenic trauma, is uncommonly clinically significant. Splenosis is typically diagnosed incidentally on imaging or at laparotomy and has been mistakenly attributed to various malignancies and pathological conditions. On the rare occasion when splenosis plays a causative role in a pathological condition, a diagnostic challenge may ensue that can lead to a delay in both diagnosis and treatment. The following case report describes a patient presenting with a massive upper gastrointestinal bleed resulting from arterial enlargement within the gastric fundus secondary to perigastric splenosis. The cause of the bleeding was initially elusive and this case highlights the importance of a thorough clinical history when faced with a diagnostic challenge. Treatment options, including the successful use of transarterial embolization in this case, are also presented.

The Palliative Management of Refractory Cirrhotic Ascites Using the PleurX (©) Catheter.

Background. Treatment options are limited for patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites (RCA). As such, we assessed the safety and effectiveness of the PleurX catheter for RCA. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with RCA who have undergone insertion of the PleurX catheter between 2007 and 2014 at our clinic. Results. Thirty-three patients with RCA were included in the study; 4 patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were still symptomatic despite bimonthly large volume paracentesis and were not candidates for TIPS or PV shunt. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients. The median duration the catheter remained in situ was 117.5 days, with 95% CI of 48-182 days. Drain patency was maintained in 90% of patients. Microorganisms consistent with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) from a catheter source were isolated in 38% of patients. The median time to infection was 105 days, with 95% CI of 34-233 days. All patients were treated for SBP successfully with antibiotics. Conclusion. Use of the PleurX catheter for the management of RCA carries a high risk for infection when the catheter remains in situ for more than 3 months but has an excellent patency rate and did not result in significant renal injury.

The successful management of diffuse lymphangiomatosis using sirolimus: a case report.

Lymphangiomatosis is a rare and fatal congenital lymphatic malformation. Because the natural course of the disease affects multiple body systems, the management can be challenging. This article presents a novel approach to the treatment of diffuse lymphangiomatosis using sirolimus. The reported case involves a 4-month-old male with a known lymphatic malformation who presented to the emergency department with respiratory difficulties. Sirolimus was successful at significantly reducing our patient's mass at a relatively low target level of 5 to 10 µg/L. The use of sirolimus for the treatment of lymphangiomatosis should be studied further in the setting of a formal trial.

Precision and reliability of strength (Jamar vs. Biodex handgrip) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry vs. bioimpedance analysis) measurements in advanced cancer patients.

Important deteriorations in body composition and strength occur and need to be accurately measured in advanced cancer patients (ACPs). The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between a single-frequency bioimpedance analyzer (BIA) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA), as well as the Jamar handgrip dynometer and the Biodex handgrip attachment, and to determine the precision of each of these instruments in ACPs. Eighty-one ACPs with non-small-cell lung cancer and gastrointestinal cancer were recruited from the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Que.). Consecutive paired measurements, with repositioning between measurements, were obtained for total-body DXA, BIA, Biodex handgrip, and BIA plus Jamar handgrip. The total-body percent coefficient of variation (%CV) for the BIA and DXA were 1.34 and 1.56 for fat mass (FM), respectively, and 0.42 and 0.72 for fat free mass (FFM), respectively. The %CV for the Jamar and Biodex handgrips were 6.3 and 16.7, respectively. Bland-Altman plots were used to characterize the limits of agreement between DXA and BIA for FM (4.60 +/- 7.80 (-3.19 to 12.39) kg) and FFM (-1.87 +/- 7.16 (-9.03 to 5.29) kg). Both DXA and BIA demonstrate good short-term precision in ACPs. However, given its poor accuracy, it remains to be determined if BIA can be used to monitor ACPs for changes in total-body tissue composition as a function of time, whether for observation or response to treatment. Furthermore, because of wide limits of agreement, the DXA and BIA cannot be used interchangeably in research or clinical settings. The Jamar handgrip dynamometer shows more consistency than the Biodex handgrip attachment in ACPs, and should therefore be the preferred measure of changes in strength over time.