Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gen Comp Endocrinol ; 301: 113656, 2021 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33159910

RESUMO

The widespread use of P-nitrophenol (PNP) as a raw material in pesticides, medicines and dyes has led to environmental pollution. PNP is a well-known endocrine disruptor in mammals and quails. This study investigated the effects of long-term PNP exposure on the testicular development and semen quality of roosters. Pubescent and postpubescent animals were given drinking water supplemented with (0 mg/L, 1 mg/L, 10 mg/L, or 100 mg/L) PNP for eight weeks or sixteen weeks. The relative testis weight, antioxidant index, serum hormone concentration, morphological changes, semen quality and expression of major steroidogenic genes were measured. The results showed that eight weeks of PNP exposure decreased CAT activity and increased H2O2 level in serum and testes in the 10 mg/L and 100 mg/L PNP-treated groups. Detached sperm cells were also found in the testicular tissues of the 100 mg/L PNP-treated group. After sixteen weeks of PNP exposure, daily weight gain, sperm motility, serum testosterone concentration and 3ß1-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD3ß1) mRNA expression were decreased in the 100 mg/L PNP-treated group. Some vacuoles in the seminiferous epithelium in the testicular tissues were found in the 10 mg/L and 100 mg/L PNP-treated groups. In conclusion, as an endocrine disruptor, PNP exposure impaired antioxidant capacity, reduced testosterone synthesis, caused morphological changes in testes, and ultimately decreased semen quality in the roosters. The reproductive damage of PNP to roosters depended on the length of exposure time and the administered dose.


Assuntos
Galinhas , Análise do Sêmen , Sêmen , Animais , Peróxido de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Nitrofenóis , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides , Espermatozoides , Testículo , Testosterona
2.
Poult Sci ; 101(12): 102189, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36240638

RESUMO

Five hundred and forty Cheery Valley ducks were used to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of acidifier and compound probiotics, individually or in combination, on production performance, egg quality, immune and oxidative status, expression of reproductive, and calcium binding related genes from 42 wk to 48 wk of age. Ducks were randomly allocated to 9 treatment groups with 6 replicates and 10 ducks per replicate for each group. A 3 × 3 factorial arrangement, with 3 dietary inclusion levels of acidifier and probiotics (0, 2, and 3 g/kg acidifier; 0, 1, and 2 g/kg probiotics) were used. The acidifier used was mainly consisted of Benzoic acid, Fumaric acid, phosphoric acid, and formic acid. The main components of the probiotics were Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium butyricum. Dietary supplementation of probiotics improved the daily feed intake, egg production rate, and body weight of ducks (P < 0.05), and diet acidifier also increased the daily feed intake compared to the control (P < 0.01). Egg quality was improved by diet inclusion of probiotics, including Haugh unit, albumen height, egg shape index (P < 0.01), and eggshell hardness (P = 0.05). A significant increase in Haught unit and yolk weight was observed in ducks fed diet added with acidifier (P < 0.05). Acidifier supplementation reduced the total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and IgG content and the catalase (CAT) activity in the serum (P < 0.05), in accompanied with an increased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration (P < 0.05). Serum total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activities were improved by dietary inclusion of probiotics (P < 0.05). There was an interaction effects on serum IgA and IgG contents between acidifier and probiotics (P < 0.05). Diet supplementation of probiotics improved the ovary follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and estrogen receptor (ER) gene expressions (P < 0.01), while dietary acidifier reduced the transcription levels of FSHR and luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) (P < 0.01) in ovary. In the uterus of the oviduct, expressions of FSHR, and carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) were also increased by diet probiotics (P < 0.01), and diet acidifier reduced the gene expressions of calbindin-D28k (CaBP-D28k) and CA2 (P < 0.05). Significant interaction effects between diet acidifier and probiotics were obtained on gene expressions of FSHR, LHR, and ovalbumin (OVAL) in the ovary (P < 0.05), and LHR, CaBP-D28k, and CA2 (P < 0.05) in the uterus. It can be concluded that production performance and egg quality of laying ducks can be improved in the late phase of reproduction by dietary inclusion of probiotics, while the organic acid mixture caused a decline in serum antioxidant and immune capacity of the ducks.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes , Probióticos , Feminino , Animais , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Patos/metabolismo , Ração Animal/análise , Galinhas/metabolismo , Dieta/veterinária , Reprodução , Probióticos/farmacologia , Imunoglobulina A , Imunoglobulina G , Suplementos Nutricionais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA