[Establishing at a shared and common educational assessment at Curie Institute]. / Naissance du bilan éducatif partagé unique et commun à l'Institut Curie.

The Institut Curie initiated a therapeutic patient education activity in 2011 by creating several programs. Coordinated and animated by different multidisciplinary teams, these functioned autonomously, with a different initial educational assessment for each one. This organization broke up the patient's educational pathway, and the educational offer, which sometimes proved to be redundant, most often corresponding to the needs shared by all cancer patients. The transversal therapeutic education unit allowed the creation of a single educational pathway per patient. It was necessary to imagine a common initial educational assessment. How can we move from eight specific educational assessments to a single educational assessment? After the harmonization of the different workshops, we moved from seven programs with several workshops to one program with eight themes and 26 workshops. Then several working groups led to the creation of a common, unique framework for the initial educational assessment. In seven months, a total of 119 unique educational assessments were carried out. The majority of those who wanted to undertake an educational process were women (96%). 7% had localized breast cancer, and 66% were undergoing treatment. Each workshop chosen corresponded to a need identified during the assessment. The themes mostly requested were nutrition, communication, and pain. Several advantages have been felt in the implementation of this educational assessment: single entry for the patient reinforced therapeutic alliance, transversal reading of the patient's educational needs. What remains to be done is to train therapeutic education practitioners about this global vision.

[Experience of care and daily life during national sanitary confinement in patients followed and treated in Cancer Control Centers: The BaroCov Inquiry]. / Expérience des soins et de la vie quotidienne pendant le confinement sanitaire national chez des patients suivis et traités en centre de lutte contre le cancer : l'enquête BaroCov.

Confinement within the framework of Covid 19 required organizations in cancer centers, in particular with postponing certain treatments. We interviewed 6080 patients who had a scheduled appointment during this period. 2478 patients gave their opinion regarding access and organization of care, teleconsultation, their concerns and their reasons for satisfaction. While 83 % of them say they are satisfied with the organization of care, 25 % of respondents say they have given up care that they consider essential in 1/3 of cases. The concern related to the follow-up of the cancerous disease takes precedence over that of being infected with the Sars-cov-2 virus, unlike the general population, and relationships with their loved ones are spontaneously cited as a reason for satisfaction. This method captures the experience of patients, despite certain limitations. Such an approach could be used to set up a specific system during normal periods.

A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial.

CONTEXT: Advance care planning is essential to enable informed medical decisions to be made and to reduce aggressiveness in end-of-life (EOL) care. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore whether a question prompt list (QPL) adapted to French language and culture could promote discussions, particularly on prognosis and EOL issues, among advanced cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care (PC) consultations. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized study, patients assigned to the intervention arm received a QPL to help them prepare for the next consultation one month later. The main inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients referred to the PC team with an estimated life expectancy of less than one year. The primary endpoint was the number of questions raised, globally and by topic. The secondary objectives were the impact of the QPL on psychological symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and coping styles at two months. RESULTS: Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 vs. 18.2, P = 0.03) than patients in the control arm (n = 71), particularly on PC (5.6 vs. 3.7, P = 0.012) and EOL issues (2.2 vs. 1, P = 0.018) but not on prognosis (4.3 vs. 3.6, not specified). At two months, there was no change in anxiety, depression, or quality of life in either arm; patient satisfaction with doctors' technical skills was scored higher (P = 0.024), and avoidance coping responses were less frequent (self-distraction, P = 0.015; behavioral disengagement, P = 0.025) in the QPL arm. CONCLUSION: Questions on PC and EOL issues in outpatient PC consultations were more frequent, and patient satisfaction was better when a QPL was made available before the consultation.