Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Esp Urol ; 66(9): 865-72, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24231297

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcomes, predictors of success and predictors of need for hospital admission in our series of patients who underwent ureteroscopy (URS) as a major outpatient surgery (MOS) procedure. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 402 patients who had undergone semi-rigid URS for ureteral calculi as a MOS procedure in our center between 2004 and 2012. Patients with previous DJ catheter were excluded. We classified the calculi according to their location (lumbar, pelvic, iliac), size (< or> 1cm) and number (single or multiple). Follow-up was done by plain X-ray of the abdomen and ultrasound one month after surgery. The procedure was considered successful when patients were free from the treated calculi or had ureteral fragments < 3 mm one month after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify the factors involved in success and hospitalization not being required. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were included. The majority of the stones were single (92.2%), <1 cm in size (76.6%), pelvic (62.1%), and left-sided (57.2%). 89.6% of the procedures were performed as MOS and 82.2% were considered to be successful. In the multivariate analysis, left-sided (p<0.001) and pelvic location of the calculi (p=0,01) were found to be independent predictors for the success of the procedure In terms of hospital admission, the only independent predictor was the presence of intraoperative complications ( p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Left-sided and pelvic locations were the independent predictors for the success of the URS. A lack of intraoperative complications was the independent predictor for not requiring hospitalisation.


Assuntos
Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Anestesia Geral , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Esp Urol ; 63(1): 74-7, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20157223

RESUMO

METHOD: Beyond postoperative suspicion, retrograde pyelogram was performed, the images of which are displayed, and demonstrated the fistula. RESULTS: Treatment has been definitive nephrectomy after failed attempt to seal the fistula with suture and TachoSil. CONCLUSIONS: Although radiofrequency ablation can be a valid technique for treating small renal tumors in patients with high morbidity, it is not without significant complications as described in this case, despite the precautions taken.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Colo/etiologia , Fístula Intestinal/etiologia , Nefropatias/etiologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Fístula Urinária/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA