Heterogeneity of values for coastal flood risk management with nature-based solutions.

The purpose of this study was to understand preferences for different coastal flood protection measures and the factors that influence such preferences, to inform management and policy. The Discrete Choice Experiment applied to Wales residents revealed that there is willingness-to-pay for coastal flood protection, especially through Nature-based Solutions (NbS) including expanding saltmarsh area and increasing saltmarsh with high vegetation. The preference for NbS provides evidence for including specific coastal area targets in financial schemes initially aimed at other benefits from natural habitats, such as habitat creation for biodiversity. This joint action will maximise the benefits from NbS and ensure integrated and concerted efforts across, often disjointed, sectors. There were also high levels of heterogeneity for preferences in different groups of people. For instance, results support that direct flood experience and damage severity can give rise to behavioural intentions that support mitigation and adaptation measures. Findings also highlight how crucial environmental education and direct contact with the object of study are for securing support and buy-in for flood protection measures. This work is original in that it considers the different types of management for a habitat as NbS and the heterogeneity of preferences within a population. Results are significant in providing a basis for future NbS developments and in supporting flood risk policy and management.

Using ecosystem-services assessments to determine trade-offs in ecosystem-based management of marine mammals.

The goal of ecosystem-based management (EBM) is to support a sustainable and holistic multisectored management approach, and is recognized in a number of international policy frameworks. However, it remains unknown how these goals should be linked to assessments and management plans for marine fauna, such as mammals and fish stocks. It appears particularly challenging to carry out trade-off analyses of various ocean uses without a framework that integrates knowledge of environmental, social, and economic benefits derived from nonstationary marine fauna. We argue this gap can be filled by applying a version of the ecosystem-service approach at the population level of marine fauna. To advance this idea, we used marine mammals as a case study to demonstrate what indicators could operationalize relevant assessments and deliver an evidence base for the presence of ecosystem services and disservices derived from marine mammals. We found indicators covering common ecosystem service categories feasible to apply; examples of indicator data are already available in the literature for several populations. We encourage further exploration of this approach for application to marina fauna and biodiversity management, with the caveat that conceptual tensions related to the use of the ecosystem service concept itself needs to be addressed to ensure acceptance by relevant stakeholders.

Uso de Evaluaciones de Servicios Ambientales para Determinar las Compensaciones en el Manejo de Mamíferos Marinos Basado en Ecosistemas Resumen El objetivo del manejo basado en ecosistemas (EBM) es respaldar una estrategia de manejo multisectorial sustentable y holística, objetivo que es reconocido dentro de varias políticas de marcos de trabajo internacional. Sin embargo, todavía desconocemos cómo deben vincularse este objetivo con las evaluaciones y los planes de manejo de la fauna marina, como los mamíferos y las poblaciones ícticas. Actualmente, parece un reto realizar los análisis de las compensaciones de varios usos oceánicos sin un marco de trabajo que integre el conocimiento sobre los beneficios ambientales, sociales y económicos derivados de la fauna marina no estacionaria. Discutimos que este vacío puede completarse con la aplicación de una versión de la estrategia de servicio ambiental a nivel poblacional para la fauna marina. Para impulsar esta idea usamos mamíferos marinos como estudio de caso para demostrar cuáles indicadores podrían poner en práctica evaluaciones relevantes y entregar una base de evidencias para la presencia de servicios y perjuicios ambientales derivados de los mamíferos marinos. Descubrimos indicadores que cubren las categorías de servicios ambientales comunes cuya aplicación es factible; los ejemplos de datos indicadores ya se encuentran disponibles en la literatura para varias de las poblaciones. Alentamos una exploración más profunda de esta estrategia para su aplicación en la fauna marina y el manejo de biodiversidad, bajo advertencia de que las tensiones conceptuales relacionadas con el uso del concepto de servicio ambiental necesitan ser tratadas para asegurar la aceptación por parte de los actores relevantes.

Using stated preference valuation in the offshore environment to support marine planning.

This study presents valuations of components of marine natural capital that have hitherto been overlooked by the valuation literature. Using a discrete choice experiment, it values a set of ecosystem services linked to seabed natural capital in the UK section of the North Sea. The study focuses on offshore seabed habitats, using Good Environmental Status as a measure of seabed health, thus linking directly to management targets under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. It considers how changing pressures on seabed habitats could affect marine industries and other ecosystems through trade-offs with (1) the contribution that exploitation of these habitats makes to the maritime cultural heritage; and (2) changes to the health of seabird populations. For seabed habitats and seabirds, the elicited values mainly represent non-use values for changes in the condition of natural capital assets. For maritime cultural heritage the valuation refers to the changed provision of this cultural ecosystem service. Results show that the public in England hold significant, strongly correlated, values for changes in the condition of offshore seabeds and seabird populations. Projected losses in maritime cultural heritage are found to lead to expected welfare decreases. Implications of these findings for marine planning and decision-making are discussed.