Metabolic Syndrome, Modifiable Lifestyle Factors, and Sleep-Disordered Breathing: The Hispanic Community Health Study.

BACKGROUND: US Hispanics/Latinos are disproportionately susceptible to metabolic syndrome (MetS), attributed in part to systemic inequities related to health and lifestyle factors such as low physical activity (PA) levels, diet quality, alcohol use, tobacco use, and sleep disorder. Gender and heritage group differences are vastly understudied and need to be examined in this heterogeneous population. PURPOSE: To examine the relationships between select health and lifestyle factors and MetS among Hispanic gender and heritage subgroups (Hypothesis 1) and determine whether gender and heritage moderate those relationships (Hypothesis 2). METHODS: Participants included 14,155 Hispanic Americans aged 18-76 (59% female, mean age 45.92 ± 13.97) from seven heritage subgroups. This secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the observational Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) dataset used hierarchical multinomial logistic regression to test Hypothesis 1; the dependent variable, MetS, included three categories delineating absence of MetS and presence of MetS with or without related medication use. Hayes' PROCESS macro tested Hypothesis 2. RESULTS: Low PA and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) each had significant (p < .001) predictive value of MetS group membership, whereas both low and high alcohol use (p < .001) were associated with decreased MetS risk. Cigarette pack-years were not significantly associated with MetS outcomes. Gender moderated the association between MetS and alcohol use (p < .001), cigarette pack-years (p < .001), and SDB (p < .001) such that the effects on MetS were higher in females than males. The association between MetS and diet quality (p < .001) was stronger among males than in females. CONCLUSIONS: Gender and heritage differences were prominent among study variables.

Perspectives of Nonspecialists Delivering a Brief Depression Treatment in the United States: A Qualitative Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Task sharing is an implementation strategy which increases access to services by training and supporting treatment delivery by nonspecialists. Such an approach has demonstrated effectiveness for depression and other mental health outcomes; however, few studies in high-income countries have examined nonspecialist providers' (NSPs) perspectives of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of delivering mental health interventions. We examine qualitative reports of NSPs experiences delivering a brief structured behavioral intervention for depression (called "Do More, Feel Better" [DMFB]) to adults aged 55 and older. METHODS: All NSPs (N = 4, 100%) who delivered DMFB participated in a focus group to probe their perceptions of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of both the intervention and their delivery experience as NSPs. Two coders analyzed the qualitative data from focus groups using codebook thematic analysis. RESULTS: NSPs perceived the intervention and delivery experience to be acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. Qualitative results provided insight into specific barriers and facilitators which may be important to consider when planning to implement task sharing. Themes that emerged from qualitative data included supervision being highly acceptable and feasible, appropriateness of the intervention for NSPs, and the feasibility of tailoring the intervention to patient participants. NSPs also expressed difficulty managing emotional investment in patients' success and providing therapy during a pandemic and racial violence in the US. CONCLUSIONS: Our results can inform future implementation and sustainment of task sharing interventions to expand access to care.

A low-intensity behavioral intervention for depression in older adults delivered by lay coaches: proof-of-concept trial.

OBJECTIVES: A broader workforce is necessary to expand U.S. geriatric mental health services. We examined (1) feasibility of training undergraduate students to deliver Do More, Feel Better (DMFB), an evidence-informed program for depression; and (2) feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes in a single-arm proof-of-concept trial. METHOD: In Study 1, we taught DMFB to 18 upper-level undergraduate students and assessed fidelity using role plays. In Study 2, four students delivered six weekly DMFB sessions to 12 community-dwelling older adults (M = 66.83 years old, SD = 10.39) with depression (PHQ ≥ 10). Patient outcomes were change in pre- to post-treatment depressive symptoms, disability, and the target mechanism of increased activity. RESULTS: Fidelity was high in the course (Study 1; 82.4% of role plays rated as 'passing') and the trial (Study 2; 100% of 24 sessions rated as 'passing'). The majority (83.3%) of patients were retained and evidenced statistically and clinically significant improvement in depressive symptoms (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]), disability (World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS 2.0], and activity (Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale [BADS]). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to train bachelor's-level students to deliver a brief, structured intervention for depression. Future research should consider implementation strategies and stakeholder feedback.

Self-objectification: Implications for physical activity in middle-aged women and men.

Self-objectification (i.e., valuing the body primarily for its attractiveness to others) is negatively related to physical health, including physical activity (PA) attitudes and behaviors. Given the low levels of PA among middle-aged adults in the US, self-objectification may be a novel correlate of PA in this population. The present study examined self-objectification and PA variables in a cross-sectional Western U.S. community sample of women (n = 215) and men (n = 134), aged 45-64, including gender as a moderator of these relations. Data were collected via survey, including measures of self-objectification, PA enjoyment, PA perceived benefits and barriers, and self-reported levels of PA. Women and men in our sample did not differ in levels of self-objectification. Results of regression analyses indicated that self-objectification predicted less PA enjoyment. In addition, men higher in self-objectification reported higher levels of PA. The findings implicate self-objectification as a potentially novel determinant of PA attitudes and behaviors in middle-aged adults.

Comparing the streamlined psychotherapy "Engage" with problem-solving therapy in late-life major depression. A randomized clinical trial.

Effective psychotherapies for late-life depression are underutilized, mainly because of their complexity. "Engage" is a novel, streamlined psychotherapy that relies on neurobiology to identify core behavioral pathology of late-life depression and targets it with simple interventions, co-designed with community therapists so that they can be delivered in community settings. Consecutively recruited adults (≥60 years) with major depression (n = 249) were randomly assigned to 9 weekly sessions of "Engage" or to the evidence-based Problem-Solving Therapy (PST) offered by 35 trained community social workers and assessed by blind raters. "Engage" therapists required an average of 30% less training time to achieve fidelity to treatment than PST therapists and had one-third of the PST therapists' skill drift. Both treatments led to reduction of HAM-D scores over 9 weeks. The mixed effects model-estimated HAM-D ratings were not significantly different between the two treatments at any assessment point of the trial. The one-sided 95% CI for treatment-end difference was (-∞, 0.07) HAM-D points, indicating a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 HAM-D points or greater; this margin is lower than the pre-determined 2.2-point margin. The two treatment arms had similar response (HR = 1.08, 95% CI (0.76, 1.52), p = 0.67) and remission rates (HR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.57, 1.39), p = 0.61). We conclude that "Engage" is non-inferior to PST. If disseminated, "Engage" will increase the number of therapists who can reliably treat late-life depression and make effective psychotherapy available to large numbers of depressed older adults.

Understanding Psychological Distress and Protective Factors Amongst Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the emotional distress and loneliness during COVID-19 and the roles of resiliency and activities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional national survey. SETTING: Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) and Prolific Research Platforms. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred and one U.S. dwelling English-speaking adults 60 years old and older. MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed an online survey with the PHQ-9; GAD-7; Short Health Anxiety Inventory; 3-item UCLA Loneliness scale; PROMIS measures of global health, instrumental, and emotional support; 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; and COVID-19 needs assessment. RESULTS: Across the sample 13% reported moderate depressive symptoms, 9% reported moderate anxiety symptoms, and 26% endorsed being "lonely." The emotionally distressed group endorsed more loneliness, lower resiliency, less physical exercise, and worse physical health. The low Socio-Economic Status group endorsed less loneliness, less likely to engage in physical exercise and worse physical health.The lonely group endorsed less resilience, less physical exercise, and worse physical health. A multiple logistic regression found that resilience, socioeconomic status, and physical health were significant predictors of loneliness, whereas global health was the best predictor of emotional distress. CONCLUSIONS: Even after prolonged social distancing, older adults in this study did not report greater psychological distress compared to earlier studies of older adults during COVID-19. Older adults with lower SES, worse physical health, and less resiliency, were more likely to report more loneliness. It is this group that should be the focus of intervention.

Modernizing Training in Psychotherapy Competencies With Adaptive Learning Systems: Proof of Concept.

PURPOSE: This proof-of-concept study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) as a classroom adjunct to improve training bachelor of social work (BSW) students in client engagement strategies. METHODS: We codeveloped the ITS with 11 undergraduate students and pilot tested it with six BSW students enrolled in a class on telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (tCBT). Student competencies in tCBT were assessed by expert review of role-plays. We also examined time spent using ITS and relation with competency. RESULTS: The majority of students (81.8%) in Wave 1 and all of the students who submitted role-plays in Wave 2 passed the clinical skills role-play. Students advancing through the ITS more quickly had better tCBT competency ratings than those progressing more slowly. DISCUSSION: One of the most challenging aspects of training is how to competently deliver evidence-based practices. ITS has the potential to streamline and scale such training.

The accuracy of passive phone sensors in predicting daily mood.

BACKGROUND: Smartphones provide a low-cost and efficient means to collect population level data. Several small studies have shown promise in predicting mood variability from smartphone-based sensor and usage data, but have not been generalized to nationally recruited samples. This study used passive smartphone data, demographic characteristics, and baseline depressive symptoms to predict prospective daily mood. METHOD: Daily phone usage data were collected passively from 271 Android phone users participating in a fully remote randomized controlled trial of depression treatment (BRIGHTEN). Participants completed daily Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A machine learning approach was used to predict daily mood for the entire sample and individual participants. RESULTS: Sample-wide estimates showed a marginally significant association between physical mobility and self-reported daily mood (B = -0.04, P < 0.05), but the predictive models performed poorly for the sample as a whole (median R2 ∼ 0). Focusing on individuals, 13.9% of participants showed significant association (FDR < 0.10) between a passive feature and daily mood. Personalized models combining features provided better prediction performance (median area under the curve [AUC] > 0.50) for 80.6% of participants and very strong prediction in a subset (median AUC > 0.80) for 11.8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Passive smartphone data with current features may not be suited for predicting daily mood at a population level because of the high degree of intra- and interindividual variation in phone usage patterns and daily mood ratings. Personalized models show encouraging early signs for predicting an individual's mood state changes, with GPS-derived mobility being the top most important feature in the present sample.

Pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and functional limitations among older adults with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: To examine pain-related activity interference as a mediator for the relationship between pain intensity and depressive symptoms among older adults with serious mental illness (SMI). METHOD: Ordinary least-squares regressions were used to investigate the mediation analysis among older adults with SMI (n = 183) from community mental health centers. Analyses used secondary data from the HOPES intervention study. RESULTS: Higher pain intensity was associated with greater pain-related activity interference. Higher pain intensity and pain-related activity interference were also associated with elevated depressive symptoms. Finally, greater pain-related activity interference significantly mediated the association between higher pain intensity and elevated depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that pain and depressive symptoms may be linked to functional limitations. Clinicians and researchers in the mental health field should better address pain-related activity interference among older adults with SMI, especially among those with higher pain intensity and elevated depressive symptoms.

A Systematic Review of Practice Guidelines and Recommendations for Discontinuation of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Dementia.

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are the primary pharmacological treatment for symptom management of Alzheimer disease (AD), but they carry known risks during long-term use, and do not guarantee clinical effects over time. The balance of risks and benefits may warrant discontinuation at different points during the disease course. Indeed, although there is limited scientific study of deprescribing ChEIs, clinicians routinely face practical decisions about whether to continue or stop medications. This review examined published practice recommendations for discontinuation of ChEIs in AD. To characterize the scientific basis for recommendations, we first summarized randomized controlled trials of ChEI discontinuation. We then identified practice guidelines by professional societies and in textbooks and classified them according to 1) whether they made a recommendation about discontinuation, 2) what the recommendation was, and 3) the proposed grounds for discontinuation. There was no consensus in guidelines and textbooks about discontinuation. Most recommended individualized discontinuation decisions, but there was essentially no agreement about what findings or situations would warrant discontinuation, or even about what domains to consider in this process. The only relevant domain identified by most guidelines and textbooks was a lack of response or a loss of effectiveness, both of which can be difficult to ascertain in the course of a progressive condition. Well-designed, long-term studies of discontinuation have not been conducted; such evidence is needed to provide a scientific basis for practice guidelines. It seems reasonable to apply an individualized approach to discontinuation while engaging patients and families in treatment decisions. .

Integrated Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Improves Illness Intrusiveness in Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Background: Progressive illnesses such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) impart a high level of physical and psychological burden. Evidence-based psychotherapies hold the potential to improve perceptions of physical health impairment, yet few studies have documented these effects. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of brief cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT) on disease-related illness intrusiveness. Methods: Participants were 175 Veterans with COPD and clinically elevated symptoms of depression and/or anxiety enrolled in a larger randomized trial (n = 99 randomized to bCBT, n = 76 to enhanced usual care; EUC). bCBT included up to six treatment sessions and optional booster sessions over a 4-month period. EUC entailed an assessment with documentation in the medical record. Primary outcomes focused on posttreatment changes on the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS), an established measure of perceived impairment from a chronic health condition. Results: Illness intrusiveness improved for bCBT participants relative to EUC, after controlling for baseline IIRS scores, depression, and anxiety (p = .03, partial η2 = .03). Specific improvement was observed in the Instrumental subscale (p = .02), encompassing improved intrusiveness of COPD on daily activities and daily functioning. IIRS scores improved in the absence of changes in physical functioning. Conclusions: Illness intrusiveness was high among Veterans with COPD but improved over the course of bCBT. Integrated behavioral health interventions hold the potential to reduce disease intrusiveness. The IIRS may be a valuable tool to augment traditional assessment and measurement-based care approaches of behavioral health interventions for medically ill patients.

Using Mobile Apps to Assess and Treat Depression in Hispanic and Latino Populations: Fully Remote Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Most people with mental health disorders fail to receive timely access to adequate care. US Hispanic/Latino individuals are particularly underrepresented in mental health care and are historically a very difficult population to recruit into clinical trials; however, they have increasing access to mobile technology, with over 75% owning a smartphone. This technology has the potential to overcome known barriers to accessing and utilizing traditional assessment and treatment approaches. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare recruitment and engagement in a fully remote trial of individuals with depression who either self-identify as Hispanic/Latino or not. A secondary aim was to assess treatment outcomes in these individuals using three different self-guided mobile apps: iPST (based on evidence-based therapeutic principles from problem-solving therapy, PST), Project Evolution (EVO; a cognitive training app based on cognitive neuroscience principles), and health tips (a health information app that served as an information control). METHODS: We recruited Spanish and English speaking participants through social media platforms, internet-based advertisements, and traditional fliers in select locations in each state across the United States. Assessment and self-guided treatment was conducted on each participant's smartphone or tablet. We enrolled 389 Hispanic/Latino and 637 non-Hispanic/Latino adults with mild to moderate depression as determined by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score≥5 or related functional impairment. Participants were first asked about their preferences among the three apps and then randomized to their top two choices. Outcomes were depressive symptom severity (measured using PHQ-9) and functional impairment (assessed with Sheehan Disability Scale), collected over 3 months. Engagement in the study was assessed based on the number of times participants completed active surveys. RESULTS: We screened 4502 participants and enrolled 1040 participants from throughout the United States over 6 months, yielding a sample of 348 active users. Long-term engagement surfaced as a key issue among Hispanic/Latino participants, who dropped from the study 2 weeks earlier than their non-Hispanic/Latino counterparts (P<.02). No significant differences were observed for treatment outcomes between those identifying as Hispanic/Latino or not. Although depressive symptoms improved (beta=-2.66, P=.006) over the treatment course, outcomes did not vary by treatment app. CONCLUSIONS: Fully remote mobile-based studies can attract a diverse participant pool including people from traditionally underserved communities in mental health care and research (here, Hispanic/Latino individuals). However, keeping participants engaged in this type of "low-touch" research study remains challenging. Hispanic/Latino populations may be less willing to use mobile apps for assessing and managing depression. Future research endeavors should use a user-centered design to determine the role of mobile apps in the assessment and treatment of depression for this population, app features they would be interested in using, and strategies for long-term engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01808976; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01808976 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/70xI3ILkz).

Naturalistic use of a digital mental health intervention for depression and anxiety: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Digital mental health interventions (DMHI) may offer scalable treatment for common mental health conditions. However, many commercially available apps have not been subjected to rigorous evaluation of effectiveness, particularly among users experiencing clinically significant symptomatology. We examined depression and anxiety symptom outcomes associated with a top-rated, commercially available self-guided DMHI based on cognitive behavioral therapy ("Sanvello") relative to waitlist control. METHODS: This preregistered web-based, 2-arm, parallel-group randomized trial enrolled U.S. adults with self-reported elevated symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. Those assigned to the treatment condition were provided 8 weeks of access to Sanvello. Co-primary outcomes of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale [GAD-7]) severity were assessed at baseline and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses included 280 participants (mean age 32.47 ± 9.32 years; 86.1 % women). Generalized linear mixed models showed a significant improvement in depression (F(4,779) = 6.51, p < .001) and anxiety (F(4,907) = 3.28, p = .01) associated with the DMHI over time. The intervention was also associated with a greater proportion of participants exhibiting depression response (25 [45.5 %] vs 26 [16.9 %]) and remission (10 [18.2 %] vs 7 [4.5 %]) on the PHQ-9, and anxiety response (31 [44.9 %] vs 39 [22.8 %]) and remission (20 [29.0 %] vs 27 [15.8 %]) on the GAD-7, relative to waitlist. LIMITATIONS: Findings may not represent people with serious mental illness, suicidality, or the broader population of DMHI users. CONCLUSIONS: A commercially available, self-guided DMHI was effective at improving symptoms in individuals experiencing depression or anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT05373329].

Behavioral Health Workforce Development in Washington State: Addition of a Behavioral Health Support Specialist.

The mental and behavioral health workforce shortage has hindered access to care in the United States, resulting in long waitlists for persons who need behavioral health care. Global models for task sharing, combined with U.S.-led studies of nonspecialists delivering interventions for depression and anxiety, support the development of this workforce in a stepped care system. This Open Forum highlights an innovative effort in Washington State to initiate a bachelor's-level behavioral health support specialist curriculum leading to credentialing to expand the mental health workforce and improve access to care for people with depression and anxiety.

Sport and mental health performance optimization in an adolescent gymnast: A case evaluation.

The Optimum Performance Program in Sports (TOPPS) is a multi-component, sport-specific Family Behavior Therapy that has demonstrated improved sport performance, relationships, and mental health outcomes in adult and adolescent athletes with, and without, diagnosed mental health disorders in clinical trials. The current case trial demonstrates successful implementation of a novel component of TOPPS (i.e., talk aloud optimal sport performance imagery leading to dream mapping) in a biracial Latina and White adolescent gymnast without a mental health diagnosis. The participant demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to both post-treatment and 3-month follow-up in severity of mental health functioning, factors interfering with sports performance, and her relationships with teammates, coaches, and family. Results suggest it may be possible to optimize mental health through sport performance optimization.

Electrocardiogram Abnormalities Associated With Metabolic Syndrome: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a prognostic cluster of physiologic risk factors that may develop into cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Electrocardiogram abnormalities (ECGA) can be instrumental in identifying the early stages of disease and may be associated with MetS in Hispanic Americans. OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationships between MetS and major and minor ECGA in the Hispanic population (Hypothesis 1) and determine whether gender-ethnic subgroups moderate these relationships (Hypothesis 2). METHODS: This secondary data analysis was conducted using large-scale data from the cohort study Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (N = 13,628; 59% women and 41% men). Major ECGA encompassed 9 abnormalities including pathologic Q waves and left ventricular hypertrophy. Minor ECGA were tested independently of major ECGA. MetS was classified into 4 categories delineating metabolic abnormalities and related medication use. Multinomial logistic regression and Hayes' PROCESS macro were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Major ECGA were significantly associated with the presence of MetS and/or related medication use, whereas minor ECGA abnormalities were associated with MetS for participants who also took MetS-related medications only. Gender moderated the association between MetS and minor ECGA such that women with minor ECGA had a higher likelihood of MetS when compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that early recognition and associated treatment of major and minor ECGA can be important to prevent MetS and further morbidities in the Hispanic population.

Mental health is related to metabolic syndrome: The Hispanic community health study/ study of Latinos.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with common mental health conditions. Using cross-sectional data from the observational Hispanic Community Health Study / Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), this study examined the relationship between MetS and depression and anxiety in addition to testing moderating effects of gender and Hispanic heritage subgroups. METHODS: Participants included 13,496 Hispanic Americans aged 18-74 (59% women, mean age 46.59 ± 13.65) from seven heritage subgroups. Depression was measured using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression 10-item scale, and anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 10-item scale. A 3-level categorical variable was developed to assess the combined influence of depression and anxiety. The dependent variable is dichotomous, delineating the presence or absence of MetS as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Third Adult Treatment Panel. Logistic regression and Hayes' PROCESS macro assessed these relationships and the moderating effects of gender-heritage subgroups. RESULTS: Results suggest depression (p < .001) and anxiety (p < .001) were associated with an increased likelihood of MetS. Puerto Ricans had the highest, and South Americans had the lowest, levels of depression and anxiety. Gender moderated the relationship between mental health and MetS, with women having a significant increase in the probability of MetS with depression (p < .001), anxiety (p < .001), or both (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety are associated with the presence of MetS in US Hispanic subgroups. Gender-heritage differences are present among the study variables. Strategies to manage psychological well-being must be employed to optimize cardiometabolic health in US Hispanics.

Task Sharing to Expand Access to Care: Development of a Behavioral Health Support Specialist.

Task sharing improves access to mental health care in many countries, but little formative research has examined uptake in the United States. This Open Forum proposes the development of nonspecialist professional roles to deliver low-intensity behavioral interventions for common mental health conditions in U.S. settings such as primary care. Using data from a multilevel stakeholder assessment, the authors discuss findings and challenges associated with such a role. Key themes from stakeholder surveys concerned scope of practice, competencies, pragmatic concerns, and training needs. Although stakeholders generally found this role to be acceptable and feasible, the themes raised will be critical to developing and implementing such a role.

Psychometric properties of the eating disorder examination questionnaire: Factor analysis and measurement invariance by race/ethnicity and gender.

OBJECTIVE: The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) was originally validated in non-Hispanic White women and has become widely used as an assessment tool for research on eating pathology in college students. However, the original factor structure has generally failed to replicate across various samples, especially among diverse populations. The current study examined the factor structure and measurement invariance of the EDE-Q in a large sample of racially/ethnically diverse college men and women. METHOD: Participants included a diverse sample of men and women from two universities (N = 1981). Exploratory factory analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the EDE-Q, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify the factor structure, and establish the configural model. Furthermore, we explored the measurement invariance of the configural model by gender (i.e., men, women) and race/ethnicity (i.e., White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, and multiracial). RESULTS: EFA and CFA results suggested a three-factor, 10-item measure best fit the data, reflecting Dietary Restraint, Preoccupation and Eating Concern, and Shape/Weight Overvaluation. This measure achieved strict invariance by gender and race/ethnicity, indicating that mean comparisons across groups are meaningful. Women, relative to men, reported higher scores for all subscales. Significant differences across race/ethnicity emerged for Dietary Restraint and Shape/Weight Overvaluation in which Hispanic individuals endorsed the highest means compared to other racial/ethnic groups. DISCUSSION: The three-factor, 10-item measure is a brief, valid, and reliable measure of eating disorder psychopathology for U.S. college students.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influencing ImPACT concussion testing in high school and collegiate athletes with self-reported ADHD and/or LD.

OBJECTIVE: Sport concussion is a common injury, and athletes with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or learning disorder (LD) are at increased risk and require specialized attention in clinical settings. Although systematic reviews of the relationship between ADHD/LD and concussion are reported in the literature, these reviews do not include quantitative syntheses. Additionally, no reviews have focused on the most commonly utilized concussion assessment, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT). The current review provides an update of sport concussion assessment in athletes with ADHD and/or LD from 2000 to 2021 on these topics: baseline and postconcussion performance on ImPACT, baseline and postconcussion symptom reporting using the Postconcussion Symptom Scale, invalid baseline classification on ImPACT, and self-reported history of concussion. METHOD: Meta-analyses were conducted on baseline ImPACT performance, symptom reporting, invalid baseline classification, and concussion rates. Thirty-four studies were included in systematic review and 19 were included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Decreased baseline performance was found for athletes with ADHD (trivial to small effects), LD (small-to-medium effects), and ADHD/LD (small-to-medium effects). Increased baseline symptom reporting was found for athletes with ADHD (small effect). Increased odds of invalid baseline performance (trivial effect) and self-reported concussion history (small effect) were found in ADHD. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the first quantitative synthesis of the literature in this area. It is recommended that future research further examines these topics in athletes with LD and co-occurring ADHD/LD (given the focus on ADHD), as well as the effects that all of these conditions may have on concussion recovery and return-to-play decision-making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).