S3-Guideline non-traumatic adult femoral head necrosis.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of adult non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN; N-ANFH) within an estimated incidence of 5000-7000 cases per annum in Germany remains a challenge. Risk factors include steroids, alcohol abuse, chemotherapy and immunosuppressive medication, but a genetic predisposition has been suggested. Early diagnosis of this often bilateral disease process is essential for successful conservative or joint preserving surgical management. In this review, we present the update German consensus S3 guideline "diagnosis and management for N-ANFH" as a concise summary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review is based on the published literature from January 1, 1970 to April 31, 2013 (German and English language). Inclusion criteria were systematic reviews, meta-analyses and relevant peer review publications. We identified a total of 3715 related publications, of which 422 were suitable according to the SIGN criteria, but only 159 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Clinical suspicion of N-ANFH mandates radiographic evaluation. If radiographs are normal MRI scans are recommended, which should be evaluated according to the ARCO-classification. Differential diagnoses include transient osteoporosis, bone bruise, insufficiency fracture and destructive arthropathy. Untreated, subchondral fractures commonly occur within 2 years, during which the risk for contralateral involvement is high-thereafter unlikely. Conservative management with Ilomedin and Alendronat can be tried, but other pharmacological or physical treatments are inappropriate. No specific joint preserving procedure can be recommended, but core decompression should be considered in early stages if necrosis is <30 %. In ARCO stages IIIc or IV total hip arthroplasty (THA) should be contemplated, which offers similar outcome compared to osteoarthritis. Young age is the main risk factor for higher revision rates after THA for N-ANFH.

[Elevated postoperative pain levels following orthopedic surgery. Depression as a strong predictor]. / Erhöhter postoperativer Schmerz nach orthopädischen Operationen. Depression als starker Prädiktor.

The aim of this study was to examine whether depression is a strong predictor of elevated postoperative pain levels following orthopedic surgery and whether the implementation of standardized pain management is more beneficial for patients with depression. We performed a non-randomized, prospective study with two different groups of patients who underwent orthopedic surgery. Group 1 (n=249) received non-standardized pain therapy whereas group 2 (n = 243) was treated with a standardized pain management concept. Effects of the treatment were monitored with a VAS-based pain assessment protocol. Depression was measured preoperatively with the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Patients with the probable diagnosis of a current episode of major depression showed significantly higher postoperative pain than patients without a depressive episode. On the other hand, patients with depression benefited from the implementation of standardized pain management. Our data suggest a predictive value of depression for severe postoperative pain. Patients with depression benefited from standardized postoperative pain therapy, but were still suffering from significantly higher postoperative pain.

[Sliding osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity in patellofemoral instability]. / Verschiebeosteotomie der Tuberositas tibiae bei patellofemoraler Instabilität.

OBJECTIVE: The development of a stable patellofemoral joint by distal realignment with normal positioning of the patella. INDICATIONS: Patellofemoral instability with increased tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance ≥ 20 mm and higher Caton-Deschamps patellar height index ≥ 1.3. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Open epiphyseal and apophyseal plates of the proximal tibia, normal TT-TG distance with normal patellar height, and high-grade chondral lesions of the patellofemoral joint (ICRS grades 3 and 4). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Examination of the knee joint under anesthesia and evaluation of stability and mediolateral translation of the patella. Diagnostic knee arthroscopy and treatment of chondral or osteochondral lesions. Lateral approach to the tibial tuberosity with soft tissue mobilization and exposure of the patellar tendon. Osteotomy is performed in the frontal plane, creating a fragment at least 6 cm long. The tuberosity is slid into the desired position, medially and distally, if necessary, according to preoperative analysis and planning, followed by careful drilling of the posterior tibial cortex and lag screw osteosynthesis. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial weight-bearing of 20 kg in a MECRON knee brace for 6 weeks. Mobilization 0/0/90° from the MECRON knee brace without active knee extension. Isometric training of the thigh muscles with the knee fully extended. RESULTS: With meticulous planning and implementation, and in cases of severe trochlear dysplasia combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, the technique of sliding osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity has a high success rate.

[S3 Guideline. Part 1: Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Non-Traumatic Adult Femoral Head Necrosis]. / S3-Leitline. Teil 1: Diagnostik und Differenzialdiagnostik der atraumatischen Femurkopfnekrose (aFKN) des Erwachsenen.

Non-traumatic femoral head necrosis (FHN) is primarily a disease of the middle-aged adult. Early diagnosis, at a time with lacking or minimal clinical symptoms, is mandatory to consider conservative therapy or joint preserving operations as a therapeutic option. The new German S3 guideline about diagnosis and therapy of FHN is a cooperative effort of five professional medical societies, overall headed by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (DGOOC). This review (part I/III) cites and explains the statements of the S3 guideline as agreed on the use of imaging methods for diagnosis of FHN. A diagnostic algorithm is presented. FHN clinically has to be considered in case of equivocal pain of a hip joint with a minimum of 6 weeks duration, when risk factors can be revealed, groin pain at clinical investigation, limping, pain or limitation of movement in case of load, and no obvious differential diagnoses. Is an FHN clinically suspected, primarily radiographs of the pelvis ap and a Lauenstein projection of the hip involved should be carried out. When the radiographs are normal, an MRI of the hips should follow routinely. MRI allows the diagnosis of FNH with high accuracy. Furthermore, MRI reveals the site and the size of the necrotic area involved and evaluates the integrity of the joint surface and subchondral fractures. When ARCO stage II (ARCO: Association Research Circulation Osseous) is diagnosed and MRI does not allow one to determine the joint surface with certainty, a CT of the hip joints should be performed. The S3 guideline explains and recommends the use of the ARCO classification. Although, this classification of 1993 is still largely based on radiographs, the pragmatic use of an "extended" version seems reasonable. Today, classical radiographic criteria like impression of the joint surface and subchondral fractures ("crescent sign") are better to be evaluated by MRI, in cases of subtle findings MRI is even surpassed by CT. The extent of the necrosis in the femoral head as well as the size of the surface area involved is best revealed with MRI. Additionally, in the era of cross sectional imaging a stage "0" seems obsolete. The guideline also addresses practically important considerations about the differential diagnosis of misleading MRI findings. This especially holds true for bone marrow oedema in the femoral head which may be misinterpreted. The differentiating features between FHN, transient bone marrow oedema and destructive arthropathy are discussed.

[Gracilis tendon augmented reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with soft tissue fixation at the patellar insertion site]. / Ersatz des medialen patellofemoralen Ligaments durch autologe Gracilissehne mit implantat- und bohrkanalfreier patellarer Fixation.

OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with autologous tendon augmentation and soft tissue fixation at the patellar insertion with resorbable suture material. INDICATIONS: Patellofemoral instability due to insufficiency of the medial passive stabilizers and dysplastic trochlea. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Primary traumatic dislocation of the patella without risk factors for patellar redislocation, severe osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint, infection. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Diagnostic arthroscopy to evaluate cartilage and shape of trochlea and to treat associated injuries. Harvesting of the gracilis tendon and arming with resorbable suture material. Transfer of the tendon through the medial capsule in the anatomical layer of the MPFL and weaving in u-shape through the capsule and periosteum near the patella. Soft tissue fixation with resorbable suture material. Anatomical reconstruction of the femoral insertion site. Femoral fixation with interference screw. POSTOPERATIVE TREATMENT: For 4 weeks, partial (20 kg) weight bearing with crutches; cast with physiotherapy (limited ROM extension, flexion 0-0-90°). Thereafter free range of motion and full weight bearing. RESULTS: 27 patients (age 12-45 years) with patellofemoral instability underwent reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Clinical follow-up was assessed up to 12 months postoperatively. After 1 year, the Kujala and Flandry scores increased from preoperatively 72 points to 95 points and 65.7 points to 89.9 points, respectively. One redislocation was observed. Patient satisfaction was significantly increased at 6 months postoperatively. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament shows good clinical results after 12 months.

[S3 Guideline. Part 3: Non-Traumatic Avascular Necrosis in Adults - Surgical Treatment of Atraumatic Avascular Femoral Head Necrosis in Adults]. / S3-Leitlinie. Teil 3: Atraumatische Femurkopfnekrose des Erwachsenen - Operative Therapie der atraumatischen Femurkopfnekrose des Erwachsenen.

The present article describes the guidelines for the surgical treatment of atraumatic avascular necrosis (aFKN). These include joint preserving and joint replacement procedures. As part of the targeted literature, 43 publications were included and evaluated to assess the surgical treatment. According to the GRADE and SIGN criteria level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (EC) and expert consensus (EK) were listed for each statement and question. The analysed studies have shown that up to ARCO stage III, joint-preserving surgery can be performed. A particular joint-preserving surgery currently cannot be recommended as preferred method. The selection of the method depends on the extent of necrosis. Core decompression performed in stage ARCO I (reversible early stage) or stage ARCO II (irreversible early stage) with medial or central necrosis with an area of less than 30 % of the femoral head shows better results than conservative therapy. In ARCO stage III with infraction of the femoral head, the core decompression can be used for a short-term pain relief. For ARCO stage IIIC or stage IV core decompression should not be performed. In these cases, the indication for implantation of a total hip replacement should be checked. Additional therapeutic procedures (e.g., osteotomies) and innovative treatment options (advanced core decompression, autologous bone marrow, bone grafting, etc.) can be discussed in the individual case. In elective hip replacement complications and revision rates have been clearly declining for decades. In the case of an underlying aFKN, however, previous joint-preserving surgery (osteotomies and grafts in particular) can complicate the implantation of a THA significantly. However, the implant life seems to be dependent on the aetiology. Higher revision rates for avascular necrosis are particularly expected in sickle cell disease, Gaucher disease, or kidney transplantation patients. Furthermore, the relatively young age of the patient with avascular necrosis should be seen as the main risk factor for higher revision rate. The results after resurfacing (today with known restricted indications) and cemented as well as cementless THA in aFKN are comparable for the appropriate indication to those in coxarthrosis or other diagnoses. Regardless of the underlying disease endoprosthetic treatment in aFKN leads to good results. Both cemented and cementless fixation techniques can be recommended.

[S3 guideline. Part 2: Non-Traumatic Avascular Femoral Head Necrosis in Adults - Untreated Course and Conservative Treatment]. / S3-Leitlinie. Teil 2: Atraumatische Femurkopfnekrose des Erwachsenen - unbehandelter Verlauf und konservative Behandlung.

BACKGROUND: In Germany there are 5000 to 7000 new cases of atraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head in adults per year. It occurs mostly in middle age. An increased frequency of idiopathic cases can be observed. Chemotherapy, corticoids and kidney transplants are frequently associated with the disease. In most cases the disease occurs on both sides. Early diagnosis is of particular importance, since in early stages it is most likely to avoid late damage with joint destruction. Whereas previously the temporary operational joint preservation and subsequent joint replacement were often the only option of treatment, conservative and joint-preserving measures today play an increasing role. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After the AWMF guidelines for S3 guideline clinical questions were formulated. Over the period from 01/01/1970 to 31/05/2013 a literature search was conducted. Systematic reviews, metaanalyses, original papers and clinical trials of all designs were evaluated. There were a total of 3715 references, of which 422 for the assessment regarding SIGN were eligible and finally 180 were in accord with the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. For the untreated course and the assessment of conservative measures, a total of 42 references was suitable. In formulating the recommendations the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used, which distinguishes A "shall", B "should" and 0 "can". RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: If left untreated, the aFKN within 2 years leads to a subchondral fracture and subsequent collapse. After the diagnosis of femoral head necrosis, the risk of a disease of the opposite side is high within the next 2 years, then unlikely. The sole conservative treatment brings no benefit for the treatment of atraumatic avascular necrosis in the adult. Although it improves function, less pain can be obtained, and surgical intervention can be delayed, the progression is not stopped. Conservative treatment must therefore always be part of the overall treatment. In ARCO stage I to II Iloprost may be considered as a pharmacological approach to reduce the pain and the bone marrow oedema. This also applies to alendronate. Since this is an off-label use, and thus a therapeutic trial, an appropriate patient education must take place. For the use of anticoagulants and statins, there is no recommendation. Also the hyperbaric oxygen therapy, shock waves and pulsating electromagnetic fields or electrical stimulation cannot be recommended.

[Imaging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in adults]. / Bildgebung der aseptischen Femurkopfnekrose des Erwachsenen.

The aim of diagnostic imaging procedures in avascular femoral head necrosis is to provide the patient with a stage-adapted therapy. Therefore, a differentiated diagnostic work-up is needed. Native radiography of the hip in two planes is still the first step. Over the past years, the diagnosis of femoral head necrosis has experienced tremendous improvement due to the use of MRI and CT scans. Because of these improvements the correct stage can be diagnosed early and the appropriate therapy can be initiated immediately. Today, MRI is the most sensitive diagnostic imaging procedure. CT scans can be particularly useful to exclude subchondral fractures. The use of bone scintigraphy is restricted to exceptional cases. In Europe, the ARCO classification of avascular femoral head necrosis has been widely accepted. It is essential here to define subtypes according to the localisation and the extent of the necrosis, because both have major influence on the prognosis of the disease and therefore also for the therapeutic strategy. In this overview, we describe the specific characteristics of the different diagnostic imaging procedures and illustrate them with appropriate imaging material. At the end of the article an algorithm for diagnostic imaging procedures in avascular femoral head necrosis for daily orthopaedic practice is proposed.

[Cell based therapy for the treatment of femoral head necrosis]. / Zellbasierte Therapie der Femurkopfnekrose.

The goal of the therapy for necrosis of the femoral head in adults is the preservation of the femoral head and, therefore, avoidance of total joint replacement. Core decompression is known to reduce the intraosseous pressure and additionally provides the opportunity to introduce bioactive materials, substances and cells into the core tract. These include vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts, allogenic and synthetic bone substitutes, osteogenic and angiogenic growth factors, as well as different progenitor cells. In particular, the use of cell-based strategies has great therapeutic potential and could play an important role in the treatment of femoral head necrosis in adults in the future. In this article, we summarize the existing clinical experience of current cell-based strategies for the treatment of femoral head necrosis in adults, and present a therapeutic approach using bone marrow stem cells (TRCs: tissue repair cells). in combination with a beta-TCP matrix.

Low-threshold heat response antagonized by capsazepine in chick sensory neurons, which are capsaicin-insensitive.

The heat-transducing receptor VR1 cloned from rat sensory neurons can be activated by both noxious heat and capsaicin. As the response of sensory neurons to capsaicin is species dependent, it is conceivable that the responses to noxious heat and to capsaicin are transduced by distinct receptors across different species. Therefore, we investigated responses to noxious heat from a capsaicin-insensitive (chick) and a capsaicin-sensitive (rat) species. In chick, whole-cell patch-clamp experiments in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons revealed two populations of neurons with different thresholds to noxious heat, activated at approximately 43 degrees C and approximately 53 degrees C. In cobalt uptake experiments, the proportion of neurons showing a heat-induced response increased with increasing heat stimuli. Application of capsaicin (1-10 microM) did not result in inward currents or cobalt uptake. Rat neurons yielded comparable results in heat experiments, but were capsaicin-sensitive. Although chick neurons are insensitive to capsaicin, the competitive capsaicin antagonist capsazepine (1-10 microM) was effective in blocking heat-induced responses, verified by patch-clamp and cobalt uptake methods. The noncompetitive capsaicin antagonist ruthenium red (10 microM) reduced to almost nil the proportion of heat-responsive neurons identified with the cobalt uptake method. These findings suggest that chick DRG neurons express a low-threshold heat-transducing receptor with a pharmacological profile distinct from the low-threshold heat receptor VR1 cloned from rat DRG neurons. The data support the idea that there might be heat receptor subtypes with differences in the capsaicin binding site.