Workplace-based health research training: a qualitative study of perceived needs in a rural setting.

BACKGROUND: The calls for increased numbers of researchers in rural health are growing. To meet this demand, training is needed. If training is to be effective, the value placed on research, the organisational need for research training and key targets for research skill development within a rural health organisation must be understood. METHODS: This qualitative study was underpinned by a critical realist perspective that allowed exploration of the organisational, cultural and structural contexts of research training and of the ability of individuals to act within these contexts. Individual interviews with purposively selected key informants from the organisation's board, executive and facility management (n = 7) and two focus groups with a convenience sample of frontline health workers with interests in research (total n = 11) were held. Data were analysed using NVivo software and thematic analysis. RESULTS: The themes emerging from this study were the fragmentation of research activity, a need for systems that support research and collaboration for expertise. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified an overreliance on individual activity leading to a fragmented approach to research. There is a need for supportive structures, coordination and workplace leadership to overcome a longstanding culture that views research as out of the rural scope of practice. Identifying research training targets, partnering for educational expertise and planning for long-term sustainability are necessary steps toward increasing research activity in the longer term.

The place of research in the rural health workplace structure: a content analysis of a rural health organisation's strategic and operational documents.

INTRODUCTION: Research training is conducted within rural health organisations without a clear understanding of the role of research within the structure of the organisation itself, potentially limiting the effectiveness of that training. This study sought to identify the role of research within the organisational structure of a large rural health organisation in Australia. Specifically, the study sought the answer to the following questions: Is research identified within the strategic documents of the organisation? If so at what level of the organisation is responsibility for research attributed? Is research identified within the position descriptions of staff? If so, at what level of the organisation are staff expected to conduct research? Is there evidence of research activity elsewhere within the organisational structure? METHODS: This qualitative study used a critical realist approach and content analysis to identify and contextualise the terms 'research' and 'evaluation' within publicly available and internal documents from a large rural health organisation in New South Wales, Australia. Secondary thematic analysis identified organisational factors influencing research activity. Data were sourced from strategic, operational and other documents from the 2015 calendar year, with key documents extracted from 1654 external and internal websites, 159 position descriptions and approvals for research projects active in 2015 (n=53). RESULTS: Only a third of research conducted in the organisation was locally instigated or involved local staff as researchers. Matching between positional responsibility for research and research activity was limited. Research was a strategic goal for the organisation; however, this was not well represented in operational documents. A lack of research in operational documents devolves responsibility for research to individuals. Individuals with greater levels of individual agency were more likely to be engaged in research. A low critical mass of local researchers means that collaboration, both internal and external, is essential to strengthen research capacity. CONCLUSION: Health services can create conditions for local health research in a rural environment by addressing structural barriers such as a lack of operational planning for research. Identifying research-active individuals as champions to build internal research collaboration is an important strategy, as is partnering with external organisations for necessary expertise.

Attitudes and beliefs of staff to feedback following the review of adverse events in clinical care.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a pilot project to determine how clinical and non-clinical staff perceive feedback given to them following clinical incident reviews. METHODS: An online survey was devised and sent as a link to staff across the Murrumbidgee Local Health District who would be likely to submit patient-related adverse incidents into the NSW Health Incident Information Management System. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-eight responses were received. Feedback was viewed as constructive and helpful. Medical staff were less enthusiastic about feedback and preferred formal feedback processes. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback from clinical incident reviews closes the loop of the review process and creates a platform for necessary changes to be undertaken.