Assessment of erlotinib in chemoresponse assay.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify the subset of patients sensitive to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition prior to using such treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (H292, H358, and Calu3) and 34 primary human lung tumor specimens were tested for chemoresponse to erlotinib. RESULTS: The assay distinguished responsiveness to erlotinib among NSCLC cell lines and human lung tumor explants. The H292 cells were responsive, the Calu3 cells were intermediate responsive and the H358 cells were non-responsive. These results were consistent with published tumor growth inhibition by erlotinib in xenografts derived from these cell lines. Out of the 34 patient specimens, 3 (8.8%) were responsive to erlotinib, 7 (20.6%) were intermediate responsive and 24 (70.6%) were non-responsive. CONCLUSION: The in vitro chemoresponse assay profile was similar to that noted for human tumors in clinical trials. Chemoresponse testing may help predict patient response to erlotinib and assist chemotherapy decision-making.

A systematic evaluation of multi-gene predictors for the pathological response of breast cancer patients to chemotherapy.

Previous studies have reported conflicting assessments of the ability of cell line-derived multi-gene predictors (MGPs) to forecast patient clinical outcomes in cancer patients, thereby warranting an investigation into their suitability for this task. Here, 42 breast cancer cell lines were evaluated by chemoresponse tests after treatment with either TFAC or FEC, two widely used standard combination chemotherapies for breast cancer. We used two different training cell line sets and two independent prediction methods, superPC and COXEN, to develop cell line-based MGPs, which were then validated in five patient cohorts treated with these chemotherapies. This evaluation yielded high prediction performances by these MGPs, regardless of the training set, chemotherapy, or prediction method. The MGPs were also able to predict patient clinical outcomes for the subgroup of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative patients, which has proven difficult in the past. These results demonstrated a potential of using an in vitro-based chemoresponse data as a model system in creating MGPs for stratifying patients' therapeutic responses. Clinical utility and applications of these MGPs will need to be carefully examined with relevant clinical outcome measurements and constraints in practical use.

Distinct genes related to drug response identified in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines.

Breast cancer patients have different responses to chemotherapeutic treatments. Genes associated with drug response can provide insight to understand the mechanisms of drug resistance, identify promising therapeutic opportunities, and facilitate personalized treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive and ER negative breast cancer have distinct clinical behavior and molecular properties. However, to date, few studies have rigorously assessed drug response genes in them. In this study, our goal was to systematically identify genes associated with multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cancer cell lines. We tested 27 human breast cell lines for response to seven chemotherapeutic agents (cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel). We integrated publicly available gene expression profiles of these cell lines with their in vitro drug response patterns, then applied meta-analysis to identify genes related to multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative cells separately. One hundred eighty-eight genes were identified as related to multidrug response in ER positive and 32 genes in ER negative breast cell lines. Of these, only three genes (DBI, TOP2A, and PMVK) were common to both cell types. TOP2A was positively associated with drug response, and DBI was negatively associated with drug response. Interestingly, PMVK was positively associated with drug response in ER positive cells and negatively in ER negative cells. Functional analysis showed that while cell cycle affects drug response in both ER positive and negative cells, most biological processes that are involved in drug response are distinct. A number of signaling pathways that are uniquely enriched in ER positive cells have complex cross talk with ER signaling, while in ER negative cells, enriched pathways are related to metabolic functions. Taken together, our analysis indicates that distinct mechanisms are involved in multidrug response in ER positive and ER negative breast cells.

Cell line derived multi-gene predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a validation study on US Oncology 02-103 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess the predictive accuracy of a multi-gene predictor of response to docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy on gene expression data from patients who received these drugs as neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS: Tumor samples were obtained from patients with stage II-III breast cancer before starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) followed by four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) on US Oncology clinical trial 02-103. Most patients with HER-2-positive cancer also received trastuzumab (H). The chemotherapy predictor (TFEC-MGP) was developed from publicly available gene expression data of 42 breast cancer cell-lines with corresponding in vitro chemotherapy sensitivity results for the four chemotherapy drugs. No predictor was developed for treatment with trastuzumab. The predictive performance of TFEC-MGP in distinguishing cases with pathologic complete response from those with residual disease was evaluated for the FEC/TX and FEC/TX plus H group separately. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AU-ROC) was used as the metric of predictive performance. Genomic predictions were performed blinded to clinical outcome. RESULTS: The AU-ROC was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.57-0.82) for the FEC/TX group (n=66) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.20-0.66) for the FEC/TX plus H group (n=25). Among the patients treated with FEC/TX, the AU-ROC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.86) for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (n=28) and it was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.36-0.82) for ER-positive cancers (n=37). ER status was not reported for one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the cell line derived 291-probeset genomic predictor of response to FEC/TX combination chemotherapy shows good performance in a blinded validation study, particularly in ER-negative patients.

An in vitro chemoresponse assay defines a subset of colorectal and lung carcinomas responsive to cetuximab.

Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that may provide benefit to select cancer patients; however, identification of the characteristics of those patients who may benefit from its use is not complete. The ChemoFx® drug response marker (DRM) is an in vitro assay that can provide drug response data on tumor specimens before any patient treatment is initiated. We determined the feasibility of using the ChemoFx DRM to test tumor samples for sensitivity to cetuximab. We exposed four non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines (H358, H520, HCC827, and H1666) to cetuximab and determined their sensitivity using the ChemoFx DRM and, in parallel, EGFR status using immunocytochemistry, Western blotting, and In-Cell Western (TM) analysis. We used the ChemoFx DRM to determine cetuximab sensitivity of primary NSCLC and colorectal tumor samples. The ChemoFx DRM distinguished between cetuximab-sensitive and -resistant cell lines. Cetuximab sensitivity was not dependent on EGFR mutational status; H358 cells were non-responsive to cetuximab yet contain wild-type EGFR, whereas H1666 cells were intermediately responsive to cetuximab and contain wild-type EGFR. HCC827 (EGFR-mutant) cells were intermediately responsive and, as expected, H520 cells (EGFR-null) were non-responsive to cetuximab. ChemoFx-determined cetuximab sensitivity of primary NSCLC and colorectal tumor samples was 9.0% and 7.5%, respectively. Use of the ChemoFx DRM is feasible for determining cetuximab sensitivity. The ChemoFx-determined cetuximab responses of primary NSCLC and colorectal tumor specimens were similar to published response rates of patients to treatment with cetuximab monotherapy.

Analysis of chemotherapeutic response heterogeneity and drug clustering based on mechanism of action using an in vitro assay.

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapeutic treatment is a complex scientific task. The ChemoFx Drug Response Marker (DRM) assists physicians in identifying treatment protocols likely to be effective for specific patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ChemoFx DRM was used to study drug response in vitro. Established human cancer cell lines and primary cultures of patient tumor specimens were challenged with chemotherapeutic agents to observe response of multiple tumor samples and determine whether drugs with similar mechanisms of action elicit similar response. RESULTS: These studies demonstrated heterogeneous response among patient tumor samples and clustering of drug response with similar mechanisms of action. Also highlighted was the reproducibility of ChemoFx DRM and its utility in characterizing tumor response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneous drug responses observed in vitro were similar to those observed clinically. Response characteristics were similar for drugs with similar mechanisms of action, suggesting response heterogeneity is determined at a cellular and molecular level.