Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge with Manual Compression and 5F Sheath Compatible Devices for Lower Extremity Arterial Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: For same-day discharge lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) endovascular procedures, femoral manual compression could be an alternative to arterial closure devices. The aim of this study was to assess the security and efficacy of same-day discharge after manual compression in patients treated for LEAD endovascular revascularization with 5F sheath. METHODS: FREEDOM OP was a national multicenter, prospective, single arm study. Patients with symptomatic LEAD (Rutherford 2-5) and eligible for same-day discharge were included. The primary endpoint was the total in-hospital admission rate, which includes overnight surveillance and rehospitalization rate at 1 month. RESULTS: Between September 2017 and August 2019, 114 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 66 ± 10 years and most of them were claudicant (103; 94%). Mainly femoropopliteal lesions were treated (178; 70%) and the technical success was 97%. One hundred forty-two 5F stents and fifty one 5F drug coated balloon were delivered. The mean manual compression duration was 13 ± 4 min. Major access-related complications rate was 4.5%. Total in-hospital admission rate was 11%. Seven patients had overnight surveillance and 5 were rehospitalized (2 for the target lesion). No rehospitalisation was carried out within 24 hr after discharge. No major cardiovascular event, including death, was observed. The patients were significantly improved in term of clinical status (P < 0.0001) and hemodynamic (P < 0.0001) in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSION: FREEDOM OP showed that manual compression is feasible and safe for same-day discharge after LEAD revascularization with 5F sheath femoral approach.

Methods of detection and prevention of preterm labour and the PAMG-1 detection test: a review.

OBJECTIVES: Preterm labour is the leading cause of hospitalization during pregnancy. In France, it results in more than 60,000 births before 37 weeks of gestation every year. Recent studies suggest that detection of placental α-microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) in vaginal secretions among women presenting symptoms of preterm labour with intact membranes has good predictive value for the onset of spontaneous preterm delivery within 7 days. The test is especially interesting, in that the repetition of antenatal corticosteroids for foetal lung maturation is no longer recommended in France and the effect of the initial administration is most beneficial in the 24 h to 7 days afterwards. METHODS: We included all studies listed in PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov with the terms "PAMG-1" and either "preterm labor" or "preterm labour", while excluding all studies on the subject of "rupture of the membranes" from 2000 through 2017. Ten studies were thus included. RESULTS: In women who had both the PAMG-1 and foetal fibronectin test, the PAMG-1 test was statistically superior to the measurement of cervical length for positive predictive value (p<0.0074), negative predictive value (p=0.0169) and specificity (p<0.001) for the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery within 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PAMG-1 may make it possible to target the women at risk with a shortened cervix on ultrasound (<25 mm) those with an imminent preterm delivery and therefore to adapt management, especially the administration of antenatal corticosteroid therapy.

The value of a vaginal sample for detecting PAMG-1 (Partosure®) in women with a threatened preterm delivery (the MAPOSURE Study): protocol for a multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Threatened preterm delivery (TPD) is the leading cause of inpatient admissions during pregnancy. The ability to predict the risk of imminent preterm delivery is thus a major priority in obstetrics. The aim of our study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the test to detect the placental alpha microglobulin 1 (PAMG-1) for the prediction of delivery within 7 days in women with TPD. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter diagnostic study. Inclusion criteria are singleton pregnancy, gestational age between 24 + 0 and 33 + 6 weeks inclusive, cervical measurement 25 mm or less assessed by transvaginal ultrasound (with or without uterine contractions), clinically intact membranes and cervical dilatation < 3 cm assessed by digital examination. According to the current protocol, when a women presents with TPD and the diagnosis is confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound, a vaginal sample to test for genital infection is performed. At the same time, the midwife will perform the PartoSure® test. To perform this analysis, a sample of cervicovaginal secretions is taken with the vaginal swab furnished in the test kit. The primary outcome is the specificity of the PartoSure® test of women who gave birth more than 7 days after their hospitalization for TPD. The secondary outcomes are the sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of the Partosure® test and the factors associated with false positives (with a univariate logistic regression model). Starting with the hypothesis of an anticipated specificity of 89%, if we want to estimate this specificity with a confidence interval of ± 5%, we will require 151 women who do not give birth within 7 days. We therefore decided to include 400 women over a period of two years to have a larger number of events (deliveries within 7 days). DISCUSSION: The different tests already used such as fetal fibronectin and phIGFBP-1, are not sufficiently relevant to recommend their use in daily practice. The different studies of PAMG-1 described above thus provide support for the use of this substance, tested by PartoSure®. Nonetheless, other larger studies are necessary to validate its use in daily practice and our study could answer this question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03401255 (January 15, 2018).

Clinical and economic aspects of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: DEPISTREC study results.

PURPOSE: Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) refers to a group of genetic disorders characterized by greatly compromised cellular and humoral immunity. Children with SCID are asymptomatic at birth, but they die from infections within the first months of life if not treated. Quantification of T-cell receptor excision circles is an extremely sensitive screening method for detecting newborns who may have SCID.The goal of the DEPISTREC study was to evaluate the feasibility of nationwide newborn screening for severe T-cell lymphopenia in France as well as its economic and clinical utility. METHODS: The test universally used for neonatal screening for SCID was the quantification of TRECs on Guthrie cards. We compared a group of 190,517 babies from 48 maternities across the country who underwent newborn SCID screening with a control group of 1.4 million babies out of whom 28 were diagnosed with SCID without such screening during the course of the study. RESULTS: Within the screening group, 62 babies were found to be lymphopenic, including three with SCID. The cost of screening ranged from 4.7€ to €8.15 per newborn. The average 18-month cost was €257,574 vs €204,697 in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale study, we demonstrate that routine SCID screening is feasible and effective. This screening offers the additional benefit of aiding in the diagnosis of non-SCID lymphopenia. Economic evaluation allowed us to calculate the cost per test. Newborn screening may also prevent death by SCID before any curative treatment can be administered. The difference in cost between screened and control children could not be ascertained because of the very low numbers and death of one of the children tested.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Crude Versus Heparin-Bonded PTFE Graft in Below the Knee Bypass Surgery for Critical Limb Ischemia (REPLACE Trial): Design and Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Although autogenous venous grafts are preferable for below-the-knee bypass surgery in patients with critical limb ischemia, some 20% of patients will have no suitable vein for grafting, compelling a resort to artificial graft materials. Retrospective subgroup analyses within published studies comparing heparin-bonded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with crude PFTE graft in below-the-knee bypass suggest that heparin-bonded graft offers superior long-term patency rates, but this has not been prospectively verified in patients with critical limb ischemia. METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled trial in 20 French centers has been designed. Patients assessed as having no suitable autologous vein for bypass grafting for critical lower limb ischemia will be randomized to receive either a heparin-bonded PTFE graft or a crude PTFE graft. A literature review suggested expected 1-year patency rates of 53% for the crude ePTFE arm and 74% for the heparin-bonded PTFE arm. On analyzing 1-year patency rate as a binary variable, for a significance level α = 0.05 and a randomization ratio of 1:1, a total of 176 patients (88 in each arm) will be required to obtain approximately 80% power to reject the null hypothesis. Assuming 10% dropout at 1 year and 20% mortality, 228 patients will be randomized (114 patients in each arm). RESULTS: The primary outcome variable will be patency at 1 year assessed by duplex ultrasound color-flow scan. Any intervention to open up or prevent a graft occlusion before 1 year will be classified as loss of patency. Technical success, deaths, complications, major adverse cardiovascular and limb events, length of hospitalization, and quality of life will also be recorded and analyzed as secondary outcome variables. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses based on standard tariffs in the French health insurance system will be performed. CONCLUSIONS: The REPLACE trial is the first randomized controlled trial designed to determine if heparin-bonded PTFE graft is superior to crude PTFE graft in below-the-knee bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia.

Prevention of Rhesus-D Alloimmunization in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: Economic Analysis of Three Management Strategies.

Anti-D alloimmunization in the first trimester of pregnancy has long been the subject of prevention with anti-D immunoglobulins during events at risk of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Although the efficacy of preventing anti-D alloimmunization by an injection of immunoglobulin at 28 weeks of gestation (WG) is obvious, the literature provides little evidence of the effectiveness before 12+6 WG and several countries have modified their recommendations. In the presumed absence of a difference in alloimmunization risk between early and late prevention, our objective was to evaluate and compare the cost of treatment for 3 alloimmunization prevention strategies in France, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. This was a single-center retrospective study. Our target population included all women who received anti-D immunoglobulins (Rhophylac) in the first trimester of pregnancy before 12+6 WG at Nantes University Hospital in 2018 (N = 356). Within the target population, 2 other populations were constituted based on British (N = 145) and Dutch (N = 142) clinical practice guidelines (CPG). These 3 populations were analyzed for the comparative cost of treatment for prevention from a health system perspective. The average cost of Rhophylac alloimmunization prevention for 1 episode was €117.8 from a health system perspective. The total cost attributed to prevention in 2018 at Nantes University Hospital (N = 356) was €41,931.4 according to this perspective. If the UK CPG or Dutch CPG had been applied to the Nantes target population, a saving of around 60% would have been achieved. At the national level, the cost according to the health system perspective specifically attributable to induced abortion (N estimated = 26,916) could represent a total cost of €3,170,704. This study highlighted the high cost of the French prevention strategy in the first trimester of pregnancy compared with British or Dutch strategies. The modification of our practices would allow substantial financial savings to the French health system but would also avoid the nonrecommended exposure to a blood product at this term, would allow a faster medical management and a relief of the care system.

Evaluation of digital medical devices: How to take into account the specificities of these solutions?

The beginning of the 21st century has seen an increasing number of digital medical devices (DMDs) arrive on the European market, bringing major benefits and changes for society. DMDs are unique in that they bring intelligence to the organisation of care, and generate and collect a wealth of real-life data with ultra-fast life cycles. They have specific requirements, particularly in terms of data security and interoperability. In France and Europe, the construction of evidence, the assessment process and evaluation methodologies with a view to purchase or reimbursement must adjust to these changes, given the specific features of these technologies. This digital leap has opened up new perspectives for healthcare, along with economic, ethical and regulatory issues. The challenge is to assess the clinical and organisational impact, reliability, safety, interoperability, efficiency and budgetary impact of DMDs in line with the requirements of new standards, guidelines and regulations. This should result in a coherent, pragmatic and proportionate evaluation, so that public decision-makers and buyers can take advantage of the potential opportunities that these digital devices offer to improve healthcare delivery. Thus, a fair and informed evaluation of DMDs would emerge, providing a solid basis to steer their inclusion into contemporary medical practices. This fundamental issue of evaluation, linked to the digital nature of these MDs, is what the round table, comprising experts from academia and/or hospitals, institutions and industry, sought to resolve. Discussions led to proposals on how DMDs should be evaluated, bearing in mind their complexity. The round table set out to identify the bottlenecks in the entire evaluation process, from the CE marking phase, compliance with French safety and interoperability requirements, through to national or local evaluation, in order to inform a purchasing policy and draw up proposals covering the entire spectrum. Ten concrete recommendations were put forward by the round table, aimed at improving the evaluation process by making it clearer and more adaptable, thus offering greater flexibility in the evaluation and decision-making stages. This well-thought-out approach is designed to facilitate a comprehensive and flexible evaluation of DMDs given the constantly evolving technological context.

[Innovation funding schemes and the structuring of health economic evaluation in France]. / Les dispositifs de soutien à l'innovation et la structuration de l'évaluation médico-économique en France.

Diffusion and reimbursement of healthcare strategies, drugs or medical devices are based on decisions made by public authorities and health authorities. In a situation of restricted resources and strict budget restrictions, decisions on innovative and costly health products must take into account not only efficacy and safety data, but also efficiency data. In France, generate health economics data to inform on efficiency can be obtain by different processes, resulting in an opportunity to develop, structure and finance health economic evaluation. However, the diversity of sources of funding and the specific requirements of each process make them difficult to understand. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of these sources, while highlighting their advantages and limitations. It also points the need to facilitate interaction between manufacturers, public authorities and the health economic evaluation organisations of health care institutions. The issue is to be able to mobilize the most appropriate system to produce relevant data at the most appropriate time.

Cost effectiveness and long-term outcomes of dexamethasone administration in major non-cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Postoperative administration of dexamethasone has been proposed to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. In this ancillary study of the PACMAN trial, we aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of dexamethasone in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients included in the multicentric randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled PACMAN trial were followed up for 12 months after their surgical procedure. Patients were randomized to receive either dexamethasone (0.2 mg/kg immediately after the surgical procedure, and on day 1) or placebo. Cost effectiveness between the dexamethasone and placebo groups was assessed for the 12-month postoperative period from a health payer perspective. RESULTS: Of 1222 randomized patients in PACMAN, 137 patients (11%) were followed up until 12 months after major surgery (71 in the DXM group and 66 in the placebo group). Postoperative dexamethasone administration reduced costs per patient at 1 year by €358.06 (95%CI -€1519.99 to €803.87). The probability of dexamethasone being cost effective was between 12% and 22% for a willingness to pay of €100,000 to €150,000 per life-year, which is the threshold that is usually used in France and was 52% for willingness to pay of €50,000 per life-year (threshold in USA). At 12 months, 9 patients (13.2%) in the DXM group and 10 patients (16.1%) in the placebo group had died. In conclusion, our study does not demonstrate the cost effectiveness of perioperative administration of DXM in major non-cardiac surgery.

Analysis of cost-effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents and new therapies for the management of unresectable and metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapies has revolutionized metastatic melanoma (MM) management but their use is associated with high daily costs compared to chemotherapies: €2 for dacarbazine versus €175 for immunotherapies and €413 for targeted therapies. While overall survival (OS) has increased, healthcare expenditures are expected to double by 2030. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate the median OS and costs for MM patients in order to evaluate the effectiveness of new biological or targeted therapies (NT) used since 2013 compared to chemotherapies. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric cost-effectiveness analysis performed in CHU Nantes (Nantes University Hospital). All MM patients treated with conventional chemotherapy as first-line treatment between 2008 and 2012 were included (CHEMO group). The same number of patients treated with NT as first-line between 2013 and 2017 were included (NT group). RESULTS: In total, 161 patients were included in each group. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.7±2.4 years in the CHEMO group and 65.3±2.4 years in the NT group (not significant). The men/women ratio was 1.48 and 1.27, respectively, (not significant). The median OS was 158 days in the CHEMO group and 395 days in the NT group (p<0.001). Treatment cost was €10,280/patient versus €94,676/patient, respectively. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €90,184/LY (95% CI: €59,637; €166,395). CONCLUSION: Our study assessed clinical and economic features associated with MM management before and after the advent of NT. Costs and life expectancy have increased. NT appears to be cost-effective.

Management of external cephalic version in France: A national practice survey.

INTRODUCTION: The breech presentation represents 4,7% of deliveries at term. There is a method of external cephalic version (ECV) performed from 36 weeks of gestation. French guidelines for the clinical practice of ECV were published in 2020. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the national practices of ECV in French maternity units, especially on the use of tocolysis, 1 year after publication of the French clinical recommendations guidelines by the French national college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF). METHODS: Data self-reported for this national descriptive study were collected from March to May 2021 by an online questionnaire distributed to all French maternities. The 25 items of the questionnaire collected information of maternity units, the general practice of ECV, use or not of tocolysis for ECV attempt and the relevance of a prospective study. RESULTS: Of the 517 French maternity units, 150 (29%) responded to the online survey.  95,3% systematically performed ECV. A Kleihauer test was routinely performed in 71 units (49.7%). A tocolysis was associated with ECV attempt in 52.4% of cases. The drugs used were intravenous atosiban (30,7%), mainly in levels 2b and 3 maternity units, intravenous salbutamol (24%), other mode of administration of salbutamol (14,7%) and oral nifedipine (22,6%) mainly in levels 1 and 2a maternity units. Adverse effects were described in 20%, mainly with the use of salbutamol (73,3%). CONCLUSIONS: 52.4% of the French maternity units surveyed used tocolysis for the ECV attempt, although it is systematically recommended. The choice of tocolytic drug differed according to the maternity units.

Potential Impact of Rapid Multiplex PCR on Antimicrobial Therapy Guidance for Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients, A Prospective Observational Clinical and Economic Study.

Objectives: To investigate the potential impact of the syndromic multiplex FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (FAPP) on the antimicrobial treatment guidance of patients with ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (VHAP). Methods: Respiratory fluids from 100 adult patients with VHAP, receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in three intensive care units from one French university hospital, were tested prospectively using FAPP. Conventional cultures were performed in parallel as routine practice. Clinicians were left blinded to the FAPP results. Antimicrobial therapies based on FAPP results were simulated by independent blinded experts according to a predefined algorithm and compared to 1) those prescribed in practice according to local guidelines (real-life), and 2) those that complied with the international ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT recommendations. The primary endpoint was the number of days of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy. Secondary endpoints were the rates of microbiological treatment failure and cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The predicted median duration of broad-spectrum antibiotics was 0 [0-1.25] day in the FAPP-based simulation, versus 2 [0-6] days in real-life (p<0.0001) and 2 [2-3.25] days in the recommendations-based simulation (p<0.0001). Treatment failure was predicted in 3% of cases with FAPP results versus observed in 11% in real-life (p=0.08) and 6% with recommendations-based simulation (p=0.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 1 121 € [-7021; 6794] to avoid one day of non-optimized antimicrobial therapy. Conclusions: Our results suggest that using FAPP in patients with VHAP has the potential to reduce the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy without increasing the risk of microbial treatment failure.

Feasibility of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Active Fully Embodied Virtual Reality for Visual Height Intolerance: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) are individually increasingly used in psychiatric research. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Our study aimed to investigate the feasibility of combining tDCS and wireless 360° full immersive active and embodied VRET to reduce height-induced anxiety. METHODS: We carried out a pilot randomized, double-blind, controlled study associating VRET (two 20 min sessions with a 48 h interval, during which, participants had to cross a plank at rising heights in a building in construction) with online tDCS (targeting the ventromedial prefrontal cortex) in 28 participants. The primary outcomes were the sense of presence level and the tolerability. The secondary outcomes were the anxiety level (Subjective Unit of Discomfort) and the salivary cortisol concentration. RESULTS: We confirmed the feasibility of the association between tDCS and fully embodied VRET associated with a good sense of presence without noticeable adverse effects. In both groups, a significant reduction in the fear of height was observed after two sessions, with only a small effect size of add-on tDCS (0.1) according to the SUD. The variations of cortisol concentration differed in the tDCS and sham groups. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the feasibility of the association between wireless online tDCS and active, fully embodied VRET. The optimal tDCS paradigm remains to be determined in this context to increase effect size and then adequately power future clinical studies assessing synergies between both techniques.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Polymer Versus Suture-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Arterial Closure Following Lower-Limb Arterial Endovascular Revascularization.

PURPOSES: The primary objective of this study (STEP trial) was to compare the efficacy of the polymer-based FemoSeal® vascular closure device (VCD) and the suture-based ProGlide® VCD in achieving hemostasis at the femoral access site after lower-limb arterial endovascular revascularization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: STEP was a multicenter randomized clinical trial including patients undergoing lower-limb arterial endovascular revascularization. The primary endpoint was technical success 5 h after the VCD intervention, defined as achievement of hemostasis without the need for a follow-up intervention at the access site and without a 2-g/dL drop in hemoglobin. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and April 2019, 113 patients were assigned to the FemoSeal® group (FS) and 117 to the ProGlide® group (PG). VCD interventions were technically successful for 90 FS patients (80%) and 58 PG patients (50%) (odds ratio, 3.98; 95% CI, 2.22 to 7.14; p < 0.0001). This difference in success rates between FS and PG is partly explained by more frequent recourse to manual compression (FS: n = 19; PG: n = 45) and an additional VCD (FS: n = 0; PG: n = 23) in the latter group. After 5 h, 87% of FS patients and 69% of PG patients resumed ambulation (odds ratio: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.93 to 6.15; p = 0.0016). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing lower-limb arterial endovascular revascularization, FemoSeal® was superior to ProGlide® in terms of technical success. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Step trial was registered on http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03192033).

The effectiveness of the BuzzyⓇ device to reduce or prevent pain in children undergoing needle-related procedures: The results from a prospective, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Pain from needle-related procedures in children can alter pain perception, increase pain sensitivity, and generate inappropriate pain responses. Currently pain management includes the use of lidocaine-containing patches, which is complicated to manage in a busy medical setting such as a vaccination centre. We assessed the BuzzyⓇ device, which combines vibration and cold, to manage pain in children undergoing a needle-related procedure, compared to the standard lidocaine patch. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The vaccination centres of three university hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: French speaking children aged 4-15 requiring a needle-related procedure (vaccination or venepuncture) were eligible. Principal exclusion criteria were allergy or sensitivity to the lidocaine patch. METHODS: Children were randomly allocated (1:1) to use either the BuzzyⓇ device or the lidocaine patch during the needle-related procedure. The lidocaine patch was applied to the puncture site for the hour prior to the intervention. The BuzzyⓇ device was applied to the puncture site for 30 s and then moved 5 cm along the limb during the procedure. The refrigerated wings were detached if they bothered the child. The child assessed their pain using the validated Revised Faces Pain Scale. The revised faces pain scale comprised six facial expressions from 0, normal "no pain" to 10, a screaming face "severe pain" (2 points/face). The primary endpoint was the average pain score recorded by the child. The study aimed to test the non-inferiority of BuzzyⓇ. RESULTS: Overall 219 participants were randomised. The primary outcome was assessed in 215 children: 108 in the BUZZY group (43% asked for the refrigerated wings were de to be detatched before the end of the procedure) and 107 in the PATCH group. The baseline characteristics were similar between the study groups with an average age of 9 (range: 4.08-15.81). The average needle-related pain was 2.04 in the BUZZY group and 1.42 in the PATCH group. The average difference between the children's assessments in the groups was 0.62, thus faling to demonstrate non-inferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Our study failed to show that the BuzzyⓇ device was not inferior to the lidocaine patch in managing pain in children undergoing needle-related procedures. Tweetable abstract: Pain management in children undergoing a needle-related procedure vaccination: which efficacy for BuzzyⓇ device as an alternative to lidocaine patch? A prospective, randomised study.

Hospital care pathway of women treated for Bartholin's gland abscess and budget impact analysis of outpatient management: A national hospital database analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Bartholin's gland abscesses cause severe pain and are a source of frequent emergency room visits. The most widespread treatment in France is incision-drainage during hospitalisation. A Word catheter, whose efficiency and safety would be identical, could be used without the need for hospitalisation, thus reducing the costs of Bartholin's gland abscess management. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: French hospital (PMSI) database 2016-2017. POPULATION: 3539 women with Bartholin's gland abscess. METHOD: From the PMSI database, we identified the population that was treated for incision-drainage of a Bartholin's gland abscess in 2016. We also looked for secondary hospitalisations occurring within 12 months of initial treatment of Bartholin's gland abscess using 2016 and 2017 PMSI database data. MAIN OUTCOME(S): The identified population was described in terms of age, hospitalisation, length of stay and readmissions within 12 months and provided a 5-year budget impact analysis of the use of the Word catheter in France from a National Health Insurance perspective. RESULTS: In 2016, 3539 women (36 +/- 11.8 years) were hospitalised for 3646 incisions of the major vestibular gland linked to a Bartholin's gland abscess. 11.38 % (403/3,539) underwent at least one new Bartholin's gland procedure during the following year. The use of the Word catheter would allow potential savings over 5 years of €7.4 million. CONCLUSION: The use of the Word catheter could be cost-saving. These results must be validated by a clinical research step evaluating efficiency in the French context, comparing the Word catheter and incision-drainage side-by-side.

Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a debilitating and costly disease for our society, especially in the case of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective adjuvant therapy in treatment-resistant unipolar and non-psychotic depression. It can be applied according to two therapeutic strategies after an initial rTMS cure: a further rTMS cure can be performed at the first sign of relapse or recurrence, or systematic maintenance rTMS (M-rTMS) can be proposed. TMS adjuvant to treatment as usual (TAU) could improve long-term prognosis. However, no controlled study has yet compared the cost-effectiveness of these two additional rTMS therapeutic strategies versus TAU alone. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper focuses on the design of a health-economic, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study with three parallel arms carried out in France. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of the adjunctive and maintenance low frequency rTMS on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex versus TAU alone. A total of 318 patients suffering from a current TRD will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is to investigate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ratio costs / quality-adjusted life-years [QALY] measured by the Euroqol Five Dimension Questionnaire) over 12 months in a population of patients assigned to one of three arms: systematic M-rTMS for responders (arm A); additional new rTMS cure in case of mood deterioration among responders (arm B); and a placebo arm (arm C) in which responders are allocated in two subgroups: sham systematic M-rTMS and supplementary rTMS course in case of mood deterioration. ICER and QALYs will be compared between arm A or B versus arm C. The secondary endpoints in each three arms will be: ICER at 24 months; the cost-utility ratio analysis at 12 and 24 months; 5-year budget impact analysis; and prognosis factors of rTMS. The following criteria will be compared between arm A or B and arm C: rates of responders; remission and disease-free survival; clinical evolution; tolerance; observance; treatment modifications; hospitalization; suicide attempts; work stoppage; marital / professional statues; and quality of life at 12 and 24 months. DISCUSSION: The purpose of our study is to check the cost-effectiveness of rTMS and we will discuss its economic impact over time. In the case of significant decrease in the depression costs and expenditures associated with a good long-term prognosis (sustained response and remission) and tolerance, rTMS could be considered as an efficient treatment within the armamentarium for resistant unipolar depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03701724. Registered on 10 October 2018. Protocol Amendment Version 2.0 accepted on 29 June 2019.

Comparison of two techniques used in routine care for the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema, subconjunctival triamcinolone injection and intravitreal dexamethasone implant: medical and economic importance of this randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether they are injected peri- or intraocularly, corticosteroids are still essential tools in the therapeutic arsenal for treating inflammatory macular oedema. A few years ago, however, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. While this compound was initially developed for rheumatological or dermatological use, it has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, despite still being off-label. In 2011, the system for delivery of dexamethasone from a biodegradable, injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained approval for use in inflammatory macular oedema. While the efficacy and safety of triamcinolone in macular oedema, including inflammatory oedema, have already been studied, there are currently no publications on subconjunctival triamcinolone injections, which are simple, effective and well tolerated. To date, the dexamethasone 700 µg implant has been authorized for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, but there have been no studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different peri- and intraocular strategies, including the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. METHODS: This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intraocular corticosteroid injections in the treatment of inflammatory macular oedema. In this ongoing study, 142 patients will be included, and the oedematous eye will be randomised to treatment with either subconjunctival triamcinolone injection or an intravitreal implant containing 700 µg dexamethasone. Follow-up is planned for 6 months with monthly visits. Each visit will include visual acuity measurement, a slit lamp examination, fundoscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, laser flare measurement (if available) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have a real impact on public health if it is shown that a Kenacort retard® (i.e. triamcinolone) injection costing just €2.84 and performed in the physician's office (with no additional overhead costs) is at least as effective as the dexamethasone 700 µg implant (Ozurdex®; costing approximately €960 with the injection performed in a dedicated room), with no increased side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02556424. Registered on 22 September 2015.

FASCE, the benefit of spironolactone for treating acne in women: study protocol for a randomized double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris has increased in women over the past 10 years; it currently affects 20-30% of women. The physiopathology of adult female acne is distinguished from that of teenagers essentially by two factors: hormonal and inflammatory. On a therapeutic plan, the four types of systemic treatment approved for female acne include cyclines (leading to bacterial resistance); zinc salts (less effective than cyclines); and antiandrogens (risks of phlebitis). The last alternative is represented by isotretinoin, but its use in women of childbearing potential is discouraged because of the teratogen risks. In this context, spironolactone could represent an interesting alternative. It blocks the 5-alpha-reductase receptors at the sebaceous gland and inhibits luteinizing hormone (LH) production at the pituitary level. It has no isotretinoin constraints and does not lead to bacterial resistance. Currently, very few studies have been performed in a limited number of patients: the studies showed that at low doses (lower than 200 mg/day), spironolactone can be effective against acne. In that context, it is clearly of interest to perform the first double-blind randomized study of spironolactone versus cyclines, which remains the moderate acne reference treatment, and to demonstrate the superiority of spironolactone's efficacy in order to establish it as an alternative to cyclines. METHODS: Two hundred female patients will be included. They must have acne vulgaris with at least 10 inflammatory lesions and no more than 3 nodules. After randomization, the patients will be treated by spironolactone or doxycycline for 3 months and after placebo. The study will be blind for the first 6 months and open for the last 6 months. DISCUSSION: The treatment frequently used in female acne is systemic antibiotics with many courses, as it is a chronic inflammatory disease. In the context of the recent World Health Organisation (WHO) revelation about the serious, worldwide threat to public health of antibiotic resistance, this trial could give the physician another alternative in the treatment of adult female acne instead of using isotretinoin, which is more complex to manage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03334682. Registered on 7 November 2017.