RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of mortality after bariatric surgery. We evaluated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter use for PE risk reduction in high-risk super morbidly obese bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: IVC filters were inserted according to the patient's risk factors, including immobility, previous deep venous thrombosis (DVT)/PE, venous stasis, and pulmonary compromise. All filters were placed concomitant to bariatric surgery and were placed through a right internal jugular vein access site. We analyzed the prospectively collected data from this cohort and evaluated the incidence of PE and complications. RESULTS: Since April 2003, 41 patients (12 men and 29 women) with a mean age of 47.3 +/- 10.0 years and body mass index of 64.2 +/- 12 kg/m2 (range 47-105) underwent IVC filter placement. These and all other patients underwent standard DVT/PE risk reduction measures. All IVC filter patients had one or more significant risk factors for thromboembolic events. No instances of PE were documented, although 1 patient experienced DVT, and no immediate or late complications related to filter placement occurred. One patient, with a body mass index of 105 kg/m2, died secondary to rhabdomyolysis after an extended procedure. The average filter placement time was 34.3 +/- 9 minutes. CONCLUSION: IVC filter placement for PE risk reduction is safe and feasible in the super morbidly obese. Our data have shown that the filters can be placed expeditiously and with minimal morbidity concomitant with bariatric surgery. In this limited series, IVC filter placement was associated with no PE. Additional studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of IVC filter placement for PE risk reduction and related mortality in the super morbidly obese.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Filtros de Veia Cava , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Prevenção Primária , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Veia Cava InferiorRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project is to evaluate factors that residents consider when choosing a career in surgery or a surgical subspecialty. Once these factors are identified, surgical residency programs may use the information in their recruiting efforts to attract the most qualified applicants for postgraduate surgical training. DESIGN: A descriptive survey consisting of 20 questions was conducted. Surgical residents were surveyed about student loan debt, career decisions and influencing factors, and demographic data. SETTING: A 2-page, Institutional Review Board-approved, survey was mailed to program directors of 40 general surgery residency programs. Included in the packet were copies of the survey, a letter to the program director, and a self-addressed prestamped envelope for return of the completed survey. The program directors were asked to have their residents complete the survey during a normally scheduled meeting and to collect and return the surveys. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents in residency programs randomly chosen throughout the country were surveyed. These residents included all postgraduate levels of training. RESULTS: Among 6 choices for entering a surgical residency, a strong desire to become a surgeon was the response chosen most often by residents. Over 50% of those surveyed indicated that they planned to pursue subspecialty training. Family ties was the most quoted influencing factor for choosing a geographical location for practice. Amount of student loan debt correlated with the perception of medical school being a financially wise decision, yet had little influence on the decision to subspecialize. CONCLUSIONS: A strong desire and passion for surgery was the predominant reason for choosing a career in surgery in this survey. Only 15% of general surgery residents surveyed intend to join the workforce as general surgeons. With the rising average age of the general population, this implies a significant shortage of general surgeons in the near future.
Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Cirurgia Geral , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Geral/economia , Humanos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estilo de Vida , Salários e Benefícios/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio ao Desenvolvimento de Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The use of intermittent pneumatic compression boots to reduce the risk of deep venous thrombosis is contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) due to a theoretical increase in venous return to the heart and exacerbation of heart failure. This study evaluates intermittent pneumatic compression effects on pulmonary artery catheter parameters in CHF patients. We conducted a prospective within-patient study of CHF patients monitored by pulmonary artery catheterization. Hemodynamic variables were assessed with and without the use of intermittent pneumatic compression boots. A sample size of 18 patients was calculated a priori to obtain an 80 per cent power to detect a mean difference of 10 per cent. Twenty patients were studied; no patient suffered hemodynamic instability during the application of pneumatic compression; no statistically significant change in any hemodynamic parameters was noted. A trend toward decreasing mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.057), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (P = 0.065), and systemic vascular resistance (P = 0.08) was observed. None were clinically significant. The application of intermittent pneumatic compression to the feet of patients in CHF does not significantly alter central hemodynamic parameters in CHF patients. This study suggests that intermittent pneumatic compression may be used in CHF patients for venous thromboembolic risk reduction.
Assuntos
Bandagens , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Trombose Venosa/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia followed by an antireflux procedure is currently the gold standard therapy for gastroesophgeal reflux disease. However, it is recognized that recurrent hiatal herniation and wrap migration are major sources of operative failures in these patients. Some have described a reduction of such events with the placement of nonbiodegradable prosthetic patches over the primary cruroplasty. This prosthetic material may be associated with transesophageal and gastric erosions and a higher rate of postoperative dysphagia and chest pain when compared with simple suture cruroplasty alone. The aim of this study is to compare hiatal closure with a biodegradable patch (acellular dermal matrix) and simple suture curaplasty in patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery. METHODS: A total of 44 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing large hiatal hernia repair (>5 cm) and fundoplication with primary suture cruroplasty only (group 1) were compared with 22 consecutive patients undergoing the same procedure with suture cruroplasty reinforced with an onlay acellular dermal matrix patch (group 2). The 2 groups were compared with regards to demographics, size of the hiatal hernia, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, pH studies, operative times, and hiatal hernia recurrence. RESULTS: Patients in both groups were well matched by age, weight, height, and size of hiatal hernia. There were similar preoperative values in esophageal manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and symptom scoring in both groups. Average operative time was 108 minutes in group 1 and 121 minutes in group 2. There were no major complications in either group. The median period of hospitalization was 1 day in both groups. Postoperative pH studies and symptoms score data were significantly improved in both groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative symptoms scores for dysphagia between the 2 groups. Two patients (one in each group) underwent esophageal dilatation for mild dysphagia postoperatively. In group 1, 2 patients (9%) had Nissen failure with hiatal hernia recurrences 6 months after surgery. There were no recurrences for the follow-up period in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our early results suggest that hiatal hernia repair reinforced with an acellular dermal matrix patch may reduce the incidence of recurrent herniation and wrap migration. In addition, the increase in postoperative dysphagia, chest pain, and esophageal erosions associated with nondegradable mesh has not been observed in those with an acellular dermal matrix patch to this point in our follow up. However, future investigation of the material for this particular application as well as longer follow-up is necessary.