Dupilumab Versus Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: Indirect Comparison Using the Eczema Area and Severity Index.

Dupilumab is approved for uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD); cyclosporine is approved for severe AD for ≤ 1 year. The efficacy/effectiveness of these treat-ments was compared indirectly. Regression models used pooled patient-level data to estimate response (Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) EASI-50/EASI-75 at weeks 12-16 and 24-30) to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (CHRONOS [NCT02260986]) or cyclosporine (University Medical Center). Models were adjusted for sex, baseline EASI, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine level. A total of 106 patients received dupilumab (+ topical cortico-steroids; + TCS), and 57 received cyclosporine (+ TCS). Among University Medical Center patients, estimated EASI-50 responders were, dupilumab vs. cyclosporine, 91% vs. 77% (p = 0.038; weeks 12-16), and 96% vs. 67% (p < 0.0001; weeks 24-30); EASI-75 responders were 78% vs. 56% (p = 0.016; weeks 12-16) and 80% vs. 47% (p <0.001; weeks 24-30). Among CHRONOS patients, estimated EASI-50 responders were 90% vs. 74% (p <0.038; weeks 12-16) and 92% vs. 53% (p < 0.0001; weeks 24-30); EASI-75 responders were 75% vs. 52% (p = 0.016; weeks 12-16) and 74% vs. 40% (p <0.001; weeks 24-30), respectively. These results suggest a higher relative efficacy of dupilumab vs. cyclosporine.

Evaluation of standard treatments for managing adult Japanese patients with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Two-year data from the ADDRESS-J disease registry.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease with a high disease burden, is one of the most common dermatological conditions in Japan. Herein, we report the disease profiles and current AD treatment during 2-year management of Japanese adults with moderate-to-severe AD. ADDRESS-J was a prospective, longitudinal, observational study that evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety of current AD treatments of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD (Investigator's Global Assessment score 3 or 4) in Japan. The maximum follow-up period was 2 years. Among 300 patients enrolled, 288 had ≥1 post-baseline evaluation and were analyzed (mean age, 35.5 years; 60.1% male). Almost all patients (99.7%) received topical therapy; the most commonly used therapy was topical corticosteroids of the second-highest potency (86.5%) (e.g., 0.1% mometasone furoate) followed by medium-potency topical corticosteroids (50.3%) (e.g., 0.05% clobetasol butyrate). At month 12 of the study, 10.4% of patients had Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1, similarly at month 24 (10.8%). A total of 132 patients (45.8%) had ≥1 AD flare-up during the observation period, with the majority of first flares occurring within the first year of the study. Various physician- and patient-reported outcomes improved considerably during the first 3 months of the study, with only minor changes after this time. In this cohort, 16.7% of patients had skin infections requiring treatment; 7.3% had adverse events (AE) potentially related to treatment; 1.7% had serious AE; and 1.0% had treatment discontinuations due to AE. Limitations include missing data at later timepoints and the inclusion criteria limiting generalizability. In summary, this analysis of the ADDRESS-J study showed that some patients with moderate or severe AD respond to conventional therapies, while others do not. For those with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD, the newly emerged systemic agents, such as biologics, may provide a potential strategy for long-term disease management.

Disease burden and treatment history among adults with atopic dermatitis receiving systemic therapy: baseline characteristics of participants on the EUROSTAD prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Insights into the real-world treatment paradigm and long-term burden of atopic dermatitis (AD) are needed to inform clinical and health policy decisions. METHODS: The prospective, observational EUROSTAD study enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe AD starting or switching systemic therapy (51 sites in 10 European countries). We report the baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of these patients using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A 12-month enrollment period of EUROSTAD was completed and 308 patients were enrolled: average age 37 years, AD duration 25 years, 43% were female. Most patients reported use of systemic therapy (93%) and ≥1 atopic comorbidity (82%). Mean [standard deviation] disease severity/burden measures were high: Investigator's Global Assessment (3.1 [0.8]), Eczema Area and Severity Index (16.2 [10.9]), Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (5.5 [2.5]), sleep impairment Visual Analog Scale (49.8 [31.6]) scores, and time lost from work (4.1 [13.7] days/year) or usual activities (16.8 [38.7] days/year). Most patients showed borderline or clinical levels of anxiety (59%) and/or depression (63%) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with moderate-to-severe AD starting/switching systemic treatment enrolled in EUROSTAD have a high burden of longstanding disease despite continuous use of topical drugs, emollients, and systemic therapies.

Protocol for a prospective, observational, longitudinal study in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (PEDISTAD): study objectives, design and methodology.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease often associated with atopic comorbidities and has significant impact on children and their families. There is a lack of robust and longitudinal long-term data on disease characteristics and typical clinical practice with currently available treatments in children with moderate-to-severe AD. Hence, an observational study is needed to evaluate AD characteristics and progression in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pediatric Study in Atopic Dermatitis (PEDISTAD) is a prospective, observational, longitudinal study in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD who are currently receiving systemic or topical treatment and whose disease is not adequately controlled by topical prescription therapies or for whom those therapies are not medically advisable. 1300 children at 100-150 sites in approximately 20 countries worldwide will be enrolled and followed for 5 years. AD therapy is at the discretion of the investigator. Data collected will include: AD disease characteristics and comorbidities; current therapy for AD and initiation of new treatments/changes in current treatment; patient-reported/caregiver-reported outcomes; days missed from school/work for the patient/caregiver; healthcare professional visits; safety and biomarkers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is conducted in accordance with the principles established by the 18th World Medical Assembly and all subsequent amendments and the guidelines for Good Epidemiology Practice. Each individual country assures that ethics approval has been received and local regulatory requirements are met. Ethics approval has been obtained in all countries currently participating in PEDISTAD. Study data will be disseminated in manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed medical journals as well as in abstracts submitted to congresses and in the resulting posters and presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03687359; pre-results.

Atopic dermatitis disease registry in Japanese adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (ADDRESS-J): Baseline characteristics, treatment history and disease burden.

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a high disease burden and a significant effect on quality of life. Observational studies are necessary to determine the patient disease burden and long-term disease control in the Japanese population. ADDRESS-J is a non-interventional, observational registry of adult Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD. Herein, we report baseline data from the ADDRESS-J study describing disease characteristics and current treatment practices. At baseline, 300 adult AD patients with Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores (range, 0-4) of 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) whose treatments for AD were intensified, were assessed for clinical and patient-reported outcomes and current AD treatments. The registry patients' median age was 34.0 years; 60.7% were male and 71.7% had had AD for more than 20 years. At baseline, 220 study patients had an IGA score of 3 and 80 had an IGA score of 4. The median Eczema Area and Severity Index score was 21.7 (range, 0-72), the median body surface area involvement was 46.25%, and the median pruritus numerical rating scale score was 7.0 (range, 0-10); for each of these measures, higher scores represent greater severity. Most registry patients (86.7%) had recently used topical corticosteroids or topical calcineurin inhibitors as treatment for AD. This registry cohort represents a population of Japanese patients with moderate to severe AD and provides an important resource for characterizing the disease burden and evaluating the safety and effectiveness of various AD treatments.