Endosonographic evaluation of the mediastinum through the i-gel O2 supraglottic airway device.

INTRODUCTION: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is an endoscopic diagnostic procedure combining flexible fibrobronchoscopy with ultrasound techniques; it allows transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal masses. We present our preliminary experience with the use of the i-gel O2 supraglottic airway device for management of EBUS procedures. METHODS: An observational study on 39 patients who underwent EBUS under general anesthesia was performed. Airways were managed with i-gel O2 by anesthesiologists unfamiliar with it. Data collected included patient characteristics, i-gel O2 positioning, mechanical ventilation, procedure, and complications occurring during and after the EBUS. RESULTS: The i-gel airway was successfully positioned during the first attempt in 34/39 cases (87.2%). No failed positioning was recorded. The EBUS scope easily passed through the i-gel in all patients and in 14 (35.6%) cases it was also inserted through the esophagus allowing the examination or fine needle aspiration of paraesophageal lymph nodes. In one case, during the EBUS procedure, the i-gel was dislocated but easily put in place again. During EBUS, air leakages were significant in 2 cases (5.1%) and minimal in 14 cases (35.9%). A brief self-solved laryngospasm and a bronchospasm during bronchoscopy were recorded. After recovery, no patients had dysphagia; mild odynophagia and pharyngodinia were referred by 2 (5.1%) and 12 (30.1%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The i-gel O2 airway is easy to position and manage even for anesthesiologists unfamiliar with it. This supraglottic airway device is suitable for a complete endosonographic evaluation of the mediastinum.

Feasibility of peritonectomy associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion in patients with Pseudomyxoma peritonei.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease characterized by a complete redistribution of mucin within the peritoneal cavity. It can be classified into three histologic groups: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis, and an intermediate group. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery requiring peritonectomy procedures associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, a technique that combines hyperthermia and high drug doses administered locally. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (19 males and 8 females) were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial. Twenty-two cases underwent cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, and 6 received debulking surgery only. One patient was operated on twice for disease recurrence. All patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis presented serous ascites, whereas all but one patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis or in the intermediate group presented mucinous ascites. Cytoreductive surgery was performed with peritonectomy procedures. The closed abdomen technique was adopted for intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion using a preheated polysaline perfusate containing cisplatin (25 mg/m2/L) plus mitomycin-C (3.3 mg/m2/L) through a heart-lung pump at a mean flow of 600 mL/min for 60 mins from the hyperthermic phase (42.5 degrees C). RESULTS: All but one of the patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 2 of the 3 patients in the intermediate group were optimally cytoreduced. Patients with serous ascites (all patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis and 1 patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis) were considered ineligible for treatment because of tumor diffusion. The morbidity rate was 22%. There was one case of treatment-related mortality 30 days after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The following conclusions can be drawn from this phase II clinical trial: 1) patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from undifferentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis), with complete distribution into the peritoneal cavity, are not eligible for the cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion technique; 2) the presence of serous ascites would seem to exclude patients from the treatment; 3) cytoreductive surgery associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion is the most suitable approach for patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and in the intermediate group.