Effects of tofacitinib on cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes based on phase III and long-term extension data in patients with plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory condition that is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Tofacitinib is being investigated as a treatment for psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects of tofacitinib on CV risk factors and major adverse CV events (MACEs) in patients with plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Changes in select CV risk factors and the incidence rate (IR) of MACEs were evaluated in patients who were treated with tofacitinib. RESULTS: Tofacitinib treatment was associated with small, dose-dependent increases in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, while the total/HDL cholesterol ratio was unchanged. There were no changes in blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin levels; C-reactive protein levels decreased. The IRs of a MACE were low and similar for both tofacitinib doses. Among 3623 subjects treated with tofacitinib, the total patient-years of exposure was 5204, with a median follow-up of 527 days, and the IR of MACEs was 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.57) patients with events per 100 patient-years. LIMITATIONS: There was relatively short follow-up time for patients who had MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: While treatment with tofacitinib is associated with a small increase in cholesterol levels, the total/HDL cholesterol ratio does not change, there are no unfavorable changes in several CV risk factors, and the incidence of MACEs is low.

The Challenge of Managing Psoriasis: Unmet Medical Needs and Stakeholder Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a debilitating chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease affecting approximately 7.4 million adults in the United States. Plaque psoriasis is the most common form, affecting 80% to 90% of patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact and challenges that psoriasis presents for various stakeholders, and to provide nondermatologist healthcare decision makers with information to enhance their contributions to drug and pharmacy benefit design discussions. DISCUSSION: Psoriasis carries an increased risk for early mortality and an increased prevalence of comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. It is also associated with anxiety, depression, and social isolation, and can negatively impact patients' relationships, productivity, and careers. The physical, psychologic, social, and economic impact of psoriasis, plus the associated stigma, result in cumulative impairment over a patient's lifetime. The current treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis include topical therapy, phototherapy, and systemic drugs (nonbiologic and biologic); however, patient satisfaction remains low, combination therapy and treatment switching are common, and many patients remain untreated or undertreated. Clinicians should consider the patient holistically, and should select treatment based on a range of factors, including disease severity (with physical and psychosocial manifestations), susceptibility to cumulative life-course impairment (considering personality, behavior, and cognition), comorbidities, concomitant medication, and patient preference. It is estimated that the total annual direct cost of treating psoriasis in the United States in 2015 exceeded $12.2 billion. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis is a complex disease, and appropriate management is correspondingly complex. Newer psoriasis treatments provide improved efficacy and safety versus traditional treatments, but challenges remain in ensuring patients access to these medications. An improved understanding of the barriers to appropriate treatment is needed, as well as clear and accessible information for payers and clinicians on current treatment options, to ensure that decision makers can control costs while providing patients with optimal care.

Elevations in troponin T and I are associated with abnormal tissue level perfusion: a TACTICS-TIMI 18 substudy. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and I elevations are associated with a higher risk of adverse events, a higher incidence of multivessel disease, complex lesions, and visible thrombus in the setting of non-ST elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Other pathophysiological mechanisms underlying troponin elevation remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the relationship between troponin elevation and tissue level perfusion using the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) in 310 patients with NSTE-ACS in the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TACTICS-TIMI) 18 trial. TMPG 0/1 ("closed" microvasculature) was observed more frequently in cTnT-positive patients both before (58.1% versus 42.1%; P=0.007) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (55.4% versus 35.6%; P=0.004). cTnT levels were higher among patients with TMPG 0/1 versus patients with TMPG 2/3 (0.50 versus 0.31 ng/mL; P=0.006). cTnT-positive patients were more likely to have thrombus (42.5% versus 29.3%), tighter stenoses (72.0% versus 64.8%), and higher rates of TIMI flow grade 0/1 (15.6% versus 7.0%; all P<0.05). TMPG 0/1 remained independently associated with cTnT elevation (odds ratio, 1.81; P=0.02), even after adjusting for epicardial TIMI flow grade, presence of thrombus, and prior myocardial infarction. TMPG 0/1 flow both before and after intervention was associated with increased risk of death or myocardial infarction at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to what has been observed in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, abnormal tissue level perfusion is also associated with adverse outcomes in the NSTE-ACS setting. Independent of the presence of thrombus and abnormal flow in the epicardial artery, impaired tissue level perfusion is associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk of cTnT elevation.

Randomized comparison of etanercept with usual therapy in an Asian population with active rheumatoid arthritis: the APPEAL trial.

AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an important rheumatologic disease in Asia-Pacific countries, as in other parts of the world. However, limited information is available regarding RA therapy in this region. The Asia-Pacific Study in Patients to be Treated With Etanercept or an Alternative Listed DMARD (APPEAL) compared efficacy and safety of etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) versus usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) + MTX (reflecting regional practice) in subjects with moderate to severe RA from multiple Asia-Pacific countries. METHOD: In this open-label, active-comparator, parallel-design, multicenter study, subjects (n = 300) in the Asia-Pacific region were randomized to ETN + MTX (n = 197) or DMARD + MTX (n = 103). The primary efficacy endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response (ACR-N) area under the curve (AUC) over 16 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. At Week 16, ACR-N AUC indicated a significantly greater response with ETN + MTX compared with DMARD + MTX (mean difference -145.3; P < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of subjects achieved ACR 20, 50 and 70 responses with ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX at Week 16 (P < 0.05). Low Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count (DAS28 < 3.2) was also achieved by significantly more subjects in the ETN + MTX group versus the DMARD + MTX group (P < 0.001). Greater improvements were shown for DAS28, pain visual analogue scale, health assessment questionnaire, and physician and patient global assessments (P < 0.05) for ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX. No new safety signals were found. CONCLUSION: In this Asia-Pacific population of subjects with moderate to severe RA, ETN + MTX showed superior efficacy versus usual DMARD + MTX regimens, with similar safety profiles.

Early invasive strategy improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report from TACTICS-TIMI 18.

BACKGROUND: Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) have been classified as a high-risk subset of patients who experience non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent studies suggest that an early invasive strategy is beneficial in moderate- and high-risk patients with non-ST elevation ACS. We hypothesized that an early invasive strategy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation ACS with prior CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 18 trial (TACTICS-TIMI 18), 2220 patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS were randomized to an early invasive or conservative (selectively invasive) strategy. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and tirofiban. Four hundred eighty-four (22%) of these patients had undergone CABG before enrollment. We analyzed whether patients with previous CABG had different 6-month outcomes and whether an early invasive strategy was associated with an improvement in long-term outcomes. Prior CABG was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes by 6 months, including a higher rate of readmission for ACS (17.4% vs 11.0%, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for ACS (22.3% vs 16.4%, P = 0.002). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 5.3%, P = 0.051). An early invasive strategy was associated with a reduction in the composite of death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.0; P = 0.089) and a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.93; P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS who have had previous CABG are a high-risk subset. An early invasive strategy reduces risk of myocardial infarction in this high-risk group.

Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vs conservative strategy for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

CONTEXT: In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 18 trial, patients with either unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) treated with the platelet glycoprotein (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibitor tirofiban had a significantly reduced rate of major cardiac events at 6 months with an early invasive vs a conservative strategy. OBJECTIVE: To examine total 6-month costs and long-term cost-effectiveness of an invasive vs a conservative strategy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial including a priori economic end points. SETTING: Hospitalization for UA/NSTEMI with 6-month follow-up period. PATIENTS: A total of 2220 patients with UA/NSTEMI; economic data from 1722 patients at US-non-VA hospitals. INTERVENTION: Early invasive strategy with routine catheterization and revascularization as appropriate vs a conservative strategy with catheterization performed only for recurrent ischemia or a positive stress test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Total 6-month costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: The average initial hospitalization costs among those in the invasive strategy group were $15714 vs $14047 among those in the conservative strategy group, a difference of $1667 (95% confidence interval [CI], $387-3091). The in-hospital costs were offset significantly at the 6-month follow-up, with an average cost in the invasive group of $6098 vs $7180 in the conservative group, a difference of $1082 (95% CI, -$2051 to $76). The average total costs at 6 months, including productivity costs, for the invasive group was $21 813 vs $21 227 for the conservative group, a $586 difference (95% CI, -$1087 to $2486). The average 6-month costs excluding productivity costs in the invasive group was $19 780 vs $19 111 in the conservative group, a difference of $670, 95% CI; (-$1035 to $2321). Estimated cost per year of life gained for the invasive strategy, based on projected life expectancy, was $12739 for the base case, and ranged from $8371 to $25769, based on model assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UA/NSTEMI treated with the Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the clinical benefit of an early invasive strategy was achieved with a small increase in cost, yielding favorable projected estimates of cost per year of life gained. These results support the broader use of an early invasive strategy in these patients.