Elevations in troponin T and I are associated with abnormal tissue level perfusion: a TACTICS-TIMI 18 substudy. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and I elevations are associated with a higher risk of adverse events, a higher incidence of multivessel disease, complex lesions, and visible thrombus in the setting of non-ST elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Other pathophysiological mechanisms underlying troponin elevation remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the relationship between troponin elevation and tissue level perfusion using the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) in 310 patients with NSTE-ACS in the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TACTICS-TIMI) 18 trial. TMPG 0/1 ("closed" microvasculature) was observed more frequently in cTnT-positive patients both before (58.1% versus 42.1%; P=0.007) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (55.4% versus 35.6%; P=0.004). cTnT levels were higher among patients with TMPG 0/1 versus patients with TMPG 2/3 (0.50 versus 0.31 ng/mL; P=0.006). cTnT-positive patients were more likely to have thrombus (42.5% versus 29.3%), tighter stenoses (72.0% versus 64.8%), and higher rates of TIMI flow grade 0/1 (15.6% versus 7.0%; all P<0.05). TMPG 0/1 remained independently associated with cTnT elevation (odds ratio, 1.81; P=0.02), even after adjusting for epicardial TIMI flow grade, presence of thrombus, and prior myocardial infarction. TMPG 0/1 flow both before and after intervention was associated with increased risk of death or myocardial infarction at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to what has been observed in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, abnormal tissue level perfusion is also associated with adverse outcomes in the NSTE-ACS setting. Independent of the presence of thrombus and abnormal flow in the epicardial artery, impaired tissue level perfusion is associated with a 1.8-fold increased risk of cTnT elevation.

Early invasive strategy improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report from TACTICS-TIMI 18.

BACKGROUND: Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) have been classified as a high-risk subset of patients who experience non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent studies suggest that an early invasive strategy is beneficial in moderate- and high-risk patients with non-ST elevation ACS. We hypothesized that an early invasive strategy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation ACS with prior CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 18 trial (TACTICS-TIMI 18), 2220 patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS were randomized to an early invasive or conservative (selectively invasive) strategy. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and tirofiban. Four hundred eighty-four (22%) of these patients had undergone CABG before enrollment. We analyzed whether patients with previous CABG had different 6-month outcomes and whether an early invasive strategy was associated with an improvement in long-term outcomes. Prior CABG was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes by 6 months, including a higher rate of readmission for ACS (17.4% vs 11.0%, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for ACS (22.3% vs 16.4%, P = 0.002). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 5.3%, P = 0.051). An early invasive strategy was associated with a reduction in the composite of death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.0; P = 0.089) and a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction at 6 months (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.93; P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS who have had previous CABG are a high-risk subset. An early invasive strategy reduces risk of myocardial infarction in this high-risk group.

Cost and cost-effectiveness of an early invasive vs conservative strategy for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

CONTEXT: In the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 18 trial, patients with either unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) treated with the platelet glycoprotein (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibitor tirofiban had a significantly reduced rate of major cardiac events at 6 months with an early invasive vs a conservative strategy. OBJECTIVE: To examine total 6-month costs and long-term cost-effectiveness of an invasive vs a conservative strategy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial including a priori economic end points. SETTING: Hospitalization for UA/NSTEMI with 6-month follow-up period. PATIENTS: A total of 2220 patients with UA/NSTEMI; economic data from 1722 patients at US-non-VA hospitals. INTERVENTION: Early invasive strategy with routine catheterization and revascularization as appropriate vs a conservative strategy with catheterization performed only for recurrent ischemia or a positive stress test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Total 6-month costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: The average initial hospitalization costs among those in the invasive strategy group were $15714 vs $14047 among those in the conservative strategy group, a difference of $1667 (95% confidence interval [CI], $387-3091). The in-hospital costs were offset significantly at the 6-month follow-up, with an average cost in the invasive group of $6098 vs $7180 in the conservative group, a difference of $1082 (95% CI, -$2051 to $76). The average total costs at 6 months, including productivity costs, for the invasive group was $21 813 vs $21 227 for the conservative group, a $586 difference (95% CI, -$1087 to $2486). The average 6-month costs excluding productivity costs in the invasive group was $19 780 vs $19 111 in the conservative group, a difference of $670, 95% CI; (-$1035 to $2321). Estimated cost per year of life gained for the invasive strategy, based on projected life expectancy, was $12739 for the base case, and ranged from $8371 to $25769, based on model assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UA/NSTEMI treated with the Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the clinical benefit of an early invasive strategy was achieved with a small increase in cost, yielding favorable projected estimates of cost per year of life gained. These results support the broader use of an early invasive strategy in these patients.