Cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients: impact of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND: Decision about the management of hypertensive patients should not be based on the level of blood pressure alone, but also on the presence of other risk factors, target organ damage (TOD) and cardiovascular and renal disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography in a more precise stratification of absolute cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Never-treated essential hypertensives (n = 141; 73 men, 68 women, mean age 46 +/- 11 years) referred for the first time to our out-patient clinic were included in the study. They underwent the following procedures: (1) family and personal medical history, (2) clinical blood pressure (BP) measurement, (3) routine blood chemistry and urine analysis, (4) electrocardiogram, (5) echocardiogram, (6) carotid ultrasonogram. Risk was stratified according to the criteria suggested by the 1999 WHO/ISH guidelines. TOD was initially evaluated by routine procedures only, and subsequently reassessed by using data on cardiac and vascular structure obtained by ultrasound examinations (left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) as left ventricular mass index (LVMI) > 134 g/m2 in men and > 110 g/m2 in women; carotid plaque as focal thickening > 1.3 mm). RESULTS: According to the first classification 20% were low-risk patients, 50% medium-risk, 22% high-risk and 8% very-high-risk patients. A marked change in risk stratification was obtained when TOD was assessed by adding ultrasound examinations: low-risk patients 18%, medium-risk 28%, high-risk 45%, very-high-risk patients 9%. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of TOD by ultrasound techniques allowed a much more accurate identification of high-risk patients, who represented a very large fraction (45%) of the patient population seen at our hypertension clinic. In particular, a large proportion of patients classified as at moderate risk by routine investigations were instead found to be at high risk when ultrasound examinations were added. The results of this study suggest that cardiovascular risk stratification only based on simple routine work-up can often underestimate overall risk, thus leading to a potentially inadequate therapeutic management especially of low-medium risk patients.

Prevalence of target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients: different impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure control.

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, LV concentric remodelling and microalbuminuria in a selected sample of treated hypertensive patients with effective and prolonged clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < 140/90 mmHg). Second, to compare the prevalence of these markers of organ damage in patients with and without ambulatory BP (ABP) control, defined as average daytime BP < 132/85 mmHg). DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-eight consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension outpatient clinic over a period of 3 months and were regularly followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, history or signs of cardiovascular or renal complications and major noncardiovascular diseases were the exclusion criteria from the study. Each patient underwent 24 h ABP monitoring, echocardiography and 24 h urine collection for albumin measurement. RESULTS: The prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LV mass index > 125 g/m2 in both sexes), LV concentric remodelling (relative wall thickness > 0.45) and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion < 300 mg/ 24 h) in this selected group of patients (32 men, 26 women; mean age 53 +/- 9 years; mean clinic BP 122 +/- 9/ 78 +/- 6 mmHg) was markedly low (6.9, 8.6 and 5.1%, respectively). The 26 patients with effective ABP control (group I) were similar to the 32 patients without effective ABP control (group II) in age, gender, body surface area, clinic BP, smoking habit, glucose, cholesterol and creatinine plasma levels. Prevalence of LV hypertrophy, LV concentric remodelling and microalbuminuria was lower in group I than in group II (0 versus 12.9% P< 0.01, 7.7 versus 9.4% NS, 3.8 versus 6.2% NS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that nonobese, nondiabetic hypertensive patients with an effective clinic BP control have a very low prevalence of target organ damage and that LVH is present only in individuals with insufficient ABP control.

Improvement of patients' knowledge by a single educational meeting on hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: A poor therapeutic compliance is a major cause of insufficient control of hypertension. As education of patients is fundamental in order to improve their compliance, we organised two pilot educational meetings aimed at (1) assessing the support of patients to this kind of meetings, and (2) verifying the impact on patient's education. METHODS: We invited 225 consecutive patients referred to our Hypertension Clinic (some of them regularly followed up and some referred for the first time) to participate to an educational meeting on hypertension. Patients were divided in two groups, for organising reasons each attending a single meeting. Each meeting included four sessions: (1) the first session included a multiple choice questionnaire (nine questions, with answers collected by an interactive electronic system) in order to evaluate the degree of patient's information about hypertension (definition, prevalence, aetiology, complications and treatment), (2) a traditional teaching session, (3) an interactive phase aimed to assess the improvement of knowledge in which the same questions as in the first session have been asked again, and (4) a general discussion session. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (mean age 54 +/- 12 years; 76 M, 68 F) of the 225 invited attended the meeting. The answers to our questions in the initial session were correct in a percentage ranging from 60% to 80%. During the third phase immediately after the teaching session, the percentage of correct answers increased significantly (range: 75--98%, P < 0.05 at least in all questions). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows: (1) a satisfactory adherence of patients to this educational initiative; (2) a positive impact of a single educational meeting on patient's knowledge about issues related to hypertension. The potential role of improving patient's education on clinical outcomes such as blood pressure levels and the rate of blood pressure control requires future controlled studies. Journal of Human Hypertension (2001) 15, 57-61