NUQA: Estimating Cancer Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity and Evolution through Alignment-Free Methods.

Longitudinal next-generation sequencing of cancer patient samples has enhanced our understanding of the evolution and progression of various cancers. As a result, and due to our increasing knowledge of heterogeneity, such sampling is becoming increasingly common in research and clinical trial sample collections. Traditionally, the evolutionary analysis of these cohorts involves the use of an aligner followed by subsequent stringent downstream analyses. However, this can lead to large levels of information loss due to the vast mutational landscape that characterizes tumor samples. Here, we propose an alignment-free approach for sequence comparison-a well-established approach in a range of biological applications including typical phylogenetic classification. Such methods could be used to compare information collated in raw sequence files to allow an unsupervised assessment of the evolutionary trajectory of patient genomic profiles. In order to highlight this utility in cancer research we have applied our alignment-free approach using a previously established metric, Jensen-Shannon divergence, and a metric novel to this area, Hellinger distance, to two longitudinal cancer patient cohorts in glioma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma using our software, NUQA. We hypothesize that this approach has the potential to reveal novel information about the heterogeneity and evolutionary trajectory of spatiotemporal tumor samples, potentially revealing early events in tumorigenesis and the origins of metastases and recurrences. Key words: alignment-free, Hellinger distance, exome-seq, evolution, phylogenetics, longitudinal.

Prospective patient stratification into robust cancer-cell intrinsic subtypes from colorectal cancer biopsies.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) biopsies underpin accurate diagnosis, but are also relevant for patient stratification in molecularly-guided clinical trials. The consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) and colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes (CRISs) transcriptional signatures have potential clinical utility for improving prognostic/predictive patient assignment. However, their ability to provide robust classification, particularly in pretreatment biopsies from multiple regions or at different time points, remains untested. In this study, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the robustness of CRC transcriptional signatures, including CRIS and CMS, using a range of tumour sampling methodologies currently employed in clinical and translational research. These include analyses using (i) laser-capture microdissected CRC tissue, (ii) eight publically available rectal cancer biopsy data sets (n = 543), (iii) serial biopsies (from AXEBeam trial, NCT00828672; n = 10), (iv) multi-regional biopsies from colon tumours (n = 29 biopsies, n = 7 tumours), and (v) pretreatment biopsies from the phase II rectal cancer trial COPERNCIUS (NCT01263171; n = 44). Compared to previous results obtained using CRC resection material, we demonstrate that CMS classification in biopsy tissue is significantly less capable of reliably classifying patient subtype (43% unknown in biopsy versus 13% unknown in resections, p = 0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in classification rate between biopsies and resections when using the CRIS classifier. Additionally, we demonstrated that CRIS provides significantly better spatially- and temporally- robust classification of molecular subtypes in CRC primary tumour tissue compared to CMS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). These findings have potential to inform ongoing biopsy-based patient stratification in CRC, enabling robust and stable assignment of patients into clinically-informative arms of prospective multi-arm, multi-stage clinical trials. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Transcriptional Profiling of a Patient-Matched Cohort of Glioblastoma (IDH-Wildtype) for Therapeutic Target and Repurposing Drug Identification.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive adult brain tumor. Despite multi-modal therapies, GBM recurs, and patients have poor survival (~14 months). Resistance to therapy may originate from a subpopulation of tumor cells identified as glioma-stem cells (GSC), and new treatments are urgently needed to target these. The biology underpinning GBM recurrence was investigated using whole transcriptome profiling of patient-matched initial and recurrent GBM (recGBM). Differential expression analysis identified 147 significant probes. In total, 24 genes were validated using expression data from four public cohorts and the literature. Functional analyses revealed that transcriptional changes to recGBM were dominated by angiogenesis and immune-related processes. The role of MHC class II proteins in antigen presentation and the differentiation, proliferation, and infiltration of immune cells was enriched. These results suggest recGBM would benefit from immunotherapies. The altered gene signature was further analyzed in a connectivity mapping analysis with QUADrATiC software to identify FDA-approved repurposing drugs. Top-ranking target compounds that may be effective against GSC and GBM recurrence were rosiglitazone, nizatidine, pantoprazole, and tolmetin. Our translational bioinformatics pipeline provides an approach to identify target compounds for repurposing that may add clinical benefit in addition to standard therapies against resistant cancers such as GBM.

Prostate cancer heterogeneity assessment with multi-regional sampling and alignment-free methods.

Combining alignment-free methods for phylogenetic analysis with multi-regional sampling using next-generation sequencing can provide an assessment of intra-patient tumour heterogeneity. From multi-regional sampling divergent branching, we validated two different lesions within a patient's prostate. Where multi-regional sampling has not been used, a single sample from one of these areas could misguide as to which drugs or therapies would best benefit this patient, due to the fact these tumours appear to be genetically different. This application has the power to render, in a fraction of the time used by other approaches, intra-patient heterogeneity and decipher aberrant biomarkers. Another alignment-free method for calling single-nucleotide variants from raw next-generation sequencing samples has determined possible variants and genomic locations that may be able to characterize the differences between the two main branching patterns. Alignment-free approaches have been applied to relevant clinical multi-regional samples and may be considered as a valuable option for comparing and determining heterogeneity to help deliver personalized medicine through more robust efforts in identifying targetable pathways and therapeutic strategies. Our study highlights the application these tools could have on patient-aligned treatment indications.

ACE: A Workbench Using Evolutionary Genetic Algorithms for Analyzing Association in TCGA.

Modern methods of acquiring molecular data have improved rapidly in recent years, making it easier for researchers to collect large volumes of information. However, this has increased the challenge of recognizing interesting patterns within the data. Atlas Correlation Explorer (ACE) is a user-friendly workbench for seeking associations between attributes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. It allows any combination of clinical and genomic data streams to be searched using an evolutionary algorithm approach. To showcase ACE, we assessed which RNA sequencing transcripts were associated with estrogen receptor (ESR1) in the TCGA breast cancer cohort. The analysis revealed already well-established associations with XBP1 and FOXA1, but also identified a strong association with CT62, a potential immunotherapeutic target with few previous associations with breast cancer. In conclusion, ACE can produce results for very large searches in a short time and will serve as an increasingly useful tool for biomarker discovery in the big data era. SIGNIFICANCE: ACE uses an evolutionary algorithm approach to perform large searches for associations between any combinations of data in the TCGA database.

Impact of Variable RNA-Sequencing Depth on Gene Expression Signatures and Target Compound Robustness: Case Study Examining Brain Tumor (Glioma) Disease Progression.

PURPOSE: Gene expression profiling can uncover biologic mechanisms underlying disease and is important in drug development. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is routinely used to assess gene expression, but costs remain high. Sample multiplexing reduces RNAseq costs; however, multiplexed samples have lower cDNA sequencing depth, which can hinder accurate differential gene expression detection. The impact of sequencing depth alteration on RNA-seq-based downstream analyses such as gene expression connectivity mapping is not known, where this method is used to identify potential therapeutic compounds for repurposing. METHODS: In this study, published RNA-seq profiles from patients with brain tumor (glioma) were assembled into two disease progression gene signature contrasts for astrocytoma. Available treatments for glioma have limited effectiveness, rendering this a disease of poor clinical outcome. Gene signatures were subsampled to simulate sequencing alterations and analyzed in connectivity mapping to investigate target compound robustness. RESULTS: Data loss to gene signatures led to the loss, gain, and consistent identification of significant connections. The most accurate gene signature contrast with consistent patient gene expression profiles was more resilient to data loss and identified robust target compounds. Target compounds lost included candidate compounds of potential clinical utility in glioma (eg, suramin, dasatinib). Lost connections may have been linked to low-abundance genes in the gene signature that closely characterized the disease phenotype. Consistently identified connections may have been related to highly expressed abundant genes that were ever-present in gene signatures, despite data reductions. Potential noise surrounding findings included false-positive connections that were gained as a result of gene signature modification with data loss. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the necessity for gene signature accuracy for connectivity mapping, which should improve the clinical utility of future target compound discoveries.

Cancer-cell intrinsic gene expression signatures overcome intratumoural heterogeneity bias in colorectal cancer patient classification.

Stromal-derived intratumoural heterogeneity (ITH) has been shown to undermine molecular stratification of patients into appropriate prognostic/predictive subgroups. Here, using several clinically relevant colorectal cancer (CRC) gene expression signatures, we assessed the susceptibility of these signatures to the confounding effects of ITH using gene expression microarray data obtained from multiple tumour regions of a cohort of 24 patients, including central tumour, the tumour invasive front and lymph node metastasis. Sample clustering alongside correlative assessment revealed variation in the ability of each signature to cluster samples according to patient-of-origin rather than region-of-origin within the multi-region dataset. Signatures focused on cancer-cell intrinsic gene expression were found to produce more clinically useful, patient-centred classifiers, as exemplified by the CRC intrinsic signature (CRIS), which robustly clustered samples by patient-of-origin rather than region-of-origin. These findings highlight the potential of cancer-cell intrinsic signatures to reliably stratify CRC patients by minimising the confounding effects of stromal-derived ITH.