Testing for ALK rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) define a molecular subgroup of tumors characterized clinically by sensitivity to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as crizotinib. Although ALK rearrangements may be detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR, immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the optimal clinical strategy for identifying ALK rearrangements in clinical samples remains to be determined. We evaluated immunohistochemistry using three different antibodies (ALK1, 5A4 and D5F3 clones) to detect ALK rearrangements and compared those with FISH. We report the frequency and clinicopathologic features of lung cancers harboring ALK translocations in 594 resected NSCLCs (470 adenocarcinomas; 83 squamous carcinomas, 26 large cell carcinomas and 15 other histological subtypes) using a tissue microarray approach. We identified an ALK gene rearrangement in 7/594 cases (1%) by FISH and all anti-ALK antibodies correctly identified the seven ALK-positive cases (100% sensitivity), although the intensity of staining was weak in some cases. These data indicate that the use of antibodies with high sensitivity and avidity to ALK may provide an effective pre-screening technique to complement the more expensive and labor-intensive approach of ALK FISH testing.

Identification errors in medical research: Privacy at all costs?

In laboratory medicine, a misidentified patient sample can lead to an incorrect tissue diagnosis, a potentially fatal blood transfusion error or other serious adverse events. Although well characterised in routine patient care, the overall impacts of misidentification errors in the clinical research setting are less conspicuous but potentially greater, with downstream effects that may extend beyond care at an individual level. When data discrepancies or queries arise in clinical trial data then a data clarification form (DCF) is issued to the researcher by the overseeing trial coordinator or sponsor. Higher rates of DCF's are sometimes used as a crude surrogate marker of poorer trial quality. However, data is scarce on misidentification rates in clinical trials. In five clinical trials involving 822 histology or blood specimens analysed by our pathology department, DCF's were issued for 21% (174) of specimens. Amongst these 67% (117 / 174) were related to sample identification. Although these errors were recognised before data was compromised or an adverse event occurred, they highlight an alarming lack of stringency of use of patient identifiers in the research setting. We therefore propose the use of an appropriate number of de-identified data points and a formalised specimen accession process as employed in routine care to mitigate misidentification errors and their impact in clinical research. Increased recognition in the research community of the likely effect of truncating or reducing the number of patient identifiers is needed to minimise misidentification errors in the research setting.

Correlation between molecular analysis, diagnosis according to the 2015 WHO classification of unresected lung tumours and TTF1 expression in small biopsies and cytology specimens from 344 non-small cell lung carcinoma patients.

We investigated correlations between diagnosis according to the 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of unresected lung tumours, molecular analysis and TTF1 expression in small biopsy and cytology specimens from 344 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. One case failed testing for EGFR, KRAS and ALK abnormalities and six had insufficient tumour for ALK testing. Overall mutation rate in 343 cases was 48% for the genes tested, with 19% EGFR, 33% KRAS and 4% BRAF mutations, and 5% ALK rearrangements detected. More EGFR-mutant (78%) and ALK-rearranged (75%) tumours had morphologic adenocarcinoma than KRAS-mutant (56%) tumours. Despite no significant difference in the overall rate of any molecular abnormality between morphologic adenocarcinoma (52%) and NSCLC, favour adenocarcinoma (47%) (p = 0.18), KRAS mutations were detected more frequently in the latter group. No significant difference in the overall rate of any molecular abnormality between TTF1 positive (49%) and TTF1 negative tumours (44%) (p = 0.92) was detected, but more EGFR-mutant (97%) and ALK-rearranged tumours (92%) were TTF1 positive than KRAS-mutant tumours (68%). Rates of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations and ALK rearrangements in this Australian NSCLC patient population are consistent with the published international literature. Our findings suggest that 2015 WHO classification of unresected tumours may assist in identifying molecular subsets of advanced NSCLC.

Multiplexed transcriptome analysis to detect ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements in lung cancer.

ALK, ROS1 and RET gene fusions are important predictive biomarkers for tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer. Currently, the gold standard method for gene fusion detection is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and while highly sensitive and specific, it is also labour intensive, subjective in analysis, and unable to screen a large numbers of gene fusions. Recent developments in high-throughput transcriptome-based methods may provide a suitable alternative to FISH as they are compatible with multiplexing and diagnostic workflows. However, the concordance between these different methods compared with FISH has not been evaluated. In this study we compared the results from three transcriptome-based platforms (Nanostring Elements, Agena LungFusion panel and ThermoFisher NGS fusion panel) to those obtained from ALK, ROS1 and RET FISH on 51 clinical specimens. Overall agreement of results ranged from 86-96% depending on the platform used. While all platforms were highly sensitive, both the Agena panel and Thermo Fisher NGS fusion panel reported minor fusions that were not detectable by FISH. Our proof-of-principle study illustrates that transcriptome-based analyses are sensitive and robust methods for detecting actionable gene fusions in lung cancer and could provide a robust alternative to FISH testing in the diagnostic setting.

Role of immunohistochemistry in the era of genetic testing in MYC-positive aggressive B-cell lymphomas: a study of 209 cases.

AIMS: MYC rearrangements with or without BCL2 rearrangements have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis and inferior survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Most of these cases are still diagnosed by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) testing, which is expensive, requires expertise and is not routinely available in all laboratories. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely available and has the potential to be used as a screening test to identify cases with increased protein expression and select cases that require confirmatory testing. We correlated the expression of MYC and BCL2 by IHC with FISH studies in an attempt to define a cut-off value, which can be used by laboratories to select cases requiring confirmatory FISH testing. The prevalence of MYC-positive DLBCL and double-hit lymphoma (DHL) has also been studied. METHODS: 209 cases comprising of 15 cases of Burkitt lymphoma (BL), 13 cases of intermediate BL/DLBCL and 181 cases of DLBCL were included. IHC and FISH for MYC and BCL2 were performed and the results were correlated. RESULTS: The prevalence of MYC-positive DLBCL and MYC/BCL2DHL was 13.4% and 7.4%, respectively, in our study. Germinal-centre subtype was more common in MYC-positive DLBCL and DHL. MYC-positive DLBCL also showed higher median Ki-67 (>90%) and CD10 positivity as compared with MYC-negative cases. CONCLUSIONS: IHC can be used for screening cases, which require further confirmatory FISH testing. We recommend a cut-off value of ≥30% for MYC by IHC; however, international standardisation of these values is necessary to provide uniformity among laboratories.

Molecular methods for somatic mutation testing in lung adenocarcinoma: EGFR and beyond.

Somatic mutational profiling in cancer has revolutionized the practice of clinical oncology. The discovery of driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an example of this. Molecular testing of lung adenocarcinoma is now considered standard of care and part of the diagnostic algorithm. This article provides an overview of the workflow of molecular testing in a clinical diagnostic laboratory discussing in particular novel assays that are currently in use for somatic mutation detection in NSCLC focussing on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1 and RET rearrangements.

Comparison of methods in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The use of targeted therapies toward specific oncogenic driver mutations has become a critical factor in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. It is therefore essential to utilize tests with high performance characteristics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the standard method for detecting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancer but the utility of other methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is unclear. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-two lung cancer patients were tested with FISH, CISH, and IHC using three ALK antibodies (ALK1, 5A4, D5F3) and one ROS1 antibody in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. RESULTS: There was a 97.4% concordance (298 of 306) between FISH and CISH for detection of ALK rearrangements. The ROS1 rearrangement status had a 97% (291 of 300) concordance between CISH and FISH. ALK protein expression was observed in 6 of 341 samples with the ALK1 and 5A4 antibodies and 5 of 341 samples with D5F3. All three antibodies stained each of the ALK FISH-positive samples (100% sensitivity). ROS1 protein expression was observed in 2 of 322 samples. One of three samples with a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH showed ROS1 protein expression (33.3% sensitivity). CONCLUSION: Our findings show good correlation between FISH versus CISH in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. FISH versus IHC showed good correlation in the detection of ALK rearrangements but showed weak correlation in the detection of ROS1 rearrangements. These results suggest CISH and IHC could be complimentary detection methods to FISH in the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.

Rationale for co-targeting IGF-1R and ALK in ALK fusion-positive lung cancer.

Crizotinib, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), shows marked activity in patients whose lung cancers harbor fusions in the gene encoding anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), but its efficacy is limited by variable primary responses and acquired resistance. In work arising from the clinical observation of a patient with ALK fusion-positive lung cancer who had an exceptional response to an insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R)-specific antibody, we define a therapeutic synergism between ALK and IGF-1R inhibitors. Similar to IGF-1R, ALK fusion proteins bind to the adaptor insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1), and IRS-1 knockdown enhances the antitumor effects of ALK inhibitors. In models of ALK TKI resistance, the IGF-1R pathway is activated, and combined ALK and IGF-1R inhibition improves therapeutic efficacy. Consistent with this finding, the levels of IGF-1R and IRS-1 are increased in biopsy samples from patients progressing on crizotinib monotherapy. Collectively these data support a role for the IGF-1R-IRS-1 pathway in both ALK TKI-sensitive and ALK TKI-resistant states and provide a biological rationale for further clinical development of dual ALK and IGF-1R inhibitors.

The molecular characterisation of unusual subcutaneous spindle cell lesion of breast.

BACKGROUND: Spindle cell lesions of the breast represent an interesting diagnostic challenge as they comprise a wide range of tumours that are rare. Differentiating dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) from other dermatofibromas using CD34 immunohistochemistry alone is difficult; therefore, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis is often employed to identify typical COL1A1-PDGFB fusion or gene rearrangement. Although molecular confirmation of diagnosis is unnecessary in the majority of DFSP cases, the detection of chromosomal rearrangement is valuable in tumours that show unusual clinicopathological features as in this study the authors report a case of DFSP of breast that did not show any typical known molecular features. METHODS AND RESULTS: Morphological and immunohistochemical study was highly suggestive of the diagnosis of DFSP. To further investigate this case, DNA copy number alterations were investigated by the 250 K Affymetrix SNP Mapping array. DNA analysis did not show any of the known translocations reported in DFSP or any known solid tumour category. However, in addition to copy number changes on chromosome 1, amplification of chromosome 7p which contains the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene was observed. Results from EGFR FISH showed an increase in EGFR gene to chromosome 7 ratio (3:1) suggesting amplification of the EGFR gene. CONCLUSION: This case of an unusual DFSP demonstrates that genomic interrogation provides additional potential targets such as a therapeutic avenue with anti-EGFR therapies and shows the power of molecular characterisation of unusual tumours for a personalised medicine approach.