Navigated augmented reality through a head-mounted display leads to low deviation between planned, intra- and post-operative parameters during glenoid component placement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a proof-of-concept case series.

BACKGROUND: Navigated augmented reality (AR) through a head-mounted display (HMD) has led to accurate glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in an in-vitro setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point and depth of the glenoid component placement during RSA, assisted by navigated AR through a HMD, in a surgical setting. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive patients undergoing RSA in two institutions, between August 2021 and January 2023, were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, surgery assisted by AR through a HMD, and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at six weeks. All participants agreed to participate in the study and an informed consent was provided in all cases. Preoperative CT scans were undertaken for all cases and used for three-dimensional (3D) planning. Intra-operatively, glenoid preparation and component placement were assisted by a navigated AR system through a HMD in all patients. Intraoperative parameters were recorded by the system. A postoperative CT scan was undertaken at 6 weeks, and 3D reconstruction was used for obtaining postoperative parameters. The deviation between planned, intra-, and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, and depth of the glenoid component placement was calculated. Outliers were defined as >5° for inclination and retroversion and >5 mm for entry point. RESULTS: 17 patients (9 females, 12 right shoulders) with a mean age of 72.8±9.1 years old (range, 47.0 to 82.0) met inclusion criteria. The mean deviation between intra- and postoperative measurements was 1.5°±1.0° (range, 0.0° to 3.0°) for inclination, 2.8°±1.5° (range, 1.0° to 4.5°) for retroversion, 1.8±1.0 mm (range, 0.7mm to 3.0mm) for entry point, and 1.9±1.9 mm (range, 0.0mm to 4.5mm) for depth. The mean deviation between planned and postoperative values was 2.5°±3.2° (range, 0.0° to 11.0°) for inclination, 3.4°±4.6° (range, 0.0° to 18.0°) for retroversion, 2.0±2.5 mm (range, 0.0° to 9.7°) for entry point, and 1.3±1.6 mm (range, 1.3mm to 4.5mm) for depth. There were no outliers between intra- and postoperative values and there were three outliers between planned and postoperative values. The mean time (minutes:seconds) for the tracker unit placement and the scapula registration was 03:02 (range, 01:48 to 04:26) and 08:16 (range, 02:09 to 17:58), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of a navigated AR system through a HMD in RSA led to low deviations between planned, intra-operative and postoperative parameters for glenoid component placement.

Lower Trapezius and Latissimus Dorsi Transfer relieve Teres Minor Activity into the Physiological Range in Collin D Irreparable Posterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Biomechanical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tendon transfers are established techniques to regain external rotation mobility in patients suffering from an irreparable, posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT). Posterosuperior MRCT with intact teres minor (Type D MRCT) can lead to excessive teres minor loading to maintain external rotation. We hypothesize that tendon transfers are effective in relieving teres minor loading in Type D MRCTs. Our aim was to biomechanically assess muscle synergism with latissimus dorsi (LD-Transfer) and lower trapezius (LT-Transfer) tendon transfer during external rotation at different abduction heights. METHODS: Using musculoskeletal modeling, we analyzed and compared the moment arm, muscle torque and muscle activity between a healthy and Type D MRCT pathological model with and without the LD- or LT-Transfer at infraspinatus and teres minor insertion sites. Output measures were analyzed during external rotation at different abduction angles and 10 to 50N resistance against external rotation. We assessed its impact on teres minor loading in a Type D MRCT. Morphological variations were parameterized using the critical shoulder angle and the acromiohumeral distance to address variations among patients. RESULTS: Both transfer types reduced teres minor torque and activity significantly, reaching physiological state at 40N external resistance (p<0.001), with insertion to infraspinatus site being more effective than teres minor site (p<0.001). External rotation moment arms of LD-Transfer were larger than LT-Transfer at 90° abduction (25.1±0.8mm vs. 21.2±0.6mm, p<0.001) and vice versa at 0° abduction (17.4±0.5mm vs. 24.0±0.2mm, p<0.001). While the healthy infraspinatus was the main external rotator in all abduction angles (50-70% torque), a Type D MRCT resulted in a 70-90% increase of teres minor torque and an up to sevenfold increase in its activity leading to excessive loadings beyond 10N resistance against external rotation. Varying the critical shoulder angle and the acromiohumeral distance led to minor variations in muscle moment arm and muscle activity. CONCLUSION: We identified biomechanical efficacy of both tendon transfers in Type D MRCT regarding teres minor load relieve and superior performance of the transfers at the infraspinatus insertion site.

Glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty assisted with augmented reality through a head-mounted display leads to low deviation between planned and postoperative parameters.

BACKGROUND: Navigated augmented reality (AR) through a head-mounted display (HMD) may lead to accurate glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the deviation between planned, intra- and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, depth, and rotation of the glenoid component placement assisted by a navigated AR through HMD during RSA. METHODS: Both shoulders of 6 fresh frozen human cadavers, free from fractures or other bony pathologies, were used. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used for the 3-dimensional (3D) planning. The glenoid component placement was assisted using a navigated AR system through an HMD in all specimens. Intraoperative inclination, retroversion, depth, and rotation were measured by the system. A postoperative CT scan was performed. The pre- and postoperative 3D CT scan reconstructions were superimposed to calculate the deviation between planned and postoperative inclination, retroversion, entry point, depth, and rotation of the glenoid component placement. Additionally, a comparison between intra- and postoperative values was calculated. Outliers were defined as >10° inclination, >10° retroversion, >3 mm entry point. RESULTS: The registration algorithm of the scapulae prior to the procedure was correctly completed for all cases. The deviations between planned and postoperative values were 1.0° ± 0.7° for inclination, 1.8° ± 1.3° for retroversion, 1.1 ± 0.4 mm for entry point, 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for depth, and 1.7° ± 1.6° for rotation. The deviation between intra- and postoperative values were 0.9° ± 0.8° for inclination, 1.2° ± 1.1° for retroversion, 0.6 ± 0.5 mm for depth, and 0.3° ± 0.2° for rotation. There were no outliers between planned and postoperative parameters. CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of a navigated AR system through an HMD for RSA led to low deviation between planned and postoperative values and between intra- and postoperative parameters.

Massive rotator cuff tears with short tendon length can be successfully repaired using synthetic patch augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Choosing the optimal treatment for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) still poses a surgical problem. In MRCTs with good muscle quality, but short tendon length, nonaugmented repairs lead to high failure rates of up to 90%. The aim of the study was to evaluate midterm clinical and radiologic outcomes of massive rotator cuff tears with good muscle quality, but short tendon length, which were repaired with synthetic patch augmentation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent arthroscopic or open rotator cuff repairs with patch augmentation between 2016 and 2019 was performed. We included patients older than 18 years, who presented with an MRCT confirmed by an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arthrogram showing good muscle quality (Goutallier ≤ II) and short tendon length (length <15 mm). Constant-Murley score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and range of motion (ROM) were compared pre- and postoperatively. We excluded patients older than 75 years or with presence of rotator cuff arthropathy Hamada stage ≥2a. Patients were followed up for 2 years minimum. Clinical failures were defined by reoperation, forward flexion <120° or a relative CS < 70. Structural integrity of the repair was assessed using an MRI scan. Comparison between different variables and outcomes was performed using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and χ2 tests. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (mean age 57 years, 13 [86.7%] male, 9 [60%] right shoulders) were reevaluated with a mean follow-up of 43.8 months (27-55 months). There was a significant improvement in the absolute CS (from 33 to 81 points, P = .03), the relative CS (from 41% to 88%, P = .04), the SSV (from 31% to 93%, P = .007), and forward flexion (from 111° to 163°, P = .004) but not in external rotation (from 37° to 38°, P = .5). There were 3 clinical failures (1 atraumatic, 2 traumatic) with reoperations (2 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties and 1 refixation). Structurally, there were 3 Sugaya grade 4 and 5 Sugaya grade 5 reruptures resulting in a retear rate of 53%. The presence of a complete or partial rerupture was not associated with inferior outcomes compared with intact cuff repairs. There were no correlations between the grade of retraction, muscle quality, or rotator cuff tear configuration and rerupture or functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patch augmented cuff repair leads to a significant improvement of functional and structural outcomes. Partial reruptures were not associated with inferior functional outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the results found in our study.

Patient-specific instrumentation reduces deviations between planned and postosteotomy humeral retrotorsion and height in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) may potentially improve humeral osteotomy in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the deviation between planned and postosteotomy humeral inclination, retrotorsion, and height in shoulder arthroplasty, using PSI vs. standard cutting guides (SCG). METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were allocated to undergo humeral osteotomy using either PSI or SCG, such that the 2 groups have similar age, gender, and side. Preosteotomy computed tomography (CT) scan was performed and used for the 3-dimensional (3D) planning. The osteotomy procedure was performed using a PSI designed for each specimen or an SCG depending on the group. A postosteotomy CT scan was performed. The preosteotomy and postosteotomy 3D CT scan reconstructions were superimposed to calculate the deviation between planned and postosteotomy inclination, retrotorsion, and height. Outliers were defined as cases with 1 or more of the following deviations: >5° inclination, >10° retrotorsion, and >3 mm height. The deviation and outliers in inclination, retrotorsion, and height were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The deviations between planned and postosteotomy parameters were similar among the PSI and SCG groups for inclination (P = .260), whereas they were significantly greater in the SCG group for retrotorsion (P < .001) and height (P = .003). There were 8 outliers in the SCG group, compared with only 1 outlier in the PSI group (P = .005). Most outliers in the SCG group were due to deviation >10° in retrotorsion. CONCLUSION: After 3D planning, PSI had less deviation between planned and postosteotomy humeral retrotorsion and height, relative to SCG.

Medial placement of trapezoid tunnel leads to higher reduction loss in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with anatomic coracoclavicular fixation.

Aim: To analyze the association between clavicular tunnel positioning and postoperative reduction loss in patients with acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treated with anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) fixation using double clavicular tunnels. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with AC joint dislocation, treated with anatomic CC fixation using double clavicular tunnels, was conducted. Patients with pre-operative, immediate post-operative, and final follow-up Zanca-view X-rays were included. On each X-ray, the obtained measures included: distance from lateral border of clavicle to trapezoid and conoid tunnels, distance between tunnels, clavicle length, and CC distance of affected and un-affected sides. Loss of reduction was calculated as CC distance difference between immediate and final post-operative X-rays. Association between reduction loss and tunnel positioning was analyzed. Results: Conoid, trapezoid and tunnel ratios were 24% ± 4, 15% ± 3, and 9% ± 2, respectively. Significant reduction loss was seen in 21(45.7%) patients. Significantly higher probabilities of reduction loss were associated with trapezoid tunnels placed medial to 24 mm (30.8% vs 65.0%, OR 4.2 (IC95%: 1.2-14.4), p: 0.024) or 15% of the clavicle length (32.1% vs 66.7%, OR 4.2 (IC 95%: 1.2-14.9), p: 0.025). Conclusions: Trapezoid tunnels placed medial to 24 mm or 15% medial to clavicle length could lead to higher probabilities of significant reduction loss. These findings support the importance of clavicular tunnels' proper placement for decreasing significant reduction loss.

Effect of patient-specific scapular morphology on the glenohumeral joint force and shoulder muscle force equilibrium: a study of rotator cuff tear and osteoarthritis patients.

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) and rotator cuff tear (RCT) pathologies have distinct scapular morphologies that impact disease progression. Previous studies examined the correlation between scapular morphology and glenohumeral joint biomechanics through critical shoulder angle (CSA) variations. In abduction, higher CSAs, common in RCT patients, increase vertical shear force and rotator cuff activation, while lower CSAs, common in OA patients, are associated with higher compressive force. However, the impact of the complete patient-specific scapular morphology remains unexplored due to challenges in establishing personalized models. Methods: CT data of 48 OA patients and 55 RCT patients were collected. An automated pipeline customized the AnyBody™ model with patient-specific scapular morphology and glenohumeral joint geometry. Biomechanical simulations calculated glenohumeral joint forces and instability ratios (shear-to-compressive forces). Moment arms and torques of rotator cuff and deltoid muscles were analyzed for each patient-specific geometry. Results and discussion: This study confirms the increased instability ratio on the glenohumeral joint in RCT patients during abduction (mean maximum is 32.80% higher than that in OA), while OA patients exhibit a higher vertical instability ratio in flexion (mean maximum is 24.53% higher than that in RCT) due to the increased inferior vertical shear force. This study further shows lower total joint force in OA patients than that in RCT patients (mean maximum total force for the RCT group is 11.86% greater than that for the OA group), attributed to mechanically advantageous muscle moment arms. The findings highlight the significant impact of the glenohumeral joint center positioning on muscle moment arms and the total force generated. We propose that the RCT pathomechanism is related to force magnitude, while the OA pathomechanism is associated with the shear-to-compressive loading ratio. Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of the impact of the complete 3D scapular morphology of the individual on shoulder biomechanics.

How to treat stiffness after proximal humeral fractures?

Shoulder stiffness is a frequent complication after proximal humeral fractures treated with or without surgery. Shoulder stiffness is associated with high rates of absence from work and a significant financial burden for the healthcare system. Secondary stiffness is characterized by additional extracapsular adhesions, including subacromial, subcoracoid, and subdeltoid spaces, usually derived from post-fracture or post-surgical extraarticular hematomas. Several secondary causes may coexist with capsular and extracapsular adhesions decreasing the shoulder motion, such as malunion, nonunion, metalwork failure, infection, and osteoarthritis, among others. Conservative treatment, usually prescribed for primary shoulder stiffness, has shown unfavorable results in secondary stiffness, and surgical intervention may be required. Surgical interventions need to be patient-specific. Usually, open or arthroscopic fibro-arthrolysis and subacromial release are performed, together with plate removal and biceps tenotomy/tenodesis. In severe osteoarthritis, shoulder replacement may be indicated. Ruling out infection is recommended in every case.

Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with triple flip-buttons leads to good functional outcomes and low reduction loss: a case series.

BACKGROUND: The management of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation remains controversial. Recently, anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with a double clavicular tunnel and three flip-buttons has shown promising results. This study aimed to evaluate functional and radiological outcomes in patients with high-grade AC joint dislocation treated with anatomic CC fixation using double clavicular tunnels and three flip-buttons. METHODS: A retrospective, unicentric study was performed. The study included patients with high-grade AC joint dislocation who underwent surgery with anatomic CC fixation using double clavicular tunnels and three flip-buttons. Demographic data were obtained from medical records. A functional evaluation using subjective shoulder value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaires was performed, and an evaluation of preoperative and postoperative comparative Zanca view images was performed. Factors associated with functional outcomes and radiological AC reduction were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients completed follow-up and were included in the analysis. The mean SSV, VAS, and DASH scores were 92.8, 0.8, and 6.4, respectively. Patients who had complications experienced significantly worse functional outcomes (DASH: P=0.037). Suboptimal final AC reduction was observed in nine patients (11.1%), and significantly more frequently in patients older than 40 years (P=0.031) and in surgeries performed more than 7 days after injury (P=0.034). There were two reoperations (2.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic CC fixation with a double clavicular tunnel and three flip-buttons leads to good functional outcomes, low complication rates, and high rates of optimal AC reduction. Level of Evidence: Level IV; Case series.

Glenoid Component Placement Assisted by Augmented Reality Through a Head-Mounted Display During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Component positioning is a key factor for avoiding complications and improving functional outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Preoperative planning can improve component positioning. However, translating the preoperative plan into the surgical procedure can be challenging. This is particularly the case for the glenoid component positioning in severe deformity or limited visualization of the scapula. Different computational-assisted techniques have been developed to aid implementation of the preoperative plan into the surgical procedure. Navigated augmented reality (AR) refers to the real world augmented with virtual real-time information about the position and orientation of instruments and components. This information can be presented through a head-mounted display (HMD), which enables the user to visualize the virtual information directly overlaid onto the real world. Navigated AR systems through HMD have been validated for shoulder arthroplasty using phantoms and cadavers. This article details a step-by-step guide use of a navigated AR system through HMD, in the placement of the glenoid bony-augmented component.