Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) for cladribine tablets in achieving sustained disability improvement (SDI) in multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to compare probabilities of SDI on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), treated with cladribine tablets (CT) or fingolimod (FTY), natalizumab (NAT), alemtuzumab (ALE) and ocrelizumab (OCR). CLINICAL RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY: Progression of neurological disability as measured by the EDSS has been a common endpoint in multiple sclerosis (MS) trials. Novel therapies can not only slow this process, but in some patients even reverse it. This effect can be measured by the sustained disability improvement (SDI) - an endpoint that seems to continuously gain importance in clinical practice. Despite that, SDI has rarely been explored as an outcome in MS clinical studies, mostly as post-hoc analyses from randomised trials or as retrospective analyses based on patient registry records. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in Medline, Embase and Cochrane to identify clinical trials (RCT or non-RCT) evaluating 6-month SDI. An indirect comparison via network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. Bayesian inference with Markov chains Monte Carlo methods were applied. RESULTS: Eight trials presenting SDI results and applicable for NMA were included: six non-RCTs, with control groups selected by propensity score matching, and two RCTs. NMA results revealed that probability of achieving 6-month SDI with CT was significantly higher compared to all other high efficacy disease-modifying drugs with available data - HR (95% Crl - Bayesian Credibility Interval) vs. FTY: 4.98 (2.11-11.79); vs. NAT: 3.12 (1.31-7.27); vs. ALE: 9.29 (3.40-25.21). The main results were confirmed in the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Of all considered therapies, treatment with cladribine tablets was associated with a higher probability of sustained disability improvement in RRMS patients. As this conclusion is based on available clinical data of limited quality, future studies, as well as real-world data, would be valuable to provide further evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of RRMS therapies.

Cladribine tablets versus other disease-modifying oral drugs in achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Assuming full control of the relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the main target for practitioners. Disease control could be defined as no clinical relapse, absence of 3-month confirmed disability progression expressed on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), as well as no disease activity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity) is a composite endpoint used primarily in clinical trials, comprising these 3 measurements of disease activity. The aim of this study is to compare cladribine tablets (CT) with oral disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) - fingolimod (FTY), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and teriflunomide (TERI) - with regard to NEDA-3 and its clinical (relapse and disability progression) and MRI (no new T1 Gd+ lesions or no new T2 lesions or no enlargement of existing lesions) components occurrence during a 24-month follow-up. METHODS: In June 2018, a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane database was performed. Due to the lack of head-to-head trials directly comparing cladribine tablets to oral drugs of interest, an indirect network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied, with placebo as a common comparator. NMA was performed with Bayesian approach and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method for estimating posterior distributions. Additional data used in the analysis were taken from conference abstracts or post hoc analyses of pooled data from the clinical studies. RESULTS: Six randomised clinical trials (RCTs) presenting NEDA, with active treatment compared to placebo, were included in the NMA: CLARITY (CT), FREEDOMS and FREEDOMS II (FTY), CONFIRM and DEFINE (DMF) and TEMSO (TERI). The rate of NEDA-3 was significantly higher in cladribine tablets vs DMF: OR (odds ratio)=1.76 (95% CrI [credible intervals]: 1.02-3.03) and TERI: OR=2.78 (95% CrI: 1.60-4.83), but not vs FTY. For the MRI NEDA results were as follows - cladribine tablets vs DMF: OR=1.87 (95% CrI: 1.18-2.97); cladribine tablets vs TERI: OR=6.59 (95% CrI: 4.32-10.09); cladribine tablets vs FTY: OR=1.58 (95% CrI: 1.10-2.29). The comparison of clinical NEDA did not reach significance vs either DMF or TERI and evaluation vs FTY was not possible because of lack of data. CONCLUSIONS: Cladribine in the form of tablets was significantly more effective in achieving NEDA-3 than DMF and TERI, but there was no significant difference vs FTY. Cladribine tablets was more effective than all oral comparators considering the MRI NEDA. For clinical NEDA, the superiority vs DMF and vs TERI was not confirmed, and vs FTY evaluation was not possible.