Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 230(2): e486-e495, 2024 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The RTS,S/AS01E (RTS,S) malaria vaccine is recommended for children in malaria endemic areas. This phase 2b trial evaluates RTS,S fractional- and full-dose regimens in Ghana and Kenya. METHODS: In total, 1500 children aged 5-17 months were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to receive RTS,S or rabies control vaccine. RTS,S groups received 2 full RTS,S doses at months 0 and 1 and either full (groups R012-20, R012-14-26) or fractional doses (one-fifth; groups Fx012-14-26, Fx017-20-32). RESULTS: At month 32 post-dose 1, vaccine efficacy against clinical malaria (all episodes) ranged from 38% (R012-20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%-49%) to 53% (R012-14-26; 95% CI: 42%-62%). Vaccine impact (cumulative number of cases averted/1000 children vaccinated) was 1344 (R012-20), 2450 (R012-14-26), 2273 (Fx012-14-26), and 2112 (Fx017-20-32). To account for differences in vaccine volume (fractional vs full dose; post hoc analysis), we estimated cases averted/1000 RTS,S full-dose equivalents: 336 (R012-20), 490 (R012-14-26), 874 (Fx012-14-26), and 880 (Fx017-20-32). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine efficacy was similar across RTS,S groups. Vaccine impact accounting for full-dose equivalence suggests that using fractional-dose regimens could be a viable dose-sparing strategy. If maintained through trial end, these observations underscore the means to reduce cost per regimen thus maximizing impact and optimizing supply. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03276962 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Malária Falciparum , Eficácia de Vacinas , Humanos , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Gana , Lactente , Quênia , Feminino , Masculino , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia , Esquemas de Imunização , Malária/prevenção & controle , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia
2.
J Integr Neurosci ; 23(3): 57, 2024 Mar 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538226

RESUMO

Recently, novel non-pharmacological interventions, such as photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy, have shown promise for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This article outlines the translation from the preclinical to clinical stages of an innovative brain-gut PBM therapy in a mouse model of AD, a pilot clinical trial involving mild-to-moderate AD patients, and a continuing pivotal clinical trial with a similar patient population. In a mouse model of AD (Aß25-35), daily application of brain-gut PBM therapy to both the head and the abdomen produced a neuroprotective effect against the neurotoxic effects of an Aß25-35 peptide injection by normalizing all the modified behavioral and biochemical parameters. The pilot clinical trial to evaluate brain-gut PBM therapy demonstrated the tolerability and feasibility of the novel PBM-based treatment for mild-to-moderate AD patients. Compared to the sham patients, the PBM-treated patients had lower Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) comprehension sub-scores, higher forward verbal spans, and lower Trail Making Test (TMT) Part B (TMT-B) execution times, which suggest an improvement in cognitive functions. This pilot study provided important information for the design of a novel pivotal clinical trial, currently in progress, to assess the efficacy of brain-gut PBM therapy in a larger sample of AD patients. This pivotal clinical trial could demonstrate that brain-gut PBM therapy is a safe, well-tolerated, and efficient disease-modifying treatment for mild-to-moderate AD patients and that it has medical and economic benefits.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Animais , Camundongos , Humanos , Doença de Alzheimer/radioterapia , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos Piloto , Encéfalo , Cognição
3.
J Integr Neurosci ; 23(5): 92, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812393

RESUMO

The evidence of brain-gut interconnections in Alzheimer's disease (AD) opens novel avenues for the treatment of a pathology for which no definitive treatment exists. Gut microbiota and bacterial translocation may produce peripheral inflammation and immune modulation, contributing to brain amyloidosis, neurodegeneration, and cognitive deficits in AD. The gut microbiota can be used as a potential therapeutic target in AD. In particular, photobiomodulation (PBM) can affect the interaction between the microbiota and the immune system, providing a potential explanation for its restorative properties in AD-associated dysbiosis. PBM is a safe, non-invasive, non-ionizing, and non-thermal therapy that uses red or near-infrared light to stimulate the cytochrome c oxidase (CCO, complex IV), the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, resulting in adenosine triphosphate synthesis. The association of the direct application of PBM to the head with an abscopal and a systemic treatment through simultaneous application to the abdomen provides an innovative therapeutic approach to AD by targeting various components of this highly complex pathology. As a hypothesis, PBM might have a significant role in the therapeutic options available for the treatment of AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Eixo Encéfalo-Intestino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Doença de Alzheimer/radioterapia , Doença de Alzheimer/metabolismo , Humanos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efeitos da radiação , Eixo Encéfalo-Intestino/fisiologia , Animais , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Encéfalo/efeitos da radiação
4.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 715-729, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042099

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The use of novel adjuvants in human vaccines continues to expand as their contribution to preventing disease in challenging populations and caused by complex pathogens is increasingly understood. AS01 is a family of liposome-based vaccine Adjuvant Systems containing two immunostimulants: 3-O-desacyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A and the saponin QS-21. AS01-containing vaccines have been approved and administered to millions of individuals worldwide. AREAS COVERED: Here, we report advances in our understanding of the mode of action of AS01 that contributed to the development of efficacious vaccines preventing disease due to malaria, herpes zoster, and respiratory syncytial virus. AS01 induces early innate immune activation that induces T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated responses with optimized functional characteristics and induction of immune memory. AS01-containing vaccines appear relatively impervious to baseline immune status translating into high efficacy across populations. Currently licensed AS01-containing vaccines have shown acceptable safety profiles in clinical trials and post-marketing settings. EXPERT OPINION: Initial expectations that adjuvantation with AS01 could support effective vaccine responses and contribute to disease control have been realized. Investigation of the utility of AS01 in vaccines to prevent other challenging diseases, such as tuberculosis, is ongoing, together with efforts to fully define its mechanisms of action in different vaccine settings.


Adjuvants are added to vaccines to increase the immune response produced after vaccination. Adjuvant Systems contain two or more molecules that stimulate the immune system. AS01 is an Adjuvant System that contains two components, MPL and QS-21, that stimulate the immune system. AS01 is included in three approved vaccines: a malaria vaccine for children, a herpes zoster vaccine for older adults, and a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine also for older adults. Vaccines containing AS01 have been extensively evaluated in clinical trials and administered to millions of individuals during market use. These vaccines are effective in preventing disease and have acceptable safety in different age groups. Experiments have been done to investigate how AS01 works in vaccines to produce an efficient immune response that helps to protect against the disease being targeted. A key effect of AS01 is to encourage specific immune cells to produce chemicals that stimulate the immune system. We now know that this effect is due to co-operation between MPL and QS-21. Experiments have shown that AS01 induces a sophisticated immune 'gene signature' in blood within 24 h after vaccination, and people who developed this 'gene signature' had a stronger response to vaccination. AS01 seems to be able to stimulate the immune system of most people ­ even if they are older or have a weakened immune system. This means that AS01 could be included in other vaccines against other challenging diseases, such as tuberculosis, or could be used in the treatment of some disease, such as chronic hepatitis B.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Adjuvantes de Vacinas , Saponinas , Humanos , Saponinas/imunologia , Saponinas/farmacologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Lipídeo A/análogos & derivados , Lipídeo A/imunologia , Lipídeo A/farmacologia , Animais , Imunidade Inata/efeitos dos fármacos , Vacinas contra Vírus Sincicial Respiratório/imunologia , Lipossomos , Malária/prevenção & controle , Malária/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Combinação de Medicamentos
5.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 2024 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The first licensed malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01E, confers moderate protection against symptomatic disease. Because many malaria infections are asymptomatic, we conducted a large-scale longitudinal parasite genotyping study of samples from a clinical trial exploring how vaccine dosing regimen affects vaccine efficacy. METHODS: Between Sept 28, 2017, and Sept 25, 2018, 1500 children aged 5-17 months were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive four different RTS,S/AS01E regimens or a rabies control vaccine in a phase 2b open-label clinical trial in Ghana and Kenya. Participants in the four RTS,S groups received two full doses at month 0 and month 1 and either full doses at month 2 and month 20 (group R012-20); full doses at month 2, month 14, month 26, and month 38 (group R012-14); fractional doses at month 2, month 14, month 26, and month 38 (group Fx012-14; early fourth dose); or fractional doses at month 7, month 20, and month 32 (group Fx017-20; delayed third dose). We evaluated the time to the first new genotypically detected infection and the total number of new infections during two follow-up periods (12 months and 20 months) in more than 36 000 dried blood spot specimens from 1500 participants. To study vaccine effects on time to the first new infection, we defined vaccine efficacy as one minus the hazard ratio (HR; RTS,S vs control) of the first new infection. We performed a post-hoc analysis of vaccine efficacy based on malaria infection status at first vaccination and force of infection by month 2. This trial (MAL-095) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03281291. FINDINGS: We observed significant and similar vaccine efficacy (25-43%; 95% CI union 9-53) against first new infection for all four RTS,S/AS01E regimens across both follow-up periods (12 months and 20 months). Each RTS,S/AS01E regimen significantly reduced the mean number of new infections in the 20-month follow-up period by 1·1-1·6 infections (95% CI union 0·6-2·1). Vaccine efficacy against first new infection was significantly higher in participants who were infected with malaria (68%; 95% CI 50-80) than in those who were uninfected (37%; 23-48) at the first vaccination (p=0·0053). INTERPRETATION: All tested dosing regimens blocked some infections to a similar degree. Improved vaccine efficacy in participants infected during vaccination could suggest new strategies for highly efficacious malaria vaccine development and implementation. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA, PATH, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA