Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 13(2): e0191556, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29444105

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether consumer-level activity trackers can estimate wheelchair strokes and arm ergometer revolutions. Thirty able-bodied participants wore three consumer-level activity trackers (Garmin VivoFit, FitBit Flex, and Jawbone UP24) on the wrist. Participants propelled a wheelchair at fixed frequencies (30, 45 and 60 strokes per minute (spm)) three minutes each and at pre-determined varied frequencies, (30-80 spm) for two minutes. Participants also freely wheeled through an obstacle course. 10 other participants performed arm-ergometry at 40, 60 and 80 revolutions per minute (rpm), for three minutes each. Mean percentage error (MPE(SD)) for 30 spm were ≥46(26)% for all monitors, and declined to 3-6(2-7)% at 60 spm. For the obstacle course, MPE ranged from 12-17(7-13)% for all trackers. For arm-ergometry, MPE was at 1-96(0-37)% with the best measurement for the Fitbit at 60 and 80 rpm, and the Garmin at 80rpm, with MPE = 1(0-1)%. The consumer-level wrist-worn activity trackers we tested have higher accuracy/precision at higher movement frequencies but perform poorly at lower frequencies.


Assuntos
Actigrafia , Braço/fisiologia , Ergonomia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Cadeiras de Rodas , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA