Belumosudil for chronic graft-versus-host disease after 2 or more prior lines of therapy: the ROCKstar Study.

Belumosudil, an investigational oral selective inhibitor of Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2), reduces type 17 and follicular T helper cells via downregulation of STAT3 and enhances regulatory T cells via upregulation of STAT5. Belumosudil may effectively treat patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a major cause of morbidity and late nonrelapse mortality after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. This phase 2 randomized multicenter registration study evaluated belumosudil 200 mg daily (n = 66) and 200 mg twice daily (n = 66) in subjects with cGVHD who had received 2 to 5 prior lines of therapy. The primary end point was best overall response rate (ORR). Duration of response (DOR), changes in Lee Symptom Scale score, failure-free survival, corticosteroid dose reductions, and overall survival were also evaluated. Overall median follow-up was 14 months. The best ORR for belumosudil 200 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62-84) and 77% (95% CI, 65-87), respectively, with high response rates observed in all subgroups. All affected organs demonstrated complete responses. The median DOR was 54 weeks; 44% of subjects have remained on therapy for ≥1 year. Symptom reduction with belumosudil 200 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily was reported in 59% and 62% of subjects, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with those expected in patients with cGVHD receiving corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants. Sixteen subjects (12%) discontinued belumosudil because of possible drug-related AEs. Belumosudil, a promising therapy for cGVHD, was well tolerated with clinically meaningful responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03640481.

Long-term follow-up of a comparison of nonmyeloablative allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma.

Before the introduction of new drugs, we designed a trial where treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma patients was based on the presence or absence of HLA-identical siblings. First-line treatments included a cytoreductive autograft followed by a nonmyeloablative allograft or a second melphalan-based autograft. Here, we report long-term clinical outcomes and discuss them in the light of the recent remarkable advancements in the treatment of myeloma. After a median follow-up of 7 years, median overall survival (OS) was not reached (P = .001) and event-free survival (EFS) was 2.8 years (P = .005) for 80 patients with HLA-identical siblings and 4.25 and 2.4 years for 82 without, respectively. Median OS was not reached (P = .02) and EFS was 39 months (P = .02) in the 58 patients who received a nonmyeloablative allograft whereas OS was 5.3 years and EFS 33 months in the 46 who received 2 high-dose melphalan autografts. Among patients who reached complete remission in these 2 cohorts, 53% and 19% are in continuous complete remission. Among relapsed patients rescued with "new drugs," median OS from the start of salvage therapy was not reached and was 1.7 (P = .01) years, respectively. Allografting conferred a long-term survival and disease-free advantage over standard autografting in this comparative study.

Association between calcineurin inhibitor blood concentrations and outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

To determine whether calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) blood concentrations within the first month after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) correlated with the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and other outcomes, we retrospectively analyzed data from 1181 patients with hematologic malignancies who had HCT from HLA-matched related (n = 634) or unrelated (n = 547) donors at a single institution between 2001 and 2009. After myeloablative HCT (n = 774), higher CNI concentrations were not associated with lower risks of acute or chronic GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD). After nonmyeloablative HCT (n = 407), higher cyclosporine concentrations were associated with decreased risks of grade 2-4 and 3-4 aGVHD (hazard ratio [HR] per 100 ng/mL change in cyclosporine concentrations, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-0.82; and HR, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.49-0.9, respectively), nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.6, 95% CI, 0.41-0.88), and overall mortality (HR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99). Cyclosporine concentrations were not associated with risks of cGVHD and recurrent malignancy after nonmyeloablative HCT. Among patients given tacrolimus after nonmyeloablative HCT, a similar trend of CNI-associated GVHD-protection was observed. Higher CNI concentrations were not associated with apparent renal toxicity. We conclude that higher cyclosporine concentrations relatively early after nonmyeloablative HCT confer protection against aGVHD that translates into reduced risks of nonrelapse and overall mortality.

Donor statin treatment protects against severe acute graft-versus-host disease after related allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes among 567 patients with hematologic malignancies who had hematopoietic cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling donors between 2001 and 2007 for a correlation between statin use and risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Compared with allografts where neither the donor nor recipient was treated with a statin at the time of transplantation (n = 464), statin use by the donor and not the recipient (n = 75) was associated with a decreased risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.9). Statin use by both donor and recipient (n = 12) was suggestively associated with a decreased risk of grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.00; 95% confidence interval, undefined), whereas statin use by the recipient and not the donor (n = 16) did not confer GVHD protection. Risks of chronic GVHD, recurrent malignancy, nonrelapse mortality, and overall mortality were not significantly affected by donor or recipient statin exposure. Statin-associated GVHD protection was restricted to recipients with cyclosporine-based postgrafting immunosuppression and was not observed among those given tacrolimus (P = .009). These results suggest that donor statin treatment may be a promising strategy to prevent severe acute GVHD without compromising immunologic control of the underlying malignancy.

Long-term outcome of patients with multiple myeloma after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation and nonmyeloablative allografting.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) followed by nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT (auto/alloHCT) provides cytoreduction and graft-versus-myeloma effects. We report on long-term outcomes of 102 patients with multiple myeloma who received auto/alloHCT with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Treatment consisted of high-dose melphalan and autograft followed by 2-Gy total body irradiation, with or without fludarabine, and alloHCT from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings. Postgrafting immunosuppressive agent was cyclosporine or tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Forty-two percent of patients developed grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 74% extensive chronic GVHD. Five-year nonrelapse mortality after allografting was 18%, 95% related to GVHD or infections. Among 95 patients with detectable disease, 59 achieved complete remissions. Median time to progression was 5 years. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 years. Five-year OS and PFS were 64% and 36%, respectively. Seventy-three patients receiving autoHCT within 10 months from treatment initiation had 5-year OS of 69% and PFS of 37%. In multivariate analysis, beta-2-microglobulin of more than 3.5 microg/mL at diagnosis and auto/alloHCT more than 10 months after treatment initiation correlated with shorter OS (P = .03 and P = .02) and PFS (P = .04 and P = .03), whereas Karnofsky scores less than 90% at allotransplantation correlated with shorter PFS only (P = .005). Long-term disease control and GVHD remain key issues.

Nonmyeloablative allografting for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the experience of the Gruppo Italiano Trapianti di Midollo.

Despite recent advances, allografting remains the only potential cure for myeloma. From July 1999 to June 2005, 100 newly diagnosed patients younger than 65 years were enrolled in a prospective multicenter study. First-line treatment included vincristin, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (VAD)-based induction chemotherapy, a cytoreductive autograft (melphalan 200 mg/m(2)) followed by a single dose of nonmyeloablative total body irradiation and allografting from an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling. Primary end points were the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) from diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 5 years, OS was not reached, and EFS was 37 months. Incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 38% and 50%, respectively. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 53% of patients. Profound cytoreduction (CR or very good partial remission) before allografting was associated with achievement of posttransplantation CR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.20, P = .03) and longer EFS (HR 0.33, P < .01). Conversely, development of chronic GVHD was not correlated with CR or response duration. This tandem transplantation approach allows prolonged survival and long-term disease control in patients with reduced tumor burden at the time of allografting. We are currently investigating the role of "new drugs" in intensifying pretransplantation cytoreduction and posttransplantation graft-versus-myeloma effects to further improve clinical outcomes. (http://ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT-00702247.).

Epidemiology and Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A US Claims Analysis.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although the clinical outcomes of cGVHD are well documented, few studies have assessed treatment practices outside of clinical trials. The present study aimed to quantify the prevalence of cGVHD, examine provider prescribing patterns, and evaluate the healthcare cost and resource utilization (HCRU) in a US cGVHD population. We analyzed anonymized claims from the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) 5% sample for beneficiaries enrolled between 2013 and 2016 and PharMetrics commercial 2013 to 2018 databases to identify cGVHD in allogeneic HCT recipients. cGVHD was identified based on International Classification of Diseases Ninth/Tenth Revision diagnosis codes for cGVHD or unspecified GVHD with a first diagnosis >180 days post-HCT or a maintained unspecified GVHD diagnosis for >12 months postindex of unspecified GVHD diagnosis. Longitudinal and line of therapy (LOT) analyses were based on the PharMetrics dataset for 2013 to 2018. Healthcare costs were calculated by adding the inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy insurer and beneficiary paid amounts for the commercially insured population. Total HCRU was assessed using the number of inpatient and outpatient visits following the initial cGVHD diagnosis. In 2016, the projected prevalence of cGVHD in the United States based on the Medicare FFS and PharMetrics commercial databases was 14,017 individual patients. Within 3 years after undergoing allogeneic HCT, 42% of patients developed cGVHD; 66% of the cGVHD patients had a prior diagnosis of acute GVHD. The majority of cGVHD patients received at least one systemic therapy; 71% and 47% of cGVHD patients progressed to a second and third LOT, respectively. A total of 24 unique therapeutic agents and more than 150 combinations were used in the second and third LOTs. Corticosteroids and corticosteroid combination therapy were the most common forms of treatment across all examined LOTs. Furthermore, the most commonly used agents in the first LOT, second LOT, and third LOT were corticosteroids only, calcineurin inhibitors only, and corticosteroids only, respectively. In the 12 months postdiagnosis, cGVHD patients had an average of 21.0 cGVHD-related inpatient and outpatient visits (2.8 inpatient and 18.2 outpatient visits). A significant proportion of allogeneic HCT recipients continue to develop cGVHD, and despite advances in the understanding of cGVHD, corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy. Patients often progress beyond the first LOT, at which time the utilization of systemic therapies is highly variable, demonstrating the need for evidence-based treatment approaches.

Impact of recipient statin treatment on graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes among 1206 patients with hematologic malignancies who had hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-identical siblings (n = 630) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (n = 576) at a single institution between 2001 and 2007 for a correlation between recipient statin use and risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Among recipients with cyclosporine-based postgrafting immunosuppression (n = 821), statin use at the time of transplant (6%) was associated with a decreased risk of extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (multivariate hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.0; P = .05) and an increased risk of recurrent malignancy (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0; P = .04). Recipient statin use, however, had no apparent impact on the risks of cGVHD and recurrent malignancy among recipients given tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (n = 385; 8% statin treated). Risks of acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, and overall mortality were not significantly affected by recipient statin use. Hence, recipient statin treatment at the time of allogeneic HCT may decrease the risk of cGVHD in patients with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, but at the expense of a compromised graft-versus-tumor effect.

A comparison of allografting with autografting for newly diagnosed myeloma.

BACKGROUND: In this trial of the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, we compared a protocol that entailed a hematopoietic stem-cell autograft followed by an allograft from an HLA-identical sibling with a protocol of tandem autografts. METHODS: We enrolled 162 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were 65 years of age or younger and who had at least one sibling. All patients were initially treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone, followed by melphalan and autologous stem-cell rescue. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling then received nonmyeloablative total-body irradiation and stem cells from the sibling. Patients without an HLA-identical sibling received two consecutive myeloablative doses of melphalan, each of which was followed by autologous stem-cell rescue. The primary end points were overall survival and event-free survival. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45 months (range, 21 to 90), the median overall survival and event-free survival were longer in the 80 patients with HLA-identical siblings than in the 82 patients without HLA-identical siblings (80 months vs. 54 months, P=0.01; and 35 months vs. 29 months, P=0.02, respectively). Among patients who completed their assigned treatment protocols, treatment-related mortality did not differ significantly between the double-autologous-transplant group (46 patients) and the autograft-allograft group (58 patients, P=0.09), but disease-related mortality was significantly higher in the double-autologous-transplant group (43% vs. 7%, P<0.001). The cumulative incidence rates of grades II, III, and IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) combined and of grade IV GVHD in the autograft-allograft group were 43% and 4%, respectively. Overall, 21 of 58 patients (36%) were in complete remission after a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 10 to 72) after allografting. Of the 46 patients who received two autografts, 25 (54%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, survival in recipients of a hematopoietic stem-cell autograft followed by a stem-cell allograft from an HLA-identical sibling is superior to that in recipients of tandem stem-cell autografts. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00415987 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Delaying DLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation after total body irradiation.

Exposure to accidental or deliberate radiation poses a threat to public health, proving lethal at higher doses in large part because of deleterious effects on marrow. In those cases, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) might be required to restore marrow function. Most radiation accident victims will have HLA-haploidentical relatives who could serve as HCT donors. Here, we assessed in a canine HCT model the total body irradiation (TBI) doses after which transplants might be required and successful engraftment would be possible. In an attempt at mimicking the logistical problems likely to exist after radiation accidents, 4-, 8- or 10-day intervals were placed between TBI and HCT. To keep the experimental readout simple, no graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention was administered. All dogs transplanted after a 4-day delay following 700 or 920 cGy TBI successfully engrafted, whereas virtually all those given 450 or 600 cGy rejected their grafts. Transplant delays of 8 and 10 days following 920 cGy TBI also resulted in successful engraftment in most dogs, whereas a delay of 8 days after 700 cGy resulted in virtually uniform graft failure. The time courses of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and rates of granulocyte recovery in engrafting dogs were comparable among dogs regardless of the lengths of delay. In other studies, we showed that most dogs not given HCT survived 700 cGy TBI with intensive supportive care, whereas those given 800 cGy TBI and higher died with marrow aplasia. Thus, DLA-haploidentical HCT was successful even when carried out 4, 8, or 10 days after TBI at or above radiation exposures where dogs survived with intensive care alone.

Bortezomib with or without dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of bortezomib in 23 patients with multiple myeloma who had relapsed after allografting. Bortezomib was given as single agent to 9 patients (39%) and in combination with steroids in the other 14 (61%). Major toxicities were thrombocytopenia (10/23, 43%) and peripheral neuropathy (12/23, 52%). The overall response rate was 61% (14/23), including 22% (5/23) immunofixation-negative complete remissions. No significant differences in toxicity and response rates were seen between patients treated with bortezomib plus steroids and bortezomib alone. After a median follow-up of 6 months, progression free survival was 6 months. Twenty-one patients are alive, two and five in continuous very good partial and complete remissions, respectively.

Unrelated donor haematopoietic cell transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning for patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Allografting induces long-term molecular remissions and possibly cure in myeloma patients. The development of non-myeloablative conditionings has reduced the transplant-related mortality (TRM) associated with myeloablation and extended the eligible age for transplantation. Moreover, high response rates are reported especially when allografting is preceded by cytoreductive high-dose chemotherapy. We investigated the feasibility of unrelated donor non-myeloablative transplantation as either part of the initial treatment plan or as salvage treatment in heavily pretreated patients. METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent non-myeloablative allografting, 10 as part of their initial treatment and 12 at relapse. Donors were matched for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1 by high-resolution typing. Only one single class I allele disparity was allowed. Conditioning consisted of fludarabine 90 mg/m(2) and 2 Gy total body irradiation. Graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: All patients except two (91%) readily engrafted. After a median follow-up of 20 (10-30) months, incidences of grade II-IV acute and extensive chronic GVHD were 50% and 61%. Overall response (OR) was 55%, with four (20%) complete and seven (35%) partial remissions. However, in patients allografted up-front OR was 89% whereas in the heavily pretreated group OR was 27% (P = 0.01). Two-year overall and event-free survivals were both 79% in the group transplanted up-front and 27% and 25% among relapsed patients (P = 0.025 and P = 0.006, respectively). Overall, six patients died of TRM and three of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Unrelated donor non-myeloablative allografting is feasible in myeloma. Disease control appears more pronounced when patients are treated soon after diagnosis.

Kaposi's sarcoma triggered by endogenous HHV-8 reactivation after non-myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic transplantation.

Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) is causally associated with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). KS is most frequently observed in HIV patients and in solid organ transplant recipients. The role of HHV-8 in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains to be determined. Here we describe a case in which KS concomitantly occurred with CMV reactivation after a non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT and presented with skin lesions, but not visceral involvement. Skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis and ruled out graft versus host disease or disease recurrence. Molecular findings indicated viral reactivation of the recipient's primary infection. Tumour lesions completely receded when immunosuppression was tapered. Prevalence studies in donors and recipients are needed to determine the clinical impact of HHV-8 in HCT.

New drugs for treatment of multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of plasma cells that has fatal consequences. New insights into the biology of MM have identified molecular mechanisms that hold promise as therapeutic targets. Laboratory and preclinical studies have shown that intracellular regulatory proteins and functional interactions between MM cells and the bone-marrow microenvironment have a pivotal role in the growth, survival, drug resistance, and malignant progression of MM cells. New agents associated with molecular targets have prompted clinical investigators to design new treatment strategies initially for advanced MM and later for newly diagnosed MM, with encouraging preliminary results. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of action of these new rational drugs and the preliminary clinical outcomes of a new treatment regimen for MM.