The complement system as a target in cancer immunotherapy.

Malignant cells are part of a complex network within the tumor microenvironment, where their interaction with host cells and soluble mediators, including complement components, is pivotal. The complement system, known for its role in immune defense and homeostasis, exhibits a dual effect on cancer progression. This dichotomy arises from its antitumoral opsonophagocytosis and cytotoxicity versus its protumoral chronic inflammation mediated by the C5a/C5aR1 axis, influencing antitumor T-cell responses. Recent studies have revealed distinct co-expression patterns of complement genes in various cancer types, correlating with prognosis. Notably, some cancers exhibit co-regulated overexpression of complement genes associated with poor prognosis, while others show favorable outcomes. However, significant intra-patient heterogeneity further complicates this classification. Moreover, the involvement of locally produced and intracellular complement proteins adds complexity to the tumor microenvironment dynamics. This review highlights the unique interplay of complement components within different cancers and patient cohorts, showing that "one size does not fit all", for complement in cancer. It summarizes the clinical trials for complement targeting in cancer, emphasizing the need for tailored therapeutic approaches. By elucidating the mechanistic basis of complement's context-dependent role, this review aims to facilitate the development of personalized cancer therapies, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.

Clinical Relevance of Anti-C3 and Anti-C4 Autoantibodies in Lupus Nephritis.

Introduction: Complement system overactivation is pivotal in lupus nephritis (LN) pathophysiology. Considering that anti-C3 autoantibodies play a significant role in LN pathophysiology, we explored them as disease activity biomarkers and compared them to the ones against the homologous protein, C4. Methods: We investigated the presence of anti-C3 and anti-C4 IgG autoantibodies in a LN cohort (N = 85 patients) and monitored their changes over time. We correlated autoantibody presence with clinical parameters. We conducted cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses (N = 295 samples, 8 years follow-up) to explore associations between autoantibodies and disease progression. Antigen-specific anti-C3 or anti-C4 IgG were purified from plasma by affinity chromatography and their reactivity was tested for cross-reactivity against purified C3 or C4 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The reactivity against C3 was independent of C4. Our study revealed distinct roles for anti-C3 and anti-C4 in LN. Anti-C3 IgG exhibited stronger clinical correlations than anti-C4, showing associations with hypocomplementemia, anti-dsDNA, class IV LN, and active disease according to British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) renal score. In a longitudinal analysis, anti-C3 positivity at initial sampling predicted present and future disease exacerbation alone and even better when combined with anti-dsDNA, as indicated by a transition to BILAG category A. Conclusion: Our research provides insights into anti-C3/C3b and anti-C4 autoantibodies in LN, revealing that they are often not cross-reactive. Anti-C3 utility as disease activity biomarkers is underscored by its stronger clinical associations and predictive value for future flares. Combining anti-C3 and anti-dsDNA out-performs the 2 factors alone, suggesting that the incorporation of anti-C3/C3b quantification into routine clinical practice could improve LN management.

Humoral complementomics - exploration of noninvasive complement biomarkers as predictors of renal cancer progression.

Despite the progress of anti-cancer treatment, the prognosis of many patients with solid tumors is still dismal. Reliable noninvasive biomarkers are needed to predict patient survival and therapy response. Here, we propose a Humoral Complementomics approach: a work-up of assays to comprehensively evaluate complement proteins, activation fragments, and autoantibodies targeting complement proteins in plasma, which we correlated with the intratumoral complement activation, and/or local production, focusing on localized and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In two prospective ccRCC cohorts, plasma C2, C5, Factor D and properdin were elevated compared to healthy controls, reflecting an inflammatory phenotype that correlated with plasma calprotectin levels but did not associate with CRP or with patient prognosis. Conversely, autoantibodies against the complement C3 and the reduced form of FH (a tumor neo-epitope reported in lung cancer) correlated with a favorable outcome. Our findings pointed to a specific group of patients with elevated plasma C4d and C1s-C1INH complexes, indicating the initiation of the classical pathway, along with elevated Ba and Bb, indicating alternative pathway activation. Boostrapped Lasso regularized Cox regression revealed that the most predictive complement biomarkers were elevated plasma C4d and Bb levels at the time of surgery, which correlated with poor prognosis. In conclusion, we propose Humoral Complementomics as an unbiased approach to study the global state of the complement system in any pathological plasma sample and disease context. Its implementation for ccRCC revealed that elevated C4d and Bb in plasma are promising prognostic biomarkers, correlating with shorter progression-free survival.