RESUMO
The purpose of this study was to review the state of the art of private sector internal error-reporting systems and to begin to develop a classification system for comparing systems. Interviews were conducted to research and examine 9 systems currently on the market. Analysis resulted in the following observations: (1) 7 of the systems are stand-alone, while 2 are part of larger hospital information systems; (2) most of the systems have been in existence for less than 5 years; (3) acute care hospitals are the primary clients; (4) systems are capable of interfacing with other information systems and root-cause analysis programs; and (5) systems are browser based and accessible via the Internet and/or the provider's intranet. Additional studies are needed to determine the impact of these systems on health outcomes. However, one fact is clear: tracking incidents will not improve patient safety unless administrators close the feedback loop on quality.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/classificação , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Setor Privado/organização & administração , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Base de Dados , Humanos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Integração de Sistemas , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This article reports the results of an evaluation of the New Jersey Stein Ethics Education and Development (NJ SEED) project--a statewide initiative to create, organize and educate a statewide network of regional long-term care ethics committees. The main focus of the evaluation was to measure utilization of the committees, describe how facilities have benefited from the project, and identify potential barriers to the use of this resource. METHODS: Based on administrative records from the NJ SEED project, 225 facilities were identified and asked to complete a facility survey. Ninety-three surveys were received, resulting in a 41% response rate. An additional survey of the regional ethics committees (RECs), as well as several focus groups and individual interviews were conducted to supplement the survey data. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of the facility respondents reported current participation in an NJ regional ethics committee. About one third (30%) of participating facilities had requested a formal case consultation (on at least one occasion) on behalf of a resident, but two thirds had consulted with their RECs on a more informal basis. Facilities that reported participating in the REC Network were more likely to have formally written policies than nonparticipants. CONCLUSIONS: Many NJ nursing homes find the statewide REC Network to be an important resource; however continued efforts need to be expended for recruiting and training facilities that are not taking full advantage of this important source of peer support and professional expertise.
Assuntos
Comissão de Ética/organização & administração , Ética Profissional/educação , Casas de Saúde/ética , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Tomada de Decisões/ética , Comissão de Ética/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Focais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , New Jersey , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Política Organizacional , Projetos Piloto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de SaúdeRESUMO
Some employers have begun to undertake a variety of initiatives, collectively termed value-based purchasing (VBP), which aim at factoring quality into the purchasing decision-making process when negotiating costs with providers and insurers. There is evidence that the VBP movement has begun gaining momentum; yet it is unclear whether employers are firmly committed to VBP principles. By surveying a national sample of employers, this study investigates the extent to which employers are currently engaged in VBP activities and also increases our understanding of barriers hampering the broader implementation of these activities.
Assuntos
Comércio , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/normas , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Negociação , Estados UnidosRESUMO
It is generally believed that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) results in less postoperative pain, fewer complications, and shorter recovery periods compared with open procedures. Yet despite these benefits, the level of reimbursement assigned to the surgeon by United States health-care payers is often lower than that for open procedures. Furthermore, the cost of performing a MIS may be higher vs an open procedure because specialized equipment, increased surgical time, or both may be required. In this report, we examine the issue by comparing reimbursements for MIS with open procedures, summarizing the medical literature on MIS vs open surgical procedures, and offering recommendations for payers who establish reimbursement policies. The review is focused on six MIS procedures where outcomes data exist: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lap chole), laparoscopic colectomy (LC), laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Outcomes summarized were length of hospital stay (LOS), operating room time, operating room costs, complications, and return to work or normal activities. The level of scientific evidence was assigned to each study using predetermined criteria. A total of 112 articles were reviewed: 14 for lap chole, 26 for LC, 7 for LF, 19 for LH, 9 for LVHR, and 37 for LA. The data demonstrate that these procedures result in reduced hospital stay, reduced hospital costs, and faster return to work or normal activities. Yet, the operating room time and costs are frequently higher for MIS. These findings suggest that as both the outcomes value and level of operating room resources are greater, MIS warrants reimbursement that meets or exceeds that of open procedures.
Assuntos
Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Apendicectomia/economia , Apendicectomia/métodos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/economia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Colonoscopia/economia , Colonoscopia/métodos , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Fundoplicatura/economia , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hérnia Abdominal/cirurgia , Preços Hospitalares , Humanos , Histeroscopia/economia , Histeroscopia/métodos , Masculino , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
To control expenditures and use medications appropriately, the Medicare drug coverage program has established pharmacy utilization management (PUM) measures. This article assesses the effects of these strategies on the care of seniors. The literature suggests that although caps on drug benefits lower pharmaceutical costs, they may also increase the use of other health care services and hurt health outcomes. Our review raises concerns regarding the potential unintended effects of the Medicare drug program's PUM policies for beneficiaries. Therefore, the economic and clinical impact of PUM measures on seniors should be studied further to help policymakers design better drug benefit plans.