Preliminary Validation Study of the French-Quebec Version of the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease dementia may be preceded by cognitive stages during which behavioral and psychological changes can occur. More precisely, behavioral symptoms may be observed during the subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stages; these symptoms can be measured using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C). OBJECTIVE: To validate the French-Quebec version of the MBI-C in individuals ages 60-85 years. METHOD: The sample included 60 participants (20 MCI, 20 SCD, 20 cognitively healthy) and their informants. To assess the discriminant validity of the MBI-C, a Kruskal-Wallis analysis with a multiple comparisons test was performed on the MBI-C Total score. To determine convergent validity, Spearman correlations were calculated between the MBI-C subscales and a set of validation tools. Finally, test-retest reliability was assessed with Spearman correlations of MBI-C scores between two test sessions. RESULTS: All of the analyses indicated satisfactory psychometric properties for the French-Quebec version of the MBI-C. CONCLUSION: This validation study reveals that the MBI-C can be used successfully in dementia risk assessments. From now on, the use of a validated MBI-C will be possible in the French-Quebec population.

Risk of Neutropenia in Adults Treated with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefazolin: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Neutropenia is an adverse effect associated with the use of several antibiotics, including piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T). Previous findings have suggested that the risk of neutropenia in children is significantly higher with P/T than with ticarcillin-clavulanate. Objectives: To compare the risk of neutropenia associated with P/T and with cefazolin in an adult population and to describe the characteristics of neutropenia episodes observed. Methods: This descriptive retrospective study involved patients aged 18 years or older who received a minimum of 10 days of treatment with P/T or cefazolin between January 2009 and December 2013. Patients who experienced neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1.5 × 109/L) were compared, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, between those who received P/T and those who received cefazolin. Results: A total of 207 patients were included (104 who received P/T and 103 who received cefazolin). Ten episodes of neutropenia were observed, 5 with each antibiotic (4.8% and 4.9%, respectively; odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.278-3.527). The mean cumulative dose of piperacillin was 290.4 g among patients who experienced neutropenia and 247.0 g among all patients treated with P/T, and the mean treatment duration was 24.0 days and 21.0 days, respectively. The average time before the onset of neutropenia was slightly longer with P/T than with cefazolin (22.0 versus 17.2 days, p = 0.38). Conclusions: Although these results require confirmation in a larger clinical trial (to lessen possible attribution bias), the risk of neutropenia appeared to be similar between P/T and cefazolin.

Contexte: La neutropénie est un effet indésirable associé à l'utilisation de plusieurs antibiotiques, dont la pipéracilline-tazobactam (P/T). Des données récentes indiquent que le risque de neutropénie chez les enfants est significativement plus élevé avec la P/T qu'avec l'association ticarcilline-clavulanate. Objectifs: Comparer le risque de neutropénie associé à la P/T et à la céfazoline chez une population adulte et décrire les caractéristiques des épisodes de neutropénie observés. Méthodes: Cette étude rétrospective descriptive impliquait des patients âgés d'au moins 18 ans ayant reçu un traitement d'au moins 10 jours par P/T ou céfazoline entre janvier 2009 et décembre 2013. Les patients ayant présenté une neutropénie (nombre absolu de neutrophiles < 1,5 × 109/L) ont été comparés, à l'aide de modèles de régression logistique univariée et multivariée, entre ceux qui ont reçu de la P/T et ceux qui ont reçu de la céfazoline. Résultats: Au total, 207 patients ont été inclus (104 ayant reçu de la P/T et 103 ayant reçu de la céfazoline). Dix épisodes de neutropénie ont été observés, 5 avec chaque antibiotique (4,8 % et 4,9 %, respectivement; rapport des cotes 0,99; intervalle de confiance à 95 % 0,278­3,527). La dose cumulée moyenne de pipéracilline était de 290,4 g chez les patients ayant présenté une neutropénie et de 247,0 g chez tous les patients traités par P/T. La durée moyenne du traitement était de 24,0 jours et 21,0 jours, respectivement. Le délai moyen avant l'apparition de la neutropénie était légèrement plus long avec la P/T qu'avec la céfazoline (22,0 contre 17,2 jours, p = 0,38). Conclusions: Bien que ces résultats nécessitent une confirmation dans un essai clinique de plus grande envergure (afin de réduire d'éventuels biais d'attribution), le risque de neutropénie semble être similaire chez les personnes ayant reçu de la P/T et ceux ayant reçu de la céfazoline.

Medium Increased Risk for Central Sleep Apnea but Not Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Long-Term Opioid Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Opioids are associated with higher risk for ataxic breathing and sleep apnea. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the influence of long-term opioid use on the apnea-hypopnea and central apnea indices (AHI and CAI, respectively). METHODS: A systematic review protocol (Cochrane Handbook guidelines) was developed for the search and analysis. We searched Embase, Medline, ACP Journal Club, and Cochrane Database up to November 2014 for three topics: (1) narcotics, (2) sleep apnea, and (3) apnea-hypopnea index. The outcome of interest was the variation in AHI and CAI in opioid users versus non-users. Two reviewers performed the data search and extraction, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. Results were combined by standardized mean difference using a random effect model, and heterogeneity was tested by χ(2) and presented as I(2) statistics. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 803 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We compared 2 outcomes: AHI (320 opioid users and 483 non-users) and 790 patients with CAI (315 opioid users and 475 non-users). The absolute effect size for opioid use was a small increased in apnea measured by AHI = 0.25 (95% CI: 0.02-0.49) and a medium for CAI = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.27-0.63). Effect consistency across studies was calculated, showing moderate heterogeneity at I(2) = 59% and 29% for AHI and CAI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis results suggest that long-term opioid use in OSA patients has a medium effect on central sleep apnea.