Maximizing opportunities for kidney transplantation in older adults.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the current state of evidence related to the outcomes of older adults who need and receive kidney transplants, and strategies to facilitate appropriate transplant access in this at-risk group. RECENT FINDINGS: Older adults are a rapidly growing subgroup of the kidney transplant waitlist. Compared to younger adults, older kidney transplant recipients have increased mortality after kidney transplant and lower death-censored graft survival. In determining suitability for transplantation in older patients, clinicians must balance procedural and immunosuppression-related risk with incremental survival when compared with dialysis. To appropriately increase access to transplantation in this population, clinicians and policy makers consider candidates' chronological age and frailty, as well as the quality of and waiting time for a donated allograft. Given risk of deterioration prior to transplant, candidates should be rapidly evaluated, listed, and transplanted using living donor and or less than ideal deceased donor organs when available. SUMMARY: Access to transplantation for older adults can be increased through targeted interventions to address frailty and reduce waiting times through optimized organ use. Focused study and educational interventions for patients and providers are needed to improve the outcomes of this vulnerable group.

Clinician and patient attitudes toward use of organs from hepatitis C viremic donors and their impact on acceptance: A contemporary review.

BACKGROUND: The use of Hepatitis C (HCV) NAT positive allografts remains unusual and is clustered at few centers. We conducted a contemporary literature review to assess whether patient and clinician attitudes toward viremic organs impact acceptance. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases were reviewed to identify studies focused on evaluating patient and provider perceptions of HCV NAT positive organ use within the DAA era (January 2015-April 2021). Search included MeSH terms related to Hepatitis C, transplantation, and patient and clinician attitudes. Two investigators extracted study characteristics including information on willingness to accept viremic organs, HCV-specific outcomes knowledge, HCV-specific concerns, and factors that contributed to acceptance or non-acceptance. RESULTS: Eight studies met all inclusion criteria. These included three pretransplant patient-directed studies, two post-transplant patient-directed studies, one pre- and post-transplant patient-directed study, and two clinician-directed studies. Common themes identified were concerns regarding HCV cure rates, viremic organ quality, DAA cost, stigma, and the possibility of HCV transmission to household members. The perception of decreased waitlist time was associated with viremic organ acceptance. Physician trust played a mixed role in acceptance patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of high cure rates, shorter waitlist times, and higher organ quality appear to have the highest impact on organ acceptance.

The Effect of a Merit Point Incentive System on the Willingness to Donate Organs.

PURPOSE: Although over 90% of the population of the United States supports organ donation, only 60% of the population is registered as donors. Currently, there is a need for a nonmonetary incentive that will improve willingness to donate. We assessed the young adult population's perspective on their willingness to donate organs when merit points are granted to their family members to prioritize their potential transplant if needed. METHODS: We administered a Qualtrics survey from March 2022 to September 2022 to the undergraduate students volunteering to participate at Saint Louis University, which comprised 10 questions that addressed the attitudes of participants regarding the effects of various factors, including the type of donation and the presence of merit points (vouchers granted to self or a family member to facilitate a potential transplant if needed), on participant's willingness to donate an organ while alive or after death. The responses were analyzed by using SAS software (SAS Institute). RESULTS: A total of 572 participants completed the survey. Overall, only 6.5% of surveyed students were unwilling to donate after death. The willingness to donate while alive to a family member was significantly higher than donating to a stranger (95.8% vs 71.2%, P < .0001). When merit points were added, the unwillingness to donate significantly decreased from 6.5% to 3.8%. However, this change was observed only when the merit points were given to a family member and not to self. When merit points were granted, unwillingness to provide a living donation to a stranger decreased from 28.8% to 16.4% (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Merit points to first-degree family members improve students' expressed willingness to donate organs after death; however, self-merit points did not decrease the rate of "unwillingness to donate after death." When living donation is assessed, offering merit points appears to decrease the "unwillingness to donate to strangers." The adoption of a merit point system in the United States may increase the rates of organ donation.