Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Contributes to Executive Function Impairment in Young Children with Down Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Children with Down syndrome (DS) commonly experience difficulties with executive function (EF). They are also vulnerable to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). OSA is associated with EF deficits in typically developing children. A recent study reported an association between OSA and cognitive deficits in 38 school-aged children with DS. We experimentally investigated EF behaviours in young children with DS, and their association with OSA. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Children with DS were recruited to take part in a larger study of OSA (N = 202). Parents of 80 children (50 male) aged 36 to 71 months (M = 56.90, SD = 10.19 months) completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Of these 80 children, 69 were also successfully studied overnight with domiciliary cardiorespiratory polygraphy to diagnose OSA. RESULTS: Obstructive apnoea/hypopnoea index was in the normal range (0-1.49/h) for 28 children but indicated OSA (≥1.5/h) in 41 children. Consistent with previous research, we found a large effect for children experiencing particular weaknesses in working memory, planning and organising, whilst emotional control was a relative strength. OSA was associated with poorer working memory (ß = .23, R2 = .05, p = .025), emotional control (ß = .20, R2 = .04, p = .047) and shifting (ß = .24, R2 = .06, p = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that known EF difficulties in DS are already evident at this young age. Children with DS already have limited cognitive reserve and can ill afford additional EF deficit associated with OSA. OSA is amenable to treatment and should be actively treated in these children to promote optimal cognitive development.

Prevalence and predictors of obstructive sleep apnoea in young children with Down syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are vulnerable to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) because of their unique craniofacial anatomy and hypotonia. Understanding the predictors of OSA in DS may enable targeted screening. METHODS: Children with DS (n = 202) aged from six months to below six years (110 boys) were recruited from three UK children's hospitals. The clinical assessment included height, weight and tonsillar size. The parents either set up cardiorespiratory polygraphy at home or chose laboratory studies. Studies with less than four hours of interpretable data were repeated where possible. American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2012 scoring criteria were used to derive an obstructive apnoea/hypopnoea index (OAHI). Predictors of moderate to severe OSA were examined. RESULTS: In total, 188/202 (93%) participants were successfully studied. Of these, 169 studies were completed at home and 19 in a sleep laboratory. Moderate to severe OSA, defined by an OAHI of >5/h, was found in 14% and mild to moderate OSA (1/h≥OAHI <5/h) was found in 59% of the children. Male gender and habitual snoring predicted OSA but did not have independent predictive power in the presence of the other factors. Age in months, body mass index (BMI) centile and tonsillar size did not predict OSA. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to severe OSA is common in very young children with DS. Examination of tonsillar size did not predict OSA severity. Population-based screening for OSA is recommended in these children, and domiciliary cardiorespiratory polygraphy is an acceptable screening approach. Further research is required to understand the natural history, associated morbidity, optimal screening methodology and treatment modality for OSA in these children.

Weighted blankets and sleep in autistic children--a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a weighted-blanket intervention in treating severe sleep problems in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHODS: This phase III trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover design. Participants were aged between 5 years and 16 years 10 months, with a confirmed ASD diagnosis and severe sleep problems, refractory to community-based interventions. The interventions were either a commercially available weighted blanket or otherwise identical usual weight blanket (control), introduced at bedtime; each was used for a 2-week period before crossover to the other blanket. Primary outcome was total sleep time (TST) recorded by actigraphy over each 2-week period. Secondary outcomes included actigraphically recorded sleep-onset latency, sleep efficiency, assessments of child behavior, family functioning, and adverse events. Sleep was also measured by using parent-report diaries. RESULTS: Seventy-three children were randomized and analysis conducted on 67 children who completed the study. Using objective measures, the weighted blanket, compared with the control blanket, did not increase TST as measured by actigraphy and adjusted for baseline TST. There were no group differences in any other objective or subjective measure of sleep, including behavioral outcomes. On subjective preference measures, parents and children favored the weighted blanket. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a weighted blanket did not help children with ASD sleep for a longer period of time, fall asleep significantly faster, or wake less often. However, the weighted blanket was favored by children and parents, and blankets were well tolerated over this period.