Radiation therapy for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: an overview of current results and controversial issues.

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors. Most meningiomas are WHO grade 1 tumors whereas less than one-quarter of all meningiomas are classified as atypical (WHO grade 2) and anaplastic (WHO grade 3) tumors, based on local invasiveness and cellular features of atypia. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of meningioma therapy and represents the definitive treatment for the majority of patients; however, grade 2 and grade 3 meningiomas display more aggressive behavior and are difficult to treat. Several retrospective series have shown the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. More recently, two phase II prospective trials by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 0539) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 2042) have confirmed the potential benefits of fractionated RT for patients with intermediate and high-risk meningiomas; however, several issues remain a matter of debate. Controversial topics include the timing of radiation treatment in patients with totally resected atypical meningiomas, the optimal radiation technique, dose and fractionation, and treatment planning/target delineation. Ongoing randomized trials are evaluating the efficacy of early adjuvant RT over observation in patients undergoing gross total resection.

Stereotactic reirradiation with temozolomide in patients with recurrent aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a second course of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (re-SRT) and temozolomide (TMZ) as salvage treatment option in patients with aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with recurrent or progressive APTs (n = 17) and PCs (n = 4) who received combined TMZ and re-SRT, 36 Gy/18fractions or 37.5 Gy/15fractions, were retrospectively evaluated. TMZ was given at a dose of 75 mg/m2 given concurrently to re-SRT, and then 150-200 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks or 50 mg/m2 daily for 12 months. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of re-SRT by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 12-58 months), 2-year and 4-year LC rates were 73% and 65%, respectively; 2-year and 4-year survival rates were 82% and 66%, respectively. A complete response was achieved in 2 and partial response in 11 patients. Six patients recurred with a median time to progression of 14 months. O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status and tumor volume emerged as prognostic factors. Grade 3 radiation-related toxicities occurred in 3 (14%) patients. Grade 2 or 3 hematologic toxicities during chemotherapy occurred in 8 (38%) patients. CONCLUSION: Re-SRT and TMZ is a safe treatment offering high LC in patients with progressive APTs and PCs. The potential advantages of combined chemoradiation as up-front or salvage treatment need to be explored in prospective trials.

Feasibility of clinical target volume reduction for glioblastoma treated with standard chemoradiation based on patterns of failure analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze recurrence patterns in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) after standard chemoradiation according to different target volume delineation strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred seven patients with GBM who recurred after standard chemoradiation were evaluated. According to ESTRO target volume delineation guideline, the CTV was generated by adding a 2-cm margin to the GTV, defined as the resection cavity plus residual tumor. Patterns of failure were analyzed using dose-volume histogram. Recurrent lesions were defined as in-field, marginal, or distant if > 80 %, 20-80 %, or < 20 % of the intersecting volume was included in the 95 % isodose line.For each patient, a theoretical plan consisting of reduced 1-cm GTV-to-CTV margin was created to compare patterns of failure and radiation doses to normal brain. RESULTS: Median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 15.3 months and 7.8 months, respectively, from the date of surgery. Recurrences were in-field in 180, marginal in 5, and distant in 22 patients. According to MGMT promoter methylation, distant recurrences occurred in 18.6 % of methylated and 6 % of unmethylated tumors (p = 0.0046). Following replanning with 1-cm reduced margin, dosimetric analysis showed similar patterns of failure. Recurrences were in-field, marginal, and distant in 177, 3, and 27 plans, respectively, although radiation doses to the healthy brain and hippocampi were significantly lower compared with standard target delineation (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Current provide the rationale for evaluating GTV-to-CTV margin reduction in future clinical trials with the aim of limiting the cognitive sequelae of GBM irradiation while maintaining survival benefits of standard chemoradiation.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brainstem metastases: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Brainstem metastases (BSM) are associated with a poor prognosis and their management represents a therapeutic challenge. BSM are often inoperable and, in absence of randomized trials, the optimal radiation treatment of BSM remains to be defined. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated steretotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in the treatment of BSM in a series of patients treated in different clinical centers. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective study of patients affected by 1-2 BSM from different histologies who underwent SRS/HSRT. Freedom from local progression (FLP), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicity were evaluated. In addition, predictors of treatment response and survivals were evaluated. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2021, 105 consecutive patients with 111 BMS who received SRS or HSRT for 1-2 BSM were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 10 months (range 3-130). One-year FLP rate was 90.4%. At the univariate analysis, tumor volume ≤ 0.4 cc, and concurrent targeted therapy were associated with longer FLP, with combined treatment that remained a significant independent predictor [0.058, HR 0.139 (95% CI 0.0182-1.064]. Median OS and CSS were 11 months and 14.6 months, respectively. At multivariate analysis, concurrent targeted therapy administration was significantly associated with longer OS [HR 0.514 (95%CI 0.302-0.875); p = 0.01]. Neurological death occurred in 30.4% of patients, although this was due to local progression in only 3 (2.8%) patients. CONCLUSION: Linac-based SRS/HSRT offers excellent local control to patients with BSM, with low treatment-related toxicity and no apparent detrimental effects on OS. When treated with ablative intent, BSM are an uncommon cause of neurological death. The present results indicates that patients with BSM should not be excluded a priori from clinical trials.

Leptomeningeal disease and brain control after postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery with or without immunotherapy for resected brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has shown activity in patients with brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). We have evaluated LMD and intraparenchymal control rates for patients with resected BM receiving postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immunotherapy or postoperative SRS alone. We hypothesize that postoperative SRS and immunotherapy will result in a lower rate of LMD with acceptable toxicity compared with postoperative SRS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma BM who received postoperative fractionated SRS (fSRS; 3×9 Gy) in combination with immunotherapy or postoperative fSRS alone for completely resected BM were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of LMD after treatments. The secondary endpoints were local failure, distant brain parenchymal failure (DBF), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients received postoperative SRS and immunotherapy, either nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and 66 patients received postoperative SRS alone to the resection cavity. With a median follow-up of 15 months, LMD occurred in 19 patients: fSRS group, 14; fSRS and immunotherapy, 5. The 12-month LMD cumulative rates were 22% (95% CI 14% to 37%) in the fSRS group and 6% (95% CI 2% to 17%) in the combined treatment group (p=0.007). Resection cavity control was similar between the groups, whereas DBF and OS were significantly different; the 1-year DBF rates were 31% (95% CI 20% to 46%) in the fSRS and immunotherapy group and 52% (95% CI 39% to 68%) in the fSRS group; respective OS rates were 78% (95% CI 67% to 88%) and 58.7% (95% CI 47% to 70%). Twenty-two patients undergoing postoperative fSRS and immunotherapy and nine subjected to postoperative fSRS experienced treatment-related imaging changes suggestive of radiation-induced brain necrosis (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative fSRS in combination with immunotherapy decreases the incidence of LMD and DBF in patients with resected BM from NSCLC and melanoma as compared with fSRS alone, reducing the rate of neurological death and prolonging survival.

Current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases.

Despite complete surgical resection brain metastases are at significant risk of local recurrence without additional radiation therapy. Traditionally, the addition of postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been considered the standard of care on the basis of randomized studies demonstrating its efficacy in reducing the risk of recurrence in the surgical bed as well as the incidence of new distant metastases. More recently, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical bed has emerged as an effective and safe treatment option for resected brain metastases. Published randomized trials have demonstrated that postoperative SRS to the resection cavity provides superior local control compared to surgery alone, and significantly decreases the risk of neurocognitive decline compared to WBRT, without detrimental effects on survival. While studies support the use of postoperative SRS to the resection cavity as the standard of care after surgery, there are several issues that need to be investigated further with the aim of improving local control and reducing the risk of leptomeningeal disease and radiation necrosis, including the optimal dose prescription/fractionation, the timing of postoperative SRS treatment, and surgical cavity target delineation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases, focusing on relevant strategies that can improve local control and minimize the risk of radiation-induced toxicity.

18F-DOPA uptake parameters in glioma: effects of patients' characteristics and prior treatment history.

OBJECTIVE: In amino acid positron emission tomography brain tumour imaging, tumour-to-background uptake parameters are often used for treatment monitoring. We studied the effects of patients' characteristics and anticancer treatments on 18F-fluoro-l-phenylalanine uptake of normal brain and tumour lesions, with particular emphasis on temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. METHODS: 155 studies from 120 patients with glioma were analysed. Average uptake of normal background (standardized uptake value, SUVbckgr) and basal ganglia (SUVbg), as well as tumour-to-brain ratios (TBR) were compared between positron emission tomography/CT studies acquired before (Group A, n = 48), after (Group B, n = 50) or during (Group C, n = 57) TMZ treatment, using analysis of variance. RESULTS: Overall, mean SUVbckgr and mean SUVbg were 1.06 ± 0.26 and 2.12 ± 0.47, respectively. Female had significantly higher SUVbckgr (p = 0.002) and SUVbg (p = 0.012) than male patients. Age showed a positive correlation with SUVbg (p = 0.001). In the overall cohort, there were significant effects of TMZ on SUVbckgr (p = 0.0237) and TBR (p = 0.0138). In particular, SUVbckgr was lower in Group C than in Group B (1.00 ± 0.25 vs 1.14 ± 0.31, p = 0.0173). Significant variations of SUVbckr could be observed in female only. TBR was significantly higher in Group C than in Group B (2.37 ± 0.54 vs 2.06 ± 0.38, p = 0.010). Variations of SUVbg between groups slightly missed significance (p = 0.0504). CONCLUSION: Temozolomide chemotherapy and patients' characteristics, including gender and age, affect physiological [18F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine uptake and, consequently, the calculation of TBRs. Advances in knowledge: For the first time, the effects of past or concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy on brain physiological amino acid uptake have been investigated. Such effects are relevant and should be taken into account when evaluating tumour-to-background ratios.

Re-irradiation in lung disease by SBRT: a retrospective, single institutional study.

BACKGROUND: The loco regional relapse is frequent in the lung disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of re-irradiation by SBRT in terms of Local Control (LC) and toxicities. METHODS: From April 2011 to December 2016, twenty-two patients received a re-irradiation by SBRT. Twenty- seven lesions were treated. The medium BED(10) of re-irradiation was 100.6 Gy (range: 48-151.2 Gy) and the medium EQD2(10) was 93.8 Gy (range: 40-126 Gy). In the previous treatment the medium BED(10) was 97.2 Gy (range: 40-120 Gy), the medium EQD2(10) was 81 Gy (range: 32.5-100 Gy). The median time between the first and the second treatment was 18 months. RESULTS: Local Control was reached in 18 out of 27 (66%) re-irradiated lesions, with rates of 67 and 54% at 1- year and 2- years respectively. The treatment was well tolerated; the maximum recorded toxicity was Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Re- irradiation by SBRT may represent an option for the treatment of lung disease with good results in terms of LC and toxicity.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Primary and Metastatic Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes and toxicities in patients with liver disease treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2016, 43 patients with 58 lesions (6 primary and 37 metastatic liver tumors) were treated with SBRT. RESULTS: Local Control was reached in 47 out of 58 (81%) treated lesions with 12 and 24-month rates of 81% and 74% respectively. The progression-free survival at 12 and 24 months was 42% and 36%, respectively. The disease specific survival at 12 and 24 months was 74% and 46% respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 20 months and the rates of OS were 74% and 46% at 12 and 24 months respectively. Toxicity was very low consisting mainly of Grade 1 and 2. CONCLUSION: SBRT provides good local control for both primary and metastatic liver lesions, with minimal toxicity.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Lesions. A Single-institution Experience.

AIM: To evaluate survival and toxicity in a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, 23 patients with 34 lesions (three primary and 31 metastatic liver tumors) were treated with SBRT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 9 months (range=1-76) for all patients. Local control was reached in 27 out of 34 (79%) treated lesions, with 1 and 2 years rates of 93% and 73%, respectively. The progression-free survival at 1-year and 2-year was 50% and 25%, respectively. Median overall survival was 16 months (95% confidence interval=8-24 months), with 1-year and 2-year rates of 58% and 41%, respectively. Toxicity was very low consisting mainly of grade 1 and 2 events. CONCLUSION: SBRT provides good local control for both primary and metastatic liver lesions, with minimal toxicity.