Fourteen years follow-up of a stable unilateral Keratoconus: unique case report of clinical, tomographical and biomechanical stability.

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus (KC) is a noninflammatory corneal ectatic disorder. In 2015, the Global Consensus on Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases agreed that the pathophysiology of KC includes environmental, biomechanical, genetic, and biochemical disorders on one hand, and that true unilateral KC does not exist on the other hand. However, with the increasingly advancements in detection methods, we report the first case of a stable unilateral keratoconus with the longest follow up period of 14 years (2006-2020). We used topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical values for both eyes over the years to confirm the diagnosis, which has never been done before. Our study focuses on a single patient therefore it illustrates the mere possibility that unilateral keratoconus exists. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 19-year-old male with no previous ocular or general health conditions who presented to our clinic in November 2006 for incidental finding of decreased vision of the right eye (OD) on a routine examination. Topographies, tomographies, and biomechanical analysis of both eyes were obtained and showed a unilateral right keratoconus at the time. Patient admitted to unilateral right eye rubbing. Although we cannot prove that previous eye rubbing alone led to these initial symptoms, he was advised to stop rubbing and was followed up without any intervention for fourteen years during which topographic, tomographic, and biomechanical values for both eyes remained stable, proving for the first time that unilateral KC could exist. CONCLUSION: We think that the data we are presenting is important because acknowledging that true unilateral keratoconus exists questions the genetic or primary biomechanical etiology of keratoconus versus the secondary biomechanical etiologies like eye rubbing. Our report also shows the importance of corneal biomechanics in detecting early changes. This is important to detect early, prevent progression, and tailor treatment.

Incorrect sleeping position and eye rubbing in patients with unilateral or highly asymmetric keratoconus: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate eye rubbing and sleeping position in patients with Unilateral or Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus (UHAKC). METHODS: Case-control study of consecutive UHAKC patients diagnosed at the Rothschild Foundation. Controls were age- and sex-matched, randomly selected refractive surgery clinic patients. Patients self-administered questionnaires regarding their family history of keratoconus, eye rubbing, and sleeping habits. All the eyes underwent a comprehensive ocular examination. Logistic regression was used to analyze univariate and multivariate data to identify risk factors for keratoconus. RESULTS: Thirty-three UHAKC patients and 64 controls were included. Univariate analyses showed that daytime eye rubbing [OR = 172.78], in the morning [OR = 24.3], or in eyes with the steepest keratometry [OR = 21.7] were significantly different between groups. Allergy [OR = 2.94], red eyes in the morning [OR = 6.36], and sleeping on stomach/sides [OR = 14.31] or on the same side as the steepest keratometry [OR = 94.72] were also significantly different. The multivariate model also showed statistical significance for most factors including daytime eye rubbing [OR = 134.96], in the morning [OR = 24.86], in the steepest eye [OR = 27.56], and sleeping on stomach/sides [OR = 65.02] or on the steepest side [OR = 144.02]. A univariate analysis in UHAKC group, comparing the worse and better eye, showed that eye rubbing [OR = 162.14] and sleeping position [OR = 99.74] were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with the worse eye. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that vigorous eye rubbing and incorrect sleeping position are associated with UHAKC. This is especially true in rubbing the most afflicted eye, and contributory sleep position, including positions placing pressure on the eye with the steepest keratometry.

Simultaneous Correction of Unilateral Rainbow Glare and Residual Astigmatism by Undersurface Flap Photoablation After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK.

PURPOSE: To report and document a case of successful rainbow glare correction using undersurface ablation of the LASIK flap. METHODS: A 33-year-old woman was treated bilaterally for myopia using femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK with the FS200 femtosecond laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Postoperatively, she complained of rainbow glare in her right eye, and presented some residual myopic astigmatism. Six months after the initial LASIK procedure, the right eye flap was lifted and a toric excimer correction was delivered on its stromal side. RESULTS: Visual symptoms related to the rainbow glare disappeared immediately after the completion of the procedure and did not reoccur. Uncorrected visual acuity improved by two lines. CONCLUSIONS: Rainbow glare following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK can be successfully corrected by undersurface ablation of the flap.

Astigmatic equivalence of 2.2-mm and 1.8-mm superior clear corneal cataract incision.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the astigmatic effects of 2.2-mm and 1.8-mm cataract incisions. METHODS: A randomized prospective study of 190 eyes of 151 patients undergoing superior clear corneal incision (SCCI) was divided into three groups: 61 eyes with a control 3.2-mm SCCI; 66 eyes with a 2.2-mm SCCI; and 63 eyes with a 1.8-mm SCCI. The corneal astigmatism was measured with an autokeratometer preoperatively and 1 month after surgery. The with-the-wound (WTW), against the-wound (ATW), and WTW-ATW changes were calculated using the Holladay-Cravy-Koch formula. RESULTS: The WTW, ATW, and WTW-ATW changes were significantly higher for the control 3.2-mm SCCI than for the 2.2- and 1.8-mm SCCI (all p < 0.001), and no difference was found between the 2.2- and 1.8-mm SCCI incision groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, the astigmatic effects were the same for the 2.2 mm and 1.8 mm incisions and as expected, were significantly lower than the control 3.2 mm incision group.

Corneal enantiomorphism in normal and keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability to discriminate between normal and keratoconic corneas by analyzing intereye corneal asymmetry parameters and defining a score of similarity that outlines the normal range of asymmetry between right and left eyes. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized study included 102 normal corneas of 51 patients and 64 keratoconic corneas of 32 patients. Topographic and tomographic parameters of the right and left eyes were extracted from an elevation and Placido-based corneal topography. Asymmetry was determined by subtracting the right eye value from the left eye value for each variable and by considering the absolute value of the result. A discriminant function was constructed to separate the normal and keratoconic groups. RESULTS: The mean intereye asymmetry differences were statistically significant for all variables except the vertical and horizontal decentration of the thinnest point, the corneal thickness at 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 mm from the thinnest point, and the posterior keratometry at 4.5 mm from the thinnest point. The discriminant function was composed of three variables (the difference between flat and steep keratometry, the 3-mm irregularity, and the anterior elevation of the thinnest point) and reached an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.992, a sensitivity of 94%, and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: A discriminant function constructed from the intereye difference of three corneal indices may be accurate and useful for the topography-based detection of advanced keratoconus. In the future, incorporating such data in automated artificial intelligence software may improve the detection ability of earlier forms of keratoconus.

AcuTarget measurements: repeatability and comparison to OPD-Scan III.

PURPOSE: To evaluate repeatability of the AcuTarget (SensoMotoric Instruments, Teltow, Germany) measurements and compare them to those obtained with the OPD-Scan III (NIDEK, Inc., Fremont, CA). METHODS: Measurements were taken with the AcuTarget and OPD-Scan III in 62 eyes of 31 patients. Results were compared using paired Student's t tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: Repeatability of the AcuTarget was good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.773, 0.777, and 0.780 for Purkinje-versus-pupil along the x-axis, y-axis, and chord length measurements, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the AcuTarget and OPD-Scan III for Purkinje-versus-pupil measurement along the x-axis (P = .061) and chord length (P = .950). Conversely, a statistically significant difference was observed between the two systems for measurements along the y-axis (P < .001). No statistical difference was found between the mean of the first three acquisitions and the best acquisition obtained with the AcuTarget. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements provided by the AcuTarget have good repeatability and are close to those obtained with the OPD-Scan III. Although controversies remain on where to best center refractive procedures, this may help in analyzing the importance of refractive surgery centration in relation to visual acuity and visual symptoms.

Measurement of pupil center shift in refractive surgery candidates with caucasian eyes using infrared pupillometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the pupil center shift with changes in the state of pupil size and with other ocular variables. METHODS: Dynamic pupillometry with the Topolyzer Vario (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) was performed in 248 eyes of 124 patients scheduled for corneal laser refractive surgery. High-resolution images were obtained using the infrared-sensitive camera (incorporated in the videokeratoscope) under mesopic and photopic conditions. Measurements of pupil diameters, distance between the pupil center and keratoscopic axis, and spatial shift of the pupil center were obtained after analysis. RESULTS: The mean distance between the pupil center and the corneal vertex in mesopic and photopic conditions of illumination in myopic eyes was 0.27 ± 0.14 (range: 0.02 to 0.70 mm) and 0.24 ± 0.12 mm (range: 0.06 to 0.65 mm), respectively, whereas it was 0.36 ± 0.15 (range: 0.03 to 0.70 mm) and 0.31 ± 0.16 mm (range: 0.03 to 0.77 mm) in hyperopic eyes, respectively. The mean spatial pupil center shift was significant: 0.11 ± 0.07 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.57 mm) in myopic eyes and 0.12 ± 0.09 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.47 mm) in hyperopic eyes. The pupil center shifted consistently temporally as the pupil dilated. The pupil center shift was not significantly related to sex, age, eye (right or left), or refractive error. CONCLUSIONS: The mean distance between the pupil center and the corneal vertex is greater in hyperopic eyes than in myopic eyes, whereas the spatial shift of this pupil center has a temporal direction as the pupil dilates and is constantly small in all groups. However, pupil center shift can be important in a few patients.

A Technique of Multiple Corneal Allogeneic Ring Segments Prepared from a Single Corneal Graft: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: To describe a novel technique for preparing multiple corneal allogeneic ring segments (CAIRS) from a single corneal graft using femtosecond laser technology. METHODS: This is a case series of 10 eyes from 10 patients with keratoconus who underwent FS-assisted CAIRS implantation using corneas from 4 donors at the Hospital Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild-Noémie de Rothschild institute. A preoperative and postoperative examination was performed at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month. Anterior segment OCT and corneal tomography with aberrometric and pachymetric analyses were performed at each visit. Visual, refractive, and topographic parameters were extracted. The thickness and width of implanted CAIRS were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients were classified according to keratoconus severity: group A (maximal keratometry Kmax <75D) and group B (Kmax >75D). At 1 month postoperatively, both groups A and B showed a significant decrease in mean keratometry by 4.78 ± 1.57D and 12.87 ± 4.62D, respectively. Total and higher order aberrations decreased by 5.66 ± 4.55 and 0.65 ± 1.54 in group A and by 9.45 ± 9.15 and 0.49 ± 1.39 in group B, respectively. The corrected distance visual acuity improved by 4.8 ± 1.7 lines in group A. Visual improvement was not significant in group B. One eye in group B exhibited acute rejection and required explantation. CONCLUSIONS: FS-assisted multiple CAIRS implantation using a single corneal graft maximizes the utilization of viable corneal tissue. CAIRS implantation is an effective and biocompatible therapeutic alternative, particularly in cases of moderate to advanced keratoconus with Kmax <75D.

Investigating the topographic effect of epithelium in myopic eyes with subtle topographic preoperative abnormalities.

PURPOSE: To explore the topographic effect of the epithelium in keratoconus suspected (KCS) and in normal Placido classified corneas. SETTING: Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Anterior corneal specular Placido topography using OPD-Scan II was performed in 97 eyes of 67 patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy for myopia, before and after epithelium removal. The differences in axial keratometry, asphericity, and astigmatism were computed. RESULTS: After epithelial peeling, some Placido-normal classified corneas became KCS. Therefore, we have subdivided this group into 2 groups: one of normal classified corneas which stayed normal after epithelium removal (Group NN) and another of corneas that became KCS classified (Group NK). The mean difference in axial mean keratometry in the third central millimeter rings was +0.50 ± 0.24 diopters (D), 0.69 ± 0.31 D, and 0.49 ± 0.35 D and the mean difference in the magnitude of epithelial-induced astigmatism in the first central millimeter ring was 0.37 D × 89 degrees (positive cylinder), 0.54 D 86 degrees, and 0.52 D 86 degrees, respectively, in Group NN, NK, and KK (KCS corneas that stayed KCS). These differences were significant ( P < .0001). Preoperative keratometry was the only predictive factor differentiating Group NN from NK ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The epithelial layer tended to reduce the magnitude of the Bowman layer's astigmatism, prolateness, and keratometry, more importantly in Group NK. In the KK group, we found a similar trend as in normal eyes (Group NN). The epithelium would be able to mask Bowman layer's irregularities until a certain degree of severity.

Intra-Observer and Inter-Observer Variability of Intraocular Lens Measurements Using an Interferometry Metrology Device.

The NIMO TEMPO (Lambda-X, Nivelles, Belgium) is a novel, user-friendly and compact device designed for in vitro optical analysis of refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs). This device analyzes the IOL wavefront and generates a synthetic eye model for numerical computation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the precision of this innovative device. Intra- and inter-observer variability were calculated using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) after conducting ten measurements of eight different IOL models, with each measurement being repeated by three distinct operators (resulting in a total of 30 measurements for each IOL). The device demonstrated satisfactory intra- and inter-observer variability in evaluating IOL power and modulation transfer function (MTF) profiles, with values of 0.066 and 0.078 diopters for IOL power and 0.018 and 0.019 for MTF measurements, respectively. Furthermore, this hybrid optical and numerical in vitro IOL wavefront analyzer appears to have several advantages over conventional optical bench devices. It reduces the need for operator manipulation, and allows for numerical modeling of various optical environments, including cornea models and apertures. In conclusion, this novel metrology device designed for refractive and diffractive IOLs appears to provide a satisfactory precision, making it a promising tool in the field of IOL metrology.

A New Method to Minimize the Standard Deviation and Root Mean Square of the Prediction Error of Single-Optimized IOL Power Formulas.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a simplified method to approximate constants minimizing the standard deviation (SD) and the root mean square (RMS) of the prediction error in single-optimized intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas. Methods: The study introduces analytical formulas to determine the optimal constant value for minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power calculation formulas. These formulas were tested against various datasets containing biometric measurements from cataractous populations and included 10,330 eyes and 4 different IOL models. The study evaluated the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing the outcomes with those obtained using traditional reference methods. Results: In optimizing IOL constants, minor differences between reference and estimated A-constants were found, with the maximum deviation at -0.086 (SD, SRK/T, and Vivinex) and -0.003 (RMS, PEARL DGS, and Vivinex). The largest discrepancy for third-generation formulas was -0.027 mm (SD, Haigis, and Vivinex) and 0.002 mm (RMS, Hoffer Q, and PCB00/SN60WF). Maximum RMS differences were -0.021 and +0.021, both involving Hoffer Q. Post-minimization, the largest mean prediction error was 0.726 diopters (D; SD) and 0.043 D (RMS), with the highest SD and RMS after adjustments at 0.529 D and 0.875 D, respectively, indicating effective minimization strategies. Conclusions: The study simplifies the process of minimizing SD and RMS in single-optimized IOL power predictions, offering a valuable tool for clinicians. However, it also underscores the complexity of achieving balanced optimization and suggests the need for further research in this area. Translational Relevance: The study presents a novel, clinically practical approach for optimizing IOL power calculations.

Technique of corneal allogenic ring segment preparation using femtosecond laser: preclinical study on human corneal grafts.

PURPOSE: To describe a new technique for preparing corneal allogenic ring segments (CAIRSs) using femtosecond laser technology. SETTING: Hospital Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild-Noémie de Rothschild institute, Paris, France. DESIGN: Preclinical study conducted on human corneal grafts. METHODS: The corneal grafts were mounted on an artificial chamber pressurizer (ACP) with preset constant pressure, and the FSL was used to create a circular annulus with specific dimensions. The resulting CAIRSs were analyzed for their thickness and width after air drying. RESULTS: A total of 25 CAIRSs were prepared using the FSL. The mean width and thickness of the CAIRSs were 803 ± 77 µm and 83 ± 16 µm, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in width among the various quadrants of each CAIRS or between different CAIRSs. Significantly thicker CAIRSs were obtained with a higher ACP pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of CAIRS preparation using FSL technology and controlled artificial anterior chamber pressure demonstrated reproducibility and precision. This approach holds the potential for customizing and personalizing CAIRSs based on individual corneal characteristics.

Unilateral ectasia after LASIK in a patient with abnormal topography but normal tomography.

PURPOSE: To report a case of unilateral ectasia developing after LASIK in a patient with abnormal topography but normal tomographic indices. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: A patient was treated bilaterally for myopia using LASIK. Five years and 5 months postoperatively, unilateral ectasia in the right eye was diagnosed. Preoperatively, anterior curvature (Placido) map of the right cornea showed an asymmetry with 1.8 diopters of steepening when evaluated from upper left to lower right meridians, and a skewing of the steepest radial axes. The calculated KISA% index was 128.4 in the right eye and 5.6 in the left eye. Conversely, posterior elevation map and pachymetry map of the right eye showed no frank abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: This case is interesting because it shows that for this patient, the anterior curvature (Placido) map was more sensitive to detect cornea at risk of post-LASIK ectasia than the tomographic features

Unilateral rainbow glare after uncomplicated femto-LASIK using the FS-200 femtosecond laser.

PURPOSE: To report a case of rainbow glare following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (femto-LASIK) with the Wavelight FS-200 femtosecond laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). METHODS: A patient was treated bilaterally for myopia with femto-LASIK using the FS-200 femtosecond laser. Postoperatively, he complained of rainbow glare in his right eye. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, the induced grating pattern (hyperreflective spot-like zones corresponding to the surgeon-programmed spot and line separation distance of the FS-200 femtosecond laser) was demonstrated with confocal microscopy at the level of the flap interface in the right eye. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of rainbow glare following femto-LASIK with the FS-200 femtosecond laser documented with in vivo confocal microscopy.

Repeatability of Ocular Response Analyzer waveform parameters in normal eyes and eyes after refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To study the repeatability of the biomechanical waveform parameters measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) device in normal eyes and eyes after refractive surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective, comparative non-interventional study of a case series. Two hundred eyes of 100 patients were divided into five groups: normal eyes of patients younger than 30 years, normal eyes of patients between 30 and 50 years old, normal eyes of patients older than 50 years, eyes of patients with a history of LASIK, and eyes of patients with a history of photorefractive keratectomy. The repeatability of the 37 waveform parameters in addition to corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), IOP measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometer (IOPg), and IOP evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (IOPcc) were examined. RESULTS: In addition to IOPg, IOPcc, CRF, and CH, five parameters had an ICC greater than 0.6 (substantial agreement): P1area, the area of peak 1 (ICC = 0.823); P2area, the area of peak 2 (ICC = 0.646); h1, the height of peak 1 (ICC= 0.702); P1area1, the area of peak 1 derived from the upper 50% of the applanation peak (ICC = 0.772); and h11, the height of peak1 derived from the upper 50% of the applanation peak 1 (ICC = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that not all parameters derived from the corneal deformation waveform signal have the same repeatability. Therefore, analysis of the waveform indices should rely on the more repeatable ones to derive consistent conclusions.

Theoretical Relationship Between the Anterior-Posterior Corneal Curvature Ratio, Keratometric Index, and Estimated Total Corneal Power.

PURPOSE: To predict the relationships between the keratometric index value that would match the total Gaussian corneal power and its related variables: anterior and posterior radii of curvature of the cornea, anterior-posterior corneal radius ratio (APR), and central corneal thickness. METHODS: The relationship between the APR and the keratometric index was approximated by calculating the analytical expression for the theoretical value of the keratometric index, which would make the keratometric power of the cornea equal to the total paraxial Gaussian power of the cornea. RESULTS: The study of the impact of variations in the radius of anterior and posterior curvature and central corneal thickness showed that the difference between exact and approximated best-matching theoretical keratometric index was less than 0.001 for all of the performed simulations. This translated to a variation in the total corneal power estimation of less than ±0.128 diopters. After refractive surgery, the estimated optimal keratometric index value is a function of the preoperative anterior keratometry, the preoperative APR, and the delivered correction. The larger the magnitude of myopic corrections, the greater the increase in postoperative APR value. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to estimate the most compatible value of the keratometric index that allows simulated keratometric power to equal the total Gaussian corneal power. The obtained equations enable the evaluation of the impact of corneal variables such as the APR on the ideal keratometric index value. The use of 1.3375 for the keratometric index results in an overestimation of the total corneal power in most clinical situations. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(4):266-272.].

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with cornea press technique and implantation of a Carlevale scleral-fixated intraocular lens.

Purpose: We describe a combined Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) using the Cornea-press (C-Press) technique, with implantation of a new sutureless, scleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL) (Carlevale, Soleko), in a case of bullous keratopathy and IOL mispositioning. Observations: Two scleral pockets were created along two scleral radial incisions, 180° apart, followed by two 23 G sclerotomies at the pockets' sites. After removal of the dislocated IOL through a corneoscleral incision, posterior vitrectomy was completed. The Carlevale IOL was injected into the anterior chamber (AC) and placed above the iris. The haptics were then externalized using opening distal forceps through the sclerotomies, and the plugs were secured in the scleral pockets. DMEK was then performed using the "C-press" technique, where corneal indentation allowed to artificially shallow the AC to ensure successful graft unrolling. Fifteen months postoperatively, the cornea was clear, the Carlevale IOL well positioned, and the patient's vision improved. Conclusions and importance: DMEK using the C-Press technique, combined with a sutureless, scleral-fixated IOL such as the Carlevale in a single procedure, may be a safe and effective option to restore vision in case of bullous keratopathy and dislocated IOL.

Theoretical Impact of Intraocular Lens Design Variations on the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculations.

To ascertain the theoretical impact of optical design variations of the intraocular lens (IOL) on the accuracy of IOL power formulas based on a single lens constant using a thick lens eye model. This impact was also simulated before and after optimization. We modeled 70 thick-lens pseudophakic eyes implanted with IOLs of symmetrical optical design and power comprised between 0.50 D and 35 D in 0.5-step increments. Modifications of the shape factor resulting in variations in the anterior and posterior radii of an IOL were made, keeping the central thickness and paraxial powers static. Geometry data from three IOL models were also used. Corresponding postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) were computed for different IOL powers and assimilated to a prediction error of the formula due to the sole change in optical design alone. Formula accuracy was studied before and after zeroization on a uniform and non-uniform realistic IOL power distribution. The impact of the incremental change in optic design variability depended on the IOL power. Design modifications theoretically induce an increase in the standard deviation (SD), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square (RMS) of the error. The values of these parameters reduce dramatically after zeroization. While the variations in optical design can affect refractive outcomes, especially in short eyes, the zeroization of the mean error theoretically reduces the impact of the IOL's design and power on the accuracy of IOL power calculation.

A Simplified Method to Minimize Systematic Bias of Single-Optimized Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas.

PURPOSE: To provide a simplified method to optimize lens constants to zero the mean prediction error (ME) of an intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula, without the need to program the formula itself, by exploring the influence of IOL and corneal power on the refractive impact of variations in effective lens position. DESIGN: Theoretical development of an optimized formula and retrospective clinical evaluation on documented datasets. METHODS: Retrospective data from 8878 patients with cataracts with pre- and postoperative measurements available using 4 IOL models and 6 IOL power calculation formulas were examined. A schematic eye model was used to study the impact of small variations in effective lens position (ELP) on the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction. The impact of keratometry (K) and IOL power (P) on SE was investigated. A theoretical thick lens model was used to devise a formula to zero the average prediction error of an IOL power calculation formula. This was achieved by incrementing the predicted ELP, which could then be translated into an increment in the IOL constant. This method was tested on documented real-life postoperative datasets, using different IOL models and single-constant optimized IOL calculation formulas. RESULTS: For small variations in ELP, there was an exponential relationship between IOL power and the resultant postoperative refractive variation. The ELP adjustment necessary to zero the ME equated to a ratio between the ME and the mean of the following expression: 0.0006*(P2+2K*P) on the considered datasets. The accuracy of the values obtained using this formula was confirmed on documented postoperative datasets, and on published and nonpublished formulas. CONCLUSION: The proposed method allows surgeons without special expertise to optimize an IOL constant to nullify the ME on a documented dataset without coding the different formulas. The influence of individual eyes is proportional to the squared power of the implanted IOL.

Impact of Single Constant Optimization on the Precision of IOL Power Calculation.

Purpose: The primary objective of this research is to examine how precision in intraocular lens calculation formulas can be impacted by zeroing the mean error through adjustments in the effective lens position value. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate how this modification influences outcomes differently based on the source of the prediction error. Methods: In order to analyze the impact of individual variables on the standard deviation, the study maintained all variables constant except for one at a time. Subsequently, variations were introduced to specific parameters, such as corneal curvature radius, keratometric refractive index, axial length, and predicted implant position. Results: According to our findings, when zeroing the mean error is applied to correct for inaccuracies in corneal power estimation, it results in a significant and exponential rise in standard deviation, thus adversely affecting the formula's precision. However, when zeroing is employed to compensate for prediction errors stemming from axial length measurements or predicted implant position, the effect on precision is minimal or potentially beneficial. Conclusions: The study highlights the potential risks associated with the indiscriminate but necessary zeroing of prediction errors in implant power calculation formulas. The impact on formula precision greatly depends on the source of the error, underscoring the importance of error source when analyzing variations in the standard deviation of the prediction error after zeroing. Translational Relevance: Our study contributes to the ongoing effort to enhance the accuracy and reliability of these formulas, thereby improving the surgical outcomes for cataract patients.