Chagas disease prevalence among migrants from El Salvador in Milan: a cross- sectional study of an often-overlooked population.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease (CD) is considered to be highly endemic in El Salvador, where its prevalence is estimated to be 1.3-3.7%. Although more than 40,000 migrants from El Salvador are currently living in Europe (particularly in Spain and Italy), there are few data regarding the prevalence of CD in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of CD among Salvadorans living in Italy. METHODS: A cross-sectional serological survey of CD among Salvadorans living in the metropolitan area of Milan was carried out between October 2017 and December 2019. The participants' blood samples were tested for Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies using two different serological assays. The collected demographic data included their biological sex, province of origin, the type of housing in their country of origin, and family history of CD. RESULTS: Of the 384 subjects who voluntarily participated in the study, five (1.3%, most coming from La Paz) were positive to both serological assays and therefore conclusively diagnosed as having CD. Five other subjects had discrepant serological results but were not positive to a third assay. Three of the five subjects with a diagnosis of CD completed medical staging, one of whom had chronic disease (digestive and cardiac involvement). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CD among Salvadorans living in Milan is similar to that estimated by the WHO in 2010. Although they are often overlooked in CD surveys, Salvadoran migrants should be included in CD control programs in countries in which the disease is not endemic.

The value of lamp to rule out imported malaria diagnosis: a retrospective observational study in Milan, Italy.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of malaria in returning travellers could be a challenge in non-endemic settings. We aimed to assess the performance of LAMP in comparison with standard conventional diagnostic methods using real-time-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in case of discordant results. METHODS: All travellers returning from malaria-endemic areas who presented to our Emergency Department (ED) from January 2017 to December 2020 with signs and symptoms suggestive for malaria were included. Blood microscopy was the reference diagnostic method applied at our laboratory with LAMP implemented as an additional method to aid in malaria diagnosis. PCR was employed only in case of between test's discordant results. Sensitivity and specificity of microscopy compared to LAMP were calculated with the confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: Four-hundred and eight patients (55.6% male, median age 42 years) were screened for malaria. The diagnosis was confirmed in 49 cases (12%): 44 cases (90%) caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Peripheral blood smear missed to identify three malaria cases, which tested positive with LAMP and PCR. One case of malaria caused by P. malariae in a naive tourist, one case by P. falciparum in a semi-immune pregnant women and one case by P. falciparum in a previously treated semi-immune patient. All the discordant cases were characterized by a very low parasitaemia. Microscopy when compared to LAMP showed a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.1-98.7%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 98.9-100%). CONCLUSIONS: In our non-endemic setting LAMP was able to identify malaria cases with low-level parasitaemia otherwise missed by blood microscopy.

Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Latin American pregnant women living outside endemic countries and frequency of congenital transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease, as a consequence of globalization and immigration, is no more restricted to Central and Latin America. Therefore, congenital transmission represents a growing public health concern in non-endemic countries. METHODS: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in pregnant Latin American (LA) women living outside endemic countries and the rate of congenital transmission. Data were extracted from studies indexed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs and SciELO databases without language restriction. Two investigators independently collected data on study characteristics, diagnosis, prevalence of infection in pregnant women and congenital infection rate. The data were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: The search identified 1078 articles of which 29 were eligible regarding prevalence of T. cruzi infection among pregnant women and 1795 articles of which 32 were eligible regarding the congenital transmission rate. The estimated pooled prevalence of T. cruzi infection in LA pregnant women was 4.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.0-5.5]. The prevalence of T. cruzi infection in pregnant women from Bolivia was 15.5% (95% CI: 11.7-19.7) and 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2-0.89) for those coming from all other LA countries. The estimated global rate of congenital transmission was 3.5% (95% CI: 2.5-4.5); excluding poor-quality studies, the rate of congenital transmission was 3.8% (95% CI: 2.4-5.1). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of Chagas disease among LA pregnant women living outside endemic countries is high, particularly in Bolivian women. The rate of vertical transmission of T. cruzi infection is similar to the rate reported in South and Central American countries.