A clinically compatible in vitro drug-screening platform identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities in primary cultures of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Brain metastases represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults and are associated with a poor prognosis. We used a personalized in vitro drug screening approach to characterize individual therapeutic vulnerabilities in brain metastases. METHODS: Short-term cultures of cancer cells isolated from brain metastasis patients were molecularly characterized using next-generation sequencing and functionally evaluated using high-throughput in vitro drug screening to characterize pharmacological treatment sensitivities. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing identified matched genetic alterations in brain metastasis tissue samples and corresponding short-term cultures, suggesting that short-term cultures of brain metastases are suitable models for recapitulating the genetic profile of brain metastases that may determine their sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. Employing a high-throughput in vitro drug screening platform, we successfully screened the cultures of five brain metastases for response to 267 anticancer compounds and related drug response to genetic data. Among others, we found that targeted treatment with JAK3, HER2, or FGFR3 inhibitors showed anti-cancer effects in individual brain metastasis cultures. CONCLUSION: Our preclinical study provides a proof-of-concept for combining molecular profiling with in vitro drug screening for predictive evaluation of therapeutic vulnerabilities in brain metastasis patients. This approach could advance the use of patient-derived cancer cells in clinical practice and might eventually facilitate decision-making for personalized drug treatment.

Combined use of 3D printing and mixed reality technology for neurosurgical training: getting ready for brain surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Learning surgical skills is an essential part of neurosurgical training. Ideally, these skills are acquired to a sufficient extent in an ex vivo setting. The authors previously described an in vitro brain tumor model, consisting of a cadaveric animal brain injected with fluorescent agar-agar, for acquiring a wide range of basic neuro-oncological skills. This model focused on haptic skills such as safe tissue ablation technique and the training of fluorescence-based resection. As important didactical technologies such as mixed reality and 3D printing become more readily available, the authors developed a readily available training model that integrates the haptic aspects into a mixed reality setup. METHODS: The anatomical structures of a brain tumor patient were segmented from medical imaging data to create a digital twin of the case. Bony structures were 3D printed and combined with the in vitro brain tumor model. The segmented structures were visualized in mixed reality headsets, and the congruence of the printed and the virtual objects allowed them to be spatially superimposed. In this way, users of the system were able to train on the entire treatment process from surgery planning to instrument preparation and execution of the surgery. RESULTS: Mixed reality visualization in the joint model facilitated model (patient) positioning as well as craniotomy and the extent of resection planning respecting case-dependent specifications. The advanced physical model allowed brain tumor surgery training including skin incision; craniotomy; dural opening; fluorescence-guided tumor resection; and dura, bone, and skin closure. CONCLUSIONS: Combining mixed reality visualization with the corresponding 3D printed physical hands-on model allowed advanced training of sequential brain tumor resection skills. Three-dimensional printing technology facilitates the production of a precise, reproducible, and worldwide accessible brain tumor surgery model. The described model for brain tumor resection advanced regarding important aspects of skills training for neurosurgical residents (e.g., locating the lesion, head position planning, skull trepanation, dura opening, tissue ablation techniques, fluorescence-guided resection, and closure). Mixed reality enriches the model with important structures that are difficult to model (e.g., vessels and fiber tracts) and advanced interaction concepts (e.g., craniotomy simulations). Finally, this concept demonstrates a bridging technology toward intraoperative application of mixed reality.

Establishment of Different Intraoperative Monitoring and Mapping Techniques and Their Impact on Survival, Extent of Resection, and Clinical Outcome in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas-A Series of 631 Patients in 14 Years.

BACKGROUND: The resection of brain tumors can be critical concerning localization, but is a key point in treating gliomas. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), awake craniotomy, and mapping procedures have been incorporated over the years. Using these intraoperative techniques, the resection of eloquent-area tumors without increasing postoperative morbidity became possible. This study aims to analyze short-term and particularly long-term outcomes in patients diagnosed with high-grade glioma, who underwent surgical resection under various technical intraoperative settings over 14 years. METHODS: A total of 1010 patients with high-grade glioma that underwent resection between 2004 and 2018 under different monitoring or mapping procedures were screened; 631 were considered eligible for further analyses. We analyzed the type of surgery (resection vs. biopsy) and type of IONM or mapping procedures that were performed. Furthermore, the impact on short-term (The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS; Karnofsky Performance Scale, KPS) and long-term (progression-free survival, PFS; overall survival, OS) outcomes was analyzed. Additionally, the localization, extent of resection (EOR), residual tumor volume (RTV), IDH status, and adjuvant therapy were approached. RESULTS: In 481 patients, surgery, and in 150, biopsies were performed. The number of biopsies decreased significantly with the incorporation of awake surgeries with bipolar stimulation, IONM, and/or monopolar mapping (p < 0.001). PFS and OS were not significantly influenced by any intraoperative technical setting. EOR and RTV achieved under different operative techniques showed no statistical significance (p = 0.404 EOR, p = 0.186 RTV). CONCLUSION: Based on the present analysis using data from 14 years and more than 600 patients, we observed that through the implementation of various monitoring and mapping techniques, a significant decrease in biopsies and an increase in the resection of eloquent tumors was achieved. With that, the operability of eloquent tumors without a negative influence on neurological outcomes is suggested by our data. However, a statistical effect of monitoring and mapping procedures on long-term outcomes such as PFS and OS could not be shown.

The Effect of Wire Versus Magnetic Seed Localization on Lumpectomy Cavity Size.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to assess whether an association exists between surgical localization technique and lumpectomy cavity size on radiation therapy planning computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of women undergoing breast conserving surgery with wire or magnetic seed guided lumpectomy followed by adjuvant radiation therapy from 2018 to 2021. Patients of a surgeon only performing 1 localization technique or undergoing bracketed localization were excluded. The primary outcome was lumpectomy cavity size on simulation CT. Confounding due to imbalance in patient and tumor factors was addressed with overlap weights derived from a propensity score analysis and used in a weighted multivariable analysis. Secondary outcomes included positive margins, total pathologic volume, boost delivery, and boost modality. RESULTS: Of 617 women who received lumpectomy during the study period, 387 were included in final analysis. Tumors of patients undergoing seed localization were more likely unifocal, assessable by ultrasound, and smaller. Seed use rates ranged from 27.7% to 70.7% per surgeon. There was no difference in positive margins (6.4 vs 5.4%, P = .79) or second surgeries (9.4 vs 8.1%, P = .79) between groups. Close margin rates were similar for ductal carcinoma in situ (P = .35) and invasive carcinoma (P = .97). In unadjusted bivariable analyses, wire localization was associated with larger total pathology volume (P = .004), but localization technique showed no association with CT cavity volume (P = .15). After adjusting for potentially confounding variables, multivariable analysis failed to show an association between localization technique and either CT cavity (P = .35) or total path volume (P = .08). There was no difference in indicated-boost delivery (P = .15) or electron boost (P = .14) by localization technique. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in CT cavity size by localization technique, suggesting choice between surgical techniques does not impede radiation therapy boost delivery.

Lymph node and tumor-associated PD-L1+ macrophages antagonize dendritic cell vaccines by suppressing CD8+ T cells.

Current immunotherapies provide limited benefits against T cell-depleted tumors, calling for therapeutic innovation. Using multi-omics integration of cancer patient data, we predict a type I interferon (IFN) responseHIGH state of dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, with efficacious clinical impact. However, preclinical DC vaccines recapitulating this state by combining immunogenic cancer cell death with induction of type I IFN responses fail to regress mouse tumors lacking T cell infiltrates. Here, in lymph nodes (LNs), instead of activating CD4+/CD8+ T cells, DCs stimulate immunosuppressive programmed death-ligand 1-positive (PD-L1+) LN-associated macrophages (LAMs). Moreover, DC vaccines also stimulate PD-L1+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This creates two anatomically distinct niches of PD-L1+ macrophages that suppress CD8+ T cells. Accordingly, a combination of PD-L1 blockade with DC vaccines achieves significant tumor regression by depleting PD-L1+ macrophages, suppressing myeloid inflammation, and de-inhibiting effector/stem-like memory T cells. Importantly, clinical DC vaccines also potentiate T cell-suppressive PD-L1+ TAMs in glioblastoma patients. We propose that a multimodal immunotherapy and vaccination regimen is mandatory to overcome T cell-depleted tumors.