Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer : DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

INTRODUCTION: The German Society of Radiation Oncology initiated a multicenter trial to evaluate core processes and subprocesses of radiotherapy by prospective evaluation of all important procedures in the most frequent malignancies treated by radiation therapy. The aim of this analysis was to assess the required resources for interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) and low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy (BRT) based on actual time measurements regarding allocation of personnel and room occupation needed for specific procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two radiotherapy centers (community hospital of Offenbach am Main and community hospital of Eschweiler) participated in this prospective study. Working time of the different occupational groups and room occupancies for the workflow of prostate BRT were recorded and methodically assessed during a 3-month period. RESULTS: For HDR and LDR BRT, a total of 560 and 92 measurements, respectively, were documented. The time needed for treatment preplanning was median 24 min for HDR (n = 112 measurements) and 6 min for LDR BRT (n = 21). Catheter implantation with intraoperative HDR real-time planning (n = 112), postimplantation HDR treatment planning (n = 112), and remotely controlled HDR afterloading irradiation (n = 112) required median 25, 39, and 50 min, respectively. For LDR real-time planning (n = 39) and LDR treatment postplanning (n = 32), the assessed median duration was 91 and 11 min, respectively. Room occupancy and overall mean medical staff times were 194 and 910 min respectively, for HDR, and 113 and 371 min, respectively, for LDR BRT. CONCLUSION: In this prospective analysis, the resource requirements for the application of HDR and LDR BRT of prostate cancer were assessed methodically and are presented for first time.

Protection of quality and innovation in radiation oncology: the prospective multicenter trial QUIRO of DEGRO: evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy with tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: The technical progress in radiotherapy in recent years has been tremendous. This also implies a change of human and time resources. However, there is a lack of data on this topic. Therefore, the DEGRO initiated several studies in the QUIRO project on this subject. The present publication focuses on results for tomotherapy systems and compares them with other IMRT techniques. METHODS: Over a period of several months, time allocation was documented using a standard form at two university hospitals. The required time for individual steps in the treatment planning process was recorded for all involved professional groups (physicist, technician, and physician) by themselves. The time monitoring at the treatment machines was performed by auxiliary employees (student research assistants). Evaluation of the data was performed for all recorded data as well as by tumor site. A comparison was made between the two involved institutions. RESULTS: A total of 1,691 records were analyzed: 148 from head and neck (H&N) tumors, 460 from prostate cancer, 136 from breast cancer, and 947 from other tumor entities. The mean value of all data from both centers for the definition of the target volumes for H&N tumors took a radiation oncology specialist 75 min, while a physicist needed for the physical treatment planning 214 min. For prostate carcinomas, the times were 60 and 147 min, respectively, and for the group of other entities 63 and 192 min, respectively. For the first radiation treatment, the occupancy time of the linear accelerator room was 31, 26, and 30 min for each entity (H&N, prostate, other entities, respectively). For routine treatments 22, 18, and 21 min were needed for the particular entities. Major differences in the time required for the individual steps were observed between the two centers. CONCLUSION: This study gives an overview of the time and personnel requirements in radiation therapy using a tomotherapy system. The most representative analysis could be done for the room occupancy times during treatment in both centers. Due to the partly small amount of data and differing planning workflows between the two centers, it is problematic to draw a firm conclusion with regard to planning times. Overall, the time required for the tomotherapy treatment and planning is slightly higher compared to other IMRT techniques.

Time management in radiation oncology: evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

PURPOSE: In order to evaluate resource requirements, the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) recorded the times needed for core procedures in the radio-oncological treatment of various cancer types within the scope of its QUIRO trial. The present study investigated the personnel and infrastructural resources required in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. METHODS: The investigation was carried out in the setting of definitive radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients between July and October 2008 at two radiotherapy centers, both with well-trained staff and modern technical facilities at their disposal. Personnel attendance times and room occupancy times required for core procedures (modules) were each measured prospectively by two independently trained observers using time measurements differentiated on the basis of professional group (physician, physicist, and technician), 3D conformal (3D-cRT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). RESULTS: Total time requirements of 983 min for 3D-cRT and 1485 min for step-and-shoot IMRT were measured for the technician (in terms of professional group) in all modules recorded and over the entire course of radiotherapy for prostate cancer (72-76 Gy). Times needed for the medical specialist/physician were 255 min (3D-cRT) and 271 min (IMRT), times of the physicist were 181 min (3D-cRT) and 213 min (IMRT). The difference in time was significant, although variations in time spans occurred primarily as a result of various problems during patient treatment. CONCLUSION: This investigation has permitted, for the first time, a realistic estimation of average personnel and infrastructural requirements for core procedures in quality-assured definitive radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The increased time needed for IMRT applies to the step-and-shoot procedure with verification measurements for each irradiation planning.

The QUIRO Study (assurance of quality and innovation in radiooncology): methodology, instruments and practices.

PURPOSE: The QUIRO study aimed to establish a secure level of quality and innovation in radiation oncology. Over 6 years, 27 specific surveys were conducted at 24 radiooncological departments. In all, 36 renowned experts from the field of radiation oncology (mostly head physicians and full professors) supported the realization of the study. METHODS: A salient feature of the chosen methodological approach is the "process" as a means of systematizing diversified medical-technical procedures according to standardized criteria. On the one hand, "processes" as a tool of translation are adapted for creating and transforming standards into concrete clinical and medical actions; on the other hand, they provide the basis for standardized instruments and methods to determine the required needs of physicians, staff, and equipment. In the foreground of the collection and measurement of resource requirements were the processes of direct service provision which were subdivided into modules for reasons of clarity and comprehensibility. Overhead tasks (i.e., participation in quality management) were excluded from the main study and examined in a separate survey with appropriate methods. RESULTS: After the exploration of guidelines, tumor- or indication-specific examination and treatment processes were developed in expert workshops. Moreover, those specific modules were defined which characterize these entities and indications in a special degree. Afterwards, these modules were compiled according to their time and resources required in the "reference institution", i.e., in specialized and as competent recognized departments (mostly from the university area), by various suitable survey methods. CONCLUSION: The significance of the QUIRO study and the validity of the results were optimized in a process of constant improvements and comprehensive checks. As a consequence, the QUIRO study yields representative results concerning the resource requirement for specialized, qualitatively and technologically highly sophisticated radiooncologic treatment in Germany.

Protection of quality and innovation in radiation oncology: the prospective multicenter trial the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO-QUIRO study). Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy with IMRT.

BACKGROUND: A number of national and international societies published recommendations regarding the required equipment and manpower assumed to be necessary to treat a number of patients with radiotherapy. None of these recommendations were based on actual time measurements needed for specific radiotherapy procedures. The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) was interested in substantiating these recommendations by prospective evaluations of all important core procedures of radiotherapy in the most frequent cancers treated by radiotherapy. The results of the examinations of radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with different tumor entities are presented in this manuscript. PATIENTS, MATERIAL, AND METHODS: Four radiation therapy centers [University Hospital of Marburg, University Hospital of Giessen, University Hospital of Berlin (Charité), Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München] participated in this prospective study. The workload of the different occupational groups and room occupancies for the core procedures of radiotherapy were prospectively documented during a 2-month period per center and subsequently statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The time needed per patient varied considerably between individual patients and between centers for all the evaluated procedures. The technical preparation (contouring of target volume and organs at risk, treatment planning, and approval of treatment plan) was the most time-consuming process taking 3 h 54 min on average. The time taken by the medical physicists for this procedure amounted to about 57%. The training part of the preparation time was 87% of the measured time for the senior physician and resident. The total workload for all involved personnel comprised 74.9 min of manpower for the first treatment, 39.7 min for a routine treatment with image guidance, and 22.8 min without image guidance. The mean room occupancy varied between 10.6 min (routine treatment without image guidance) and 23.7 min (first treatment with image guidance). CONCLUSION: The prospective data presented here allow for an estimate of the required machine time and manpower needed for the core procedures of radiotherapy in an average radiation treatment with IMRT. However, one should be aware that a number of necessary and time-consuming activities were not evaluated in the present study.

Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. The DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To conform to recommendations regarding the treatment of breast cancer, an estimation of costs and personnel to assure treatment is required. To date no recommendations based on real time measurements are available. The DEGRO (German Society of Radiation Oncology), therefore, initiated a prospective multicenter evaluation of core procedures of radiotherapy. In this analysis, the results regarding human resources and room occupation during the treatment of breast cancer are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three academic radiation oncology centers (Erlangen, Münster, Mannheim) prospectively documented their workflow and working time for all breast cancer patients from July-October 2008. Subsequently, a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The longest working time of physicians was the definition of the target volume and organs at risk (mean 33 min). Furthermore, physicians needed much time for general tasks, which included conversations. Physicists needed the most time for treatment planning and authorization (64 min), whereas technicians were mostly needed in day-to-day radiotherapy treatment (15 min, 31 min including verification). Despite significant differences in specific steps between centers, overall working times and room occupation were comparable and representative. Special procedures (intraoperative radiotherapy/multicatheter brachytherapy) required considerable amounts of additional working time of physicians and physicists. CONCLUSION: In this prospective analysis, data of human resources and room occupation during treatment of breast cancer are presented for the first time. Each patient consumes about 12 h of human resources for treatment and 3.75 h for general tasks (physicians 4.7 h, physicists 1.8 h, and technicians 9.2 h).

Time management in radiation oncology: development and evaluation of a modular system based on the example of rectal cancer treatment. The DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

PURPOSE: The goal was to develop and evaluate a modular system for measurement of the work times required by the various professional groups involved in radiation oncology before, during, and after serial radiation treatment (long-term irradiation with 25-28 fractions of 1.8 Gy) based on the example of rectal cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of experts divided the work associated with providing radiation oncology treatment into modules (from the preparation of radiotherapy, RT planning and administration to the final examination and follow-up). The time required for completion of each module was measured by independent observers at four centers (Rostock, Bamberg, Düsseldorf, and Offenbach, Germany). RESULTS: A total of 1,769 data sets were collected from 63 patients with 10-489 data sets per module. Some modules (informed consent procedure, routine treatments, CT planning) exhibited little deviation between centers, whereas others (especially medical and physical irradiation planning) exhibited a wide range of variation (e.g., 1 h 49 min to 6 h 56 min for physical irradiation planning). The mean work time per patient was 12 h 11 min for technicians, 2 h 59 min for physicists, and 7 h 6 min for physicians. CONCLUSION: The modular system of time measurement proved to be reliable and produced comparable data at the different centers. Therefore, the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) decided that it can be extended to other types of cancer (head and neck, prostate, and breast cancer) with appropriate modifications.

[Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery : QUIRO-DEGRO Trial].

BACKGROUND: The German Society of Radiation Oncology ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie", DEGRO) initiated a multicenter trial to develop and evaluate adequate modules to assert core processes and subprocesses in radiotherapy. The aim of this prospective evaluation was to methodical assess the required resources (technical equipment and medical staff) for stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At two radiotherapy centers of excellence (University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Marburg/Giessen), the manpower and time required for the implementation of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was prospectively collected consistently over a 3-month period. The data were collected using specifically developed process acquisition tools and standard forms and were evaluated using specific process analysis tools. RESULTS: For intracranial (extracranial) fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and radiosurgery (RS), a total of 1,925 (270) and 199 (36) records, respectively, could be evaluated. The approximate time needed to customize the immobilization device was median 37 min (89 min) for FRST and 31 min (26 min) for RS, for the contrast enhanced planning studies 22 and 27 min (25 and 28 min), for physical treatment planning 122 and 59 min (187 and 27 min), for the first and routine radiotherapy sessions for FSRT 40 and 13 min (58 and 31 min), respectively. The median time needed for the RS session was 58 min (45 min). The corresponding minimal manpower needed was 2 technicians for customization of the immobilization device, 2.5 technicians and 1 consultant for the contrast-enhanced planning studies, 1 consultant, 0.5 resident and 0.67 medical physics expert (MPE) for physical treatment planning, as well as 1 consultant, 0.5 resident, and 2.5 technicians for the first radiotherapy treatment and 2.33 technicians for routine radiotherapy sessions. CONCLUSION: For the first time, the resource requirements for a radiotherapy department for the maintenance, protection and optimization of operational readiness for the application of intra- and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy was determined methodically.

Combined preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Interim analysis of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) remains poor when treated with local modalities. An intensive preoperative program with chemoradiotherapy was used to evaluate the curative resection rate, pathologic response, and survival of patients with LAEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety patients with LAEC were treated preoperatively with chemotherapy (three courses of fluorouracil, leucovorin, etoposide, and cisplatin [FLEP]) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (one course of cisplatin plus etoposide in combination with 40 Gy of radiation). Transthoracic esophagectomy was performed 4 weeks after the end of radiation. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included in this evaluation. Forty-four (61%) underwent a complete tumor resection, and 16 (22%) had no tumor in the resected specimen (pathologic complete response [PCR]). The operative mortality rate was 15%. At a median follow-up time of 22 months (range, 12 to 41), the median survival duration of all 72 patients was 17 months (range, 1 to 41+). The calculated survival rates at 3 years were 33%, 42%, and 68% for all patients, patients after complete resection, and patients with PCR, respectively. CONCLUSION: This combined treatment modality is active in LAEC, with a PCR in 33% of the patients undergoing surgery. The results appear improved compared with those reported with surgery alone, by approximately doubling the 3-year survival rate. The high efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation warrants evaluation of the role of surgery in LAEC.

Preoperative chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy based on hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy and definitive surgery in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: mature results of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an intensive multimodality approach with combination chemotherapy, hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiotherapy, and definitive surgery in prognostically unfavorable subgroups of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer stages IIIA and IIIB (LAD-NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following staging, including mediastinoscopy, 94 patients with inoperable LAD-NSCLC were treated preoperatively with chemotherapy (three courses of split-dose cisplatin and etoposide [PE]) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (one course of PE combined with 45 Gy hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy). After repeat mediastinoscopy, patients underwent surgery 4 weeks postradiation. RESULTS: Of 94 consecutive patients (52 stage IIIA [> or = two lymph node levels involved] and 42 stage IIIB [no pleural effusion, no supraclavicular nodes]), 62 (66%) completed induction and underwent surgery. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 50 (53% of all patients) and pathologic complete response (PCR) in 24 (26%). After a median follow-up of 43 months, the median survival time was 20 months for IIIA, 18 months for IIIB, and 42 months for R0 patients. Calculated survival rates at 4 years were 31%, 26%, and 46%. Two patients died of sepsis preoperatively and four died postoperatively of pleural empyema (n = 1), stump insufficiency (n = 2), and cardiac failure (n = 1). Other toxicities were acceptable-mainly hematologic during chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and esophagitis during chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: This intensive multimodality treatment is feasible and demonstrates high efficacy in prognostically unfavorable LAD-NSCLC subgroups with high R0 rates and improved long-term survival compared with historical controls

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after multimodality treatment: long-term follow-up and investigations of late neuropsychologic effects.

PURPOSE: Relapse pattern and late toxicities in long-term survivors were analyzed after the introduction of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) into a phase II trial on trimodality treatment of locally advanced (LAD) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with stage IIIA(N2)/IIIB NSCLC were treated with induction chemotherapy, preoperative radiochemotherapy, and surgery. PCI was routinely offered during the second period of study accrual. Patients were given a total radiation dose of 30 Gy (2 Gy per daily fraction) over a 3-week period starting 1 day after the last chemotherapy cycle. RESULTS: Introduction of PCI reduced the rate of brain metastases as first site of relapse from 30% to 8% at 4 years (P =.005) and that of overall brain relapse from 54% to 13% (P <.0001). The effect of PCI was also observed in the good-prognosis subgroup of 47 patients who had a partial response or complete response to induction chemotherapy, with a reduction of brain relapse as first failure from 23% to 0% at 4 years (P =.01). Neuropsychologic testing revealed impairments in attention and visual memory in long-term survivors who received PCI as well as in those who did not receive PCI. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed white matter abnormalities of higher grades in patients who received PCI than in those who did not. CONCLUSION: PCI at a moderate dose reduced brain metastases in LAD-NSCLC to a clinically significant extent, comparable to that in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer. Late toxicity to normal brain was acceptable. This study supports the use of PCI within intense protocols for LAD-NSCLC, particularly in patients with favorable prognostic factors.

Local recurrences of soft tissue sarcomas in adults: a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in 102 cases after surgery and radiation therapy.

Between 1974 and 1990, 102 adult patients (age 18-86 years) with the diagnosis of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) were treated with photons and/or electrons in combination with surgery. The total doses in the initial treatment volume (second order target volume) was 40-50 Gy. For the coning down volume (first order target volume) the median total dose was 59 Gy (range 45-72 Gy). A total of 18% (18/102) local failures was observed. In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for the occurrence of a local failure were identified as follows: treatment of a primary or recurrent STS (P = 0.02), total dose (P = 0.025) and tumour grade (P = 0.05). Mode of surgery, tumour size (trunk versus extremity), pre- or postoperative radiotherapy, combined chemotherapy and tumour size (T1 versus T2) had no significant impact on the local relapse-free survival. These data give further evidence that combined surgery and radiotherapy is an effective modality in treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

DNA content as a predictor of clinical outcome in soft tissue sarcoma patients.

The prognostic relevance of cellular DNA content has been shown for a variety of human malignancies. However, only a few studies concerning soft tissue sarcomas have been published. Biopsies of 81 patients with soft tissue sarcomas, referred for primary or secondary surgery, were analysed by flow cytometry to determine cellular DNA content of tumours. Most patients (60/81) already had one or more local recurrences at the time of first presentation at Essen University. The median age of the patients was 45 years (range 14-79). 44 (54%) patients had euploid and 37 (46%) had aneuploid tumours. Age, sex, and tumour localisation (trunk versus extremity) were equally distributed between euploid and aneuploid sarcoma patients. The median follow-up was 69 months (range 9-312). The median survival time for euploid and aneuploid tumours was 84 and 30 months, respectively (P < 0.0005). In the univariate analysis, ploidy, S-phase percentage, localisation and tumour grading were significant predictors of survival, whereas in the multivariate analysis, only DNA content and tumour localisation were independent prognostic variables for survival.

Chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer--long-term results of a phase II trial.

The feasibility and effectiveness of a combined chemo-radiotherapy treatment modality for locally advanced head and neck cancer was tested in a phase II trial. Between 1990 and 1993, 74 patients (20 female/54 male) with head and neck cancer stage III (n = 12) and IV (n = 62) were treated with accelerated radiotherapy (72 Gy) and simultaneous chemotherapy (5-FU, folinic acid, mitomycin C). The median follow-up time was 43 months (1-72). Complete remission (CR) was absent in 76% (56/74) of patients and, after subsequent resection of residual lymph nodes, another 8 patients achieved CR. The cumulative local control rate was 72% and disease-specific survival rate was 59% at 4 years. Two patients died with treatment-related conditions (pancytopenia, larynx oedema). By multivariate analysis, only lymph node status was an independent parameter for local control (P = 0.04). This treatment was feasible and toxicity was not a treatment-limiting factor. As a consequence, a German multicentre phase III trial was initiated in 1995.

Radioresponsiveness of human glioma, sarcoma, and breast cancer spheroids depends on tumor differentiation.

PURPOSE: Differences in the intrinsic radiosensitivity within and between different tumor classes have been noticed for human tumor cell lines using the clonogenic assay. By far, most of the cell lines studied up to now were derived from poorly differentiated tumors. In this study, the influence of tumor differentiation on the radiation doses necessary to control 50% of small oxic spheroids (SCD50) was determined. Evidence of a distinct dependence of radioresponsiveness on tumor progression provides a background for an investigation of the underlying mechanisms. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Spheroids were aggregated from 1000-1500 cells in agarose coated 24 multi-well plates. Their diameters ranged from 156 to 405 microns, depending on the cell line. Spheroids were irradiated with graded 60Co single doses using spheroid control as end point and a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. RESULTS: Cell lines from three low grade gliomas and 10 malignant gliomas were studied in the spheroid control assay. The group mean SCD50 values were 6.1 +/- 1.6 Gy and 13.1 +/- 3.3 Gy, respectively. Four cell lines from grade 2 soft tissue sarcomas had a mean SCD50 value of 6.2 +/- 0.5 Gy and one undifferentiated sarcoma line of 11.0 Gy. Three well-differentiated breast cancer lines expressed the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, had an epithelioid morphology in monolayer culture, were estrogen receptor positive or contact inhibited in multicellular spheroids. Two undifferentiated breast cancer lines had a fibroblastoid morphology and were marker negative. The mean SCD50 value of the former was 10.5 +/- 1.0 Gy while that of the undifferentiated lines was 14.8 +/- 2.8 Gy. Analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the tumor type as well as the grade of dedifferentiation on the SCD50 after irradiation with one fraction or 2Gy/fraction. The surviving fractions at 2 Gy (SF2), obtained from the spheroid control rates after different fractionation schedules by approximation of the linear quadratic model assuming Poisson statistics were significantly dependent on tumor type (p = 0.001, ANOVA F-test) but not on tumor differentiation (p = 0.27). The alpha/beta ratios did not depend on tumor type (p = 0.08, ANOVA F-Test) but significantly increased with the grade of tumor cell dedifferentiation (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The spheroid model is suitable for measuring the radioresponsiveness of differentiated cell lines with very low colony forming efficiencies. Tumor cell differentiation is an important factor for the radioresponsiveness and recovery capacity of human tumor cells.

Radiosensitivity, repair capacity, and stem cell fraction in human soft tissue tumors: an in vitro study using multicellular spheroids and the colony assay.

Radiation doses necessary to control 50% of spheroids (SCD50) were determined for five human soft tissue tumor lines after single dose and fractionated irradiation. Spheroids with 1000-1500 cells were used throughout. A similar number of cells per spheroid resulted in different sized spheroids for the respective cell lines. The parameters alpha, beta, and the number of regenerating cellular units per spheroid (SRU) were estimated from the spheroid control data using a direct fit according to the linear quadratic model assuming Poisson statistics. The number of spheroid regenerating cellular units was also determined from the growth delay at doses required for 10% spheroid control. In addition, alpha, beta, and the fraction of clonogenic cells of the five cell lines were obtained from a soft agar colony forming assay. The most precise parameter for radiation sensitivity was the SCD50, with a coefficient of variation smaller than 5%. SCD50 values ranged from 5.9 to 11.0 Gy for the five soft tissue tumor lines. Two of the five cell lines showed significantly higher alpha values and lower calculated survival fractions after 2 Gy (SF2) in the soft agar clonogenic assay than in the spheroid control assay. This points to a resistance-enhancing effect in the spheroid system. Whereas the fractions of SRU from the number of cells per spheroid, estimated from the spheroid control and growth delay assays, agreed well, no significant correlation existed between the fraction of SRU and the fraction of clonogenic cells in the soft agar colony forming assay. The alpha/beta ratios as a descriptive measure of the fractionation sensitivity of the tumor cell spheroids in the spheroid control assay corresponded well with those derived from the dose-cell survival data using a soft agar colony forming assay. Two of the five cell lines showed high fractionation sensitivities with alpha/beta values smaller than 5 Gy while those of the remaining three ranged from 7.8 to 10.8 Gy. Spheroids are structurally more similar to in vivo tumors than monolayer cultures. From the observed lack of correlation in the radiosensitivity parameters alpha and SF2 as well as in the fraction of SRU or clonogenic cells obtained from the spheroid control assay or the colony forming assay, one would expect even greater differences between results from colony forming assays and the radiosensitivity of in vivo tumors, at least for human soft tissue sarcomas.

Heterogeneity in the fractionation sensitivities of human tumor cell lines: studies in a three-dimensional model system.

PURPOSE: Current concepts to optimize the therapeutic gain of radiotherapy by hyperfractionation assume that human tumors are less sensitive to fractionation than late reacting normal tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the intercell line heterogeneity of fractionation sensitivity of a wide variety of human tumor cell lines in a three-dimensional model system under fully oxic conditions using schedules with one to eight fractions. Biological characteristics of the tumors that correlate with fractionation sensitivity should be identified. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 21 cell lines from human tumors maintained as multicellular spheroids consisting of 1000-1500 cells were given fractionated irradiation within a total treatment time of maximally 50 h. Complete dose-spheroid control curves were determined for each fractionation scheme. The spheroid control data were adequately described by the linear quadratic model assuming Poisson statistics. In addition, the induction of a G2 block by a fractionated test dose of seven 3 Gy fractions given at 6-h intervals was determined in spheroid cells using flow cytometry of propidium bromide stained cell nuclei. RESULTS: The fractionation sensitivities of human tumor cells in multicellular spheroids could be characterized by alpha/beta values, ranging from 2.8-37 Gy in dependence on the cell line. The log normally distributed alpha/beta values were positively correlated with the percentage increase in G2/M phase after the fractionated test dose compared to the controls (r = 0.72, p < 0.01), and were associated with the degree of tumor differentiation (p = 0.01, ANOVA F-test). No significant correlation between the log (alpha/beta) values and the surviving fractions at 2 Gy (SF2) or the total doses with 2 Gy per fraction necessary to control 50% of the spheroids (SCD50) was observed. Despite the intercell line variability of the alpha/beta values, the SCD50 values of the different cell lines, given with one and eight fractions or one fraction and 2 Gy per fraction, were closely associated (Spearman rank correlation coefficients: r = 0.89 or r = 0.90, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Human tumor cell lines showed a marked heterogeneity in the fractionation sensitivity when irradiated as multicellular spheroids and assayed in situ using the spheroid control end point. Therefore, the therapeutic gain of altered fractionation also depends on those biological characteristics of each individual tumor that affects its fractionation sensitivity. Parameters that correlate with fractionation sensitivity of the tumor lines in the spheroid system were identified as grade of tumor differentiation and percentage increase in G2/M cells at the end of an eight-fraction schedule.

Radioresponsiveness, sublethal damage repair and stem cell rate in spheroids from three human tumor lines: comparison with xenograft data.

Dose-control curves after fractionated irradiation were generated for small oxic spheroids from the two human glioma cell lines, U87 and A7, as well as the squamous cell carcinoma line FaDu. These data were fitted by the linear quadratic model assuming Poisson statistics. The alpha/beta values of A7, U87, and FaDu spheroids, respectively were 10.3 (8.1-12.9) Gy, 17.8 (15.1-21.1) Gy, and 37.9 (29.1-51.5) Gy. These data were compared with those previously published by Suit et al. (31) and Zietman et al. (40) for 6 mm xenografts of U87 and FaDu after fractionated irradiation and for A7 after single dose irradiation under clamped conditions. A good agreement in the alpha/beta values was observed for U87 and Fadu xenografts and spheroids assuming an oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) of 2.7. In addition, the ranking according to the single doses needed to control 50% of the tumors agreed for xenografts and spheroids from the three cell lines. U87 was the most resistant line in both model systems, followed by A7 and FaDu. However, the absolute values of alpha and beta, obtained from the direct fit to the dose-control data were only about half as high for U87 and FaDu xenografts than for the spheroids. Monte Carlo simulations showed that this discrepancy can be explained by a greater tumor heterogeneity of the xenografts. While the number of critical stem cells or spheroid rescuing units equaled the number of cells per spheroid for the three cell lines, the percentage of tumor rescuing units for Fadu and U87 xenografts was estimated to be below 1%. In a next step, survival curves were generated for exponentially growing cells of the three lines. A7 cells were significantly more radioresistant when plated on tissue plastic than in soft agar. Using the most resistance-promoting colony assay conditions for each cell line, a good agreement was observed for the alpha and SF2Gy values calculated from the colony and spheroid control data. This study shows that the spheroid model can quantitatively predict the repair capacity of sublethal damage as well as the rank order of radiation sensitivity of in vivo tumors.

Deep regional hyperthermia: comparison between the annular phased array and the sigma-60 applicator in the same patients.

PURPOSE: Several institutions have accumulated clinical experience with the annular array as well as with the Sigma applicator. There exist only limited data in comparison of both heating devices possibly favoring the annular array over the Sigma applicator with regard to tumor temperatures and acute toxicity. The objective of this study was to record temperature distributions at identical sites in tumor and normal tissue in the same patients treated with each device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with advanced pelvic tumors were treated on successive occasions with regional hyperthermia using the annular phased array applicator usually driven at 60-80 MHz or the Sigma applicator usually driven at 70-90 MHz. In all patients detailed thermal mapping and temperature analysis for tumor and normal tissues could be performed. RESULTS: Regardless the device used the acute toxicity was treatment limiting in nearly 50% of the treatments. Systemic stress was treatment limiting in 30% of the treatments with both devices although systemic parameters (core temperature, heart rate, changes in blood pressure) were higher with the annular array. The overall mean minimum, average and maximum tumor temperature observed were 39.5 +/- 1.0 degrees C, 40.9 +/- 1.4 degrees C, 42.7 +/- 2.3 degrees C for the annular array and 39.3 +/- 0.9 degrees C, 40.9 +/- 1.4 degrees C, and 42.5 +/- 1.7 degrees C for the Sigma applicator. The time-averaged temperatures achieved in 20% (T20), 50% (T50) and 90% (T90) of all measured sites were 41.7 +/- 2.1 degrees C, 40.8 +/- 1.4 degrees C, 39.9 +/- 1.2 degrees C for the annular array and 41.7 +/- 1.4 degrees C, 41.0 +/- 1.3 degrees C, and 40.1 +/- 1.0 degrees C, for the S-60. The difference was not statistically significant. With regard to normal tissue temperatures a trend to higher maximum temperatures in the deep muscle and fat tissue was evident for the Sigma applicator. The overall minimum and average normal tissue temperatures in the deep muscle and fat tissue and the rectum and the time-averaged temperatures achieved in 20% (T20), 50% (T50) and 90% (T90) of the measured sites differ not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that there continue to be unresolved limitations in achieving temperature elevation in deep seated tumors of the pelvis with radiative coherent EM wave techniques using amplitude and phase steering capabilities without any special optimization procedure.