Enduring effects of psychological treatments for anxiety disorders: meta-analysis of follow-up studies.

BACKGROUND: It is a widespread opinion that after treatment with psychotherapy, patients with anxiety disorders maintain their gains beyond the active treatment period, whereas patients treated with medication soon experience a relapse after treatment termination.AimsWe aimed to provide evidence on whether enduring effects of psychotherapy differ from control groups. METHOD: We searched 93 randomised controlled studies with 152 study arms of psychological treatment (cognitive-behavioural therapy or other psychotherapies) for panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder that included follow-up assessments. In a meta-analysis, pre-post effect sizes for end-point and all follow-up periods were calculated and compared with control groups (medication: n = 16 study arms; pill and psychological placebo groups: n = 17 study arms). RESULTS: Gains with psychotherapy were maintained for up to 24 months. For cognitive-behavioural therapy, we observed a significant improvement over time. However, patients in the medication group remained stable during the treatment-free period, with no significant difference when compared with psychotherapy. Patients in the placebo group did not deteriorate during follow-up, but showed significantly worse outcomes than patients in cognitive-behavioural therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Not only psychotherapy, but also medications and, to a lesser extent, placebo conditions have enduring effects. Long-lasting treatment effects observed in the follow-up period may be superimposed by effects of spontaneous remission or regression to the mean.Declaration of interestIn the past 12 months and in the near future, Dr Bandelow has been/will be on the speakers/advisory board for Hexal, Mundipharma, Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Servier. Dr Wedekind was on the speakers' board of AstraZeneca, Essex Pharma, Lundbeck and Servier. All other authors have nothing to declare.

Case report: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment in multiple domains associated with neurofascin 186 autoantibodies: Case series with follow-up and review.

Background: Neurofascin 186 autoantibodies are known to occur with a diseased peripheral nervous system. Recently, also additional central nervous system (CNS) involvement has been reported in conjunction with neurofascin 186 autoantibodies. Our case enlarges the spectrum of neurofascin 186 antibody-related disease to include mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: We report here a case after having examined the patient files retrospectively, including diagnostics such as blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis involving the determination of neural autoantibodies, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), brain fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and extensive neuropsychological testing. Results: We report on two patients with MCI. Brain MRI showed cerebral microangiopathy in both patients, but brain FDG-PET demonstrated pathology in the right prefrontal cortex, in the right inferior parietal cortex, and in both lateral occipital cortices in one patient. Neurofascin 186 antibodies were detected in serum in both patients, and neurofascin 186 autoantibodies were also detected in the CSF of one of these patients. At follow-up six month later, neurofascin 186 autoantibodies disappeared in one patient while persisting in the other. Conclusion: We report on two individuals presenting MCI associated with neurofascin 186 antibodies, thus expanding the potential spectrum of neurofascin 186-associated disease. This report supports the recommendation to consider also neurofascin 186 autoantibodies in not just peripheral nerve disease, but also in disorders involving CNS autoimmunity. More studies are needed to clarify the lack of association between neurofascin 186 autoantibodies and cognitive decline.