Prospective cohort study of appendicectomy for treatment of therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicectomy may reduce relapses and need for medication in patients with ulcerative colitis, but long-term prospective data are lacking. This study aimed to analyse the effect of appendicectomy in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre cohort series, all consecutive patients with refractory ulcerative colitis referred for proctocolectomy between November 2012 and June 2015 were counselled to undergo laparoscopic appendicectomy instead. The primary endpoint was clinical response (reduction of at least 3 points in the partial Mayo score) at 12 months and long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score of 1 or less), failure (colectomy or start of experimental medication), and changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) (range 32-224), EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (13 women; median age 40·5 years) underwent appendicectomy. The mean baseline IBDQ score was 127·0, the EQ-5D™ score was 0·65, and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL score was 41·1. At 12 months, 13 patients had a clinical response, five were in endoscopic remission, and nine required a colectomy (6 patients) or started new experimental medical therapy (3). IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores improved to 167·1 (P < 0·001), 0·80 (P = 0·003) and 61·0 (P < 0·001) respectively. After a median of 3·7 (range 2·3-5·2) years, a further four patients required a colectomy (2) or new experimental medical therapy (2). Thirteen patients had a clinical response and seven were in endoscopic remission. The improvement in IBDQ, EQ-5D™ and the EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL scores remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: Appendicectomy resulted in a clinical response in nearly half of patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and a substantial proportion were in endoscopic remission. Elective appendicectomy should be considered before proctocolectomy in patients with therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.

ANTECEDENTES: La apendicectomía puede reducir las recaídas y la necesidad de medicación en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (ulcerative colitis, UC), sin embargo, faltan datos a largo plazo obtenidos de forma prospectiva. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el efecto de la apendicectomía en pacientes con UC refractarios al tratamiento. MÉTODOS: En esta serie prospectiva de cohortes multicéntrica, a todos los pacientes consecutivos con UC refractaria remitidos para proctocolectomía entre noviembre de 2012 y junio de 2015 se les recomendó en su lugar someterse a una apendicectomía laparoscópica. El criterio de valoración principal fue la respuesta clínica (disminución de ≥ 3 puntos del sistema de puntuación parcial de Mayo que varía de 0 a 9) a los 12 meses y en el seguimiento a largo plazo. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron la remisión endoscópica (puntuación endoscópica de Mayo ≤ 1), fracaso (colectomía o inicio de medicación experimental) y cambios en el IBDQ (rango 32-224), EQ-5D y EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL. RESULTADOS: En total, 28 pacientes (13 mujeres, mediana de edad 40,5) se sometieron a una apendicectomía. El IBDQ de referencia promedio fue de 127,0; el EQ-5D 0,65 y el EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL 41,1. A los 12 meses, 13 pacientes presentaban una respuesta clínica, cinco estaban en remisión endoscópica y nueve precisaron colectomía (n = 6) o un nuevo tratamiento médico experimental (n = 3). El IBDQ, EQ-5D y EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL mejoraron a 167,1 (P < 0,001); 0,80 (P = 0,003) y 61,0 (P < 0,001) respectivamente. Después de una mediana de 3,7 años (rango 2,3-5,2), otros cuatro pacientes requirieron una colectomía (n = 2) o un nuevo tratamiento médico experimental (n = 2). Trece pacientes presentaron respuesta clínica y siete se encontraban en remisión endoscópica. La mejora del IBDQ, el EQ-5D y el EORTC-QLQ-C30-QL se mantuvo estable a lo largo del tiempo. CONCLUSIÓN: La apendicectomía consiguió una respuesta clínica en casi la mitad de los pacientes con UC refractaria. La apendicectomía electiva debería ser considerada antes que la proctocolectomía en pacientes con UC refractaria al tratamiento.

Outcome after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in children and adults.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in children and adults are scarce. This complicates decision-making in young patients. The aim of this study was to compare adverse events and pouch function between children and adults who underwent IPAA. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort study included all consecutive children (aged less than 18 years) and adults with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease or familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent IPAA in a tertiary referral centre between 2000 and 2015. Adverse events were assessed by chart review, and pouch function by interview using a pouch function score (PFS). RESULTS: In total, 445 patients underwent IPAA: 41 children (median age 15 years) and 404 adults (median age 39 years), with a median follow-up of 22 (i.q.r. 8-68) months. Being overweight (P = 0·001), previous abdominal surgery (P = 0·018), open procedures (P < 0·001) and defunctioning ileostomy (P = 0·014) were less common among children than adult patients. The occurrence of anastomotic leakage, surgical fistulas, chronic pouchitis and Crohn's of the pouch was not associated with paediatric age at surgery, nor was pouch failure. The development of anastomotic strictures was associated with having IPAA surgery during childhood (odds ratio 4·22, 95 per cent c.i. 1·13 to 15·77; P = 0·032). Pouch function at last follow-up was similar in the children and adult groups (median PFS 5·0 versus 6·0 respectively; P = 0·194). CONCLUSION: Long-term pouch failure rates and pouch function were similar in children and adults. There is no need for a more cautious attitude to use of IPAA in children based on concerns about poor outcome.

External validation of a prognostic model of preoperative risk factors for failure of restorative proctocolectomy.

AIM: The Cleveland Clinic has proposed a prognostic model of preoperative risk factors for failure of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The model incorporates four predictive variables: completion proctectomy, handsewn anastomosis, diabetes mellitus and Crohn's disease. The aim of the present study was to perform an external validation of this model in a new cohort of patients who had RPC. METHOD: Validation was performed in a multicentre cohort of 747 consecutive patients who had an RPC between 1990 and 2015 in three tertiary-care facilities, using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis. The performance of the model was expressed using the Harrell concordance error rate. The primary outcome measure was pouch survival with maintenance of anal function. RESULTS: During the study period, 45 (6.0%) patients experienced failure at a median interval of 31 months (interquartile range 9-82 months) from the original RPC. Multivariable analysis showed handsewn anastomosis to be the only significant independent predictor. The Harrell concordance error rate was 0.42, indicating poor performance. Anastomotic leakage and Crohn's disease of the pouch were strong postoperative predictors for pouch failure and showed a significant difference in pouch survival after 10 years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The poor performance of the Cleveland Clinic prognostic model makes it unsuitable for daily clinical practice. Handsewn anastomosis was associated with pouch failure in our cohort with relatively few events. A prediction model for anastomotic leakage or Crohn's disease of the pouch may be a better solution since these variables are strongly associated with pouch failure.

The Link between the Appendix and Ulcerative Colitis: Clinical Relevance and Potential Immunological Mechanisms.

The human appendix has long been considered as a vestigial organ, an organ that has lost its function during evolution. In recent years, however, reports have emerged that link the appendix to numerous immunological functions in humans. Evidence has been presented for an important role of the appendix in maintaining intestinal health. This theory suggests that the appendix may be a reservoir or 'safe house' from which the commensal gut flora can rapidly be reestablished if it is eradicated from the colon. However, the appendix may also have a role in the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Several large epidemiological cohort studies have demonstrated the preventive effect of appendectomy on the development of ulcerative colitis, a finding that has been confirmed in murine colitis models. In addition, current studies are examining the possible therapeutic effect of an appendectomy to modulate disease course in patients with ulcerative colitis. This literature review assesses the current knowledge about the clinical and immunological aspects of the vermiform appendix in IBD and suggests that the idea of the appendix as a vestigial remnant should be discarded.

The immunology of the vermiform appendix: a review of the literature.

This literature review assesses the current knowledge about the immunological aspects of the vermiform appendix in health and disease. An essential part of its immunological function is the interaction with the intestinal bacteria, a trait shown to be preserved during its evolution. The existence of the appendiceal biofilm in particular has proved to have a beneficial effect for the entire gut. In assessing the influence of acute appendicitis and the importance of a normally functioning gut flora, however, multiple immunological aspects point towards the appendix as a priming site for ulcerative colitis. Describing the immunological and microbiotical changes in the appendix during acute and chronic inflammation of the appendix, this review suggests that this association becomes increasingly plausible. Sustained by the distinct composition of cells, molecules and microbiota, as well as by the ever more likely negative correlation between the appendix and ulcerative colitis, the idea of the appendix being a vestigial organ should therefore be discarded.

Treatment of perianal fistula in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing seton drainage and anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment.

AIM: The introduction of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF; infliximab and adalimumab) has changed the management of Crohn's perianal fistula from almost exclusively surgical treatment to one with a much larger emphasis on medical therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the success rates of setons and anti-TNF for Crohn's perianal fistula. METHOD: Studies evaluating the effect of setons and anti-TNF on Crohn's perianal fistula were included. Studies assessing perianal fistula in children, rectovaginal and rectourinary fistulae were excluded. The primary end-point was the fistula closure rate. Partial closure and recurrence rates were secondary end-points. RESULTS: Ten studies on seton drainage were included (n = 305). Complete closure varied from 13.6% to 100% and recurrence from 0% to 83.3%. In 34 anti-TNF studies (n = 1449), complete closure varied from 16.7% and 93% (partial closure 8.0-91.2%) and recurrence from 8.0% to 40.9%. Four randomized controlled trials (n = 1028) comparing anti-TNF with placebo showed no significant difference in complete or partial closure in meta-analysis (risk difference 0.12, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.30 and 0.09, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.41, respectively). Subgroup analysis (n = 241) showed a significant advantage for complete fistula closure with anti-TNF in two trials with follow-up > 4 weeks (46% vs 13%, P = 0.003 and 30% vs 13%, P = 0.03). Of four included cohort studies, two revealed a significant difference in response in favour of combined treatment (P = 0.001 and P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Closure and recurrence rates after seton drainage as well as anti-TNF vary widely. Despite a large number of studies, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the preferred strategy. However, combination therapy with (temporary) seton drainage, immunomodulators and anti-TNF may be beneficial in achieving perianal fistula closure.

Appendectomy for Therapy-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Results in Pathological Improvement of Colonic Inflammation: Short-Term Results of the PASSION Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine the modulating effect of an appendectomy on the disease course of therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis [UC] patients, and to analyse appendiceal pathological characteristics predictive of pathological response. METHODS: Patients with therapy-refractory UC, and referred for proctocolectomy, were invited to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy first. The primary end points were clinical response after 3 and 12 months. Secondary end points were endoscopic remission, failure, and pathologic response. Appendiceal specimens, and pre- and post-operative biopsies were histologically graded according to the validated Geboes score. RESULTS: Thirty patients [53% male] with a median age of 40 (interquartile range [IQR], 33-47) underwent appendectomy, with a median preoperative total Mayo score of 9 [IQR, 8-11]. After 12 months, 9 patients [30%] had lasting clinical response, of whom 5 [17%] were in endoscopic remission. Pathological evaluation was possible in 28 patients. After a median of 13.0 weeks [range 7-51], pathological response was seen in 13 patients [46%], with a median decrease of 2 points [range 1-3]. Appendiceal inflammation was highly predictive of pathological response when compared with no inflammation or extensive ulcerations [85% vs 20%, p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Appendectomy was effective in one-third of therapy-refractory UC patients, with a substantial proportion of patients demonstrating complete endoscopic remission after 1 year. Pathological response was seen in almost 50% of patients and was related to active inflammation in the appendix, limited disease, and shorter disease duration. These early results suggest that there is a UC patient group that may benefit from appendectomy.

Risk factors for proximal disease extension and colectomy in left-sided ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess proximal disease extension of ulcerative colitis (UC) over time, with disease behaviour pattern and risk factors for proximal disease extension and colectomy as secondary aims. METHODS: All cumulative incident cases diagnosed with UC at the Academic Medical Center between January 1990 and December 2009 were studied. The cumulative risk of colectomy was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors associated with proximal disease extension and colectomy. RESULTS: In total, 506 UC patients were included with a median age of 33 years (IQR 23-41) at diagnosis. Ninety-five (18.8%) patients underwent colectomy during follow-up. Median follow-up was 10 years (IQR 5-15). Initial disease extent was evaluable in 416 patients, of whom 142 (34.1%) had proctitis, 155 (37.3%) left-sided colitis and 119 (28.6%) pancolitis. Proximal disease extension was observed in 120 (28.8%) patients during follow-up (51 proctitis to left-sided colitis, 39 proctitis to extensive colitis and 30 left-sided to extensive colitis). Disease behaviour was evaluable in 378 patients, of whom 244 (64.6%) had less than one relapse per year. Younger age at diagnosis (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) and continuous active disease (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.27-3.73) were independent risk factors for proximal disease extension. The cumulative risk of colectomy did not change over time between patients diagnosed before and after the year 2000 (p = 0.341). Continuous active disease (HR 7.05, 95% CI 4.23-11.77), systemic steroids (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.37-7.71) and cyclosporine treatment (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.66-4.72) were independent risk factors for colectomy, whereas proctitis at diagnosis (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.86) carried a lower risk. CONCLUSION: In one-third of UC patients, left-sided disease at diagnosis will extend proximally during 10 years of follow-up. Proximal disease extension was not a risk factor for colectomy, but the risk of colectomy is rather determined by continuous disease activity, and use of systemic steroids and cyclosporine.

The prognostic value of micrometastases and isolated tumour cells in histologically negative lymph nodes of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Detection of occult tumour cells in lymph nodes of patients with stage I/II colorectal cancer is associated with decreased survival. However, according to recent guidelines, occult tumour cells should be categorised in micrometastases (MMs) and isolated tumour cells (ITCs). This meta-analysis evaluates the prognostic value of MMs and of ITCs, separately. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Biosis and the World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform were searched for papers published until April 2013. Studies on the prognostic value of MMs and ITCs in lymph nodes of stage I/II colorectal cancer patients were included. Odds ratios (ORs) for the development of disease recurrence were calculated to analyse the predictive value of MMs and ITCs. RESULTS: From five papers, ORs for disease recurrence could be calculated for MMs and ITCs separately. In patients with colorectal cancer, disease recurrence was significantly increased in the presence of MMs in comparison with absent occult tumour cells (OR 5.63; 95%CI 2.4-13.13). This was even more pronounced in patients with colon cancer (OR 7.25 95% CI 1.82-28.97). In contrast, disease recurrence was not increased in the presence of ITCs (OR 1.00 95% CI 0.53-1.88). CONCLUSION: Patients with stage I/II colorectal cancer and MMs have a worse prognosis than patients without occult tumour cells. However, ITCs do not have a predictive value. The distinction between ITCs and MMs should be made if the detection of occult tumour cells is incorporated in the clinical decision for adjuvant treatment.