An MRI-compatible varus-valgus loading device for whole-knee joint functionality assessment based on compartmental compression: a proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: Beyond static assessment, functional techniques are increasingly applied in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Stress MRI techniques bring together MRI and mechanical loading to study knee joint and tissue functionality, yet prototypical axial compressive loading devices are bulky and complex to operate. This study aimed to design and validate an MRI-compatible pressure-controlled varus-valgus loading device that applies loading along the joint line. METHODS: Following the device's thorough validation, we demonstrated proof of concept by subjecting a structurally intact human cadaveric knee joint to serial imaging in unloaded and loaded configurations, i.e. to varus and valgus loading at 7.5 kPa (= 73.5 N), 15 kPa (= 147.1 N), and 22.5 kPa (= 220.6 N). Following clinical standard (PDw fs) and high-resolution 3D water-selective cartilage (WATSc) sequences, we performed manual segmentations and computations of morphometric cartilage measures. We used CT and radiography (to quantify joint space widths) and histology and biomechanics (to assess tissue quality) as references. RESULTS: We found (sub)regional decreases in cartilage volume, thickness, and mean joint space widths reflective of areal pressurization of the medial and lateral femorotibial compartments. DISCUSSION: Once substantiated by larger sample sizes, varus-valgus loading may provide a powerful alternative stress MRI technique.

In-Situ Cartilage Functionality Assessment Based on Advanced MRI Techniques and Precise Compartmental Knee Joint Loading through Varus and Valgus Stress.

Stress MRI brings together mechanical loading and MRI in the functional assessment of cartilage and meniscus, yet lacks basic scientific validation. This study assessed the response-to-loading patterns of cartilage and meniscus incurred by standardized compartmental varus and valgus loading of the human knee joint. Eight human cadaveric knee joints underwent imaging by morphologic (i.e., proton density-weighted fat-saturated and 3D water-selective) and quantitative (i.e., T1ρ and T2 mapping) sequences, both unloaded and loaded to 73.5 N, 147.1 N, and 220.6 N of compartmental pressurization. After manual segmentation of cartilage and meniscus, morphometric measures and T2 and T1ρ relaxation times were quantified. CT-based analysis of joint alignment and histologic and biomechanical tissue measures served as references. Under loading, we observed significant decreases in cartilage thickness (p < 0.001 (repeated measures ANOVA)) and T1ρ relaxation times (p = 0.001; medial meniscus, lateral tibia; (Friedman test)), significant increases in T2 relaxation times (p ≤ 0.004; medial femur, lateral tibia; (Friedman test)), and adaptive joint motion. In conclusion, varus and valgus stress MRI induces meaningful changes in cartilage and meniscus secondary to compartmental loading that may be assessed by cartilage morphometric measures as well as T2 and T1ρ mapping as imaging surrogates of tissue functionality.

Identifying the imaging correlates of cartilage functionality based on quantitative MRI mapping - The collagenase exposure model.

Cartilage functionality is determined by tissue structure and composition. If altered, cartilage is predisposed to premature degeneration. This pathomimetical study of early osteoarthritis evaluated the dose-dependant effects of collagenase-induced collagen disintegration and proteoglycan depletion on cartilage functionality as assessed by serial T1, T1ρ, T2, and T2* mapping under loading. 30 human femoral osteochondral samples underwent imaging on a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner (Achieva, Philips) in the unloaded reference configuration (δ0) and under pressure-controlled quasi-static indentation loading to 15.1 N (δ1) and to 28.6 N (δ2). Imaging was performed before and after exposure to low (LC, 0.5 mg/mL; n = 10) or high concentration (HC, 1.5 mg/mL; n = 10) of collagenase. Untreated samples served as controls (n = 10). Loading responses were determined for the entire sample and the directly loaded (i.e. sub-pistonal) and bilaterally adjacent (i.e. peri­pistonal) regions, referenced histologically, quantified as relative changes, and analysed using adequate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. Dose-dependant surface disintegration and tissue loss were reflected by distinctly different pre- and post-exposure response-to-loading patterns. While T1 generally decreased with loading, regardless of collagenase exposure, T1ρ increased significantly after HC exposure (p = 0.008). Loading-induced decreases in T2 were significant after LC exposure (p = 0.006), while changes in T2* were ambiguous. In conclusion, aberrant loading-induced changes in T2 and T1ρ reflect moderate and severe matrix changes, respectively, and indicate the close interrelatedness of matrix changes and functionality in cartilage.