The Effects of Residual Femoral Deformity on Computed Contact Mechanics in Patients Treated With In Situ Fixation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

OBJECTIVE: In situ fixation for treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can stabilize the epiphysis and prevent further joint deformation but often leaves residual deformity that may adversely affect intra-articular contact mechanics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between residual deformity and contact mechanics in the post-SCFE hip. METHODS: Patient-specific hip models were created for 19 patients with SCFE treated with in situ fixation. For each model, discrete element analysis was used to compute cumulative acetabular and femoral contact stress exposure during a walking gait cycle. Slip severity was evaluated for each patient using the two-dimensional Southwick angle and a novel three-dimensional (3D) assessment of multiplanar femoral deformity (3D slip angle). RESULTS: Of the SCFE cases, 2/7 mild (Southwick angle ≤30 degrees) had peak cumulative femoral exposures equivalent to that of severe (Southwick angle ≥60 degrees) cases. Severe SCFE cases had higher peak ( P = 0.015) and mean ( P = 0.028) femoral contact stress exposure and lower cumulative femoral contact area ( P = 0.003) than mild (Southwick angle ≤30 degrees) SCFE cases. Mean femoral contact stress exposure was also higher in severe SCFE cases than in moderate SCFE cases ( P = 0.027). Acetabular and femoral contact mechanics metrics typically demonstrated stronger correlations with 3D slip angle than two-dimensional Southwick angle. CONCLUSIONS: Increased slip severity adversely impacts intra-articular femoral contact mechanics. Contact mechanics metrics demonstrate higher correlations with 3D slip angle, indicating that this novel measurement may better describe global deformity and its relationship to intra-articular mechanics; however, the modest strength of these correlations may also imply that global impingement-generating deformity is not the primary factor driving contact mechanics in the post-SCFE hip. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Greater slip severity adversely impacts contact mechanics in the post-SCFE hip. However, focal regions of high contact stress were seen even in mild SCFE deformities, suggesting some type of deformity correction should be considered even for mild slips to alleviate secondary impingement, address focal incongruities, and reduce osteoarthritis development/progression.

Three-dimensional assessment of subchondral arc and hip joint coverage angles in the asymptomatic young adult hip.

The primary objective of this study was to develop a custom algorithm to assess three-dimensional (3D) acetabular coverage of the femoral head based on surface models generated from computed tomography (CT) imaging. The secondary objective was to apply this algorithm to asymptomatic young adult hip joints to assess the regional 3D acetabular coverage variability and understand how these novel 3D metrics relate to traditional two-dimensional (2D) radiographic measurements of coverage. The algorithm developed automatically identifies the lateral- and medial-most edges of the acetabular lunate at one-degree intervals around the acetabular rim based on local radius of curvature. The acetabular edges and the center of a best-fit sphere to the femoral head are then used to compute the mean 3D subchondral arc angles and hip joint coverage angles in five acetabular octants. This algorithm was applied to hip models generated from pelvis/hip CT imaging or abdomen/pelvis CT angiograms of 50 patients between 17 and 25 years of age who had no history of congenital or developmental hip pathology, neuromuscular conditions, or bilateral pelvic and/or femoral fractures. Corresponding 2D acetabular coverage measures of lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular arc angle (AAA) were assessed on the patients' clinical or digitally reconstructed radiographs. The 3D subchondral arc angle in the superior region (58.0 [54.6-64.8] degrees) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than all other acetabular subregions. The 3D hip joint coverage angle in the superior region (26.2 [20.7-28.5] degrees) was also significantly higher (p < 0.001) than all other acetabular subregions. 3D superior hip joint coverage angle demonstrated the strongest correlation with 2D LCEA (r = 0.649, p < 0.001), while 3D superior-anterior subchondral arc angle demonstrated the strongest correlation with 2D AAA (r = 0.718, p < 0.001). The 3D coverage metrics in the remaining acetabular regions did not strongly correlate with typical 2D radiographic measures. The discrepancy between standard 2D measures of radiographic acetabular coverage and actual 3D coverage identified on advanced imaging indicates potential discord between anatomic coverage and the standard clinical measures of coverage on 2D imaging. As 2D measurement of acetabular coverage is increasingly used to guide surgical decision-making to address acetabular deformities, this work would suggest that 3D measures of acetabular coverage may be important to help discriminate local coverage deficiencies, avoid inconsistencies resulting from differences in radiographic measurement techniques, and provide a better understanding of acetabular coverage in the hip joint, potentially altering surgical planning and guiding surgical technique.