First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer: LIGHT-NING study.

OBJECTIVE: As first-line treatment for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without chemotherapy, had demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy; however, data on Japanese patients are limited. METHODS: LIGHT-NING was a multicenter, observational study and retrospectively collected data. In this interim analysis, we analyzed patients who received combination immunotherapy between 27 November 2020 and 31 August 2021 for the treatment status, safety objectives (treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events incidences), and effectiveness objectives (objective response rate and progression-free survival) to determine the characteristics and early safety information. RESULTS: We analyzed 353 patients, with a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 5.0-9.7) months. Overall, 60.1 and 39.9% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy, respectively. In these cohorts, the median age was 67 and 72 years; 10.8 and 35.5% were aged ≥75 years; 80.2 and 79.4% were male; 5.2 and 13.5% had a performance score ≥ 2; 32.1 and 27.0% developed grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events; treatment-related deaths were observed in 6 (2.8%) and 5 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse event incidence was the highest within the first month of treatment in both cohorts, although the immune-related adverse event risk persisted throughout. No new safety signals were observed at this interim analysis. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-7.6) and 5.8 (4.3-7.0) months in nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIGHT-NING offers valuable insights into combination immunotherapy for untreated patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world settings.

Clinical roles of soluble PD-1 and PD-L1 in plasma of NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a limited proportion of patients can benefit from this therapy, and clinically useful predictive biomarkers remain to be elucidated. METHODS: Blood was collected from 189 patients with NSCLC before and six weeks after the initiation of ICI treatment (anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody). Soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and PD-L1 (sPD-L1) in plasma before and after treatment were analyzed to evaluate their clinical significance. RESULTS: Cox regression analysis demonstrated that higher sPD-L1 levels before treatment significantly predicted unfavorable progression-free survival (PFS; HR 15.4, 95% CI 1.10-86.7, P = 0.009) and overall survival (OS; HR 11.4, 95% CI 1.19-52.3, P = 0.007) in NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 122) but not in those treated with ICIs combined with chemotherapy (n = 67: P = 0.729 and P = 0.155, respectively). In addition, higher sPD-1 levels after treatment were significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.91, P = 0.037) in patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, whereas higher sPD-L1 levels after treatment were significantly associated with worse PFS (HR 6.09, 95% CI 1.42-21.0, P = 0.008) and OS (HR 42.6, 95% CI 6.83-226, P < 0.001). The levels of sPD-L1 at baseline closely correlated with those of other soluble factors, such as sCD30, IL-2Ra, sTNF-R1, and sTNF-R2, which are known to be released from the cell surface by zinc-binding proteases ADAM10/17. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the clinical significance of pretreatment sPD-L1 as well as posttreatment sPD-1 and sPD-L1 in NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy.

Adjuvant atezolizumab in Japanese patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (IMpower010).

The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1-4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator-assessed disease-free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease-free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.08), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35-1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34-1.10) populations. Atezolizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment-related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease-free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results.

Prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status.

BACKGROUND: Pathological stage IB-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (Mt) has a high recurrence rate even after complete resection. However, there have been few reports on the risk factors for Mt recurrence. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological factors related to the relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with pathological stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma with and without an EGFR mutation. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative surgery for Mt (n = 208) harboring the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation or EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation and EGFR mutation wild-type lung adenocarcinoma (Wt, n = 358) between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Patients who received adjuvant EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The prognostic factors for RFS were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year RFS rates in the Mt and Wt groups were 43.5 and 52.3%, respectively (p = 0.907). Prognostic factors for RFS in the Mt group included smoking history (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; p = 0.049), blood vessel invasion (HR, 1.84; p = 0.023), and lymph node metastasis (HR, 1.96; p = 0.005). However, adjuvant chemotherapy was not a prognostic factor (HR, 1.02; p = 0.906). In contrast, positron emission tomography (PET) max standardized uptake value (SUV) ≥ 6.0 (HR, 1.53; p = 0.042), lymphatic vessel invasion (HR, 1.54; p = 0.036), lymph node metastasis (HR, 1.79; p = 0.002), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.60; p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for RFS in the Wt group. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors for RFS in stage IB-IIIA primary lung adenocarcinoma differ by epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on RFS also differed by EGFR mutation status.

IMpower132: Atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in Japanese patients.

IMpower132 explored the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Key eligibility criteria for the phase 3, open-label, IMpower132 study included age ≥18 y, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-squamous NSCLC per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and no prior systemic treatment for stage IV NSCLC. Patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 ) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 ) or carboplatin (area under the concentration curve, 6 mg/mL/min) (APP arm) or chemotherapy alone (PP arm). The co-primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. A subgroup analysis was conducted in Japanese patients. In the Japanese subgroup (n = 101), median OS was 30.8 (95% CI, 24.3 to not estimable) mo in the APP arm (n = 48) and 22.2 (95% CI, 15.7-30.8) mo in the PP arm (n = 53; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.36-1.14]). PFS was 12.8 (95% CI, 8.6-16.6) mo in the APP arm vs 4.5 (95% CI, 4.1-6.7) mo in the PP arm (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21-0.58]). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 68.8% of APP arm patients and 44.2% of PP arm patients. Consistent with global study results, atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy improved efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 TRAEs.

Clinical significance of peripheral TCR and BCR repertoire diversity in EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody.

INTRODUCTION: TCR and BCR repertoire diversity plays a critical role in tumor immunity. Thus, analysis of TCR and BCR repertoires might help predict the clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. METHODS: Blood samples from 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-PD-1 antibody were collected before and six weeks after treatment initiation. The clinical significance of TCR and BCR repertoire diversity in peripheral blood was evaluated in all the enrolled patients (n = 30) or in the subset with (n = 10) or without (n = 20) EGFR/ALK mutation. RESULTS: TCR and BCR diversity was significantly correlated at baseline (R = 0.65; P = 1.6 × 10-4) and on treatment (R = 0.72; P = 1.2 × 10-5). Compared to non-responders (SD or PD), responders (PR) showed significantly decreased TCR and BCR diversity after treatment in the EGFR/ALK wild-type subset (P = 0.0014 and P = 0.034, respectively), but not in all the enrolled patients. The post-treatment reduction in TCR and BCR repertoire diversity was also significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse events in the EGFR/ALK wild-type subset (P = 0.022 and P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with more reduced TCR diversity showed better progression-free survival (PFS) in the EGFR/ALK wild-type subset (P = 0.011) but not in the mutant subset. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the clinical significance of changes in peripheral TCR and BCR repertoire diversity after anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutation. Monitoring of the peripheral TCR and BCR repertoires may serve as a surrogate marker for the early detection of EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC patients who would benefit from anti-PD-1 treatment.

First-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: CASPIAN Japan subgroup analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 CASPIAN study (NCT03043872), first-line durvalumab plus etoposide and cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved OS versus EP alone in patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.59-0.91; p = 0.0047]). Here we report results for a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients recruited in Japan. METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC received either 4 cycles of durvalumab 1500 mg plus EP q3w followed by maintenance durvalumab 1500 mg q4w until disease progression or up to 6 cycles of EP q3w. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: In the Japan subgroup, 18 patients were randomized to durvalumab plus EP and 16 patients to EP. At the interim analysis with a median follow-up of 12.5 months in the subgroup, OS numerically favored durvalumab plus EP versus EP (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.26‒2.26]; median not reached vs 15.2 months). PFS was similar for durvalumab plus EP versus EP (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.43‒1.89]). Confirmed ORR was 89% with durvalumab plus EP versus 69% with EP. Adverse events (AEs) of CTCAE grade 3 or 4 were reported in 78% versus 94% of patients in the durvalumab plus EP versus EP arms. There were no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation or death in the Japan subgroup. CONCLUSION: First-line durvalumab plus EP was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with ES-SCLC. Despite the small size of the Japan subgroup, results were generally consistent with the global study population.

Detection of EGFR mutation of pulmonary adenocarcinoma in sputum using droplet digital PCR.

BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation of primary lung adenocarcinoma can be detected on sputum samples. This study aimed to examine EGFR mutations of primary lung adenocarcinoma in sputum samples using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and compare it with an EGFR mutation in surgically resected lung cancer. METHODS: Sputum was prospectively collected from the patients before complete resection of the primary lung cancer at Kanagawa Cancer Center from September 2014 to May 2016. ddPCR was performed to detect EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation (Ex21) and EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation (Ex19) in sputum samples from patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The concordance of EGFR mutation status in sputum samples and tumors in surgically resected specimen was evaluated for each positive and negative cytology group. RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma provided sputum samples. Sputum cytology was positive in 13 patients (11.0%). ddPCR detected two cases of Ex21 and two cases of Ex19 in sputum cytology positive cases. Compared to surgically resected specimens, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of EGFR mutation (Ex19 and Ex21) detection were 80.0%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in sputum cytology positive cases. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of EGFR mutation (Ex19 and Ex21) detection were 3.1%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in sputum cytology negative cases. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutations in primary lung adenocarcinoma can be detected with high sensitivity in sputum samples if sputum cytology is positive.

Plasma screening for the T790M mutation of EGFR and phase 2 study of osimertinib efficacy in plasma T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer: West Japan Oncology Group 8815L/LPS study.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy allows the identification of patients whose tumors harbor specific mutations in a minimally invasive manner. No prospective data have been available for the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and who test positive for the TKI resistance-conferring T790M mutation of EGFR by liquid biopsy. Therefore, a phase 2 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in such patients. METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC with known TKI-sensitizing mutations of EGFR, had documented disease progression after treatment with at least 1 first- or second-generation EGFR TKI, and were positive for the T790M mutation in plasma according to the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics) or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis. Patients were treated with osimertinib (80 mg/d) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) in patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and November 2017, 276 patients were screened for their T790M status with a liquid biopsy. Seventy-four patients were positive for T790M in plasma, and 53 of these individuals were enrolled in the study. The ORR for evaluable patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay (n = 49) was 55.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.2%-69.3%). The median progression-free survival for all evaluable patients (n = 52) was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-12.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the utility of liquid biopsy for the detection of T790M with the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. Plasma genotyping with this assay is informative for treatment selection in clinical practice when tumor sampling is not feasible.

Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy develops in almost half of patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1 year of treatment. The JO25567 phase 2 trial comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy with erlotinib monotherapy established the activity and manageable toxicity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC. We did a phase 3 trial to validate the results of the JO25567 study and report here the results from the preplanned interim analysis. METHODS: In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 NEJ026 trial, we recruited patients with stage IIIB-IV disease or recurrent, cytologically or histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR genomic aberrations from 69 centres across Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, and one or more measurable lesions based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day plus intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib 150 mg per day monotherapy. Randomisation was done by minimisation, stratified by sex, smoking status, clinical stage, and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This study is ongoing; the data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Sept 21, 2017. Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one response evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069. FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n=114) or erlotinib alone (n=114). 112 patients in each group were evaluable for efficacy, and safety was evaluated in 112 patients in the combination therapy group and 114 in the monotherapy group. Median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 7·0-15·7). At the time of interim analysis, median progression-free survival for patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group was 16·9 months (95% CI 14·2-21·0) compared with 13·3 months (11·1-15·3) for patients in the erlotinib group (hazard ratio 0·605, 95% CI 0·417-0·877; p=0·016). 98 (88%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 53 (46%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was rash (23 [21%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 24 [21%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). Nine (8%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and five (4%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (two [2%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group) and grade 4 hepatic dysfunction (one [1%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and one [1%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The results of this interim analysis showed that bevacizumab plus erlotinib combination therapy improves progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC. Future studies with longer follow-up, and overall survival and quality-of-life data will be required to further assess the efficacy of this combination in this setting. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Association between soluble immune mediators and tumor responses in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with anti-PD-1 inhibitor.

Although programmed death (PD)-1 immune checkpoint therapies target the immune system, the relationship between inflammatory factors and the clinical outcome of anti-PD-1 therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not fully understood. Here we examined the association between soluble immune mediators and the outcome of treatment with PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC. In two independent cohorts, we assessed the levels of 88 different soluble immune mediators in peripheral blood before and after anti-PD-1 treatment, and evaluated their associations with clinical outcomes. In the training cohort, the plasma levels of chitinase 3-like-1 and GM-CSF before treatment (p = 0.006 and p = 0.005, respectively) and changes in the plasma levels of CXCL2, VEGF, IFNα2, and MMP2 after treatment (p < 0.001, p = 0.019, p = 0.019, and p = 0.012, respectively) were significantly correlated with PFS. The change in the plasma CXCL2 level was also significantly associated with treatment-related AEs (p = 0.017). In the validation cohort, however, only the changes in the plasma levels of CXCL2 and MMP2 after treatment were associated with PFS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.006, respectively), and these changes were maintained during the course of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients who showed better clinical outcomes, even in those with tumor pseudoprogression. Since CXCL2 and MMP2 can be easily measured by minimally invasive blood sampling, they could be useful for monitoring of clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitor therapy.

Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) with EGFR wild-type.

BACKGROUND: Continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed (PEM) and bevacizumab (BEV) following induction therapy with cisplatin (CDDP), PEM, and BEV is beneficial in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC), but the survival benefit of addition of BEV to CDDP/PEM as induction therapy is still unclear. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen in Japanese patients with EGFR wild-type NS-NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 25 patients who receive intravenous CDDP, PEM, and BEV (15 mg/kg) from August 2010 to February 2013. The primary endpoint of this study was the response rate (RR) and the secondary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: The median cycles of induction chemotherapy were four (range 1-6). RR was 64%. Most patients (64%) transitioned to maintenance therapy. The median PFS was 9.7 months. Median OS was 21.6 months. Haematological adverse events reaching grade 3 to 4 were neutropenia (8%) without febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia (4%), and anemia (4%). BEV-related non-haematological toxicities of grade 3/4 were hypertension (16%), thrombosis (4%), and gastrointestinal perforation (4%). Each adverse events was controllable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: CDDP/PEM/BEV regimen is effective and tolerable in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NS-NSCLC, but should be paid attention to some BEV-related toxicities.

Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel plus maintenance bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer combined with exploratory analysis of circulating endothelial cells: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG)1016.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have demonstrated that docetaxel and bevacizumab may act synergistically by decreasing endothelial cell proliferation and preventing circulating endothelial progenitor mobilization. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel in chemotherapy-naive Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligible patients were chemotherapy-naive and had advanced/recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. The patients received 4 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/m2), cisplatin (80 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks, followed by bevacizumab as maintenance therapy, every 3 weeks until disease progression or attainment of unacceptable toxicity level. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The numbers of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) were also estimated on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle for the exploratory analysis of efficacy prediction. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were enrolled from October 2010 to April 2012. Bevacizumab as maintenance therapy was administered to 41 patients (87.2%), and the median number of total treatment cycles was 9 (range: 1-36). ORR, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival of the patients were 74.5%, 9.0 months, and 27.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (95.7%), followed by leukopenia (59.6%) and hypertension (46.8%). PFS was longer in patients with ≥10 count increase in CECs than that in patients with < 10 count increase in CECs (respective median PFS of 11.0 months versus 6.90 months) although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). CONCLUSIONS: A combination therapy of bevacizumab, cisplatin, and docetaxel, followed by bevacizumab as maintenance was highly effective in patients with non-squamous NSCLC despite the high incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The increase in CEC count between days 1 and 8 may predict the efficacy of our bevacizumab-contained treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004368 . Registered date; October 11, 2010 (Retrospectively registered).

Nedaplatin and irinotecan with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by docetaxel consolidation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase II study of nedaplatin (NP) and irinotecan (CPT) with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) followed by docetaxel for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the safety and efficacy of the treatment. Patients with stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were treated with 3 cycles of chemotherapy comprising NP at 50 mg/m2 and CPT at 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks with concurrent TRT (2 Gy/day, total 66 Gy) followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel at 60 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. CONCLUSION: Fifteen patients were registered, and 8 were able to receive the entire treatment regimen. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 and 1 patient, respectively, receiving NP and CPT with concurrent TRT. Major non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Grade 3 pneumonitis and esophagitis occurred in one patient each, and 4 patients developed febrile neutropenia. Docetaxel consolidation was associated with mild toxicities. Two patients died of late pulmonary failure 3 to 4 months after treatment completion, and the study was terminated. Twelve patients responded, and the median survival time, and the 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 39.3 months, 86.7% and 60.0%, respectively. In conclusion, NP and CPT with concurrent TRT is effective for patients with locally advanced NSCLC, but frequently induces pulmonary damage.

Bevacizumab beyond disease progression after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (West Japan Oncology Group 5910L): An open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has been established as a standard treatment option in the first-line setting for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there has been no evidence to support the use of bevacizumab beyond disease progression in such patients. METHODS: West Japan Oncology Group 5910L was designed as a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial of docetaxel versus docetaxel plus bevacizumab every 3 weeks for patients with recurrent or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC whose disease had progressed after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus a platinum-based doublet. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (n = 50) or docetaxel plus bevacizumab (n = 50), and this yielded median PFS times of 3.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 and a stratified log-rank P value of .058, which met the predefined criterion for statistical significance (P < .2). The median overall survival also tended to be longer in the docetaxel plus bevacizumab group (13.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-21.4 months) versus the docetaxel group (11.0 months; 95% CI, 7.6-16.1 months) with an HR of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.46-1.19; stratified log-rank P = .11). No unexpected or severe adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation of bevacizumab beyond disease progression is warranted for patients with advanced NSCLC whose disease has progressed after treatment with bevacizumab plus a platinum-based doublet.

Clinicopathological features and EGFR gene mutation status in elderly patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The rapid aging of the population in Japan has been accompanied by an increased rate of surgery for lung cancer among elderly patients. It is thus an urgent priority to map out a treatment strategy for elderly patients with primary lung cancer. Although surgical resection remains standard treatment for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is now essential to confirm the status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations when planning treatment strategies. Furthermore, several studies have reported that EGFR mutations are an independent prognostic marker in NSCLC. However, the relations between age group and the molecular and pathological characteristics of NSCLC remain unclear. We studied the status of EGFR mutations in elderly patients with NSCLC and examined the relations of EGFR mutations to clinicopathological factors and outcomes according to age group. METHODS: A total of 388 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent complete tumor resection in our hospital from 2006 through 2008 were studied retrospectively. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used to isolate DNA from carcinoma lesions. Mutational analyses of EGFR gene exons 19, 20, and 21 and KRAS gene exons 12 and 13 were performed by loop-hybrid mobility shift assay, a highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based method. RESULTS: EGFR mutations were detected in 185 (47.7%) and KRAS mutations were detected in 33 (8.5%) of the 388 patients. EGFR mutations were found in a significantly higher proportion of patients younger than 80 years (younger group; 178/359, 49.6%) than in patients 80 years or older (older group; 7/29, 24.1%) (P = 0.008). In contrast, KRAS mutations were more common in the older group (6/29, 20.7%) than in the younger group (27/359, 7.5%) (P = 0.014). The older group showed a trend toward a higher rate of 5-year overall survival among elderly patients with EGFR mutations (100%) than among those with wild-type EGFR (66.2%), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the EGFR status of patients with NSCLC differs between patients 80 years or older and those younger than 80 years. EGFR mutation status might be a prognostic marker in elderly patients with completely resected NSCLC.

Comparison between next-generation sequencing and multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays for nonsmall-cell lung cancer molecular diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Genetic mutation detection has become an important step in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment because of the increasing number of drugs that target genomic rearrangements. A multiplex test that can detect multiple gene mutations prior to treatment is thus necessary. Currently, either next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based tests are used. We evaluated the performance of the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT), an NGS-based multiplex biomarker panel test, and the AmoyDx Pan Lung Cancer PCR Panel (AmoyDx PLC panel), a real-time PCR-based multiplex biomarker panel test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically diagnosed NSCLC and a sufficient sample volume to simultaneously perform the AmoyDx PLC panel and ODxTT-M were included in the study. The success and detection rates of both tests were evaluated. RESULTS: Biopsies revealed 116 cases of malignancies, 100 of which were NSCLC. Of these, 59 met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for analysis. The success rates were 100% and 98% for AmoyDx PLC panel and ODxTT-M, respectively. Nine driver mutations were detected in 35.9% and 37.3% of AmoyDx PLC and ODxTT-M panels, respectively. EGFR mutations were detected in 14% and 12% of samples using the AmoyDx PLC panel and ODxTT-M, respectively. Of the 58 cases in which both NGS and AmoyDx PLC panels were successful, discordant results were observed in seven cases. These differences were mainly due to different sensitivities of the detection methods used and the gene variants targeted in each test. DISCUSSION: The AmoyDx PLC panel, a PCR-based multiplex diagnostic test, exhibits a high success rate. The frequency of the nine genes targeted for treatment detected by the AmoyDx PLC panel was comparable to the frequency of mutations detected by ODxTT-M. Clinicians should understand and use the AmoyDx PLC panel and ODxTT-M with respect to their respective performances and limitations.

Mutation profile and programmed death ligand 1 status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with "adenocarcinoma" and "non-small cell carcinoma favor adenocarcinoma".

BACKGROUND: The terminology for lung cancer diagnosis in small biopsies was adopted in the 2015 World Health Organization classification. If non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has no clear adenocarcinoma (AD) or squamous cell carcinoma morphology, the tumor is further classified based on mucin or immunohistochemical staining as NSCLC favor AD (NFAD), NSCLC favor squamous cell carcinoma, or NSCLC not otherwise specified. Since this new term was defined, the difference between AD and NFAD has not yet been fully explored. This study aimed to examine the differences in clinical background, gene alteration frequency, and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with AD or NFAD with small samples, and who underwent testing with the Oncomine Dx target test between August 2019 and April 2023 in Kanagawa Cancer Center. RESULTS: This study comprised 268 patients. A total of 96 patients underwent surgery after AD or NFAD diagnosis. The clinical stage was more advanced and pathological N0 was lower in NFAD than in AD. The pathology of the surgical specimens revealed that solid predominant AD was significantly more common in NFAD than in AD (p < 0.001). In both AD and NFAD, EGFR mutation was the most frequent gene alteration, followed by KRAS mutation. The frequency of EGFR mutations was significantly higher in AD than in NFAD. PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in NFAD than in AD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows a clear difference between AD and NFAD in terms of cancer progression, pathological features of the main tumor, genetic characteristics, and PD-L1 expression.

Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 pharmDx assays to test programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab, one of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, has been approved as an adjuvant treatment following resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with 1% or more programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved SP263 as a companion diagnostic assay for adjuvant treatment with atezolizumab; however, in clinical practice, the 22C3 assay is most commonly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, our study aimed to compare two PD-L1 assays, SP263 and 22C3, to evaluate whether 22C3 could replace SP263 when deciding whether to administer adjuvant atezolizumab. METHODS: We retrospectively and prospectively analyzed 98 patients who underwent surgical resection at Kanagawa Cancer Center (Japan). An immunohistochemistry assay was performed for all the cases with both SP263 and 22C3. We statistically analyzed the concordance of PD-L1 expression between SP263 and 22C3 assays. RESULTS: The concordance between the two assays using Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.670 (95% CI: 0.522-0.818) at the 1% cutoff and κ = 0.796 (95% CI: 0.639-0.954) at the 50% cutoff. The Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.874 (p < 0.01) indicated high concordance. PD-L1 expression with 22C3 resulted slightly higher than that with SP263. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a high concordance of PD-L1 expression with the SP263 and 22C3 assays. Further studies examining the therapeutic effects of adjuvant atezolizumab are required.