Efficacy of the cardiac septal occluder in the treatment of post-bariatric surgery leaks and fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy has evolved to become first-line therapy for the treatment of post-bariatric leaks; however, many sessions are often required with variable success rates. Due to these limitations, the use of the cardiac septal defect occluder (CSDO) has recently been reported in this population. METHODS: The study population was a multicenter retrospective series of patients with post-bariatric surgical leaks who underwent treatment with CSDO placement. Data on the type of surgery, previous treatment details, fistula dimensions, success rate, and adverse events were collected. Leaks were grouped according to the International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus. Outcomes included technical and clinical success and safety of the CSDO. Regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of response. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with leaks were included (31 sleeve gastrectomy and 12 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). They were divided into acute (n = 3), early (n = 5), late (n = 23), and chronic (n = 12). Forty patients had failed previous endoscopic treatment and 3 patients had CSDO as the primary treatment. Median follow-up was 34 weeks. Technical success was achieved in all patients and clinical success in 39 patients (90.7%). All chronic, late, and early leaks were successfully closed, except one undrained late leak. The 5 patients with early leaks had an initial satisfactory response, but within 30 days, drainage recurred. The CSDOs were removed and replaced with larger-diameter devices leading to permanent defect closure. Acute leaks were not successfully closed in all 3 patients. Regression analysis showed that chronicity and previous treatment were associated with fistula closure; success rates for late/chronic leaks versus acute/early leaks were 97.1% and 62.5%, respectively (P = .0023). CONCLUSION: This observational study found that the CSDO had a high efficacy rate in patients with non-acute leaks, with no adverse events. All early, late, and chronic leaks were successfully closed, except for one undrained late leak. However, early leaks required a second placement of a larger CSDO in all cases. These results suggest that the CSDO should be considered for non-acute fistula and that traditional closure methods are likely preferred in the acute and early settings.

[Differences between the 2013 and 2014 hypertension guidelines.: Position of the Central American and Caribbean Society for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prevention]. / Divergencias entre guías de 2013 y 2014 de la hipertensión arterial.: Posición de la Sociedad Centroamericana y del Caribe de Hipertensión y Prevención Cardiovascular¹.

Between the end of 2013 and the beginning of 2014 the most internationally influential hypertension guidelines were published. Although there are no major differences between them, there are discrepancies that can have an impact on treatment and prognosis for individuals with hypertension. This article analyzes the main controversial elements in the guides and presents the recommendations of the Sociedad Centroamericana y del Caribe de Hipertensión y Prevención Cardiovascular (Caribbean Society for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prevention). The main differences are found a) in the categorization of prehypertension, b) in the use of global cardiovascular risk in the decision to begin antihypertensive treatment, c) in the validity of beta-blockers as first-line drugs in treating uncomplicated hypertension, and d) the increase in the therapeutic goal of maintaining values between < 140/90 and < 150/90 mmHg in patients over 60 years of age with no history of diabetes or chronic kidney disease. All the factors in favor of and against accepting each of these four controversial criteria are analyzed critically and the observations made by the Society are included. The conclusion is that there are pros and cons for all controversial elements in the hypertension guides. However, the weight of the evidence and clinical judgment favor subdividing prehypertension into stages I and II, seeking a therapeutic goal of maintaining systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg in all the hypertensive patients under 80 years of age, retaining beta-blockers as first-line drugs in uncomplicated hypertension, and not delaying the start of drug treatment for hypertension stage I with low global cardiovascular risk. Finally, seven recommendations by the Society based on the analysis are included.

Clinical Perspective on Antihypertensive Drug Treatment in Adults With Grade 1 Hypertension and Low-to-Moderate Cardiovascular Risk: An International Expert Consultation.

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for disease burden globally. An unresolved question is whether grade 1 hypertension (140-159/90-99mmHg) with low (cardiovascular mortality <1% at 10 years) to moderate (cardiovascular mortality ≥1% and <5% at 10 years) absolute total cardiovascular risk (CVR) should be treated with antihypertensive agents. A virtual international consultation process was undertaken to summarize the opinions of select experts. After holistic analysis of all epidemiological, clinical, psychosocial, and public health elements, this consultation process reached the following consensus in hypertensive adults aged <80 years: (1) The question of whether drug treatment in grade 1 should be preceded by a period of some weeks or months during which only lifestyle measures are recommended cannot be evidence based, but the consensus opinion is to have a period of lifestyle alone reserved only to patients with grade 1 "isolated" hypertension (grade 1 uncomplicated hypertension with low absolute total CVR, and without other major CVR factors and risk modifiers). (2) The initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy in grade 1 hypertension with moderate absolute total CVR should not be delayed. (3) Men ≥55 years and women ≥60 years with uncomplicated grade 1 hypertension should automatically be classified within the moderate absolute total CVR category, even in the absence of other major CVR factors and risk modifiers. (4) Statins should be considered along with blood-pressure lowering therapy, irrespective of cholesterol levels, in patients with grade 1 hypertensive with moderate CVR.

Occupational toluene exposure induces cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA expression in peripheral lymphocytes.

Print workers are exposed to organic solvents, of which the systemic toxicant toluene is a main component. Toluene induces expression of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1), an enzyme involved in its own metabolism and that of other protoxicants, including some procarcinogens. Therefore, we investigated the association between toluene exposure and the CYP2E1 response, as assessed by mRNA content in peripheral lymphocytes or the 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone (6OH-CHZ)/chlorzoxazone (CHZ) quotient (known as CHZ metabolic ratio) in plasma, and the role of genotype (5 -flanking region RsaI/PstI polymorphic sites) in 97 male print workers. The geometric mean (GM) of toluene concentration in the air was 52.80 ppm (10-760 ppm); 54% of the study participants were exposed to toluene concentrations that exceeded the maximum permissible exposure level (MPEL). The GM of urinary hippuric acid at the end of a work shift (0.041 g/g creatinine) was elevated relative to that before the shift (0.027 g/g creatinine; p < 0.05). The GM of the CHZ metabolic ratio was 0.33 (0-9.3), with 40% of the subjects having ratios below the GM. However, the average CYP2E1 mRNA level in peripheral lymphocytes was 1.07 (0.30-3.08), and CYP2E1 mRNA levels within subjects correlated with the toluene exposure ratio (environmental toluene concentration:urinary hippuric acid concentration) (p = 0.014). Genotype did not alter the association between the toluene exposure ratio and mRNA content. In summary, with further validation, CYP2E1 mRNA content in peripheral lymphocytes could be a sensitive and noninvasive biomarker for the continuous monitoring of toluene effects in exposed persons.

[Arterial mean pressure and pulse pressure in young hypertensive patients]. / Presión arterial media y presión del pulso en pacientes hipertensos jóvenes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence shows that pulse pressure (PP) is very useful when assessing the hypertensive patient and this has led to a lower use of mean arterial pressure (MAP). We intended to demonstrate that MAP should be better than PP in young hypertensive patients. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional study in 70 white males with ages among 16-40 years, distributed in two groups of 35 individuals labelled as control group or hypertensive patients, who were assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: PP was similar (36.37 +/- 7.90 mmHg vs. 36.67 +/- 9.41 mmHg, p = 0.8851) in both control and hypertensive groups, as well as the arterial compliance (2.22 +/- 0.62 ml/mmHg vs. 2.41 +/- 0.77 ml/mmHg, p = .2555) and the aortic stiffness index (0.88 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.91 +/- 0.33, P = .6591). MAP (94.85 +/- 8.68 mmHg vs. 115.11 +/- 10.01 mmHg, P < .001) and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) [2681.42 +/- 602.31 dinas.s.cm-5/m2 vs. 3120.68 +/- 741.74 dinas.s.cm-5/m2, p = .0066] were higher in hypertensive patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our cross-sectional assessment in young hypertensive patients, MAP and its determiner (TPRI) were modified, with no important changes in the PP or its determiners.

Self-expandable metal stents to treat gastric leaks.

OBJECTIVES: Anastomotic leak is a major complication after gastric bypass (GBP) surgery, and it usually necessitates reoperation and is associated with long-term recovery and death. We present our experience with the use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to treat this complication. METHODS: Seventeen patients (14 males and 3 females, mean body mass index of 43.7 kg/m(2)) with gastro-jejunal leak after GBP underwent covered SEMS placement 1 to 3 weeks after surgery: 8 laparoscopic, 5 open, and 4 revisional procedures. All patients who underwent laparoscopic and revisional procedures had abdominal drains placed at surgery. No drains were placed in the open cases. Five patients required surgery to drain an abdominal abscess. RESULTS: Tolerance for oral feeding was achieved between 2 and 3 days after SEMS placement. One patient persisted with a minimal leak for 2 weeks. To date, all stents have been removed endoscopically 3.2 +/- 1.2 months after placement. Four patients needed a second session to complete removal of the uncovered top of the stent. Two esophageal mucosal tears occurred; both were managed conservatively. Sixteen patients had a totally sealed leak. One remained with a gastro-gastric fistula. One stent spontaneously migrated to the splenic flexure and was removed colonoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: SEMS placement for gastro-jejunal leaks is a safe therapeutic option.

[Hypertensive crisis: urgency and hypertensive emergency]. / Crisis hipertensivas: urgencia y emergencia hipertensiva.

Hypertensive crises lumped several clinical situations with different seriousness and prognosis. The differences between hypertensive urgency and hypertensive emergency depends on if this situation involves a vital risk for the patient. This risk is defined more by the severity of the organ damage than for the higher values of blood pressure. The hypertensive urgency not involves an immediately risk for the patient, for these reason, the treatment can be completed after discharged. Otherwise, the hypertensive emergency is a critical clinical condition that requires hospital assistance. Faced with a patient, with severe hypertension, asymptomatic or with unspecific symptoms we must be careful. First, we need to confirm the values of blood pressure, with several measures of blood pressure and investigate and treat factors, which triggered this situation. The objective of medical treatment for hypertensive urgency is to reduce blood pressure values (at least 20% of baseline values) but to avoid sudden reduction of these values. In hypertensive urgencies rapid acting drug should not be used because of the risk of ischemic stroke and use drugs with longer half-life. The cardiovascular risk of these patients is higher than that do not suffer hypertensive crisis. The treatment must be personalized in each hypertensive emergency and intravenous it’s the best route to treat these patients.

Las crisis hipertensivas son un conjunto de situaciones clínicas de variada gravedad y pronóstico. Las diferencias entre urgencias y emergencias hipertensivas radican en la existencia o no de riesgo vital por afectación de órganos diana, más que por los niveles de presión arterial. Las urgencias hipertensivas no suelen comportar riesgo vital inmediato por lo que el tratamiento puede iniciarse, incluso completarse, en el medio extrahospitalario. Las emergencias hipertensivas son situaciones clínicas muy graves que requieren asistencia hospitalaria. Ante un paciente con hipertensión grave, asintomático o con síntomas inespecíficos debe adoptarse una actitud terapéutica prudente. La primera medida será comprobar las cifras de presión arterial con tomas repetidas de la misma y tratar los posibles factores desencadenantes. El objetivo del tratamiento de las urgencias hipertensivas es tanto obtener una reducción de las cifras de presión arterial (al menos un 20% de las cifras basales) como evitar reducciones bruscas y/o excesivas de la misma. En las urgencias hipertensivas no deberían utilizarse fármacos de acción rápida por el riesgo de accidentes isquémicos y utilizar fármacos con vida media más larga. El riesgo cardiovascular de estos pacientes es superior al de los hipertensos que no sufren una crisis hipertensiva. En las emergencias hipertensivas la elección del fármaco deberá individualizarse. La vía parenteral es la forma habitual de la administración de fármacos.

[Practicality of cardiovascular risk functions]. / Utilidad práctica de las funciones de riesgo cardiovascular.

Cardiovascular diseases prevention strategies require refinement because their incidence decreases very slowly. Risk functions were developed by including classical cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, and basic lipid profile) in cohorts followed more than 10 years. They are reasonably precise for population screening of, principally, coronary artery disease risk, required in all cardiovascular primary prevention clinical guidelines. Coronary artery disease risk functions classify patients in risk strata to concentrate the maximum therapeutic and life style effort in the highest risk groups, in which the number needed to treat and cost-effectiveness are optimal. By communicating the relative risk and vascular age to patients, increased motivation to comply with the proposed drug and life-style modifications can be achieved. Approximately 20% of the population 35 to 74 years old has an intermediate risk that requires reclassification into high or low risk because they concentrate 35% of population coronary artery disease events. Several biomarkers (biochemical, genetic or imaging) are being tested to improve coronary artery disease risk functions precision. Computerized systems of health facilities should incorporate, automated risk calculation in order to support the preventive task of health care providers.

Las estrategias de prevención de las enfermedades cardiovasculares necesitan refinamiento porque su incidencia se reduce muy lentamente. Las funciones de riesgo incorporaron los factores de riesgo clásicos (edad, sexo, consumo de tabaco, diabetes, presión arterial, y perfil lipídico básico) en cohortes seguidas generalmente más de 10 años. Son razonablemente precisas para el cribado poblacional del riesgo de enfermedad coronaria exigido en las guías de práctica clínica. Clasifican a los pacientes en niveles de riesgo para concentrar un mayor esfuerzo terapéutico y preventivo en los de mayor riesgo, y en los que el número necesario a tratar y el coste-efectividad son óptimos. Proporcionar el riesgo relativo y de la edad vascular al paciente, le motiva a cumplir seguir tratamientos y estilos de vida. Alrededor del 20% de la población de 35 a 74 años tiene riesgo intermedio y requiere reclasificación a alto o bajo riesgo porque concentra 35% de eventos poblacionales de enfermedad coronaria. Se ensayan nuevos biomarcadores (bioquímicos, genéticos o de imagen) para mejorar la precisión de las predicciones. Si los equipos informáticos de los sistemas de salud incorporaran el cálculo automatizado del riesgo se facilitaría la tarea preventiva del personal asistencial.

Silastic ring vertical gastric bypass: evolution of an open surgical technique, and review of 1,588 cases.

BACKGROUND: Silastic ring vertical gastric bypass (SRVGBP) has evolved from a stapled (SSRVGBP) to a transected (TSRVGBP), and finally to a transected pouch with jejunal interposition (TSRVGBP with J-I). The creation of the gastroenterostomy evolved from a hand-sewn to a stapled and finally to a combined stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis. The circumference of the ring was increased from 5.5 to 6.0 cm. We address the effect of these modifications on surgical outcome. METHOD: The records of 1,588 consecutive patients (mean BMI of 44.5) since 1990 who had a SRVGBP were indentified from a prospective data-base of all patients undergoing bariatric operations. 205 patients with a prior bariatric operation were excluded from the review, leaving 1,383 patients who had a primary SRVGBP. RESULTS: In the 193 SRVGBP patients, there was 1 gastric leak (0.5%) and 64 gastrogastric fistulas (33.2%). In the 165 TSRVGBP patients, there were 4 gastric leaks (2.4%) and 14 gastrogastric fistulas (8.5%). In the 1,025 patients with TSRVGBP with JI, there were 8 gastric leaks (0.8%) and no gastro-gastric fistulas. In the TSRVGBP with J-I, 367 patients had a hand-sewn, 16 a stapled, and 642 a combined stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis. Stricture rate was 3.8%, 31%, and 2.6% respectively. There were 7 ring migrations (0.7%), all in the totally hand-sewn group. Ring removal was necessary in 20 (5%) with a 5.5-cm and 4 (0.74%) with a 6.0-cm ring. CONCLUSION: TSRVGBP with J-I with a combined stapled and hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis using a 6.0-cm ring decreased the incidence of complications, and is our current technique.

Disabling spondyloarthrosis risk factors in valley of Mexico workers.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe the most prevalent physically disabling conditions for insured workers belonging to the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) in the Valley of Mexico and to identify risk factors for disabling spondyloarthrosis. METHODS: Retrospective cases and prevalent controls from IMSS clinics in the Mexico City metropolitan area were studied. Eighty cases were IMSS workers reporting disability due to spondyloarthrosis; 80 controls were active workers at the same workplace and shared the economic activity of the cases. The 1995 IMSS Disability Report was reviewed. From this report congenital conditions of the musculoskeletal system, obesity, history of trauma, and sociodemographic patient characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: The most important risk factors were a history of spina bifida (odds ratio [OR] = 29.3, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 5.3-161; p = 0.0009), supernumerary vertebrae (OR = 21.3, 95% CI = 5.3-95; p = 0.0001), history of low back (lumbar) trauma (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.9-8.3; p = 0.0004), flatfoot (OR = 11.7, 95% CI = 1.9-69, p = 0.02), and obesity (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.06-4.03; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A history of congenital deformity of the musculoskeletal system, spinal column trauma, and obesity were risk factors most associated with work disability due to spondyloarthrosis.

Frecuencia de factores de riesgo coronarios en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio en el Servicio de Cardiología del Hospital de Clínicas

RESUMEN Introducción: el infarto agudo de miocardio es una complicación grave de la enfermedad cardiovascular y se conocen varios factores de riesgo coronarios. Objetivo: determinar la frecuencia de factores de riesgo coronarios en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio en el Servicio de Cardiología del Hospital de Clínicas. Material y método: diseño observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo de corte transversal, que incluyó a pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio del Servicio de Cardiología del Hospital de Clínicas desde enero de 2015 a marzo de 2018. Se determinaron las variables demográficas, motivo de consulta, antecedentes familiares de cardiopatía isquémica y la presencia de factores de riesgo coronario. Resultados: se incluyeron 231 sujetos, la edad media fue 63±1 años, 138 (60%) fueron varones. El motivo de consulta más frecuente fue el dolor precordial (71%). La mayoría presentó infarto sin elevación del segmento ST (63,6%). Los factores de riesgo coronario más frecuentes fueron la hipertensión arterial (89%), el sedentarismo (60%) y el consumo de tabaco (55,4%) sobre todo en los pacientes mayores de 65 años. Conclusión: los factores de riesgo coronario más frecuentes fueron la hipertensión arterial, el sedentarismo y el tabaquismo, predominando en mayores de 60 años.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction is a serious complication of cardiovascular disease and several coronary risk factors are known. Objective: To determine the frequency of coronary risk factors in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the Cardiology Service of the Hospital de Clínicas. Material and method: Observational, descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional design which included adult patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction from the Cardiology Service of the Hospital de Clínicas from January 2015 to March 2018. Demographic variables, reason of consultation, family history of ischemic heart disease and the presence of coronary risk factors were determined. Results: Two hundred thirty-one subjects were included, the mean age was 63±1 years, and 138 (60%) were male. The most frequent reason for consultation was precordial pain (71%). The majority presented infarction without elevation of the ST segment (63.6%). The most frequent coronary risk factors were arterial hypertension (89%), sedentary lifestyle (60%) and tobacco consumption (55.4%), especially in patients older than 65 years. Conclusion: The most frequent coronary risk factors were arterial hypertension, sedentary lifestyle and smoking, predominating in people over 60 years of age.