Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following sole gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger: a case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report three cases of early severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a), leading to hospitalization and the need for peritoneal drainage. Additionally, a review of the existing literature on this topic is provided. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case series and a literature review. SETTING: This study was conducted at obstetrics and gynecology department of tertiary academic referral hospitals, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: This study included three patients presented with severe OHSS symptoms, including abdominal distension, ascites, and hemoconcentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main focus of the treatment was to address the symptoms and prevent any further complications. The outcome was the complete recovery of the patients. RESULTS: The presented cases detail instances of severe OHSS following oocyte retrieval, utilizing GnRH-a for triggering. Case 1 involved a 33-year-old patient with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), Case 2 featured a 22-year-old patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and Case 3 included a 41-year-old patient with a history of depressive disorder. All patients receiving supportive care, including infusions and medications, exhibited gradual improvement during hospitalization, with complete resolution observed during the 20-day post-hospitalization check-up. CONCLUSIONS: These three cases highlight the occurrence of severe early OHSS following a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH-a in the absence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration for trigger or luteal-phase support. Clinicians must be aware that a GnRH-a trigger followed by a freeze-all approach does not guarantee the complete elimination of OHSS in all patients.

The Effect of Month-Long Daily Fasting on Semen Parameters: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether Ramadan month-long daily fasting affects semen analysis parameters. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in tertiary academic medical center. Medical records of 97 Muslim patients who were admitted to the IVF unit from May 2011 to May 2021 were reviewed. Only men who provided at least one semen sample during Ramadan period (Ramadan month +70 days after) and one sample not during Ramadan were included. Semen characteristics of each patient were independently compared to themselves. RESULTS: The post-gradient semen analysis indicated significantly lower progressive sperm motility (mean 30.01 ± 20.46 vs. 38.12 ± 25.13) (p < 0.001). The decrease in the progressive motility remained significant among patients with non-male factor indications (p < 0.001). In the non-male factor indication group, the difference in the progressive motility of the post-gradient semen analysis between the 2 samples was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). There were no significant differences between semen parameters before centrifuging. The incidence of asthenospermia (progressive sperm motility <32%) as an absolute parameter was higher after centrifuging the semen sample during the Ramadan period (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Semen samples collected during Ramadan period were associated with lower progressive motility and reduced semen volume compared to semen samples from the same men outside of the Ramadan period. A possible effect of these altered semen parameters on fertility should be investigated further.

Similar fertilization rates and preimplantation embryo development among testosterone-treated transgender men and cisgender women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of testosterone treatment on oocyte fertilization and preimplantation embryo development among transgender men who have undergone fertility preservation? DESIGN: A retrospective study was undertaken in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital between April 2016 and November 2021. Embryos were divided into three groups by source: 210 embryos from 7 testosterone-exposed transgender men, 135 from 10 cisgender women who cryopreserved embryos, and 276 from 24 cisgender women who underwent fertility treatment. Statistical analyses compared assisted reproductive technology outcomes between the group of transgender men and both groups of cisgender women. Morphokinetic and morphological parameters were compared between the embryos derived from these three groups. RESULTS: The transgender men (30.2 ± 3.5 years of age) were significantly younger than the cisgender women who cryopreserved embryos (35.1 ± 1.8 years; P = 0.005) and the cisgender women who underwent fertility treatment (33.8 ± 3.2 years; P = 0.017). After adjusting for participant age, the fertilization rate was comparable between the transgender men and both groups of cisgender women (P = 0.391 and 0.659). There were no significant differences between the transgender men and the cisgender women who preserved fertility in terms of number of cryopreserved embryos (7.2 ± 5.1 and 3.5 ± 2.6; P = 0.473) or the distribution of embryo age at cryopreservation (P = 0.576). All morphokinetic parameters evaluated by time-lapse imaging, as well as the morphological characteristics, were comparable for the embryos in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone exposure among transgender men has no adverse impact upon fertilization rates or preimplantation embryo development and quality.

Maternal underweight does not adversely affect the outcomes of IVF/ICSI and frozen embryo transfer cycles or early embryo development.

OBJECTIVE: To compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes and preimplantation embryo development between underweight and normal-weight women. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 26 underweight women (body mass index [BMI] < 18.50 kg/m2) and 104 normal-weight women (BMI >20 and <24.9 kg/m2) who underwent a total of 204 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles and 358 fresh/frozen embryo transfers (ET) in our institution between January 2016 and December 2018. Statistical analyses compared selected ART outcomes (ovarian stimulation, fertilization, and pregnancy) between both weight groups. Morphokinetic and morphological parameters were also compared between 346 and 1467 embryos of underweight and normal-weight women, respectively. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation age of the underweight and normal-weight women was similar (31.6 ± 4.17 vs 32.4 ± 3.59 years; p = .323). There were no differences in the peak estradiol levels, the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of metaphase II oocytes, and the oocyte maturity rates between the two groups. The IVF/ICSI fertilization rates and the number of embryos suitable for transfer or cryopreservation were similar for both groups. All morphokinetic parameters that were evaluated by means of time-lapse imaging as well as the morphological characteristics were comparable between low and normal BMI categories. There were no significant differences in pregnancy achievement, clinical pregnancy, live births, and miscarriage rates between the suboptimal and optimal weight women. CONCLUSION: Underweight status has no adverse impacts on the outcomes of IVF/ICSI with either fresh or frozen ET or on preimplantation embryo development and quality.

Ovarian stimulation outcomes among transgender men compared with fertile cisgender women.

PURPOSE: To compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among transgender men with those of fertile cisgender women. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 12 transgender men, six with no testosterone exposure and six after testosterone treatment, and 12 cisgender women (oocyte donors) who underwent ART in our institution between June 2017 and December 2019. Statistical analyses compared ART data and outcomes between three groups: cisgender women, transgender men without testosterone exposure, and transgender men after testosterone exposure. Comparisons were also made between transgender men with and without testosterone exposure. RESULTS: The transgender men with no testosterone exposure (23.3 ± 4 years) were significantly younger than the transgender men who had undergone testosterone treatment (30.3 ± 3.8 years; P = 0.012) and the cisgender women (29.1 ± 3.1 years; P = 0.004). The amount of FSH used for ovulation induction (1999 ± 683 mIU/mL) was significantly lower among transgender men without prior testosterone exposure compared with that among cisgender women (3150 ± 487 mIU/mL; P = 0.007). There were no differences in the peak estradiol levels, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of MII oocytes, and the oocyte maturity rates between the three groups. Five out of six testosterone-treated transgender men underwent embryo cryopreservation, and they all achieved good-quality embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Transgender men have an excellent response to ovulation stimulation even after long-term exposure to testosterone. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is, therefore, a feasible and effective way for them to preserve their fertility for future biological parenting.

Sub-endometrial contractility or computer-enhanced 3-D modeling scoring of the endometrium before embryo transfer: are they better than measuring endometrial thickness?

PURPOSE: Recent studies have focused on transvaginal ultrasound measurement (TVUS) of sub-endometrial contractility and computer-enhanced 3-D modeling scoring of the endometrium prior to embryo transfer (ET).The aim of this study was to compare pregnancy outcome of patients who performed the 3-D scoring or the sub-endometrial measurement prior to the ET with patients that did not perform those procedures. METHODS: A single center retrospective cohort study of 635 freeze/thaw cycles of blastocysts vitrified on day 5 and transferred between January 2016 and August 2016. RESULTS: We compared the patients who performed 3-D scoring with the control group and found comparable patients' characteristics, clinical pregnancy rates (42% vs. 44.3, p = NS, respectively), and ongoing pregnancy rates (31.7% vs. 33.9%, p = NS).We then compared the patients who performed the sub-endometrial wave measurements with the control group and found similar findings. The clinical pregnancy rate (38.2% vs. 44.3, p = NS, respectively) and the ongoing pregnancy rate (30.8% vs. 33.9%) were comparable between the two groups. We performed a regression analysis to examine the independent contribution of different variables to the ongoing pregnancy rates. Both the 3-D and the wave count procedures were not found to have any influence on the ongoing pregnancy rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although new ultrasonic methods of evaluating the endometrium have been proposed during the last years, these methods have not been shown to improve the pregnancy rates compared to the original method of assessing the endometrium by measuring the endometrial thickness.

Time-lapse imaging reveals delayed development of embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the morphokinetic parameters of embryos carrying balanced chromosomal translocations with those carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations using time-lapse microscopy. METHODS: The study group included 270 embryos that underwent biopsies on day 3 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for chromosomal translocations in our unit between 2013 and 2015. All embryos were incubated under time-lapse microscopy and evaluated for timing of developmental events up to day 5. The timing of these events was compared between balanced and unbalanced embryos, potentially viable and nonviable variants, and maternal versus paternal inheritance of the translocation. RESULTS: The PGD analysis found that 209 (77%) of the 270 biopsied embryos carried an unbalanced translocation. Embryos carrying unbalanced translocations, which are expected to lead to implantation failure or miscarriage, cleaved less synchronously and were delayed in time of cleavage to the 4-cell stage (t4) and in time of start of blastulation (tSB) compared with balanced embryos (P < 0.05). Furthermore, embryos carrying nonviable translocations demonstrated a significant delay at the time of pronuclei fading (tPNf) compared with those carrying potentially viable translocations (P < 0.05). Embryos whose unbalanced translocations were of maternal origin were significantly delayed in most of the morphokinetic parameters (including tPNf, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, cc2, s2, and tSB) compared with embryos carrying balanced translocations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations mainly of maternal origin undergo delayed development and asynchronous cleavage that may lead to implantation failure or miscarriage.

Intramuscular versus Vaginal Progesterone Administration in Medicated Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Sub-Endometrial Contractions.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess whether sub-endometrial contractility is reduced by the use of intramuscular (IM) progesterone. DESIGN: This is a randomized clinical trial. Patients assigned to a medicated day 5 frozen embryo transfer (FET) were randomly allocated to "vaginal progesterone" or "IM progesterone": patients randomized to the vaginal arm were treated with 200 mg micronized progesterone 3 times daily while patients randomized into the IM progesterone arm were treated with a single daily injection of 50 mg progesterone in oil. The main outcome measure was the number of sub-endometrial contractions (waves) per minute 1 day before a blastocyst embryo transfer. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The progesterone serum concentration was significantly higher in patients using the IM progesterone (85.2 ± 50.1 vs. 30.3 ± 11.2 nmol/L, respectively) but this did not translate into a lower sub-endometrial contractility (2.4 ± 4.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.1 contraction/min, respectively). Clinical pregnancy rates were comparable between groups. The number of sub-endometrial waves was significantly lower among pregnant patients (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The use of IM progesterone in medicated FET cycles does not reduce the sub-endometrial activity compared to vaginal progesterone administration. Our data support a poor clinical pregnancy outcome with high wave activity, regardless of the progesterone mode.

Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to determine the percentage of infertility patients who are diagnosed with a non-receptive endometrium according to the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test and to examine whether adjusting the embryo transfer day according to the proposed shift in the window of implantation improves the pregnancy rate compared to non-ERA-tested patients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study, including 53 consecutive good prognosis patients (0-2 previous frozen embryo transfers) admitted to our IVF unit for a mock cycle prior to their frozen day-5 embryo (blastocyst) transfer cycle. The mock cycle included an endometrial biopsy for both the ERA test and histological assessment by the Noyes criteria (study group). The next cycle frozen embryo transfer (FET) in the study group was adjusted according to the ERA results. The control group consisted of patients who underwent FET cycles at our clinic during the same period, without performing the endometrial biopsy and ERA testing. RESULTS: During the study period, 503 patients (control group) underwent FET cycles without performing the ERA testing and 41 patients had FET following an ERA test. There were no between-group differences in patients' age, number of previous transfers, endometrial thickness, number of transferred embryos, and ongoing pregnancy rates (35.2 vs. 39%, respectively, p = NS). Out of the 53 patients who performed the ERA test before their first or second FET, five endometrial samples (9.4%) were found to be post-receptive, 29 (54.7%) pre-receptive, and only 19 samples (35.8%) were receptive. Women in the study group with pre- or post-receptive endometrium on ERA testing, the appropriate adjustment in timing of FET according to the ERA test resulted in a 33.3% pregnancy rate, which is comparable to the 35.2% background ongoing pregnancy rate of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Performing the ERA test in a mock cycle prior to a FET does not seem to improve the ongoing pregnancy rate in good prognosis patients. Further large prospective studies are needed to elucidate the role of ERA testing in both good prognosis patients and in patients with recurrent implantation failure.

Does daily co-administration of letrozole and gonadotropins during ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome?

BACKGROUND: For the last year we have been treating normal responders with gonadotropins and letrozole during the whole stimulation in order to improve response to FSH by increasing the intrafollicular androgen concentration, and to reduce circulating estrogen concentrations. The aim of this study was to compare the IVF outcome of normal responders treated with letrozole and gonadotropins during ovarian stimulation with patients treated with gonadotropins only. METHODS: A single centre retrospective cohort study of 174 patients (87 in each group). RESULTS: The age of the patients was comparable between the groups. Estradiol levels were significantly higher in the control group (6760 pmol/L vs. 2420 pmol/L respectively, p < 0.01), and the number of follicles ≥15 mm at the trigger day was significantly lower in the control group (7.9 vs. 10, p = 0.02). The number of retrieved oocytes (10 vs. 14.5, p < 0.01), MII oocytes (7.9 vs. 11.2, p < 0.01) and blastocysts (2.7 vs. 4.0, p = 0.02) was significantly higher in the study group. We found no significant differences in the cumulative pregnancy outcome between the two groups (65.2% vs 58.3% p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that co-treatment with letrozole improves the IVF outcome in normal responders in terms of increased number of blastocysts obtained without increasing the pregnancy rate or the risk of OHSS.