What Is the Representation of Sexual and Gender Minority Identities Among Orthopaedic Professionals in the United States?

BACKGROUND: There is substantial corroborating evidence that orthopaedic surgery has historically been the least diverse of all medical and surgical specialties in terms of race, ethnicity, and sex. Growing recognition of this deficit and the benefits of a diverse healthcare workforce has motivated policy changes to improve diversity. To measure progress with these efforts, it is important to understand the existing representation of sexual and gender minorities among orthopaedic professionals. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) members reported their identity as a sexual or gender minority? (2) What demographic factors are associated with the self-reporting of one's sexual orientation and gender identity? METHODS: The AAOS published the updated membership questionnaire in January 2022 to collect information from new and existing society members regarding age and race or ethnicity and newly added categories of gender identity, sexual orientation, and pronouns. The questionnaire was updated with input from a committee of orthopaedic surgeons and researchers to ensure face validity. The AAOS provided a deidentified dataset that included the variables of interest: membership type, gender identity, sexual orientation, pronouns, age, race, and ethnicity. Of 35,427 active AAOS members, 47% (16,652) updated their membership questionnaire. To answer our first study question, we calculated the prevalence of participants who self-reported as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or another sexual or gender minority identity (LGBTQ+) and other demographic characteristics of the 16,652 respondents. Categorical demographic data are described using frequencies and proportions. Median and IQR were used to describe the central tendency and variability. To answer our second study question, we conducted a stratified analysis to compare demographic characteristics between those who self-reported LGBTQ+ identity and those who did not. Visual methods (quantile-quantile plots) and statistical tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro Wilk) confirmed that the age of AAOS member was not normally distributed. Therefore, a Kruskal Wallis test was used to determine the statistical associations between age and self-reported LGBTQ+ status. Chi-square tests were used to determine bivariate statistical associations between categorical demographic characteristics and self-reported LGBTQ+ status. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to identify the independent demographic characteristics associated with respondents who self-reported LGBTQ+ identity. Further stratified analyses were not conducted to protect the anonymity of AAOS members. An alpha level of 5% was established a priori to define statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 3% (109 of 3679) and fewer than 1% (3 of 16,182) of the AAOS members (surgeons, clinicians, allied healthcare providers, and researchers) who updated their membership profiles reported identifying as a sexual (lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer) or gender minority (nonbinary or transgender), respectively. No individual self-identified as transgender. Five percent (33 of 603) of women and 3% (80 of 3042) of men self-identified as a sexual minority (such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer). AAOS members who self-identified as LGBTQ+ were younger (OR 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 0.99]; p < 0.001), less likely to self-identify as women (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.767 to 0.954]; p < 0.001), less likely to be underrepresented in medicine (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.405 to 0.599]; p < 0.001), and less likely to be an emeritus or honorary member (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.641 to 0.883]; p < 0.003). CONCLUSION: The proportion of self-reported LGBTQ+ AAOS members is lower than the 7% of the general US population. The greater proportion of younger AAOS members reporting this information suggests progress in the pursuit of a more-diverse field. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings support standardized collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data to better identify and address diversity gaps. As orthopaedic surgery continues to transform to reflect the diversity of musculoskeletal patients, all orthopaedic professionals (surgeons, clinicians, allied healthcare providers, and researchers), regardless of their identities, are essential in the mission to provide equitable and informed orthopaedic care. Sexual and gender minority individuals may serve as important mentors to the next generations of orthopaedic professionals; individuals from nonminority groups should serve as important allies in achieving this goal.

How Much Bullying and Discrimination Are Reported by Sexual and Gender Minorities in Orthopaedics?

BACKGROUND: Discriminatory practices against minority populations are prominent, especially in the workplace. In particular, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) individuals experience several barriers and stressors more often than individuals who do not identify as LGBTQ+. Mistreatment is common among these individuals in their personal and professional lives. However, representation and perceptions of discrimination and bullying among attendings, residents, medical students, and other professionals who identify as LGBTQ+ and are "out" (openly acknowledging and expressing one's sexual orientation or gender identity) is seldom studied in orthopaedic surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How often are orthopaedic trainees and professionals who identify as LGBTQ+ out in their workplaces? (2) What proportion of these individuals report experiencing discrimination, bullying, or differential treatment? (3) Is there regional variation in these reported experiences of bullying and discriminatory behaviors by orthopaedic trainees and professionals in the LGBTQ+ community? METHODS: Individuals registering for Pride Ortho, a community of LGBTQ+ individuals and their allies established in 2021 to provide mentorship, networking, and a sense of community among its members, completed an internet-based survey developed by organization leadership. A total of 156 individuals registering for the Pride Ortho community were eligible to participate in the internet-based survey. In all, 92% (144 of 156) fully completed the survey, 6% (10 of 156) partially completed it, and 1% (2 of 156) did not complete any part of the survey. Most respondents (64% [100 of 156]) identified as being LGBTQ+, with 77 members at the attending level of their careers. More than half of LGBTQ+ members (56% [56 of 100]) identified as cisgender women (individuals who identify as women and who were born female). Demographic information was privately collected and deidentified, and included sex assigned at birth, gender expression or identity (the social constructed role that an individual chooses to inhabit, regardless of that individual's assigned sex at birth), sexual orientation, self-identified race, location, level of training, and orthopaedic subspecialty. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent (94 of 100) of LGBTQ+ respondents reported being out at their workplace, with nearly one-third of respondents indicating they were only partially out. Most (74% [74 of 100]) respondents reported either "yes" or "maybe" to perceived experiences of bullying, discrimination, or being treated differently. All individuals who partially completed the survey were straight or heterosexual and did not answer or answered "not applicable" to being out in their workplace. These individuals also all answered "no" to experiencing bullying, discrimination, or being treated differently. There was no geographic variation in reported experiences of bullying and discriminatory behaviors by orthopaedic trainees and professionals. CONCLUSION: Most LGBTQ+ orthopaedic trainees and professionals are out in their workplaces, although they report experiencing discrimination and bullying more than do non-LGBTQ+ individuals. Bullying and discrimination can deter individuals from beginning and completing their training in orthopaedic surgery. We recommend that orthopaedic institutions not only enforce existing antidiscrimination legal mandates but also increase the visibility of LGBTQ+ faculty and residents. This effort should include the implementation of diversity and sensitivity training programs, strengthened by a structured process of monitoring, reporting, and integrating feedback from all members in the workplace to continuously refine policy adherence and identify the root cause of the reported perceptions of bullying and discrimination. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To deepen our understanding of the experiences faced by sexual and gender minorities in orthopaedic surgery settings, it is crucial to quantify reports of perceived bullying and discrimination. Addressing these issues is key to creating a more diverse and empathetic workforce within orthopaedic institutions, which in turn can lead to improved patient care and a better work environment. Recognizing and understanding the specific contexts of these experiences is an essential starting point for developing a truly inclusive environment for both trainees and attending physicians.

Simulation Training in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Simulation training encompasses all methods of learning technical skills that do not require practicing on a live patient. Surgical training typically uses an apprenticeship model, in which responsibility is gradually shifted from attending surgeon to the trainee over years of experiences with live patients. Skill acquisition from simulation modalities can prevent unnecessary harm to patients if trainees have practice and experience from simulation before participation in live surgeries. Surgeons are morally required to prevent unnecessary harm to patients, regardless of whether they are consequentialist or nonconsequentialist in one's metaethics. It is the authors' opinion that simulation training is a moral imperative, as there is early empirical evidence for preventing harm to patients and it should be incorporated to the extent it is feasible in every surgical training program. Further definitive studies need to be performed.

Issues in Ethics in Orthopaedic Surgery Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused changes in health care as well as human suffering, and consideration of the principles of ethics can build a foundation to consider dilemmas that have arisen. Diversity, equity, and inclusion have become key issues. Simulation training and the related ethics of its application have taken on new meaning. Access to health care continues to evolve and will need further evaluation in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Impact on Families of Children With Congenital Upper Extremity Differences.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact on caregivers of caring for a child with congenital upper extremity differences. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, caregivers of patients enrolled in the multi-institutional Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CoULD) registry were contacted. Demographic information and the Impact on Family Scale (IOFS), a validated measure of perceived caregiver strain, were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures from the CoULD registry, the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were also analyzed for correlation with IOFS. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine caregivers participated. Factors with significantly stronger impact on family included public insurance; bilateral upper extremity involvement; household income of $20,000-40,000; additional musculoskeletal diagnosis; and a single adult caregiver household. There was a significantly increased subcategory of IOFS-Finance score for distant travel to see the surgeon. Additionally, all categories of the PODCI (upper extremity, mobility, sports, pain, happiness, and global) demonstrated a negative correlation with IOFS. PROMIS upper extremity and peer relations also demonstrated an inverse relationship with IOFS, whereas PROMIS pain interference had a positive correlation with IOFS. The overall IOFS for children with CoULDs was greater than previously reported for children with brachial plexus birth injury, and less than cerebral palsy and congenital heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of children with congenital upper extremity differences report a significant impact on family life. Socioeconomic factors, such as economically disadvantaged or single-caregiver households, and clinical factors, such as bilateral upper extremity involvement, correlate with greater family impact. These findings represent opportunities to identify at-risk families and underscore the importance of caring for the whole family through a multidisciplinary approach. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Volar Distal Radius Buckle Fractures: Is Bracing and Home Management Safe?

BACKGROUND: A removable brace with home management is widely accepted treatment for distal radius buckle fractures, which most commonly involve the dorsal cortex. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine if a removable brace and home management treatment is safe for volar distal radius buckle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isolated distal radius buckle fractures in children (3-16 years) diagnosed at an acute care visit (April 1, 2019 to May 31, 2022) were identified. Final diagnosis was confirmed using strict criteria including cortical buckling without cortical breach or physeal involvement. Cortical buckling was categorized as either dorsal or volar. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, treatment, and any complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-three fractures were either dorsal (254, 76%) or volar (79, 24%) buckle fractures. Mean age (SD) for volar fractures (9.3 [2.2 years]; range, 4-14 years) was significantly higher than for dorsal fractures (8.5 (3.0 years); range, 3-15 years; P = 0.012). More girls had volar fractures (48 [60%], P = 0.006). Most fractures occurred after a standing-height fall. Two hundred forty-four (96%) dorsal and 76 (96%) volar fractures were initially treated with a removable brace. Two hundred fourteen (84%) dorsal and 66 (84%) volar fractures had orthopedic follow-up. Brace treatment continued for 167 (167/204, 82%) dorsal and 56 (56/63, 89%) volar fractures. Treatment changed from initial brace to cast for 37 (37/204, 18%) dorsal fractures and 7 (7/63, 11%) volar fractures, influenced by caregiver preference and/or sport participation requirements. Only 1 (1/79, 1%) patient with a volar fracture returned for an additional visit for persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosis of volar buckle fracture is made using the same strict criteria used for dorsal buckle fractures, removable brace and home management treatment is safe. Shared decision making with caregivers may alter buckle fracture treatment.

Effect of Race and Geography on Patient- and Parent-Reported Quality of Life for Children With Congenital Upper Limb Differences.

PURPOSE: Patient beliefs about health and disability are shaped by many social factors and are a key determinant in their ultimate outcome. We hypothesized that pediatric and parent-reported outcome measures regarding a child's congenital upper limb difference will be affected by geographic location, parent education, sex, ethnicity, race, age, and presence of additional medical comorbidities. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the multicenter Congenital Upper Limb Difference registry were included. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, highest level of parental education, area deprivation index, and geographic region were recorded. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in the pediatric and parent-reported domains of upper extremity, anxiety, pain interference, peer relationships, and depressive symptoms were collected. RESULTS: The only difference between geographic regions in the United States in pediatric and parent-reported PROMIS was that parents in the Midwest reported higher upper extremity function scores in children with upper limb differences than the West. Black patients demonstrated higher scores in parent and child-reported domains of depression, pain, and anxiety, and lower scores in upper extremity function than White and Asian peers. Additionally, children with medical comorbidities also demonstrated worse outcomes in multiple PROMIS domains. There was no difference in scores based on sex, parent education, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: In children with congenital upper limb differences, race and additional medical comorbidities have an impact on patient- and parent-reported PROMIS outcome measures in multiple domains, with Black children and those with additional medical comorbidities scoring lower than their peers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As we strive to develop a health care system that provides equitable care to all patients, providers who care for children with upper limb differences should be aware that race and additional medical comorbidities can negatively affect patient- and parent-reported PROMIS outcome measures.

Presentation and Management of the Pediatric Trigger Finger: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Pediatric trigger finger (PTF) is an acquired condition that is uncommon and anatomically complex. Currently, the literature is characterized by a small number of retrospective case series with limited sample sizes. This investigation sought to evaluate the presentation, management, and treatment outcomes of PTF in a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with a diagnosis of PTF between 2009 and 2020 was performed at three tertiary referral hospitals. Patient demographics, PTF characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records. Patients and families also were contacted by telephone to assess the downstream persistence or recurrence of triggering symptoms. RESULTS: In total, 321 patients with 449 PTFs were included at a mean follow-up of 3.9 ± 4.0 years. There were approximately equal numbers of boys and girls, and the mean age of symptom onset was 5.4 ± 5.1 years. The middle (34.7%) and index (11.6%) fingers were the most and least commonly affected digits, respectively. Overall, PTFs managed operatively achieved significantly higher rates of complete resolution compared with PTFs managed nonsurgically (97.1% vs 30.0%). Seventy-five percent of PTFs that achieved complete resolution with nonsurgical management did so within 6 months, and approximately 90% did so within 12 months. Patients with multidigit involvement, higher Quinnell grade at presentation, or palpable nodularity were significantly more likely to undergo surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete resolution between splinted versus not splinted PTFs or across operative techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Only 30% of the PTFs managed nonsurgically achieved complete resolution. Splinting did not improve resolution rates in children treated nonsurgically. In contrast, surgical intervention has a high likelihood of restoring motion and function of the affected digit. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Policies, Practices, and Attitudes Related to Parental Leave for Practicing Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Parental leave impacts family engagement, bonding, stress, and happiness. Because parental leave benefits are important to all surgeons regardless of sex, understanding parental leave practices in pediatric orthopaedic surgery is critical to promote equity within the profession and supporting balance in work and family life. The aim of this study was to survey pediatric orthopaedic surgeons about their knowledge of parental leave policies, attitudes towards parental leave, and their individual experiences taking leave. METHODS: A 34-question anonymous survey was distributed to the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America membership. Eligible respondents were attending pediatric orthopaedic surgeons practicing in the United States or Canada. The survey gathered information about employer parental leave policies, perceptions about and experiences with parental leave while practicing as a surgeon, and demographic information about respondents. RESULTS: A total of 77 responses were completed and used for analysis. Most respondents were men (59.7%), <50 years old (67.5%), married (90.9%), and in urban communities (75.3%). A large majority were practicing in the United States (97.4%). Most respondents were unfamiliar with employer parental leave policies (maternity: 53.3%; paternity: 67.5%; and adoption: 85.7%). Those familiar with policies reported that employers offered 7 to 12 weeks for maternity leave (45.7%) and <1 week for paternity leave (50%) and adoption leave (45.5%). Most respondents believed 7 to 12 weeks should be offered for maternity leave (66.2%), 1 to 6 weeks for paternity leave (54.6%), and 7 to 12 weeks for adoption leave (46.8%). Many respondents reported taking 1 to 6 weeks of parental leave as a surgeon (53.3%) and that their colleagues were supportive of their parental leave (40.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric orthopaedic surgeons were unfamiliar with parental leave benefits provided by employers. Respondents who were familiar with these policies believed that more parental leave should be provided, especially for men who may feel social pressure to take less time for leave. Although respondents reported that their work environments were supportive, this study identified opportunities for improvement to support surgeons who wish to balance parental experiences with work responsibilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Long-read whole genome sequencing reveals HOXD13 alterations in synpolydactyly.

Synpolydactyly 1, also called syndactyly type II (SDTY2), is a genetic limb malformation characterized by polydactyly with syndactyly involving the webbing of the third and fourth fingers, and the fourth and fifth toes. It is caused by heterozygous alterations in HOXD13 with incomplete penetrance and phenotypic variability. In our study, a five-generation family with an SPD phenotype was enrolled in our Rare Disease Genomics Protocol. A comprehensive examination of three generations using Illumina short-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) did not identify any causative variants. Subsequent WGS using Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) long-read HiFi Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS) revealed a heterozygous 27-bp duplication in the polyalanine tract of HOXD13. Sanger sequencing of all available family members confirmed that the variant segregates with affected individuals. Reanalysis of an unrelated family with a similar SPD phenotype uncovered a 21-bp (7-alanine) duplication in the same region of HOXD13. Although ExpansionHunter identified these events in most individuals in a retrospective analysis, low sequence coverage due to high GC content in the HOXD13 polyalanine tract makes detection of these events challenging. Our findings highlight the value of long-read WGS in elucidating the molecular etiology of congenital limb malformation disorders.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Orthopaedic Care of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: A Survey of Two Pediatric Academic Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) children and adolescents continue to experience unmet healthcare needs, partly because of clinician biases, discrimination, and inadequate education. Although clinician attitudes and knowledge related to sexual and gender minority health have been well studied in other medical specialties, these have been scarcely studied in orthopaedics. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are pediatric orthopaedic healthcare professionals' attitudes (perceived importance, openness, comfort, and confidence) toward caring for sexual and gender minority youth? (2) What do pediatric orthopaedic healthcare professionals know about caring for this patient population? (3) What factors are associated with clinician attitude and/or knowledge? (4) What existing initiatives to improve orthopaedic care for this population are clinicians aware of at their home institutions? METHODS: All 123 orthopaedic healthcare professionals at two pediatric academic hospitals in the Midwestern and Northeastern United States were sent a 34-question, internet-based, anonymous survey. The survey queried respondent demographics, attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors at their home institutions related to the care of sexual and gender minority youth. Respondent attitudes were queried using the Attitudes Summary Measure, which is a survey instrument that was previously validated to assess clinicians' attitudes regarding sexual and gender minority patients. Items used to assess knowledge and practice behaviors were developed by content experts in LGBTQ health and/or survey design, as well as orthopaedic surgeons to improve face validity and to mitigate push-polling. Attitude and knowledge items used a 5-point Likert scale. Sixty-six percent (81 of 123) of clinicians completed the survey. Of those, 47% (38 of 81) were physicians, 73% (59 of 81) were licensed for fewer than 20 years, 63% (51 of 81) were women, and 53% (43 of 81) described themselves as liberal-leaning. The response proportions were 73% (38 of 52) among eligible physicians specifically and 61% (43 of 71) among other clinicians (nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and registered nurses). To assess potential nonresponse bias, we compared early responders (within 2 weeks) with late responders (after 2 weeks) and found no differences in responder demographics or in questionnaire responses (all p > 0.05). The main outcome measures included responses to the attitude and knowledge questionnaire, as well as the existing practices questionnaire. To answer our research questions regarding clinician attitudes knowledge and awareness of institutional initiatives, we compared participant responses using chi-square tests, the Student t-test, and the McNemar tests, as appropriate. To answer our research question on factors associated with questionnaire responses, we reported data for each question, stratified by hospital, years since licensure, and political leaning. Comparisons were conducted across strata using chi-square tests for Likert response items and ANOVA for continuous response items. All p values less than 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of the respondents who reported feeling comfortable treating lesbian, gay, and bisexual (sexual minority) youth, a small proportion reported feeling confident in their knowledge about these patients' health needs (99% [80 of 81] versus 63% [51 of 80], 36% reduction [95% confidence interval 23% to 47%]; p < 0.001). Similarly, of those who reported feeling comfortable treating transgender (gender minority) youth, a smaller proportion reported feeling confident in their knowledge of their health needs (94% [76 of 81] versus 49% [37 of 76], 45% reduction [95% CI 31% to 59%]; p < 0.001). There was substantial interest in receiving more education regarding the health concerns of LGBTQ people (81% [66 of 81]) and being listed as an LGBTQ-friendly clinician (90% [73 of 81]). Factors that were associated with select attitude and knowledge items were duration of licensure and political leaning; gender identity, institutional affiliation, educational degree, or having LGBTQ friends and family were not associated. Many respondents were aware of the use of clinic intake forms and the electronic medical record to collect and provide patient gender identity and sexual orientation data at their practice, as well as signage and symbols (for example, rainbow posters) to cultivate LGBTQ-welcoming clinic spaces. CONCLUSION: There were varying degrees of confidence and knowledge regarding the health needs of sexual and gender minority youth among pediatric orthopaedic healthcare professionals. There was considerable interest in more focused training and better use of medical technologies to improve care for this population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study findings support the further investment in clinician training opportunities by healthcare administrators and orthopaedic associations related to the care of sexual and gender minority patients, as well as in the expansion of medical documentation to record and report important patient information such as pronouns and gender identity. Simultaneously, based on these findings, clinicians should engage with the increasing number of educational opportunities, explore their personal biases, and implement changes into their own practices, with the ultimate goal of providing equitable and informed orthopaedic care.

An Analysis of Associated Conditions and the Relationship Between the Severity of Hand Manifestations With That of the Forearm in Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency.

PURPOSE: A deeper investigation of medical and musculoskeletal conditions in patients with ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ULD) is needed. The association between the severity of the manifestations of ULD in the hands and forearms has not been firmly established. The purpose of this study was to describe the medical and musculoskeletal conditions associated with ULD and examine the relationship between hand and forearm anomalies. METHODS: The Congenital Upper Limb Differences registry was queried for all patients with a diagnosis of ULD, as defined by the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin classification system, between 2014 and 2020. The patients' demographic information, medical and musculoskeletal comorbidities, radiographs, and clinical images were reviewed. The participants were classified using the Bayne, Cole and Manske, and Ogino classification systems. RESULTS: Of 2,821 patients from the Congenital Upper Limb Differences registry, 75 patients (2.7%) with ULD (14 bilateral), with 89 affected extremities, were included. Hand anomalies were present in 93% of the patients. Approximately 19% of the patients had an associated medical comorbidity, and 20% of the patients had an associated musculoskeletal condition. Cardiac anomalies were present in 8.0% of the patients, and 12% of the patients had a lower extremity abnormality. Radial head dislocation was observed in 13 of 18 patients with Bayne type II or III ULD compared with 8 of 43 patients with other types of unilateral ULD. There was a significant positive association among the Bayne and Ogino, Bayne and Cole/Manske, and Ogino and Cole/Manske classification systems in patients with unilateral ULD. CONCLUSIONS: Associated medical and musculoskeletal conditions are common in patients with ULD, of which cardiac and lower extremity abnormalities are most frequently observed. There is a significant positive association between the severity of forearm anomalies and that of hand anomalies in patients with unilateral ULD. All patients with ULD should undergo a thorough cardiac evaluation by their pediatrician or a pediatric cardiologist. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Symptom prevalence study III.

Outcomes of Pediatric Scaphoid Nonunions Treated With Distal Radius Cancellous Autograft.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of pediatric scaphoid fracture nonunions is controversial. We hypothesize that pediatric patients with scaphoid fracture nonunions will have favorable functional outcomes with the utilization of nonvascularized distal radius cancellous autograft with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: A review was performed from 2012 to 2017 identifying skeletally immature patients with scaphoid fracture nonunions treated with ORIF and nonvascularized distal radius cancellous autograft, including demographic data, mechanism of injury, length of time from injury to treatment, operative procedure, length of immobilization, time to union, and complications. RESULTS: Ten patients (9 males, 1 female) met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 14.3 SD 1.5 years. The majority of fractures were sustained during sports or secondary to a fall. Mean time between injury and orthopaedic evaluation was 33 weeks (SD 20 wk). Eight fractures occurred at the waist, and 2 occurred at the proximal pole. Four patients had a humpback deformity, and three presented with a dorsal intercalated segmental instability deformity. Nine patients were treated with a single cannulated compression screw with distal radius autograft. One patient also received a single Kirschner wire fixation in addition to a single cannulated screw and graft. Patients underwent a mean postoperative immobilization period of 14 SD 5 weeks. Two patients received a bone stimulator postoperatively. Radiographic union was documented after initial surgery in nine patients, with mean time to union of 17 SD 5 weeks. The 1 patient with persistent radiographic nonunion underwent revision fixation and repeat nonvascularized distal radius autograft, achieving union and resolution of symptoms. All patients ultimately reported full return to activity. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric scaphoid fracture nonunions that undergo ORIF using nonvascularized distal radius cancellous autograft have favorable rates of consolidation and functional outcomes. Surgeons should consider this source of grafting in operative management of scaphoid nonunions in children and adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic.

Association of Preoperative Pneumonia With Postsurgical Morbidity and Mortality in Children.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a common lower respiratory tract infection (LRI) and the leading cause of pediatric hospitalization in the United States. Given its frequency, children with pneumonia may require surgery during their hospital course. This poses serious anesthetic and surgical challenges because preoperative pulmonary status is among the most important risk factors for postoperative complications. Although recent adult data indicated that preoperative pneumonia was associated with poor surgical outcomes, comparable data in children are lacking. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the association of preoperative pneumonia with postoperative mortality and morbidity in children. METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we assembled a retrospective cohort of children (<18 years) who underwent inpatient surgery between 2012 and 2015. Our primary outcome was the time to all-cause 30-day postoperative mortality that we evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. For the secondary outcomes, including 30-day postoperative morbidity events, we used Fine-Gray models to account for competing risk by mortality. We also evaluated the association of preoperative pneumonia with duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation and postoperative hospital length of stay. We used propensity score weighting methods to adjust for potential confounding factors, whose distributions differ across the pneumonia groups. RESULTS: Among 153,242 children who underwent inpatient surgery, 0.7% (n = 867) had preoperative pneumonia. Compared with those without preoperative pneumonia, children with preoperative pneumonia had a higher risk of mortality throughout the 30-day postoperative period (hazard ratio [HR], 4.10; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 2.42-6.97; P < .001). Although not statistically significant, children with preoperative pneumonia were twice as likely to develop cardiovascular complications compared to children without preoperative pneumonia (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.17-3.75; P = .012). Furthermore, children with preoperative pneumonia had longer duration of postoperative ventilation (incidence rate ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.71; P < .001). Finally, children with preoperative pneumonia were estimated to be 56% less likely to be discharged within the 30 days following surgery, compared to children without preoperative pneumonia (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.40-0.47; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pneumonia was strongly associated with increased incidence of postoperative mortality and complications in children. Clinicians should make concerted efforts to screen for preoperative pneumonia and consider whether proceeding with surgery is the most expedient course of action. Our findings may be helpful in preoperative discussions with parents of children with preoperative pneumonia for risk stratification and postoperative resource allocation purposes.

How Does Representation of Women on Editorial Boards Compare Among Orthopaedic, General Surgery, and Internal Medicine Journals?

BACKGROUND: Women have historically been underrepresented as editors of peer-reviewed medical journals. Studies have demonstrated that there are differences in editorial board reviewer behavior based on gender, suggesting that greater representation by women on editorial boards may improve the quality and diversity of the review process. Therefore, the current representation of women on the editorial boards of orthopaedic journals, particularly compared with peer-reviewed surgical and medical journals, is of interest. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the representation of women as members of editorial boards of prominent orthopaedic surgery journals? (2) How does it compare with representation on the editorial boards of journals in general surgery and internal medicine? METHODS: The top 15 journals with a strong clinical emphasis based on Impact Factor (Clarivate Analytics) calculated by the 2018 Journal Citation Reports were identified for orthopaedic surgery, general surgery (and all general surgical subspecialties), and internal medicine (with representative internal medicine subspecialties). Clinical publications with their primary editorial office located in the United States led predominantly by physicians or basic scientists were eligible for inclusion. The members of an editorial board were identified from the journals' websites. The gender of editors with gender-neutral names (and editors whose gender we considered uncertain) was identified by an internet search for gender-specific pronouns and/or pictures from an institutional profile. Fisher exact tests and t-tests were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the editors analyzed, women made up 9% (121 of 1383) of editorial boards in the orthopaedic journals with the highest Impact Factors, compared with 21% (342 of 1665) of general surgery journals (p < 0.001) and 35% (204 of 587) of internal medicine journals (p < 0.001). The overall mean composition of editorial boards of orthopaedic journals was 10% ± 8% women, compared with that of general surgery, which was 19% ± 6% women (p < 0.001), and that of internal medicine, which was 40% ± 19% women (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women make up a smaller proportion of editorial boards at orthopaedic surgery journals than they do at general surgery and internal medicine journals. However, their representation appears to be comparable to the proportion of women in orthopaedics overall (approximately 6%) and the proportion of women in academic orthopaedics (approximately 19%). Ways to improve the proportion of women on editorial boards might include structured mentorship programs at institutions and personal responsibility for championing mentorship and diversity on an individual level. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increasing representation of women on editorial boards may improve the diversity of perspectives and quality of future published research, generate visible role models for young women considering orthopaedics as a career, and improve patient care through enriching the diversity of our specialty.

Social Deprivation and Congenital Upper Extremity Differences-An Assessment Using PROMIS.

PURPOSE: Social deprivation, a measure of socioeconomic status, has been shown to negatively affect perceptions of orthopedic conditions and outcomes of treatment. The objective of this study was to assess whether social deprivation correlates with subjective assessment of function in pediatric patients with congenital hand differences. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) registry were assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The PROMIS scores for Pain Interference, Peer Relations, Anxiety, Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) function were obtained for all patients 5 years and older at initial presentation. Social deprivation was determined by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI); the index ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores being the most deprived. The PROMIS scores were correlated with the ADI for all patients. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-five pediatric patients with congenital UE differences were evaluated. Average age was 11 years, 56% were female, and 55% had bilateral involvement. Overall, PROMIS scores were within 1 SD of normal for Peer Relations, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety. However, child-reported scores for UE function (39) were more than 1 SD below the national average (50). The mean ADI for the cohort was lower than the national average, indicative of less deprivation, with 14% of patients in the most deprived national quartile. Children in the highest ADI quartile reported PROMIS scores that reflected higher Pain Interference (41 vs 45), lower Peer Relations (55 vs 50), higher Anxiety (44 vs 49), and higher Depression (43 vs 47) than children in the lowest ADI quartile. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS scores were normal for psychosocial measures in children with congenital hand differences when evaluated as an entire cohort. However, child self-reported PROMIS scores for Pain Interference, Peer Relations, Anxiety, and Depression were worse in more socially deprived areas, suggesting more psychosocial challenges in these children. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pediatric patients with congenital upper extremity differences in areas of higher social deprivation report lower psychosocial well-being. The care of these individuals must be considered within the context of their environment because they may be more at risk for negative outcomes secondary to environmental and societal stressors.

Distal Radius Physeal Bar and Ulnar Overgrowth: Indications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius physeal bar with associated growth arrest can occur because of fractures, ischemia, infection, radiation, tumor, blood dyscrasias, and repetitive stress injuries. The age of the patient as well as the size, shape, and location of the bony bridge determines the deformity and associated pathology that will develop. METHODS: A search of the English literature was performed using PubMed and multiple search terms to identify manuscripts dealing with the evaluation and treatment of distal radius physeal bars and ulnar overgrowth. Single case reports and level V studies were excluded. RESULTS: Manuscripts evaluating distal radial physeal bars and their management were identified. A growth discrepancy between the radius and ulna can lead to distal radioulnar joint instability, ulnar impaction, and degenerative changes in the carpus and triangular fibrocartilage complex. Advanced imaging aids in the evaluation and mapping of a physeal bar. Treatment options for distal radius physeal bars include observation, bar resection±interposition, epiphysiodeses of the ulna±completion epiphysiodesis of the radius, ulnar shortening osteotomy±diagnostic arthroscopy to manage associated triangular fibrocartilage complex pathology, radius osteotomy, and distraction osteogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-making when presented with a distal radius physeal bar is multifactorial and should incorporate the age and remaining growth potential of the patient, the size and location of the bar, and patient and family expectations.

Do Obese Children Have Poor Patient-reported Outcomes After Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pin Fixation of Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Nearly 1 in 5 American children are obese. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between childhood obesity and perioperative complications, patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and functional recovery after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of type II and III supracondylar humerus fractures. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients treated operatively with CRPP of Wilkins modification of the Gartland classification type II and III supracondylar humerus fractures was performed over a 1-year timeframe (July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017). One hundred forty-four patients under the age of 16 treated were identified. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile for age. Obesity as a risk factor for poor outcomes was assessed. The primary outcome measure was postoperative PRO [quick-DASH, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-UE, PROMIS Global Health, and PROMIS Pain scores]. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 5.9 years (SD=2.1, 1.07 to 12.2) and mean age at final follow-up (3.3 y) was 8.8 (SD=2.14, 4 to 16). Mean patient BMI was 17.2 (SD=4.48, 12.4 to 56.2). Sixty-six patients were female (45.8%) and 78 patients were male (54.2%). In all, 31 of 144 patients (21.5%) met criteria for obesity. Obesity (95th percentile for BMI or above) was not associated with a higher rate of complications overall (χ2=1.29, P=0.256), range of motion loss (χ2=0.2, P=0.655) or requirement of postoperative physical therapy (χ2=0.17, P=0.678). Seventy-five patients were available and willing to participate in the outcomes score assessments. Mean follow-up for this cohort of 75 patients was 3.3 years (SD=0.31, 2.85 to 3.88). There were no differences in PROMIS pain, PROMIS upper extremity function, PROMIS general health, or quick-DASH scores when comparing obese with nonobese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is a growing concern in the United States and its effect on long-term outcomes after CRPP of supracondylar humerus fractures is unknown. The present study demonstrates no difference in complications or PRO among obese patients compared with nonobese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective cohort study.

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle: surgical decision making and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Congenital pseudarthrosis of the clavicle (CPC) is a rare entity in which the primary ossification center of the clavicle fails to coalesce. The natural history of CPC is unknown, and there is controversy regarding surgical vs. conservative treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of 47 pediatric patients treated for CPC was performed. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder (QuickDASH) survey and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity domain were used to assess overall patient satisfaction, function, and quality of life after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 47 (51%) patients underwent surgical treatment. Of these, 9 patients (38%, 9/24) underwent surgery at <18 months of age using suture fixation alone, whereas the older 15 surgical patients (15/24, 62%) were treated with plate fixation. The younger surgical cohort had a nonunion rate of 43% (3/7) compared with 13% (2/15) in the older cohort. All surgical patients had resolution of preoperative symptoms. Eleven (11/24, 46%) surgical subjects responded to the follow-up survey. Upper extremity function normalized according to the QuickDASH survey (score of 0 for all subjects). The median PROMIS upper extremity domain score was 55, which was also in the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: This series of CPC patients improves our understanding of treatment options and outcomes of surgical treatment. All surgical patients had resolution of preoperative symptoms. Patients treated surgically with stable fixation at an older age had higher rates of union than those treated in infancy with suture fixation. Patient-reported outcomes were favorable overall.

Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fracture Management: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: There remains controversy surrounding the treatment of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. This systematic review examines the existing literature with the aim to elucidate optimal management strategies. METHODS: A systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was executed. All data collection was completed by August 01, 2018. Functional outcomes, diagnostic imaging, athlete management, union rates, ulnar nerve symptoms, surgical methods, surgical positioning, and posttreatment protocols were categorized and recorded. Frequency-weighted mean values were calculated with associated SDs. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies with 1022 patients met the inclusion criteria. Functional outcomes for patients were mostly good following operative and nonoperative management. The most common complication was a slight loss of elbow extension (7.6±5.9 degrees) and flexion (13.3±5.8 degrees). Operative treatment was associated with higher union rates than nonoperative management (700/725, 96% vs. 69/250, 28%; P<0.001). Standard diagnostic imaging techniques to measure displacement were unreliable with a newly proposed axial view having high inter-rater and intrarater reliability. The most common surgical method used was open reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires. Whereas surgical management of patients with associated ulnar nerve symptoms led to symptom resolution, nonoperative management occasionally led to the development of these symptoms. Elbow range of motion was initiated at ~2.8±1.4 (range, 0 to 8 wk) weeks after surgery and 3.4±1.2 (range, 3 to 5 wk) weeks without surgery (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is still no consensus on treatment of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures, both operative and nonoperative approaches result in good outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.