Perioperative escape from dormancy of spontaneous micro-metastases: A role for malignant secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and VEGF, through adrenergic and prostaglandin signaling.

We recently showed that a minimally-invasive removal of MDA-MB-231HM primary tumors (PTs) and elimination of their secreted factors (including IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, EGF, PDGF-aa, MIF, SerpinE1, and M-CSF), caused regression of spontaneous micro-metastases into a non-growing dormant state. To explore the underlying mechanisms and potential clinical ramifications of this phenomenon, we herein used the MDA-MB-231HM human breast cancer cell-line, in-vitro, and in vivo following orthotopic implantation in immune-deficient BALB/C nu/nu mice. Employing bioluminescence imaging, we found that adding laparotomy to minimally-invasive removal of the PT caused an outbreak of micro-metastases. However, perioperative ß-adrenergic and COX-2 inhibition, using propranolol + etodolac, maintained metastatic dormancy following laparotomy. In-vitro, ß-adrenergic agonists (epinephrine or metaproterenol) and prostaglandin-E2 markedly increased MDA-MB-231HM secretion of the pro-metastatic factors IL-6, IL-8, and VEGF, whereas cortisol reduced their secretion, effects that were maintained even 12 h after the washout of these agonists. In-vivo, laparotomy elevated IL-6 and IL-8 levels in both plasma and ex-vivo PT spontaneous secretion, whereas perioperative propranolol + etodolac administration blocked these effects. Similar trends were evident for EGF and MIF. Promoter-based bioinformatics analyses of excised PT transcriptomes implicated elevated NF-kB activity and reduced IRF1 activity in the gene regulatory effects of laparotomy, and these effects were inhibited by pre-surgical propranolol + etodolac. Taken together, our findings suggest a novel mechanism of post-operative metastatic outbreak, where surgery-induced adrenergic and prostanoid signaling increase the secretion of pro-metastatic factors, including IL-6, IL-8, and VEGF, from PT and possibly residual malignant tissue, and thereby prevent residual disease from entering dormancy.

ß2-adrenergic signaling promotes higher-affinity B cells and antibodies.

Stress-induced ß2-adrenergic receptor (ß2AR) activation in B cells increases IgG secretion; however, the impact of this activation on antibody affinity and the underlying mechanisms remains unclear. In the current study, we demonstrate that stress in mice following ovalbumin (OVA) or SARS-CoV-2 RBD immunization significantly increases both serum and surface-expressed IgG binding to the immunogen, while concurrently reducing surface IgG expression and B cell clonal expansion. These effects were abolished by pharmacological ß2AR blocking or when the experiments were conducted in ß2AR -/- mice. In the second part of our study, we used single B cell sorting to characterize the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) generated following ß2AR activation in cultured RBD-stimulated B cells from convalescent SARS-CoV-2 donors. Ex vivo ß2AR activation increased the affinities of the produced anti-RBD mAbs by 100-fold compared to mAbs produced by the same donor control cultures. Consistent with the mouse experiments, ß2AR activation reduced both surface IgG levels and the frequency of expanded clones. mRNA sequencing revealed a ß2AR-dependent upregulation of the PI3K pathway and B cell receptor (BCR) signaling through AKT phosphorylation, as well as an increased B cell motility. Overall, our study demonstrates that stress-mediated ß2AR activation drives changes in B cells associated with BCR activation and higher affinity antibodies.

Prevention of liver metastases through perioperative acute CpG-C immune stimulation.

Following excision of colorectal tumors, metastatic disease is prevalent, primarily occurs in the liver, and is highly predictive of poor prognosis. The perioperative period is now recognized as critical in determining the incidence of postoperative metastases and long-term cancer outcomes. Thus, various perioperative prophylactic interventions are currently studied during this time frame. However, immune stimulation during the perioperative period has rarely been attempted due to specific contraindications to surgery and various adverse effects. Here, to prevent liver metastases, we perioperatively employed a TLR-9 agonist, CpG-C, which exhibits minimal pyrogenic and other adverse effects in patients. We found that marginating-hepatic (MH) cells in BALB/c mice contained high percentage of NK cells, but exhibited negligible NK cytotoxicity, as previously reported in humans. However, a single CpG-C administration (25-100 µg/mouse) doubled MH-NK cell numbers, increased NK cell activation and maturation markers (NKp46, CD11b), decreased the inhibitory NKG2A ligand, and dramatically increased MH-NK-cell cytotoxicity against the syngeneic CT26 colon cancer line. Moreover, in operated mice, this innocuous intervention also markedly improved resistance to CT26 and MC38 hepatic metastases in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. Beneficial effects of CpG-C were mediated through activation of MH-NK cells, as indicated by an in vivo NK depletion study. Last, CpG-C protected against surgery-induced suppression of MH-NK cytotoxicity and improved their activation indices. Thus, we suggest that systemic perioperative CpG-C treatment should be considered and studied as a novel therapeutic approach to improve long-term cancer outcomes in colorectal cancer patients.

Deleterious synergistic effects of distress and surgery on cancer metastasis: Abolishment through an integrated perioperative immune-stimulating stress-inflammatory-reducing intervention.

The perioperative period holds disproportionate impact on long-term cancer outcomes. Nevertheless, perioperative interventions to improve long-term cancer outcomes are not clinical routines, including perioperative stress-reducing or immune-stimulating approaches. Here, mimicking the clinical setting of pre-operative distress, followed by surgery, we examined the separate and combined effects of these events on the efficacy of pre-operative immune stimulation in rats and mice, and on post-operative resistance to tumor metastasis of the syngeneic mammary adenocarcinoma MADB106 in F344 rats and the CT26 colon carcinoma in Balb/C mice. The novel immune stimulating agents, GLA-SE or CpG-C (TLR-4 and TLR-9 agonists, respectively), were employed pre-operatively. Sixteen hours of pre-operative behavioral stressors (i) lowered CpG-C induced plasma IL-12 levels, and reduced resistance to MADB106 and CT-26 experimental metastases, and (ii) worsened the deleterious effects of laparotomy on metastasis in both tumor models. In rats, these effects of pre-operative stress were further studied and successfully abolished by the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU-486. Additionally, in vitro studies indicated the dampening effect of corticosterone on immune stimulation. Last, we tested a perioperative integrated intervention in the context of pre-operative stress and laparotomy, based on (i) antagonizing the impact of glucocorticoids before surgery, (ii) activating anti-metastatic immunity perioperatively, and (iii) blocking excessive operative and post-operative adrenergic and prostanoid responses. This integrated intervention successfully and completely abolished the deleterious effects of stress and of surgery on post-operative resistance to experimental metastasis. Such and similar integrated approaches can be studied clinically in cancer patients.

Immunotherapy during the Immediate Perioperative Period: A Promising Approach against Metastatic Disease.

Tumor excision is a necessary life-saving procedure in most solid cancers. However, surgery and the days before and following it, known as the immediate perioperative period (IPP), entail numerous prometastatic processes, including the suppression of antimetastatic immunity and direct stimulation of minimal residual disease (MRD). Thus, the IPP is pivotal in determining long-term cancer outcomes, presenting a short window of opportunity to circumvent perioperative risk factors by employing several therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapy. Nevertheless, immunotherapy is rarely examined or implemented during this short timeframe, due to both established and hypothetical contraindications to surgery. Herein, we analyze how various aspects of the IPP promote immunosuppression and progression of MRD, and how potential IPP application of immunotherapy may interact with these deleterious processes. We discuss the feasibility and safety of different immunotherapies during the IPP with a focus on the latest approaches of immune checkpoint inhibition. Last, we address the few past and ongoing clinical trials that exploit the IPP timeframe for anticancer immunotherapy. Accordingly, we suggest that several specific immunotherapies can be safely and successfully applied during the IPP, alone or with supporting interventions, which may improve patients' resistance to MRD and overall survival.

Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions.

The notion that stress and cancer are interlinked has dominated lay discourse for decades. More recent animal studies indicate that stress can substantially facilitate cancer progression through modulating most hallmarks of cancer, and molecular and systemic mechanisms mediating these effects have been elucidated. However, available clinical evidence for such deleterious effects is inconsistent, as epidemiological and stress-reducing clinical interventions have yielded mixed effects on cancer mortality. In this Review, we describe and discuss specific mediating mechanisms identified by preclinical research, and parallel clinical findings. We explain the discrepancy between preclinical and clinical outcomes, through pointing to experimental strengths leveraged by animal studies and through discussing methodological and conceptual obstacles that prevent clinical studies from reflecting the impacts of stress. We suggest approaches to circumvent such obstacles, based on targeting critical phases of cancer progression that are more likely to be stress-sensitive; pharmacologically limiting adrenergic-inflammatory responses triggered by medical procedures; and focusing on more vulnerable populations, employing personalized pharmacological and psychosocial approaches. Recent clinical trials support our hypothesis that psychological and/or pharmacological inhibition of excess adrenergic and/or inflammatory stress signalling, especially alongside cancer treatments, could save lives.

Harnessing cancer immunotherapy during the unexploited immediate perioperative period.

The immediate perioperative period (days before and after surgery) is hypothesized to be crucial in determining long-term cancer outcomes: during this short period, numerous factors, including excess stress and inflammatory responses, tumour-cell shedding and pro-angiogenic and/or growth factors, might facilitate the progression of pre-existing micrometastases and the initiation of new metastases, while simultaneously jeopardizing immune control over residual malignant cells. Thus, application of anticancer immunotherapy during this critical time frame could potentially improve patient outcomes. Nevertheless, this strategy has rarely been implemented to date. In this Perspective, we discuss apparent contraindications for the perioperative use of cancer immunotherapy, suggest safe immunotherapeutic and other anti-metastatic approaches during this important time frame and specify desired characteristics of such interventions. These characteristics include a rapid onset of immune activation, avoidance of tumour-promoting effects, no or minimal increase in surgical risk, resilience to stress-related factors and minimal induction of stress responses. Pharmacological control of excess perioperative stress-inflammatory responses has been shown to be clinically feasible and could potentially be combined with immune stimulation to overcome the direct pro-metastatic effects of surgery, prevent immune suppression and enhance immunostimulatory responses. Accordingly, we believe that certain types of immunotherapy, together with interventions to abrogate stress-inflammatory responses, should be evaluated in conjunction with surgery and, for maximal effectiveness, could be initiated before administration of adjuvant therapies. Such strategies might improve the overall success of cancer treatment.