Dosimetric comparison of free-breathing versus respiratory motion-managed radiotherapy via four-dimensional computed tomography-based volumetric-modulated arctherapy for lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to use respiratory motion-managed radiotherapy (RT) to reduce side effects and to compare dosimetric factors with free-breathing planning in patients with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulation images were obtained in 10 respiratory phases with free breathing using four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scanner. Planning target volume (PTV) was created with 5mm margins in each direction of the internal target volume delineated using the maximum intensity projection. A volumetric arc treatment (VMAT) plan was created so that the prescribed dose would cover 98% of the PTV. Target volumes for the free-breathing VMAT plan were created according to ICRU Reports 62 and the same prescribed dose was used. RESULTS: Patients were evaluated during January 2020. Median 63Gy (59.4-64) RT was administered. Median PTV volumes were 173.53 and 494.50cm3 (P=0.008) and dose covering 95% of PTV volume was 62.97 and 60.51Gy (P=0.13) in 4D-CT based and free-breathing VMAT plans, respectively. The mean and V50 heart dose was 6.03Gy (vs. 10.36Gy, P=0.043) and 8.2% (vs. 33.9%, P=0.007), and significantly lower in 4D-CT based VMAT plans and there was also found a non-significant reduction for other risky organ doses. CONCLUSION: Ten patients treated with respiratory motion-managed RT with 4D-CT based VMAT technique. It was observed that PTV did not increase, the target was covered with 95% accuracy, and with statistical significance in heart doses, all risky organ doses were found to be less.

A phase II trial, feasibility of combination of daily cisplatinum and accelerated radiotherapy via concomitant boost in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: A prospective phase II trial was conducted by the Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University in December 1994 on patients with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer to assess acute toxicity and the feasibility of a combination of radiosensitizer and accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were irradiated using 'large' fields (primary tumour and locoregional lymph nodes) with 1.8 Gy per fraction, five fractions a week. Reduced 'boost' fields (primary and involved nodes only) were also irradiated twice-weekly 1.8 Gy per fraction in ten fractions concomitantly 6 h after the administration of large field. Total radiation dose was 63 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy 'large' fields and 18 Gy 'boost'). The maximum allowed dose to the spinal cord was 3750 cGy. Cisplatinum, 6 mg/m2 was given daily just before 'large' field irradiation. RESULTS: As of January 1997, 15 patients were evaluated (median follow-up of 12.5 months with a range of 5.5-23 months). The overall acute toxicity rate was 38% and Grade 3 acute toxicity was 8%. Grade 4 or greater acute toxicities were not observed. The overall rate of cisplatinum-induced nausea and vomiting was 80% (severe in 60%), but all were easily treated with antiemetics. Complete response rate (clinical and radiological) was 40% and an overall response rate was 73%. Median survival was 16 months and progression-free survival was 5.5 months (range of 2.5-21 months). CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity was well tolerated and no treatment-related death occurred with this combined treatment regimen. Although it appears that better local control rates can be achieved, additional phase II/III studies are needed.

Randomized phase 2 study of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy with paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer.

This randomized phase 2 study aimed to assess and compare the toxicity and response rates in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy (1.8-2 Gray [Gy] daily, five fractions a week, total 63 Gy) or radiotherapy + paclitaxel administered weekly (1.8 Gy daily, five fractions a week, total 59.4 Gy). Twelve patients in the latter arm received 30 mg/m2 paclitaxel (median six cycles) over a 3-h infusion once weekly. After assessing toxicity, the remaining nine patients received 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly (median six cycles). Response was evaluated radiologically 1 month after treatment. Grade 3 toxicity was 20% and 38% in the radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively. Overall survival rates in complete and objective (complete plus partial) responders and progression-free survival rate of the objective responders were significantly better in the chemoradiotherapy arm. We believe that using paclitaxel in concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens may be effective in patients with unresectable, locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Safety and efficacy of transdermal fentanyl in patients with cancer pain: phase IV, Turkish oncology group trial.

We have performed a prospective evaluation of the efficacy, safety and convenience of the transdermal therapeutic system - fentanyl (TTS-F) in Turkish cancer patients when it was newly available in Turkey. Ninety-nine patients with historically confirmed malignancy and pain entered the study; the mean age was 55.1 (16-58) years. The study duration was 28 days. Transdermal therapeutic system - fentanyl was used in opioid-naïve or pre-treated patients. Most patients reported a decrease in pain severity. Use of rescue medication decreased from day 4 to day 28. The majority of patients rated patch convenience of use as excellent. A total of 22.2% of patients experienced adverse events that were either probably related or very likely to be related to the study drug. The majority of the adverse events mentioned were related to the digestive system. Eighteen serious adverse events were reported by 13 patients. Six events were doubtfully related, and 12 events were not related to the study drug. Four patients died during the trial. None of these deaths was attributed to the study drug. In conclusion, the trial showed that TTS-F is easily managed, effective and will help to enable the appropriate opioid administration to patients who are suffering from cancer pain in Turkey.