Evaluation of the usefulness of protocol-based pharmacist-facilitated laboratory monitoring to ensure the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lung cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Improved monitoring systems for irAEs, which include laboratory tests by a qualified multidisciplinary team, might prevent patients from irAE-associated events. Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital developed protocol-based pharmacist-facilitated laboratory tests named protocol-based pharmacotherapy management (PBPM) to aid the administration of immunotherapy to patients with lung cancer. The protocol defines the laboratory test items and times at which they should be performed. It requires pharmacists to check laboratory orders initiated by physicians and enter additional test items if the orders are incomplete. We evaluated the efficacy of PBPM in irAE monitoring and compared it with those of conventional care systems. METHODS: From January 2016 to March 2018, 114 patients with lung cancer received immunotherapy, which was managed by conventional care (conventional group). From April to September 2018, 62 patients were managed by PBPM (PBPM group), among those 28 patients were transited from conventional group to PBPM group. Data on whether the laboratory tests were conducted or omitted were collected retrospectively for the conventional group and prospectively for the PBPM group. RESULTS: Within the conventional group, 4604 (87.6%) out of the 5253 laboratory test items were ordered by physicians. Of the remaining 649 test items, 224 (4.3%) items were added by physicians based on recommendations by pharmacists. However, of the 1581 (86.6%, from among 1826) test items that were previously ordered by physicians, only 231 (12.7%) test items were added by pharmacists. The execution rate was found to be significantly higher in the PBPM group (99.2% vs 91.9%, P < .001). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: PBPM-based pharmacist-facilitated laboratory monitoring systems provided higher executing rate of laboratory order to monitor irAEs during immunotherapy.

Successful oral desensitization with osimertinib following osimertinib-induced fever and hepatotoxicity: a case report.

Osimertinib is a standard second-line therapy for patients who develop EGFR Thr790Met resistance mutation after treatment with first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although no other effective targeted treatment option exists for these patients, osimertinib might be permanently discontinued owing to the onset of severe drug-induced toxicities like hepatotoxicity. Herein, we report a case of successful oral desensitization with osimertinib after the patient developed osimertinib-induced fever and hepatotoxicity. In the present case report, a 62-year-old Japanese woman received osimertinib as the sixth-line therapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma harboring EGFR Thr790Met-mutation. After 15 days of treatment, she developed general malaise. Although we reduced the drug at a lower dose, she again presented with high fever and elevated serum AST/ALT levels three days after re-initiating treatment. We then attempted oral desensitization with osimertinib over a two-week period. Thereafter, the patient continued osimertinib treatment for 6 months without the recurrence of side effects. In conclusion, oral desensitization may be a useful method in treating hepatotoxicity and drug fever caused by osimertinib.

Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Physician Collaborative Management for Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Receiving Pirfenidone.

Background: Pirfenidone is an anti-fibrotic agent used to treat patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Managing adverse drug events and ensuring compliance with pirfenidone treatment for a prolonged period are important to reduce the rate of disease progression. To maximize the benefits of pirfenidone treatment, we established and evaluated an ambulatory care pharmacy practice, a model of pharmacist-physician collaborative management, for patients receiving pirfenidone. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 76 consecutive patients treated with pirfenidone in the Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Japan, between January 2012 and January 2019. The first group (61 patients) received pirfenidone treatment as conventional management, whereas the second group (15 patients) started pirfenidone based on collaborative pharmacist-physician management. The drug discontinuation rate and time to drug discontinuation were compared between the groups. To analyze factors associated with pirfenidone discontinuation, we used a multivariate Cox regression analysis to evaluate the baseline characteristics of patients, including those receiving the collaborative management. Clinical outcomes were compared using a propensity score matched analysis. Results: In the collaborative management group, pharmacists made 56 suggestions, including suggestions for supportive care (51 suggestions), to the physicians. Among these suggestions, 52 were accepted by the physicians. The discontinuation rates at 3 [6.7% (1/15) vs. 26.2% (16/61)] and 6 [9.1% (1/11) vs. 36.1% (22/61)] months were lower in the collaborative management group than in the conventional management group. Multivariate analysis revealed that collaborative management [hazard ratio (HR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.08-0.96, p = 0.041] and predicted baseline forced vital capacity <60% (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.17-3.85, p = 0.015) were significantly associated with pirfenidone discontinuation. The time to drug discontinuation was also significantly longer in the collaborative management group than in the conventional management group (p = 0.034, log-rank test). Propensity score matched analysis confirmed a significant correlation between collaborative management and drug discontinuation time (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, p = 0.027). Conclusions: We established an ambulatory care pharmacy practice for out-patients with IPF receiving pirfenidone. The results suggest that collaborative management may help prevent pirfenidone discontinuation compared with conventional management.