Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Psychother Psychosom ; 85(4): 208-17, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230862

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although antidepressants are still a commonly used treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD), a significant proportion of patients fail to remit following antidepressants. However, no standard approach has been established for managing such patients. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as an adjunct to usual care (UC) compared with UC alone in SAD patients who remain symptomatic following antidepressant treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized open-blinded end-point study with two parallel groups (CBT + UC, and UC alone, both for 16 weeks) conducted from June 2012 to March 2014. SAD patients who remain symptomatic following antidepressant treatment were recruited, and a total sample size of 42 was set based on pilot results. RESULTS: Patients were randomly allocated to CBT + UC (n = 21) or UC alone (n = 21). After 16 weeks, adjusted mean reduction in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale from baseline for CBT + UC and UC alone was -40.87 and 0.68, respectively; the between-group difference was -41.55 (-53.68 to -29.42, p < 0.0001). Response rates were 85.7 and 10.0% for CBT + UC and UC alone, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding remission rates were 47.6 and 0.0%, respectively (p = 0.0005). Significant differences were also found in favor of CBT + UC for social anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in SAD patients who have been ineffectively treated with antidepressants, CBT is an effective treatment adjunct to UC over 16 weeks in reducing social anxiety and related symptoms.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Fobia Social/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25960085

RESUMO

Fasciculations are characteristic features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and suggest motor nerve hyperexcitability. Recent reports have shown that an increase in persistent nodal sodium current is associated with shorter survival in ALS patients. This objective of this trial is to study the efficacy and safety of mexiletine, a sodium channel blocker, for ALS. Sixty eligible participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to riluzole 100 mg or riluzole plus mexiletine 300 mg. The primary endpoint was change in the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) scores during six months. We also monitored strength-duration time constant (SDTC, a measure of persistent sodium current) in median motor axons. Results showed that during six months of treatment, changes in the ALSFRS-R score and SDTC were -7.0 ± 7.1 and -0.04 ± 0.1, respectively, in the riluzole group and -6.9 ± 6.4 and 0.04 ± 0.1, respectively, in the mexiletine group (p = 0.96 and 0.049). Adverse events amounted 20% in the riluzole and 33% in the mexiletine groups. In conclusion, the results suggest that daily 300 mg mexiletine has no effects on axonal sodium current and ALSFRS-R deterioration in ALS. We have to attempt another trial using a higher dose of mexiletine or other agents to suppress sodium currents and ALS progression in the future.


Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Mexiletina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Bloqueadores do Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/fisiopatologia , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Potencial Evocado Motor/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA