Use of the Drospirenone-Only Contraceptive Pill in Adolescents with Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a progestin-only pill containing 4 mg drospirenone (DRSP) as a hormonal therapy for the management of endometriosis-associated symptoms in adolescents and young adults. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adolescents who were prescribed DRSP continuously (without placebo) for treatment of endometriosis at a single pediatric tertiary care center between 2019 and 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients. Measured outcomes included symptom resolution and medication discontinuation. The study was deemed IRB exempt. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients with endometriosis were prescribed DRSP during the study period, with a median age of 18.9 years (SD 2.3). The majority (97%) were laparoscopically confirmed to have endometriosis, and 85% had stage I disease. Before DRSP use, the most common medications trialed were norethindrone (57%) and norethindrone acetate (68%), and 56% had at least one medical contraindication to receiving estrogen-containing therapy. Of those with follow-up, 52% established an absence of bleeding/spotting, and 67% reported less pain at follow-up. One in 4 patients discontinued DRSP during the study period, most commonly due to breakthrough bleeding. CONCLUSION: DRSP is a well-tolerated and effective option for the treatment of endometriosis-associated symptoms in adolescents and young adults.

Danazol's use for menstrual suppression in transgender individuals: A retrospective multi-site cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Danazol is a synthetic progestin with androgenic effects that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of endometriosis, benign fibrocystic breast disease, and hereditary angioedema. In recent years, increasing numbers of transgender and nonbinary individuals seeking menstrual suppression have been offered danazol due to its potential to both induce amenorrhea and cause reversible androgenic side effects including pigmentation of vellus hairs and voice changes, which may be desirable in this population. There are currently no studies assessing use of danazol within the transgender population for menstrual suppression. OBJECTIVE: This study's primary aim was to evaluate the use of danazol as a menstrual suppression agent in transgender patients. DESIGN: This was a retrospective multisite cohort study of all individuals who had been on danazol at two tertiary care centers between 2000 and 2022. METHODS: All patients prescribed danazol were identified using a search of the electronic medical records. For demographic purposes, comparisons were made between those who did and did not use danazol for the purpose of menstrual suppression. A detailed chart review was then performed to analyze the experiences of menstrual suppression in transgender and nonbinary patients. RESULTS: Most transgender and nonbinary patients on danazol for menstrual suppression remained on it at their most recent follow-up visit, and many charts noted improvements in gender dysphoria, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, and heavy menstrual bleeding. Most transgender patients achieved amenorrhea. CONCLUSION: Danazol may be a reasonable option for menstrual suppression in transgender and nonbinary patients. Our findings show its potential to not only induce amenorrhea but cause desired androgenic symptoms and improve gender dysphoria, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, and heavy bleeding. While the androgenic effects of danazol are less desirable in cisgender populations, it is an attractive option for menstrual suppression in transgender and nonbinary patients.

Using danazol to stop periods in transgender individualsDanazol has previously been used to help treat pain and bleeding related to endometriosis. However, danazol can have certain androgenic side effects (acne, deepening of the voice) that cisgender women (individuals who were assigned female at birth and identify with the female gender) often find undesirable, but that could be desirable in transgender patients seeking to affirm their gender by stopping periods. Our study looked at danazol use for period suppression, as well as for other reasons. We found that most transgender patients using danazol for period suppression found it to be successful and remained on it at follow-up appointments, and that many transgender patients saw improved gender dysphoria, pelvic pain, pain during periods, endometriosis, and heavy period bleeding. These findings suggest that danazol may be a good option for menstrual suppression in transgender individuals as any experienced androgenic effects may help with gender dysphoria, whether individuals are not yet ready to start testosterone or do not desire testosterone therapy at all.

A Series of Personalized Virtual Light Therapy Interventions for Fatigue: Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial for N-of-1 Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms treated in primary care and can lead to deficits in mental health and functioning. Light therapy can be an effective treatment for symptoms of fatigue; however, the feasibility, scalability, and individual-level heterogeneity of light therapy for fatigue are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a series of personalized (N-of-1) interventions for the virtual delivery of bright light (BL) therapy and dim light (DL) therapy versus usual care (UC) treatment for fatigue in 60 participants. METHODS: Participants completed satisfaction surveys comprising the System Usability Scale (SUS) and items assessing satisfaction with the components of the personalized trial. Symptoms of fatigue were measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) daily, PROMIS weekly, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) questionnaires delivered 3 times daily. Comparisons of fatigue between the BL, DL, and UC treatment periods were conducted using generalized linear mixed model analyses between participants and generalized least squares analyses within individual participants. RESULTS: Participants rated the usability of the personalized trial as acceptable (average SUS score=78.9, SD 15.6), and 92% (49/53) of those who completed satisfaction surveys stated that they would recommend the trial to others. The levels of fatigue symptoms measured using the PROMIS daily fatigue measure were lower or improved in the BL (B=-1.63, 95% CI -2.63 to -0.63) and DL (B=-1.44, 95% CI -2.50 to -0.38) periods relative to UC. The treatment effects of BL and DL on the PROMIS daily measure varied among participants. Similar findings were demonstrated for the PROMIS weekly and EMA measures of fatigue symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The participant scores on the SUS and satisfaction surveys suggest that personalized N-of-1 trials of light therapy for fatigue symptoms are both feasible and acceptable. Both interventions produced significant (P<.05) reductions in participant-reported PROMIS and EMA fatigue symptoms relative to UC. However, the heterogeneity of these treatment effects across participants indicated that the effect of light therapy was not uniform. This heterogeneity along with high ratings of usability and satisfaction support the use of personalized N-of-1 research designs in evaluating the effect of light therapy on fatigue for each patient. Furthermore, the results of this trial provide additional support for the use of a series of personalized N-of-1 research trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04707846; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04707846.