RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound diagnostics are widely used and are standard for radiologists, otolaryngologists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the diagnostic work-up of various pathologies. There is agreement that digital documentation is urgently needed at present to improve and standardize the quality of sonographic documentation. There are more and more publications on the implementation of standardized documentation of findings in imaging diagnostics, including head and neck sonography. OBJECTIVE: The present work aims to determine the quality of routine head and neck sonography findings on a random basis, according to the criteria of the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KVB) at a selection of German university otolaryngology departments (ENT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 randomly selected anonymized written findings including image documentation from seven ENT departments were retrospectively analyzed by an experienced KVB examiner concerning fulfilment of KVB criteria. The data were evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: Of the 70 reports, 69 were eligible for evaluation. The average documentation completeness was 80.6%. A total of 9 findings were correctly documented in full (13%). The documentation completeness of the individual departments was sorted in ascending order from 68.1% to 93%. With 88.5% vs. 75%, the hospitals with a structured report showed a higher level of completeness. In 75% of the cases the hospitals with structured reports also had digital solutions for reporting and image archiving. CONCLUSION: In general, there is potential for optimization regarding the completeness and quality of routinely prepared head and neck sonography findings at the selected university ENT departments. The implementation of structured reporting masks and the conversion of analogue documentation into digital solutions as well as digital networking with the hospital information systems, picture archiving and communication systems should be promoted. Supervision by senior doctors is required to ensure the quality of findings of inexperienced colleagues and to help to achieve standards in reporting.
Assuntos
Cabeça , Pescoço , Documentação , Cabeça/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is now judged alongside other therapeutic alternatives like salivary gland endoscopy (SGE). The present analysis investigates the significance of ESWL within the scope of a defined treatment algorithm. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data obtained between 2003 and 2009. The results were analysed according to the therapeutic modality used. Successful treatment was defined as an absence of symptoms or stones at follow-up examination. RESULTS: During the period studied, 206 patients with parotid stones and 736 with submandibular stones underwent treatment. Among the latter group, 5 % were treated exclusively by SGE, 92 % underwent transoral stone removal and 3 % received ESWL. The long-term success rates were 93 %, 90 % and 94 %, respectively. Patients with parotid stones were treated in 78 % of cases by ESWL and 22 % underwent SGE exclusively. The overall long-term success rates here were 85 % and 98 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: ESWL remains an important therapeutic tool in the management of sialolithiasis. The method is particularly important as a gland-preserving tool in the therapy of parotid stones and selected cases of submandibular stones, even though it is not available in the US due to the lack of official equipment approval.
Assuntos
Litotripsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cálculos das Glândulas Salivares/epidemiologia , Cálculos das Glândulas Salivares/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of this study was to compare several surgical modalities with respect to the incidence of positive margins and focal capsular exposure of pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland. The clinical records and histopathological findings of all patients who underwent parotidectomy for pleomorphic adenoma between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated (n = 845). The lesion was removed by extracapsular dissection in 577 cases (68%) and facial nerve dissection in 268 (32%). Our analysis did not reveal a statistically significant difference between the examined modalities regarding positive margins (p=0.648) or capsular exposure (p=0.112). Recurrences were detected in 7/845 cases (0.82%) with a mean (range) follow-up time of 82.3 (6-183) months. The choice of surgical method does not seem to have a significant effect on the incidence of positive margins, or on the capsular exposure of a pleomorphic adenoma.
Assuntos
Adenoma Pleomorfo , Neoplasias Parotídeas , Humanos , Margens de Excisão , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Glândula Parótida , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The aim of this study was to highlight several misleading imaging and clinical aspects of parotid gland lymphoma, taking our personal experience and relevant literature reports into consideration. The records of all patients diagnosed with lymphoma in the parotid gland between 2005 and 2017 were examined retrospectively. Sixty-seven patients were included in this study. The mean age was 61.4 years. The most frequent histological entities were marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (31.3%) and follicular lymphoma (28.4%). The tumour was stage I in 35 cases (52.2%), stage II in 13 cases (19.4%), stage III in 11 cases (16.4%), and stage IV in eight cases (11.9%). B symptoms were seen in only three patients (4.5%). The diagnosis was made after parotidectomy in 51 cases (76.1%), by core needle biopsy in 14 cases (20.9%), and by means of open biopsy in the remaining two cases (3.0%). Parotid gland lymphoma represents a diagnostically challenging, multifaceted entity that can easily mimic both benign and malignant conditions. This entity should be included in the differential diagnosis of almost all types of parotid lesion, as it seems to play the role of a great pretender.
Assuntos
Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B , Neoplasias Parotídeas , Humanos , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Glândula Parótida/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândula Parótida/cirurgia , Neoplasias Parotídeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Parotídeas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the simultaneous application of ultrasound and sialendoscopy (US+SE) in several salivary gland diseases not caused either by sialolithiasis or by tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: US+SE are routinely used in patients with inflammatory, obstructive, and other non-tumorous major salivary gland diseases. In patients in whom US and SE as single investigation tools were not conclusive or not useful in the management of several non-sialolithiasis-related conditions (stenoses, ductal anomalies, ductal trauma, space-occupying paraductal lesions), both methods were used simultaneously for diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: US+SE were used simultaneously in 44 patients for 56 indications. Stenosis was managed in 36 cases (81.8%) and in thirty-eight of the indications (67.9%) with simultaneous US+SE. The successful opening was achieved in 23 (63.9%), conservative and/or ablative treatment was indicated in 13 (36.1%), and further imaging was indicated in two (5.5%) of these cases. Post-traumatic or postinfectious complications were managed in 12 (27.3%) of all cases, and isolated ductal anomalies and paraductal space-occupying lesions were assessed in three cases (8.3%) each. In all instances, simultaneous US+SE clearly improved the management in diagnosis and/or therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous application of US+SE provided additional information that proved to be valuable for diagnosis, planning, and treatment in several non-sialolithiasis-related conditions such as stenoses, ductal anomalies, ductal trauma, and space-occupying paraductal lesions.